Searching stars that are mentioned in Ancient times.

If you watch those Penn and Teller Bullshit episodes I linked to, it'll explain those questions you asked.

Yes, 100% of them are all faked.

Note I did not mention "aliens" in my statement once. ;-)


I see no evidence of aliens, I only see evidence (and a lot of it) that unidentified objects do exist, do fly around, and are caught on tape all the time. Way too much to refute it all.
____________
-Dave #2


3.2.0-33

That's precisely my point. They might be unidentified flying objects, but that doesn't prove inconclusively an alien origin.

Part of the problem is that people will exaggerate claims of what they saw. People who are biased in favor of what they are predispositioned to believe will match their bias to their testimony of what they saw, most certainly because they believe it couldn't have been anything else.

This is what I'm talking about being 100% fake - the eye witness reports. Not the footage themselves (though the majority of them are faked).

If you note, every single bit of UFO documentary deals with the most unreliable bit of evidence - eye witness reports and the people who assert their opinions about what they saw as fact. They will then take completely unrelated observations and tie it in with their conspiracy theory.

Watch the beginning of the Penn and Teller show on Area 51. It summarizes the logic (or lack thereof) used by UFO conspiracy theorists and how they come to their off-base conclusions and assertions.

I hap't to come across a web site yesterday, purporting to be a serious site,? said that three alien spacecraft are travelling towards Earth. At the moment they are just passing Pluto or Mars,

Here's a good one... ROFLMAO

They're running late with the attack
____________

That's precisely my point. They might be unidentified flying objects, but that doesn't prove inconclusively an alien origin.

Part of the problem is that people will exaggerate claims of what they saw. People who are biased in favor of what they are predispositioned to believe will match their bias to their testimony of what they saw, most certainly because they believe it couldn't have been anything else.

This is what I'm talking about being 100% fake - the eye witness reports. Not the footage themselves (though the majority of them are faked).

If you note, every single bit of UFO documentary deals with the most unreliable bit of evidence - eye witness reports and the people who assert their opinions about what they saw as fact. They will then take completely unrelated observations and tie it in with their conspiracy theory.

Watch the beginning of the Penn and Teller show on Area 51. It summarizes the logic (or lack thereof) used by UFO conspiracy theorists and how they come to their off-base conclusions and assertions.

Here's a good one... ROFLMAO

They're running late with the attack

Scientists predict the new ships will arrive in November of 2012.

Ok, now that I've given everyone plenty of time to watch the videos, let's apply the knowledge to your questions.

so you think things like phoenix lights were just flares?

a dozen different officers on different nights were hallucinating at rendelsham forest?

how did ufo's hover above nuclear missile bases and disable over a dozen nuclear missiles on independent electrical systems, separated by miles, with multiple eyewitnesses present?

Countless professional airline pilots and military pilots have attested not only to seeing UFO's and the near impossible maneuvers they make, but seeing UFO's the size of many football fields which is obviously many times larger than any man made vehicles; why would a plane full of people or pilots with their jobs and reputations at risk make things like that up? Many of those cases are backed up with radar evidence.

Astronauts like Edgar Mitchel have come out recently and said they know for sure that the gov't has been covering up existence of ET's, and Gordon Cooper claims he saw them first hand.

Also, why all the cloak and dagger secrecy on the part of the government?

I could go on and on but I'm just trying to make a point here..
Where there's smoke there's fire.

I know this is a scientific project, and skepticism is extremely necessary in a field like this because 99% of sightings, abductions, ET stories are obviously BS.. But not 100% of them.

Im thinking that UFOs have something going but the fakes overlap with the real stuff and gets dumped into the fake pile. That 15% is the story.

just nothing you could really say as solid case.

I would pay 50 bucks just to touch one like in Rhendahlshem forest.

The complete lack of any communication is a part I dont understand. Life celebrates life why not communicate.

Spirits, ghosts and a Divine Being are all accepted as well, but there is no proof for their existence either. Just because a story is accepted, doesn't mean there's any truth to it at all.

Aliens haven't contacted us because they haven't been visiting us.

Its odd UFOs are an accepted part of life throughout the world. ...