Message boards :
Number crunching :
Cant upload again
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
gregh Send message Joined: 10 Jun 99 Posts: 220 Credit: 4,292,549 RAC: 0 |
Havent been able to send in results for the last 12 hours. Had a look at server status page but the names bear no relationship the explanation underneath so I cant see if an upload/download server is running or not. Anyone know if it is going to get going again soon or is this the post Xmas breakdown? ;-} |
Luke Send message Joined: 31 Dec 06 Posts: 2546 Credit: 817,560 RAC: 0 |
Havent been able to send in results for the last 12 hours. Had a look at server status page but the names bear no relationship the explanation underneath so I cant see if an upload/download server is running or not. It could be just that the servers are bogged down from the backlog of this mornings outage. But, there were upload problems a few days back. I'm not entirely 100% sure which one is to blame. It could even be both. - Luke. - Luke. |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
Havent been able to send in results for the last 12 hours. Had a look at server status page but the names bear no relationship the explanation underneath so I cant see if an upload/download server is running or not. I believe (but am not certain) the bandwidth problems of a couple of days ago were not solved - so it could very well be both. BOINC WIKI |
cliff west Send message Joined: 7 May 01 Posts: 211 Credit: 16,180,728 RAC: 15 |
well i have been getting this for the past few hours 1/27/2009 8:17:09 PM||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. |
hvleon Send message Joined: 22 Sep 02 Posts: 3 Credit: 498,286 RAC: 0 |
My systems is getting 27/01/2009 10:12:13 p.m.|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 129600 seconds of work, reporting 3 completed tasks 27/01/2009 10:15:47 p.m.||Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site 27/01/2009 10:15:48 p.m.||Internet access OK - project servers may be temporarily down. 27/01/2009 10:15:49 p.m.|SETI@home|Scheduler request failed: Server returned nothing (no headers, no data) Still waiting for some new workunits and send back done job for the last 12 hours |
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
arkayn Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 |
|
Dave Stegner Send message Joined: 20 Oct 04 Posts: 540 Credit: 65,583,328 RAC: 27 |
My to upload cache cleared right after the outage ended but, since then not able to upload. Up to 140 to upload. Dave |
BarryAZ Send message Joined: 1 Apr 01 Posts: 2580 Credit: 16,982,517 RAC: 0 |
Well, typically there is something like 8 to 12 hours of over saturation issues after the weekly outage. Add to that what was a persistent upload problem during the two days prior to the outage and you can expect there to be I/O issues for a while. My to upload cache cleared right after the outage ended but, since then not able to upload. |
Bobby Culpepper Send message Joined: 5 Apr 08 Posts: 29 Credit: 43,368 RAC: 0 |
I'm also waiting on an upload. |
gregh Send message Joined: 10 Jun 99 Posts: 220 Credit: 4,292,549 RAC: 0 |
Well, over 36 hours later and still cant upload, damn it. Cant download either it seems. Dunno what that all means but if someone working in there is reading this area at all, I hope it means something to you because the server status page names bear no relationship to the information you provide, at the bottom of the same page thus I cannot tell what is an upload/download server. If I knew what was the upload/download server and I could see it wasnt working then I would at least sit here contemplating my navel without this damned disturbance in the force bothering me. Oh look - blue bellybutton lint! Hey! I dont wear that colour! |
DMMD Send message Joined: 14 Feb 00 Posts: 118 Credit: 71,564,960 RAC: 0 |
Yes gregh yes. How bout if they just fixed the basic issue of not being seriously involved with the project. A wee bit of serious intent is called for here, and a wee bit of seriously respecting the dedication of SAH VOLUNTEERS would be appreciated. I've been optimizing my seti@home for over 9 years and this typical disrespect of the SAH users has been the norm. If there was ever a more compelling DCP, ah just hope F@H. |
Antjest Send message Joined: 27 Oct 99 Posts: 27 Credit: 19,796,139 RAC: 0 |
If they would limit download of WU's to some 90Mbits, all uploads would go fine and downloads would not be limited much more than they are now. So now with the BOINC clients that do not request work until uploads are clear (like 6.2.19), if someone do not want to get their queue dry, is forced to hit retry button over and over again and creating even more load on line and servers. |
DMMD Send message Joined: 14 Feb 00 Posts: 118 Credit: 71,564,960 RAC: 0 |
Hey Colt There are a bunch of "issues" regarding the diminution of S@H server responsiveness. Many of these have been scoped over and over and over in these hallowed halls and on the porches of all the S@H sensitive benchmark sites. Look below, and READ the posts, yes all of them. And you will see that the "problem"is a wee bit more involved. |
Antjest Send message Joined: 27 Oct 99 Posts: 27 Credit: 19,796,139 RAC: 0 |
This time it is not about server responsiveness. If they would be able to limit only d/l server to not use the full line, uploads would get trough and other servers would be even less stressed then they are now. But all depends on net organisation and priorities. Since eventually everything cleares, I guess they have other better (more important) things to do. |
DMMD Send message Joined: 14 Feb 00 Posts: 118 Credit: 71,564,960 RAC: 0 |
Hey Colt It's great to see a fellow long travelar out here. It IS about server responiveness, you are just arguing a very good point and I think one I have also been stating; ergo when will they get serious comensurate with the dedication of the crunchers? Watching the UL/DL tasks, it is clearly observable that an AI is invoked [UL and DL follows project needs and host "standings" and ability] And as you intimate, they should not have anything else more important to do. Serious Intent! |
Cosmic_Ocean Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 |
I got kind of annoyed last night. I couldn't upload three completed tasks, but I was able to download 51 shorties without a single one timing out or retrying. Something seems...off. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
Dorphas Send message Joined: 16 May 99 Posts: 118 Credit: 8,007,247 RAC: 0 |
uploads working fine for me. have been all morning..... |
Nacrol Send message Joined: 2 Jul 04 Posts: 4 Credit: 518,740 RAC: 0 |
I have not been able to get any units for the last 2 days?? Keep getting the following message. 28/01/2009 15:14:56|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 1555202 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 28/01/2009 15:15:01|SETI@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 28/01/2009 15:15:01|SETI@home|Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) |
sammy2 Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 1 Credit: 141,415 RAC: 0 |
I have not been able to get any units for the last 2 days?? Same here, my machine sitting twiddling it's thumbs with only 1 AP on the go, and the occasional regular, but mostly I have 4+ cores doing nothing 29/01/2009 11:04:39|SETI@home|Sending scheduler request: Requested by user. Requesting 3371014 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks 29/01/2009 11:04:44|SETI@home|Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 29/01/2009 11:04:44|SETI@home|Message from server: (Project has no jobs available) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.