Message boards :
Number crunching :
petition for two separately 'credit counter'
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
New Credit Adjustment? - Message 798941 [second part of the post] Maybe it would be good to have now two separately 'credit counter' for 'SETI@home Enhanced' and 'Astropulse'. If there are 'credit hunters' out there, they don't want to crunch AP-WUs. OR, increase the Credits for the AP-WUs.. ;-D Why are the Credits/hour so much different to the Enhanced-WUs?? |
KWSN Sir Clark Send message Joined: 17 Aug 02 Posts: 139 Credit: 1,002,493 RAC: 8 |
I read somewhere that they'd like to do it but it would require some complex scripting |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
On the other hand.. ;-D If then there are two separately credit counter.. and the AP-WUs are so much bad in credits/hour.. the credit hunters don't want to crunch AP also.. |
Clyde C. Phillips, III Send message Joined: 2 Aug 00 Posts: 1851 Credit: 5,955,047 RAC: 0 |
I think they oughta make'em equivalent. Don't they just have to adjust some multiplier or something? Right now I don't know how they compare to the yields of the other Boinc projects. |
SATAN Send message Joined: 27 Aug 06 Posts: 835 Credit: 2,129,006 RAC: 0 |
To change the multiplier, it may well require some scripting from the Server side, the opti apps would need new app_info.xml files as well. |
zoom3+1=4 Send message Joined: 30 Nov 03 Posts: 65747 Credit: 55,293,173 RAC: 49 |
Never going to happen, Unless money were no object and right now It is. Besides then It would be a separate project and Its not from what I've read. The T1 Trust, PRR T1 Class 4-4-4-4 #5550, 1 of America's First HST's |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
The basic concept here is that credit should be equal across all projects and across all science applications. If credits are equal, then two counters are not needed. So, the question is: where should the project put their efforts? Equalizing credit between Multibeam and Astropulse, or reworking BOINC so that one project can have two totally different credit counts? |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19062 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
While people have commented on the reduced credits for MB, there has been very little said about the increase of ~100cr/AP app, example, in the same time. It would appear to me credit equalisation between MB and AP is working just as Eric promised it would. Therefore there is absolutely no need for separate credit counters. |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
So, we will see soon: Enhanced-WUs = AP-WUs ? [Credits/hour] Or what we will see? |
1mp0£173 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0 |
"Soon" is relative. In the near term, I expect that we'll see the average Multibeam WU, crunched by the stock application equal credit/hour to an AstroPulse WU crunched by the stock AstroPulse WU. "High paying" and "Low paying" multibeam is a different issue, and I expect that one to get sorted out eventually. |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19062 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
I have just chosen a wingman at random that runs stock applications, on this page it shows an AP unit at 25.5cr/hr and on line above a MB, AR=0.43, unit at 22.75cr/hr. For the same host a few lines above it shows a VHAR unit that gets 44cr/hr and on previous page 17cr/hr for AR=0.83 unit. |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
For a very very long time this were the ARs for everybody: Best application for Q6600 - Message 687825 'AR-WUs' every PC will get: 1.) 0.001 - 0.05 -> 18.4% 2.) 0.05 - 0.12 -> 0.80% 3.) 0.12 - 0.225x -> 1.48% 4.) 0.225x - 0.4 -> 21.6% 5.) 0.4 - 0.5 -> 39.9% 6.) 0.5 - 0.75 -> 3.42% 7.) 0.75 - 1.127x -> 3.10% 8.) 1.127x - x.x -> 11.3% This is now also? How are now the Credits for the ARs? Then we can make a small calculation.. :-D EDIT: Ooopsss.. I forgot.. ;-D How is now the share of the AP-WUs? ..#9. .. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.