62 AP_V5 Left In The Field

Message boards : Number crunching : 62 AP_V5 Left In The Field

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next

Author	Message
HAL9000 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 3279 Credit: 76,947,769 RAC: 78,305	Message 1229252 - Posted: 8 May 2012, 22:37:55 UTC - in response to Message 1229245.
	12! & waiting for purging 8 & 127. I suppose once everything reaches 0 they will start putting the v6 info up there. ____________ SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the BP6/VP6 User Group today!
	ID: 1229252 ·

red-ray Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 308 Credit: 9,024,991 RAC: 0	Message 1229502 - Posted: 9 May 2012, 12:00:20 UTC - in response to Message 1229245.
	10! Workunits waiting for purging 3 + Results waiting for purging 107
	ID: 1229502 ·

MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 221 Credit: 16,059,966 RAC: 24,543	Message 1230449 - Posted: 11 May 2012, 7:15:15 UTC - in response to Message 1230037.
	And then there were......8. And then there were......7. ____________
	ID: 1230449 ·

Bill G Send message Joined: 1 Jun 01 Posts: 241 Credit: 19,137,537 RAC: 25,407	Message 1230468 - Posted: 11 May 2012, 10:16:59 UTC - in response to Message 1230449.
	Now 6 ____________
	ID: 1230468 ·

John Neale Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Mar 00 Posts: 403 Credit: 1,951,637 RAC: 3,747	Message 1230545 - Posted: 11 May 2012, 15:14:13 UTC
	We're down to 4! ____________
	ID: 1230545 ·

MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 221 Credit: 16,059,966 RAC: 24,543	Message 1231474 - Posted: 13 May 2012, 8:41:03 UTC - in response to Message 1230545.
	We're down to 4! make that 3 ____________
	ID: 1231474 ·

clive G1FYE Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 4 Nov 04 Posts: 1284 Credit: 14,949,097 RAC: 2,668	Message 1231683 - Posted: 13 May 2012, 19:28:27 UTC - in response to Message 1231474.
	We're down to 4! make that 3 Is it not around nowish that James Bond steps in to stop the clock ticking. Or Murphy Will it be over for Tuesday
	ID: 1231683 ·

red-ray Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 308 Credit: 9,024,991 RAC: 0	Message 1232407 - Posted: 15 May 2012, 9:02:38 UTC Last modified: 15 May 2012, 9:03:23 UTC
	Another one has been returned, but now there are 4 Results in progress rather than the expected 2!
	ID: 1232407 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7462 Credit: 39,753,252 RAC: 34,171	Message 1232412 - Posted: 15 May 2012, 9:24:51 UTC - in response to Message 1232407.
	Another one has been returned, but now there are 4 Results in progress rather than the expected 2! 'Returned' in that context could just mean yet another deadline passed. That - or any one of a number of other outcomes - will require another resend, and perhaps another 25 days before we can finally put this sequence to bed, if the resend has gone to somebody taking advantage of the newly unlimited caches.
	ID: 1232412 ·

red-ray Send message Joined: 24 Jun 99 Posts: 308 Credit: 9,024,991 RAC: 0	Message 1232415 - Posted: 15 May 2012, 9:37:04 UTC - in response to Message 1232412. Last modified: 15 May 2012, 9:40:28 UTC
	Another one has been returned, but now there are 4 Results in progress rather than the expected 2! 'Returned' in that context could just mean yet another deadline passed. That - or any one of a number of other outcomes - will require another resend, and perhaps another 25 days before we can finally put this sequence to bed, if the resend has gone to somebody taking advantage of the newly unlimited caches. Yes, but it came back in 186.88 hours so how can it be a deadline? I guess it could have been aborted. 3 I could understand, but what could cause 4? Two timeout resends? Is there any way to get a list of who has the 4 AP WUs please?
	ID: 1232415 ·

Richard Haselgrove Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 7462 Credit: 39,753,252 RAC: 34,171	Message 1232417 - Posted: 15 May 2012, 9:55:57 UTC - in response to Message 1232415.
	Is there any way to get a list of who has the 4 AP WUs please? Ask Eric to give you sufficient access rights to run a bespoke SQL query against the database? Not going to happen. Test every possible WU ID number? That will (or should) get your IP blacklisted for mounting a DOS attack. Better just to wait. It may be fun watching, but it really doesn't matter, in the overall scheme of things.
	ID: 1232417 ·

N9JFE Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 2578 Credit: 8,458,401 RAC: 15,040	Message 1232464 - Posted: 15 May 2012, 13:16:00 UTC - in response to Message 1232415.
	Another one has been returned, but now there are 4 Results in progress rather than the expected 2! 'Returned' in that context could just mean yet another deadline passed. That - or any one of a number of other outcomes - will require another resend, and perhaps another 25 days before we can finally put this sequence to bed, if the resend has gone to somebody taking advantage of the newly unlimited caches. Yes, but it came back in 186.88 hours so how can it be a deadline? I guess it could have been aborted. 3 I could understand, but what could cause 4? Two timeout resends? Is there any way to get a list of who has the 4 AP WUs please? It ain't me! I had one, but I returned it a couple of weeks ago. I'm also wondering why it went back up to 4. I hope someone in the lab is at least curious enough to check for himself and see if they're out to hosts that are likely to return them. ____________ David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
	ID: 1232464 ·

MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 221 Credit: 16,059,966 RAC: 24,543	Message 1233630 - Posted: 19 May 2012, 21:45:00 UTC - in response to Message 1232464.
	Another one has been returned, but now there are 4 Results in progress rather than the expected 2! 'Returned' in that context could just mean yet another deadline passed. That - or any one of a number of other outcomes - will require another resend, and perhaps another 25 days before we can finally put this sequence to bed, if the resend has gone to somebody taking advantage of the newly unlimited caches. Yes, but it came back in 186.88 hours so how can it be a deadline? I guess it could have been aborted. 3 I could understand, but what could cause 4? Two timeout resends? Is there any way to get a list of who has the 4 AP WUs please? It ain't me! I had one, but I returned it a couple of weeks ago. I'm also wondering why it went back up to 4. I hope someone in the lab is at least curious enough to check for himself and see if they're out to hosts that are likely to return them. Amidst all the power cut problems we seem to have forgotten about this thread. Just noticed AP5 out in the field has now gone up to 5! ____________
	ID: 1233630 ·

Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 615 Credit: 36,757,362 RAC: 2,454	Message 1233768 - Posted: 20 May 2012, 1:44:48 UTC - in response to Message 1233630. Last modified: 20 May 2012, 1:47:02 UTC
	I'm also wondering why it went back up to 4. I hope someone in the lab is at least curious enough to check for himself and see if they're out to hosts that are likely to return them. Simply because tasks that have timed out "return home" to wait for a new host to come along. Until then, they are not out in the field!
	ID: 1233768 ·

Josef W. Segur Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 3932 Credit: 934,327 RAC: 15	Message 1233783 - Posted: 20 May 2012, 2:18:30 UTC - in response to Message 1233768.
	I'm also wondering why it went back up to 4. I hope someone in the lab is at least curious enough to check for himself and see if they're out to hosts that are likely to return them. Simply because tasks that have timed out "return home" to wait for a new host to come along. Until then, they are not out in the field! Yes, and with all AP tasks having exactly 25 day deadlines there's likely to be some correlation in timeouts. I don't remember exactly what day they stopped splitting AP v505 tasks, but it was around March 10 and we're getting close to 75 days after that. In pure theory, if one of the first two task replications was completed normally but all the wingmates time out it would be some time in October before the maximum total replications of 10 would be reached. Joe
	ID: 1233783 ·

Andy Lee Robinson Send message Joined: 8 Dec 05 Posts: 615 Credit: 36,757,362 RAC: 2,454	Message 1233901 - Posted: 20 May 2012, 6:39:33 UTC - in response to Message 1233783.
	A theoretical 250 days to bounce around peeing everyone off! Has to be a solution for user or admin to notify of a bad host and force reassignment, prioritize high turnover hosts etc. There already is something in place that limits delivery to hosts that produce many errors, so shouldn't be difficult to add. I remember having this discussion some years ago! Not checking in for a few days could count as an error, if the user has specified that the machine is permanently connected to the net and expects to check in/report daily.
	ID: 1233901 ·

Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 2081 Credit: 6,732,952 RAC: 4,628	Message 1233906 - Posted: 20 May 2012, 6:59:39 UTC - in response to Message 1233783.
	I'm also wondering why it went back up to 4. I hope someone in the lab is at least curious enough to check for himself and see if they're out to hosts that are likely to return them. Simply because tasks that have timed out "return home" to wait for a new host to come along. Until then, they are not out in the field! Yes, and with all AP tasks having exactly 25 day deadlines there's likely to be some correlation in timeouts. I don't remember exactly what day they stopped splitting AP v505 tasks, but it was around March 10 and we're getting close to 75 days after that. In pure theory, if one of the first two task replications was completed normally but all the wingmates time out it would be some time in October before the maximum total replications of 10 would be reached. Joe I'm pretty sure a few weeks ago I mathed out that they should all expire by October 1, but I don't remember what my start date was for that math. At any rate, by Halloween, v505 should be dead. ____________ Linux laptop uptime: 1484d 22h 42m Ended due to UPS failure, found 14 hours after the fact
	ID: 1233906 ·

clive G1FYE Volunteer moderator Send message Joined: 4 Nov 04 Posts: 1284 Credit: 14,949,097 RAC: 2,668	Message 1234457 - Posted: 21 May 2012, 11:14:08 UTC - in response to Message 1233906.
	At any rate, by Halloween, v505 should be dead. At haloween the dead do rise from the grave, there are zombies all over the place [around here, anyway] So. There may be a bit of `fun` left in the old bits yet :¬)
	ID: 1234457 ·

N9JFE Send message Joined: 4 Oct 99 Posts: 2578 Credit: 8,458,401 RAC: 15,040	Message 1235426 - Posted: 23 May 2012, 13:33:32 UTC
	The SSP is back to showing 4 in the field. It also has 1 waiting for validation. Now I'm wondering if this means the 4 have not had a response from ANY host to which they've been sent. I take it there's no way for any of us who don't work in the lab to find out the history of these last few WUs. ____________ David Sitting on my butt while others boldly go, Waiting for a message from a small furry creature from Alpha Centauri.
	ID: 1235426 ·

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : 62 AP_V5 Left In The Field