It Lives, It Lives !! |
![]() |
| log in |
Message boards : Number crunching : It Lives, It Lives !!
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Freeking awsome mate ! | |
| ID: 1228869 · | |
|
The Monster's cooling system intrigued me. I have to do something to my P4/gt430 rig. When betreger starting making fun of of it I thought I'd better take a look. From what I've seen it should be capable of 3000-3500 RAC. The first thing GPU-Z showed me was that the GPU wasn't being pushed. I installed Process Lasso and set it to change the cuda apps to high priority. That pushed the GPU usage to 85-90%. Perfect. Then I started overclocking. Didn't take long before my GPU temps were topping 90c, so I backed down to the default again. The temp in my house hit maybe 25c and when I checked on it after work the GPU was running 90-95c. It's not going to last long like that. I've got a CPU fan, the power supply fan and a 80mm case fan in there. The 80mm seems pretty useless, but I guess you get what you pay for. I have space for a couple of good fans and I'm willing to drill. Any suggestions? I'm new to this. The house will never hit higher than 30c. | |
| ID: 1228988 · | |
|
Hi Doug | |
| ID: 1229010 · | |
|
A Question. | |
| ID: 1229020 · | |
A Question. Around 21,000. That's how much higher my E6600 is with a GTX560Ti in it (Factory overclock model). I think Jason has a GTX680 these days. I remember him mentioing it putting the GTX560Ti to shame for it's output, and while using very considerably less power. If i had the money, and it were actually possible to buy one, a GTX690 or 2 would be a very good investment. ____________ Grant Darwin NT. | |
| ID: 1229036 · | |
A Question. It isn't that nobody wants to answer you. It's just that nobody believes you could get 7 560ti's to run long enough without errors for it to matter. ;-) Something over 20k and less than 30k each, probably less than 25k each. | |
| ID: 1229038 · | |
I think Jason has a GTX 680 these days. I remember him mentioing it putting the GTX560Ti to shame for it's output, and while using very considerably less power. Yes Jason has a 680. With 7 x 680 the RAC would be over 200K but the current CPU would not fast enough to feed them. How hot do all the GPUs get on this system and how do you monitor them? I suspect SIV would do OK, but have never tested it with more than 4 GPUs. | |
| ID: 1229042 · | |
It isn't that nobody wants to answer you. It's just that nobody believes you could get 7 560ti's to run long enough without errors for it to matter. ;-) FWIW, to fill in the picture with those: The 'main' problem turned out to be the horrible drivers that came with these (266.66 IIRC), that corrupted a Cuda compute cache in Windows... I never had that issue, probably as Windows automatically put in a newer WHQL driver, so it was a toughie to find, and I found a way to force the drivers to use 'my' kernel binaries instead of driver runtime produced ones... overall reliability has improved significantly since that time on many cards. This was followed by noticing a strange coincidence where at least 3 users buying 560ti's, also purchased the same model of SSD... all of which had bung firmware. The symtom was bizarre file access problems encountered only with Cuda apps, and periodic bluescreens &/or crashes. likely paging / virtual / VRAM related. In those cases I understand a SSD firmware flash fixed that. The last 'main' issue was that a few models/brands were selling factory overclocked models with insufficient core voltage. I think, IIRC, our poor buddy Brad (Slavac) copped all three of these issues. He's now an appointed guinea pig, because anyone that can find all the problems that quickly is an excellent tester ;) 560ti is an excellent card, and has been from the start. The technology from that refinement clearly went into the 680/690 GPU design... so funnily enough some of my test code is scaling really well. Just goes to show experience down in the trenches can teach you a lot.. .the hard way of course ;) Jason ____________ "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent that survives. It is the one that is the most adaptable to change." Charles Darwin | |
| ID: 1229046 · | |
"His name is Robert Paulson!" I'm pretty sure I don't own any sort of rights to that name. If I do then some movie company owes me quite a lot of money. Generally I use names that come from the same movie as my user name.If I were to make a big crunchy thing like this then I suppose I might consider giving it some other kind of name. Maybe "Nibbler" ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1229091 · | |
Hi Doug Passively cooled and powered through the PCI bus. I should run XP. I have an unused copy. Currently I have 1Gb in the box. I have another 1Gb, but things didn't run as well for some weird reason when I went to 2Gb. It's the correct memory, clock speed etc. That's another project. I seem to be getting ~90% GPU usage now that I upped the priority of the Lunatics thread. I still use only ~6% of the CPU on that thread. I know Explorer chews a lot of CPU and memory as does Chrome, Firefox et.al. Surprised at Boinc client though. I usually leave it running. That's an easy enough change. Here's the URL for exactly where I got the card and my exact model. The site has front/left/right/back pictures of it. http://www.circuitcity.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=1416091&CatId=3669 I got it because it's a Fermi card and I'm taking an online course in parallel programming using none other than Cuda and Fermi cards. I also have an ATI OpenCL card in my i7 laptop, so from the computer science end of things my bases are covered. I pulled off the side cover and used your "external" fan approach for a few minutes (without the fags). GPU temps dropped to low 60s before I had to terminate because the cats got curious. I think I can clock this thing pretty high if I can get air to it. I am running CPU tasks as well, but I'm getting good GPU usage now. I'm not sure whether I should stop those or not given my low CPU usage for cuda apps. Doesn't appear to be a bottleneck. Thank you T.A. and thank "The Monster." You're an inspiration. Doug[/url] | |
| ID: 1229108 · | |
|
seing as your able to run 7 .. | |
| ID: 1229152 · | |
seing as your able to run 7 .. IIRC the server will not believe you have more than 8. Which only effects the amount of work you can request. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today! | |
| ID: 1229157 · | |
The Monster's cooling system intrigued me. I have to do something to my P4/gt430 rig. When betreger starting making fun of of it I thought I'd better take a look. From what I've seen it should be capable of 3000-3500 RAC. The first thing GPU-Z showed me was that the GPU wasn't being pushed. I installed Process Lasso and set it to change the cuda apps to high priority. That pushed the GPU usage to 85-90%. Perfect. Then I started overclocking. Didn't take long before my GPU temps were topping 90c, so I backed down to the default again. The temp in my house hit maybe 25c and when I checked on it after work the GPU was running 90-95c. It's not going to last long like that. I've got a CPU fan, the power supply fan and a 80mm case fan in there. The 80mm seems pretty useless, but I guess you get what you pay for. I have space for a couple of good fans and I'm willing to drill. Any suggestions? I'm new to this. The house will never hit higher than 30c. Doug I did not intend to make fun of your GT430, I was merely making an observation. FYI I crunch Einstein on the gpu and am getting apx 8000 RAC there, Now I know E@H pays apx 30% more than seti so the expectation was conservative. BTW congrats on getting the card producing more. ____________ | |
| ID: 1229167 · | |
Actually it was good for me to look at it. I was sort of letting things settle out before I paid much attention to it. That's when I discovered I was barely using the GPU. There are others out there with equipment similar to mine that are doing far better RAC-wise. I want to know why. Doug | |
| ID: 1229355 · | |
|
Doug, I suspect, expect about 4k from that gpu, pls keep posted. It is very cool to keep old stuff productive. I would like to see your RAC after a couple of weeks of 24/7. | |
| ID: 1229373 · | |
|
well what i was getting at was if you split the pcie lanes and were able to put for example 12 gtx 690's in a custom built enclosure with a few 1200 watt power supplys and a AMD's Magny-cours (12 core) Opteron just to feed the gpus | |
| ID: 1229552 · | |
|
Well the Monster might not have happened If I had not mentioned that I'd bought one of those pci-e x16 extenders over in another thread. | |
| ID: 1229618 · | |
|
10 x GTX 680 will give at least a 300K RAC with the next Lunatics_x41 release. More if you power mod and overclock the GTX 680s. | |
| ID: 1229621 · | |
10 x GTX 680 will give at least a 300K RAC with the next Lunatics_x41 release. So 10 GTX690s would give over 600,000 for a single machine. You'd also be chewing through 2.5-3kW of power. ____________ Grant Darwin NT. | |
| ID: 1229623 · | |
10 x GTX 680 will give at least a 300K RAC with the next Lunatics_x41 release. No, 10 x 690 is 20 GPUs so the PCI memory limit applies. | |
| ID: 1229627 · | |
Message boards : Number crunching : It Lives, It Lives !!
| Copyright © 2013 University of California |