Message boards :
Number crunching :
Setting BROWSER environment variable?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
Hi folks... I uninstalled a browser I hadn't used in a long time on my WinVista laptop, but every time I clicked 'Your Account' in BOINC it would launch with it. Now the browser is uninstalled, when clicking 'Your Account' in BOINC manager, I firstly get the message: "http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/etc... Application not found." Clicking Okay to that brings up the dialog box: "BOINC manager tried to display the webpage http://etc... but couldn't find a web browser. To fix this, set the environment variable BROWSER to the path of your web browser, then restart BOINC manager." So naturally, I went to Control Panel > System > Advanced > Environment Variables > New... > and typed in for var name "BROWSER" and var value the location of the browser I want it to load in (Firefox 3.6.3). And then restarted BOINC. All to no avail. Any ideas? Regards, - Luke. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
Set up the default browser for the OS. |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
Set up the default browser for the OS. Hmm. It would seem like that should work. But I don't have the option to radio Firefox. Only Google Chrome, Google Chrome, IE, and Safari. And yes, it lists chrome twice? Is there any settings in the registry or other options...? - Luke. |
Gundolf Jahn Send message Joined: 19 Sep 00 Posts: 3184 Credit: 446,358 RAC: 0 |
(Re)installing firefox might help, as that should set the required variables in the registry. Gruß, Gundolf [edit]Perhaps one of the two chrome entries is the missing firefox, where the registry got corrupted. Does a registry search for the exact name show any hints?[/edit] Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz) SETI@home classic workunits 3,758 SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours |
52 Aces Send message Joined: 7 Jan 02 Posts: 497 Credit: 14,261,068 RAC: 67 |
Per re-install, sometimes you need to do a remove in order to get the install to tackle everything. Another thought to the core problem, might want to check the usual suspect file association mappings (Start / Default Programs / Associate a file type or protocol) to confirm they're pointed to your browser. http, html, php, yadda |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
Per re-install, sometimes you need to do a remove in order to get the install to tackle everything. Hmm. Things get weirder. http, https, and ftp were all associated with "Unknown Program". I tried to reassign it but only got the options of Chrome (once), IE and Safari. I really want to leave doing a remove and install as the last option. Thoughts? - Luke. |
Jord Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3 |
I'd think a repair installation of Firefox is the easiest, but who am I. ;-) See if http://www.winhelponline.com/articles/105/1/File-association-fixes-for-Windows-Vista.html helps you out. |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
I'd think a repair installation of Firefox is the easiest, but who am I. ;-) Thanks Jord... still no avail. :) I will try a uninstall/reinstall of Firefox and see how it goes. - Luke. |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
|
52 Aces Send message Joined: 7 Jan 02 Posts: 497 Credit: 14,261,068 RAC: 67 |
Yep, there is an age old dev team adage --- "No one wants to own the installer." It's the punishment possition of EVERY product out there, and it shows in situations like yours where the "Going got tough." I've dissected enough installers with the certification tools to be amazed at the lazy shortcuts taken (ie: stuff that is specific to the dev's personal OS build rather than going through the proper installer API's & OS registration functions). Fortunately the dev's get even lazier on the uninstall, which means the OS+Installer product layer is "mostly" in charge, so a back out has half a chance at clearing the path forward. Add to that, most Off-The-Shelf systems come with dozens of these equally hack-installed trial/nag editions (99% fruitlessly useless -- damn these marketing deals cut on golf courses) where everything wants to load something all the time (plus half of them are sending chatty tattle msgs weighing down your network). First thing I do is grab the Mfg utils (hot keys, battery metering, & other box drivers), and wipe out the drive and build fresh. Just too many phantom abberant behaviors otherwise. And No, this isn't Microsoft's fault -- quite the contrary. |
HAL9000 Send message Joined: 11 Sep 99 Posts: 6534 Credit: 196,805,888 RAC: 57 |
It would seem that this issue occurs every now and then. SETI@home classic workunits: 93,865 CPU time: 863,447 hours Join the [url=http://tinyurl.com/8y46zvu]BP6/VP6 User Group[ |
hiamps Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 4292 Credit: 72,971,319 RAC: 0 |
Yep, there is an age old dev team adage --- "No one wants to own the installer." It's the punishment possition of EVERY product out there, and it shows in situations like yours where the "Going got tough." All the extra crap software is why I haven't added more laptops to our network. It amazes me that even a laptop has to come with so much advertising and total junk. Official Abuser of Boinc Buttons... And no good credit hound! |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.