Message boards :
Number crunching :
FYI: Cruncher Alert - GTX 460 CHEAP
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Just got my daily email from Tiger Direct this morning; they have a Galaxy GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 for only $89.99 (after two rebates). You can buy up to two of them with the rebates. Have at it. BTW: can you run two or more WUs at once in 768MB? |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
Just got my daily email from Tiger Direct this morning; they have a Galaxy GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 for only $89.99 (after two rebates). You can buy up to two of them with the rebates. I think it would depend on the OS. After someone had mentioned how much gpu ram Aero uses in Vista and 7 (~70Mb on my machine) it would be cutting it close. Crunching two at a time plus Aero right now on my 480 is using 670MB of gpu ram. Meaning both WU's are using ~300MB a piece. So I wouldn't imagine you would have much of an issue doing it with Aero off, or on XP/Linux. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
Helli_retiered Send message Joined: 15 Dec 99 Posts: 707 Credit: 108,785,585 RAC: 0 |
Running two with 512MB (Win7, Aero disabled - if this matters.) Helli A loooong time ago: First Credits after SETI@home Restart |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Thanks to both of you. I'll keep that in mind, as I am also finding Vista 64 Ultimate is much worse than XP 64 (both completely updated); if I build a 3rd cruncher, it will definitely be XP 64. If you look at my two current crundhers, the Vista one, even though it has faster CPUs (2.3 vs 2.1), and are otherwise similar, is significantly behind in RAC (25K to 20K) |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
Gecko Send message Joined: 17 Nov 99 Posts: 454 Credit: 6,946,910 RAC: 47 |
Just got my daily email from Tiger Direct this morning; they have a Galaxy GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 for only $89.99 (after two rebates). You can buy up to two of them with the rebates. Lol, I ordered 2 yesterday on this same deal as I couldn't pass it up. Had a $10 coupon also that covered the shipping cost and no sales tax for my state. Yeah! |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
Just got my daily email from Tiger Direct this morning; they have a Galaxy GTX 460 768MB GDDR5 for only $89.99 (after two rebates). You can buy up to two of them with the rebates. I thought all 460's would have a 256-bit memory interface, but TD shows both the Sale and Super OC Galaxy 460's (768MB models) have just 192-bit memory interface. Is that the norm for 460's with <1GB memory? Martin |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
I thought all 460's would have a 256-bit memory interface, but TD shows both the Sale and Super OC Galaxy 460's (768MB models) have just 192-bit memory interface. It chimes with the Wikipedia reference table. |
Lint trap Send message Joined: 30 May 03 Posts: 871 Credit: 28,092,319 RAC: 0 |
Thanks, Richard! Martin |
ai5000 Send message Joined: 1 Jan 01 Posts: 57 Credit: 2,805,412 RAC: 0 |
Would a 400W power supply be sufficient for one of these bad boys? |
JohnDK Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 |
Would a 400W power supply be sufficient for one of these bad boys? Don't have the same 460 but with my eVGA card 380W is OK. |
perryjay Send message Joined: 20 Aug 02 Posts: 3377 Credit: 20,676,751 RAC: 0 |
Would a 400W power supply be sufficient for one of these bad boys? When I got my GTS-450 I also ordered an Ultra LSP-550 power supply at the same time just to be on the safe side. A couple of people questioned if that would be enough but it seems to be doing the trick. A 460 shouldn't pull that much more. I don't know what JohnDK has done to his but remember, if you overclock it it will need a bit more power. I'm a firm believer in too much is a good thing in cases like this. Plus, you never know what else you might throw in there so, better safe than sorry. PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Hey - I finally decided to go for it, so I bought two of these myself - maybe a third cruncher will be born, who knows. AND ALSO: Tiger now has the HAF 932 for $119 with FREE SHIPPING. Go indulge yourselves! |
Joel Send message Joined: 31 Oct 08 Posts: 104 Credit: 4,838,348 RAC: 13 |
Whoa, thanks jravin. I just bought one. I didn't think I'd spend much on hardware this year, especially since I'm pushing my power limits, but I think if I can make this happen. I'm currently running two machines, each with a 9500 GT and a 250 GTS, and I think if I consolidate the 250s in the machine with the beefier PSU and put the 460 by itself in the machine with slightly less power, this should work. |
Will Malven Send message Joined: 2 Jun 99 Posts: 52 Credit: 4,441,977 RAC: 0 |
Yes, you can run 2/card with the GTX 460/768. Yes, you can run two GTX 460/768 cards in one machine. I am running them on WIN 7 platform, but I'm certain that Vista 64 will work as well and probably XP64. I am currently cranking out 4 units every 21:48 on average, but that may still be dropping slightly as the cards settle out. Both cards are severely overclocked at 850/1700MHz processor and 1950MHz memory {EVGA's SSC--super, superclock--speed). One of them is a base EVGA 460/768 card and the other is an SSC card. The SSC card has an extra heat sink and runs about 8C cooler (58C vs. 66C) than the base card at that speed. CPU loading is ~94% on each card and memory usage is 612 Mb on each card. I am running the fans on manual at 70% Man's future lies in the stars, not on Earth. It is each successive generation's responsibility to humanity to expand the knowledge and understanding of our Universe so that we may one day venture forth to meet our neighbors. Houston, Texas |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Glad it worked for some of you. Now I have a question - I'm running Lunatics on my machines with GT 240s. If I swap out a GT 240 for a GTX 460, what do I have to do to get things running OK? Does Lunatics run on Fermi? Do i have to redo app_info.xml? Or can I just re-install Lunatics, and will it automatically fix me up? Or can/ should I go back to the BOINC version of the apps, by (I'm running 6.10.56) installing 6.10.58, or whatever version does Fermi OK. I would appreciate hints or refs to the relevant threads. >>>THANK YOU ALL |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 |
Glad it worked for some of you. Now I have a question - I'm running Lunatics on my machines with GT 240s. If I swap out a GT 240 for a GTX 460, what do I have to do to get things running OK? Nothing at all since you're using the current Lunatics install. It's the same x32f application for any CUDA capable card. Eventually you may want to change to doing more than one task at a time, then it's just a matter of editing the <count> fields to the fraction of a GPU for each task. Joe |
Cruncher-American Send message Joined: 25 Mar 02 Posts: 1513 Credit: 370,893,186 RAC: 340 |
Joe - thanks for that info. However, that seems to be global within the app_info (?); how do I run two different types of cards (GT 240, 1 instance; GTX 460 - two instances) at the same time? |
Saaby900T Send message Joined: 24 Dec 10 Posts: 76 Credit: 4,971,171 RAC: 0 |
Joe - thanks for that info. However, that seems to be global within the app_info (?); how do I run two different types of cards (GT 240, 1 instance; GTX 460 - two instances) at the same time? You don't |
Tim Norton Send message Joined: 2 Jun 99 Posts: 835 Credit: 33,540,164 RAC: 0 |
Joe - thanks for that info. However, that seems to be global within the app_info (?); how do I run two different types of cards (GT 240, 1 instance; GTX 460 - two instances) at the same time? See Vyper's thread and blog http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=63079 Tim |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.