Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Moon Hoax Theory
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 . . . 8 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
What about all that stuff that remained on the moon? The buggies, the platforms? If the garbage collection has no rockets and no alien has stolen it meanwhile, it all should be still there and can be found by moon mapping missions or other crewed spaceflights. 2-7 were apparently used for escape testing for a couple of different systems. BOINC WIKI |
Michael Belanger, W1DGL Send message Joined: 30 Jul 00 Posts: 1887 Credit: 7,441,278 RAC: 49 |
Just aim Hubble at the moon and start snapping some High Res Photos of the surface, It should show everything, Including the foot prints and the tire tracks(11 and 12 didn't have a Buggy, 14 and maybe 15 might have(39 years since this started 1969-1972) and 16 & 17 did have a buggy, 17 was the only one with a real geologist along though, Astronauts filled in before. 13 didn't get there as they converted the LEM into a Lifeboat so 13 doesn't count and neither did 8-10(practice and shakedowns of the technology), 1 was a fire, 2-7 never existed at all cause of the Fire in 1 that killed 3 Astronauts due to a pure oxygen atmosphere(poof!). Taken from A Debunking of the Moon Hoax Theory: Earth based telescopes should be able to see the Apollo hardware on the Moon, yet none is visible. The theoretical resolving power of a telescope, measured in arc seconds, is calculated by dividing the aperture of the telescope (in inches) into 4.56. The largest telescope on Earth is the 10-meter Keck telescope in Hawaii. The theoretical resolving power of this telescope is 0.012", however the Earth's atmosphere limits the resolving power of any ground-based telescope to about 0.5"-1.0". The Hubble Space Telescope does not suffer from this limitation; thus, with an aperture of 94 inches, HST's resolving power is 0.05". At the Earth-Moon distance of 239,000 miles, the smallest object that can be resolved by HST is about 300 feet. The largest dimension of any hardware left behind on the Moon is 31 feet, which is the diagonal distance across the LM's footpads. No telescope, presently in existence, can see the Apollo hardware from Earth. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Just aim Hubble at the moon and start snapping some High Res Photos of the surface, It should show everything, Including the foot prints and the tire tracks(11 and 12 didn't have a Buggy, 14 and maybe 15 might have(39 years since this started 1969-1972) and 16 & 17 did have a buggy, 17 was the only one with a real geologist along though, Astronauts filled in before. 13 didn't get there as they converted the LEM into a Lifeboat so 13 doesn't count and neither did 8-10(practice and shakedowns of the technology), 1 was a fire, 2-7 never existed at all cause of the Fire in 1 that killed 3 Astronauts due to a pure oxygen atmosphere(poof!). Then that means any photos would have to be from a closeup mapping mission with enough resolution or the newer replacement for the HST(ATLAS Telescope, a True replacement for the HST, the JWST is an infrared only) which is supposed to be 8-16 Meters in size and is to be launched by an Ariane 5 rocket. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Dirk Villarreal Wittich Send message Joined: 25 Apr 00 Posts: 2098 Credit: 434,834 RAC: 0 |
Note the black sky, with no stars, no light at all in the background--->The Earth and the Moon This is a video taken of the probe SELENE operated by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, JAXA |
Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 |
OMG, this means the Japanese are in on the hoax too! |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51468 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
OMG, this means the Japanese are in on the hoax too! We're all in on it, except you....LOL. "Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting." Alan Dean Foster |
Hans Dorn Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2262 Credit: 26,448,570 RAC: 0 |
The moon is made of cheese, actually... |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Wernher von Braun, with the F-1 engines of the Saturn V first stage at the US Space and Rocket Center The Father of the US Space Program I think Lunar soil from what I've read makes a superior form of Portland Cement as the stuff has a higher stress fracture ability. Plus the Apollo Program found some of the oldest known rocks in the solar system according to New Scientist. New Scientist: Space wrote:
The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 |
Yes, but is it as tasty as a nice bit of Wensleydale? |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Yes, but is it as tasty as a nice bit of Wensleydale? I prefer Cheddar, California or Wisconsin. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
KWSN Ekky Ekky Ekky Send message Joined: 25 May 99 Posts: 944 Credit: 52,956,491 RAC: 67 |
Try Grandma Singleton's. Pure genius. |
Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 |
Yes, but is it as tasty as a nice bit of Wensleydale? Never had California cheddar, but Wisconsin cheddar can't come close to Ontario's finest. It says so right in a government cheese document, so it must be true. Unless the document is a hoax.... |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Yes, but is it as tasty as a nice bit of Wensleydale? California Cheese has the REAL label The Story of Real CALIFORNIA CHEESE Good GOD! That website is hosted on CompuServe.com! Then there's this website Here. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
champ Send message Joined: 12 Mar 03 Posts: 3642 Credit: 1,489,147 RAC: 0 |
Sorry guys, i do not want to take the fun away, but can you please go back on topic? |
ML1 Send message Joined: 25 Nov 01 Posts: 20084 Credit: 7,508,002 RAC: 20 |
Sorry guys, i do not want to take the fun away, but can you please go back on topic? But, but, but, ... Isn't that the moon is made of cheese one of the oldest hoaxes going? Or do some children forever stay as Peter Pan?... And I do like my crackers! :-p Cheese! Martin See new freedom: Mageia Linux Take a look for yourself: Linux Format The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3) |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Sorry guys, I do not want to take the fun away, But can you please go back on topic? And before Men landed on the Moon, It was thought that the Moon was made of Cheese, So It is related. I should know, Now of course back then the question was If the Moon is made of Cheese, What type is It? And people would say Limburger or something equally silly and so It was a Moon Hoax, It was just that everybody and their Uncle(not Uncle Sam) was in on the Joke. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
Note the black sky, with no stars, no light at all in the background--->The Earth and the Moon Photographic film including both chemical and electronic varieties suffers from a lower allowed contrast latitude than the human eye. For example, take a picture from inside a house with a window in the picture. The picture will have either no detail in the house because it is too dark, or will have no detail outside because it is too bright, or both. The same holds true of photography of the moon. The bright side of the moon as seen from the earth has about the same brightness as the surface of the earth in daylight as seen from the earth. The bright side of the moon as seen from the moon has a somewhat higher brightness as there is no atmosphere to absorb and scatter the light on its way to the earths surface. While I would expect the human eye to be able to see some stars from the bright side of the moon with bright moon landscape in view, I would NOT expect a camera to be able to pick it up - especially a camera from 40 years ago when the film did not have as good a latitude as it does today. BOINC WIKI |
Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0 |
Sorry guys, i do not want to take the fun away, but can you please go back on topic? I think that the extensive discussion about cheese shows how seriously we take the original topic. Think of it as a statement, rather than a diversion. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65689 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Here's something, Some said that there must have been a breeze so It couldn't be the Moon they were on. (Not that I believe that, NASA is full of occasional failures, Including a couple of Mars Probes) Read on below. This image shows Apollo 11 astronaut Buzz Aldrin with the U.S. flag. The illusion of a breeze was caused by the horizontal rod intended to hold the flag flat failing to telescope out completely, thus leaving ripples in the fabric like those seen in a flag in the wind. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
Here's something, Some said that there must have been a breeze so It couldn't be the Moon they were on. And people at NASA liked the effect so well that they imitated it on every subsequent moon shot. I still want the hoax believers to explain the experiment with the hammer and the feather. BOINC WIKI |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.