CUDA performance Issue

Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA performance Issue
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Allan Grimshaw

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 2
Credit: 427,207
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1151448 - Posted: 12 Sep 2011, 14:47:42 UTC

My setup:

2 - 8800GT running the latest Nvidia drivers

One video card is set for video, the other is set for Phys-x

under this config I can run 2 instances of SETI@Home ( CUDA ) and both cards will max out the CUDA processers and the math will fly. Takes about 5 mins to process each SETI@Home work load.

But, if I take the same setup, and do nothing but turn on SLI mode, the 2 instances of SETI@Home ( CUDA ) basically crawl and the video cards seem to just idle. Takes over an hour to process each SETI@Home work load.

As well, if I leave the setup in SLI mode, BUT only run one (1) SETI@Home ( CUDA ) process, it flys again and takes 5 mins.

Any comments?
ID: 1151448 · Report as offensive
Profile HAL9000
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 Sep 99
Posts: 6534
Credit: 196,805,888
RAC: 57
United States
Message 1151449 - Posted: 12 Sep 2011, 14:49:06 UTC

IIRC SLI is known not to play nice with S@H.
SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[
ID: 1151449 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14653
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 1151457 - Posted: 12 Sep 2011, 15:19:35 UTC - in response to Message 1151449.  

IIRC SLI is known not to play nice with S@H.

And also IIRC, SLI was decoupled from the drivers many, many driver versions ago.

In theory, at least. It would be worth investigating the "two instances, SLI enabled" case in more detail, to ensure that BOINC is correctly identifying both graphics cards and assigning the tasks appropriately.

And everybody asking a question - please don't just say "the latest" of anything. I know it doesn't take us long to click through and see driver 280.26 under 64-bit Windows 7, but it always helps to have all the information gathered together in one place before we start.
ID: 1151457 · Report as offensive
Profile Sutaru Tsureku
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 6 Apr 07
Posts: 7105
Credit: 147,663,825
RAC: 5
Germany
Message 1151481 - Posted: 12 Sep 2011, 16:54:03 UTC - in response to Message 1151448.  

Welcome (with your first message here) in the S@h forum.

SLI need to be disabled during S@h CUDA calculation.
Normally newer drivers should disable it automatically.


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -
ID: 1151481 · Report as offensive
Allan Grimshaw

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 2
Credit: 427,207
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 1151485 - Posted: 12 Sep 2011, 17:22:47 UTC - in response to Message 1151481.  

Thanks All.

When I installed 280.26 under 64-bit Windows 7 ( sorry, my bad for not saying before ) it defaulted to have one card video and one card phys-x. I then turned on SLI via the Nvidia software and tested out some games. All was well, with high frame rates etc. as expected. But when I left it in SLI mode and tried S@H that's when things got wonkie.

The Bionic Manager shows both CUDA tasks running, each assigned to a different video card, but performance was horrid. Went in the Nvidia software, turned off SLI, then things are great for CUDA.

I'm not going to worry about it, I was just wondering if there was an easy explaination. If it's just a case of S@H and SLI not playing well... then that's good enough for me.
ID: 1151485 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : CUDA performance Issue


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.