Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

---

Janice

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=753788639

The 1st not, so a 3rd WU was sent out.
But in the meantime the 1st result came (2 Jul 2011 - 6:11:09 UTC)

You are right. I did misinterprid.

But mine should not have started on July 8, it should have been deleted before my machine startedto crunch this one, for there were already two retults validated.

The second host already reported late.
Deadline was 27 june so it was sent to third host.
But the second returned before you did and got credits already.

It could srill be you get credits for it.

---

With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.

Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

That's once every three hours - not as bad as it looks when quoted for a two month period!

---

Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=753788639

The 1st not, so a 3rd WU was sent out.
But in the meantime the 1st result came (2 Jul 2011 - 6:11:09 UTC)

You are right. I did misinterprid.

But mine should not have started on July 8, it should have been deleted before my machine startedto crunch this one, for there were already two retults validated.

IIRC, in past the S@h server sent an info to BOINC to delete the WU on the PC.
So this server function is currently off.


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

The first entry in the host overview is the IP address in your home LAN network (if you have a (DSL-)Router).
This is not the IP address with which you are visible online.

Everytime BOINC have scheduler contact (report/request), this is counted here.


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=753788639

The 1st not, so a 3rd WU was sent out.
But in the meantime the 1st result came (2 Jul 2011 - 6:11:09 UTC)

You are right. I did misinterprid.

But mine should not have started on July 8, it should have been deleted before my machine startedto crunch this one, for there were already two retults validated.

The second host already reported late.
Deadline was 27 june so it was sent to third host.
But the second returned before you did and got credits already.

It could srill be you get credits for it.

Look again. ;-)

The 2nd result came in time.


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

WOW, what's up?

My BOINC got:
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 No tasks sent
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress

[UTC + 02:00]


Is this correct or a mistake of the server?
If it's correct, someone know how high the set limit is?
Yes I know, lower than BOINC have currently.. ;-)


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

---

Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

That's once every three hours - not as bad as it looks when quoted for a two month period!

Hmm, 61 days at 24 hours per day is 1464 hours, 11642/1464 says 7.9 connections per hour. That's about once every 7.5 minutes on average, which would seem excessive.

However, the count is bogus. I don't have a fixed IP address, and the last IP address shown for my two hosts differs here and at SETI Beta which demonstrates the ISP is really giving me different assignments (and being on fairly unreliable dial-up I sometimes use a different ISP anyhow). Yet there are large counts shown in that field, my guess is it may actually be the total times the host has contacted the Scheduler.

                                                              Joe

Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

That's once every three hours - not as bad as it looks when quoted for a two month period!

Hmm, 61 days at 24 hours per day is 1464 hours, 11642/1464 says 7.9 connections per hour. That's about once every 7.5 minutes on average, which would seem excessive.

However, the count is bogus. I don't have a fixed IP address, and the last IP address shown for my two hosts differs here and at SETI Beta which demonstrates the ISP is really giving me different assignments (and being on fairly unreliable dial-up I sometimes use a different ISP anyhow). Yet there are large counts shown in that field, my guess is it may actually be the total times the host has contacted the Scheduler.

                                                              Joe

If they haven't been able to fill their queue. Then they might be requesting work about every 5 minutes. Every 5 minutes would be more like 17568 requests over 61 days. Which does not seem an unreasonable amount I guess.

Personally I don't take much stock in the number. Also I think they must reset this every now and then or something. Out 5 of my i7 machine the number are all over the place. Ranging from 2200 to 7800.

@soft^spirit:
You can change the setting for "Connect about every xx days" if you feel you are really connecting to often. With 0.13 you would only connect about every 3 hours.

---

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[

WOW, what's up?

My BOINC got:
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 No tasks sent
SETI@home 09.07.2011 17:50:09 This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progress

[UTC + 02:00]


Is this correct or a mistake of the server?
If it's correct, someone know how high the set limit is?
Yes I know, lower than BOINC have currently.. ;-)

It looks like 2,559 WUs/GPU is the currently limit.

This could be 'funny' for Fermi GPUs if this are only shorties.. ;-)
(GTX580 - 2 days WUs?)


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

---

Seems we're probably in the middle of a VLAR storm, Just refitted my HD5770, and once i'd put ATI MB back in my app_info, i got 63 MB Wu's all VLAR's,

Claggy

So, lets hope they don't send out any more AP's or it may never be finished :-)

I'm getting a couple. Resends from someone else messing up. One was a -4 the other a -5. The -5 ran on my GPU and is finished and reported the -4 is chugging along on my CPU.

---

PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC

"(same the last 43951 times)" on the main cruncher. If that count works as a tally since the computer was created, I'm looking at... 1690 days, which comes out to ~26/day, which is close enough for "connect every 0.041667 days" (1 hour).

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Are my eyes playing tricks on me? Synergy has been bumped up doing AP things?

---

[/quote]

Old James

Are my eyes playing tricks on me? Synergy has been bumped up doing AP things?

Yep, for at least the past few weeks if not longer. I just noticed a while back. I'm sure someone said something about it when it was done, but I have either forgotten or didn't notice. :)

---

SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours
Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[

Yeah, Synergy just kind of gets re-assigned to whatever area of the pipeline needs help the most until that area gets caught up.

---

Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)

Yeah, Synergy just kind of gets re-assigned to whatever area of the pipeline needs help the most until that area gets caught up.

They did this about 1-2wks ago to take the load off Bruno and its suspect CPU. ;)

Cheers.

---

Yes...but why did you say 'Burma'?

Hmm

I went to a static IP about 2 months ago..

And now I am seeing this...

IP address

<my IP address>
same the last 11642 times)

I have made I think NO manual connection attempts in that time....

But my question is, am I inadvertantly beating the server to death?

Seriously, do I need to connect 11,642 times in 2 months?

That's once every three hours - not as bad as it looks when quoted for a two month period!

Hmm, 61 days at 24 hours per day is 1464 hours, 11642/1464 says 7.9 connections per hour. That's about once every 7.5 minutes on average, which would seem excessive.

However, the count is bogus. I don't have a fixed IP address, and the last IP address shown for my two hosts differs here and at SETI Beta which demonstrates the ISP is really giving me different assignments (and being on fairly unreliable dial-up I sometimes use a different ISP anyhow). Yet there are large counts shown in that field, my guess is it may actually be the total times the host has contacted the Scheduler.

                                                              Joe

My sums were out, I blame it on taking a phone call to discuss food half way through the calc and forgetting either where I'd got to or what I was doing... Two hundred connections per day does sound rather a lot for a single cruncher. Check the "connect about every x days" setting on the advanced/preferences/network usage tab - if that was way to small (say something like 0.01 or less) then that could be a trigger.

---

Bob Smith
Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society)
Somewhere in the (un)known Universe?

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=753788639

The 1st not, so a 3rd WU was sent out.
But in the meantime the 1st result came (2 Jul 2011 - 6:11:09 UTC)

You are right. I did misinterprid.

But mine should not have started on July 8, it should have been deleted before my machine startedto crunch this one, for there were already two retults validated.

The second host already reported late.
Deadline was 27 june so it was sent to third host.
But the second returned before you did and got credits already.

It could srill be you get credits for it.

Look again. ;-)

The 2nd result came in time.


- Best regards! - Sutaru Tsureku, team seti.international founder. - Optimize your PC for higher RAC. - SETI@home needs your help. -

Name ap_02ap11ae_B4_P0_00026_20110601_16835.wu_0
Arbeitspaket 753788639
Erstellt 2 Jun 2011 | 0:29:01 UTC
Gesendet 2 Jun 2011 | 4:26:56 UTC
Empfangen 2 Jul 2011 | 6:11:09 UTC
Serverstatus Abgeschloßen
Resultat Erfolgreich
Clientstatus Fertig
Endstatus 0 (0x0)
Computer ID 5541162
Ablaufdatum 27 Jun 2011 | 4:26:56 UTC

---

With each crime and every kindness we birth our future.