Message boards :
Number crunching :
how to increase productivity?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
speedbump Send message Joined: 19 May 01 Posts: 247 Credit: 192,906,380 RAC: 0 |
I see computers with the same or lesser specs than the ones I have processing average units in much greater quantities than my stats show. What is the magic in achieving this I wonder? For exampleI have one unit with the lastest 980 extreme chip and 2 HD5800 series gpu, and see another user with the same chip and 1 gtx470 gpu. My computer shows an average of 2065 works units since the system came back up, and his shows over 8600. I see others with computers that have lesser specs than ones I have outperforming my systems. I have not done anything other than download and run BOINC on each system. I have set the preferences to let it use 100% of the processor usage. |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
I see computers with the same or lesser specs than the ones I have processing average units in much greater quantities than my stats show. What is the magic in achieving this I wonder? For exampleI have one unit with the lastest 980 extreme chip and 2 HD5800 series gpu, and see another user with the same chip and 1 gtx470 gpu. My computer shows an average of 2065 works units since the system came back up, and his shows over 8600. I see others with computers that have lesser specs than ones I have outperforming my systems. I have not done anything other than download and run BOINC on each system. I have set the preferences to let it use 100% of the processor usage. OCing and/or optimized apps are probably the difference. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
I see computers with the same or lesser specs than the ones I have processing average units in much greater quantities than my stats show. What is the magic in achieving this I wonder? For exampleI have one unit with the lastest 980 extreme chip and 2 HD5800 series gpu, and see another user with the same chip and 1 gtx470 gpu. My computer shows an average of 2065 works units since the system came back up, and his shows over 8600. I see others with computers that have lesser specs than ones I have outperforming my systems. I have not done anything other than download and run BOINC on each system. I have set the preferences to let it use 100% of the processor usage. Plus the Fermi cards can process 2-3 units at the same time. I don't know how far up I can go with my budget cruncher CPU type AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 630 Processor [Family 16 Model 5 Stepping 2] Number of processors 4 Coprocessors NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 (767MB) driver: 26063 |
-BeNt- Send message Joined: 17 Oct 99 Posts: 1234 Credit: 10,116,112 RAC: 0 |
Optimized apps, overclocking, and fermi are the main differences. Traveling through space at ~67,000mph! |
W5DMG - Dave Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 155 Credit: 33,162,251 RAC: 0 |
Yes replace all your AMD/ATI gpu's with CUDA and just make sure you let them crunch 24/7. |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
I just had a bit of an experiment.. increased % of processors to use from 90 to 100%.. and the GPU time TRIPLED. Taking it back to 90% increased it back. So balancing out your system can really pay off. But you gotta play with it to find your sweet spots. Janice |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
I just had a bit of an experiment.. increased % of processors to use from 90 to 100%.. and the GPU time TRIPLED. Taking it back to 90% increased it back. Soft^spirit, You raised a good point, so I checked my preff page. I take it you mean setting the use at most % of CPU time to 100? I have this i7 set at 100% and my times for GPU are about 23 to 30 minutes per WU. Now my suspend work if CPU is above 95% is what I have set. Not sure what setting you tweaked to find your sweet spot. [/quote] Old James |
soft^spirit Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 6497 Credit: 34,134,168 RAC: 0 |
Still tweaking James... I will try to keep you posted what my sweet spot ends up being. of course your mileage may vary. at 100/100, gpu units were shooting up to 2hrs +, well above my average cpu core speed. that made me go AAAAAGGGGHH!!! I was running 3 cpu cores, I now have it at all 4 (90% vs 100% of processors) But did take the "use at most" back down to 90%. That helped. More dialing in to follow. I am also wondering if the opp apps .04%of cpu+gpu is adequate.. But right now.. it seems my gpu is taking around 50 minutes for a typical work unit. That still seems high... Lots to figure out and it will take me some time. Janice |
James Sotherden Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 10436 Credit: 110,373,059 RAC: 54 |
Ok thanks soft^spirit. I did some tweaking back when i fist got the i7 But dropped back to the 95 after seeing whacky stuff happening on screen. I think I will just leave mine as is. [/quote] Old James |
SciManStev Send message Joined: 20 Jun 99 Posts: 6652 Credit: 121,090,076 RAC: 0 |
Still tweaking James... I will try to keep you posted what my sweet spot ends up being. of course your mileage may vary. The .04% is just fine. It really doesn't take much. Use me as an example. Steve Warning, addicted to SETI crunching! Crunching as a member of GPU Users Group. GPUUG Website |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14653 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
Still tweaking James... I will try to keep you posted what my sweet spot ends up being. of course your mileage may vary. And the figure in app_info doesn't actually change any processor behaviour - it's just an accounting device to help maintain resource share. The only time it makes a difference is if you have multiple cards, and set a high percentage - if you have say three GPUs, and declare that each of them requires 40% of a CPU, then the total is more than a core, and accordingly BOINC will stop scheduling a core to leave space. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.