Message boards :
Number crunching :
62 AP_V5 Left In The Field
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 . . . 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 319 Credit: 64,719,409 RAC: 85 |
Hmm, the result turnaround time for astropulse is just showing "hours". Now 53 left to go. and then there were 49. |
.clair. Send message Joined: 4 Nov 04 Posts: 1300 Credit: 55,390,408 RAC: 69 |
48 tick tock tick tock Does something go bang at zero ? |
Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3252 Credit: 31,903,643 RAC: 0 |
48 Should those be really the last of V5.05? Well, just wait and see.......;-) I've seen 'only' AstroPulse V6.0 work, lucky enough just on my ATI (5870's) cruncher. This host, does them rather fast. |
Paul D Harris Send message Joined: 1 Dec 99 Posts: 1122 Credit: 33,600,005 RAC: 0 |
I have 4 that been hanging around since August 2011 |
.clair. Send message Joined: 4 Nov 04 Posts: 1300 Credit: 55,390,408 RAC: 69 |
47 i can`t bear the tension, it`s so, so, z zzzZZZzz.... |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Don't look now.....46. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
tbret Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 3380 Credit: 296,162,071 RAC: 40 |
Don't look now..... I won't. 46. See, I don't have to look. You'll tell me. Friends are good to have. |
Amauri Send message Joined: 18 May 08 Posts: 26 Credit: 1,107,140 RAC: 0 |
What about this one? Completed, validated, and pending??? |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19075 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Now 45, returned in 73.10 hrs |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
43... |
Fred J. Verster Send message Joined: 21 Apr 04 Posts: 3252 Credit: 31,903,643 RAC: 0 |
|
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Results out in the field 42 But it took 4 received in the last hour to get there... Joe |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Hmm, but the Results returned and awaiting validation for AP 505 is now all of a sudden down to zero. What's up with that? Gone into waiting to purge, so obviously the staff has done something. Checking the list of eleven I posted in message 1196397 last February, four are showing "Completed, too late to validate" for the last reported result, but in the other seven they're still "Completed, waiting for validation". Joe |
MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 319 Credit: 64,719,409 RAC: 85 |
Hmm, but the Results returned and awaiting validation for AP 505 is now all of a sudden down to zero. What's up with that? Same here, of my 4, two are now showing in my invalid list as returned too late to validate. However, they have a credit allocated to them. I cannot work out if I have been allocated this credit or not. If not, this is a disappointing con as the results were retuned within deadline. They really should not be in an invalid list as they were totally consistent with the other two results for the WUs http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?userid=9412958&offset=0&show_names=0&state=4&appid= |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
Hmm, but the Results returned and awaiting validation for AP 505 is now all of a sudden down to zero. What's up with that? They must have done something. Several of the old stuck ones I have now have credit for all of the hosts. Although 2 still have hosts with "pending". I imagine the query might still be running. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 319 Credit: 64,719,409 RAC: 85 |
Hmm, but the Results returned and awaiting validation for AP 505 is now all of a sudden down to zero. What's up with that? Update, all for of my AP5's have now been moved to invalid on the grounds that they were too late to validate. I am fairly sure that I did not get any credit for them, despite returning them before the deadline and with a valid result:(( |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
Update, all for of my AP5's have now been moved to invalid on the grounds that they were too late to validate. I am fairly sure that I did not get any credit for them, despite returning them before the deadline and with a valid result:(( You got credit for them, you can see that once in the results list for each of those WUs and also in each result's details. EDIT: we are down to 41 now. |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Update, all for of my AP5's have now been moved to invalid on the grounds that they were too late to validate. I am fairly sure that I did not get any credit for them, despite returning them before the deadline and with a valid result:(( Eric has scripts he uses at SETI Beta to grant credit for completed tasks when work needs to be cancelled or such, I think one of those or similar is probably being used. I just knew 42 wasn't the final answer! ;^) Joe |
MikeN Send message Joined: 24 Jan 11 Posts: 319 Credit: 64,719,409 RAC: 85 |
Update, all for of my AP5's have now been moved to invalid on the grounds that they were too late to validate. I am fairly sure that I did not get any credit for them, despite returning them before the deadline and with a valid result:(( OK, but I still dont like having them classed as invalid. Invalid implies my PC did something wrong and produced results that did not match the others. They should have gone into valid even if they were not used as part of the validation process. EDIT now down to 40 |
Link Send message Joined: 18 Sep 03 Posts: 834 Credit: 1,807,369 RAC: 0 |
OK, but I still dont like having them classed as invalid. Invalid implies my PC did something wrong and produced results that did not match the others. They should have gone into valid even if they were not used as part of the validation process. My guess is that BOINC knows only valid and invalid, so since the results were not part of the validation process, they are marked invalid, as it's not sure, if they actually were valid. After all it doesn't matter, neither for the science nor for your application statistics (your consecutive valid tasks value was not reseted to 0), so give it few hours more and nobody will know you had any "invalid" results. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.