No work

Author	Message
Sir Ulli Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0	Message 141048 - Posted: 22 Jul 2005, 22:22:39 UTC SETI@home - 2005-07-22 23:36:51 - Deferring communication with project for 10 minutes and 6 seconds --- - 2005-07-22 23:46:58 - May run out of work in 2.00 days; requesting more SETI@home - 2005-07-22 23:46:58 - Requesting 81882 seconds of work my P4 is running out of Work, but when i look here http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html no wonder only 29 Units are ready to send so i shut this Host down btw We now have the new data server online. It has 3x the capacity of the old one. Details will be appearing in Technical News. This should help clear the backlog of result uploads. @Matt i see nothing new at the Technical News... only for Info Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli ID: 141048 ·

DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0	Message 141076 - Posted: 22 Jul 2005, 23:36:29 UTC Last modified: 22 Jul 2005, 23:38:26 UTC i dont think its the data servers that have a problem, there is just no work to be had. be patient... In fact, i just looked at boinc manager, and some new work just arrived. ID: 141076 ·

mikey Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0	Message 141086 - Posted: 22 Jul 2005, 23:51:33 UTC - in response to Message 141048. SETI@home - 2005-07-22 23:36:51 - Deferring communication with project for 10 minutes and 6 seconds --- - 2005-07-22 23:46:58 - May run out of work in 2.00 days; requesting more SETI@home - 2005-07-22 23:46:58 - Requesting 81882 seconds of work my P4 is running out of Work, but when i look here http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/sah_status.html no wonder only 29 Units are ready to send so i shut this Host down btw We now have the new data server online. It has 3x the capacity of the old one. Details will be appearing in Technical News. This should help clear the backlog of result uploads. @Matt i see nothing new at the Technical News... only for Info Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli Isn't this exactly what Berkeley said would happen sometimes...they would run out of work and we should attach to other projects and crunch for them in the interim? ID: 141086 ·

DecBassI Send message Joined: 21 May 05 Posts: 152 Credit: 86,905 RAC: 0	Message 141090 - Posted: 22 Jul 2005, 23:55:58 UTC exactly. If seti runs dry (which it hasent yet on my machine), I have CPDN. ID: 141090 ·

nairb Send message Joined: 18 Mar 03 Posts: 201 Credit: 5,447,501 RAC: 5	Message 141113 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 0:44:41 UTC Last modified: 23 Jul 2005, 0:45:13 UTC ----i see nothing new at the Technical News...---- Check again....... ID: 141113 ·

Eric Fischer Send message Joined: 29 May 05 Posts: 10 Credit: 2,838 RAC: 0	Message 141115 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 0:49:26 UTC I just got some work. About 15 mins ago. Something must be getting through! ~Eric. ID: 141115 ·

MJKelleher Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 1 Jul 99 Posts: 2048 Credit: 1,575,401 RAC: 0	Message 141120 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 0:55:53 UTC - in response to Message 141115. I just got some work. About 15 mins ago. Something must be getting through! Server shows a whopping 60 units ready to send, that's about 3 times what it was earlier. It must be gaining on the users! MJ ID: 141120 ·

Mike and Sandra Send message Joined: 10 Oct 04 Posts: 4 Credit: 944,970 RAC: 0	Message 141228 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 4:33:43 UTC One of my servers has been trying for 4 days to get work. Keep getting the same response: 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Scheduler request to http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Project is down 7/22/2005 11:32:15 PM\|SETI@home\|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds ID: 141228 ·

KB7RZF Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 15 Aug 99 Posts: 9549 Credit: 3,308,926 RAC: 2	Message 141240 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 5:04:50 UTC - in response to Message 141228. One of my servers has been trying for 4 days to get work. Keep getting the same response: 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Scheduler request to http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Project is down 7/22/2005 11:32:15 PM\|SETI@home\|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds Hmm, mine has been getting work. Sometimes it deferres comminications but it does download. ID: 141240 ·

KWSN - MajorKong Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 5 Jan 00 Posts: 2892 Credit: 1,499,890 RAC: 0	Message 141245 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 5:13:00 UTC - in response to Message 141228. One of my servers has been trying for 4 days to get work. Keep getting the same response: 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Scheduler request to http://setiboincdata.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Message from server: Project is temporarily shut down for maintenance 7/22/2005 11:32:14 PM\|SETI@home\|Project is down 7/22/2005 11:32:15 PM\|SETI@home\|Deferring communication with project for 58 seconds uhh... that is not the correct url for the scheduler. 7/22/2005 11:37:41 PM\|SETI@home\|Requesting 31208 seconds of work, returning 0 results 7/22/2005 11:37:42 PM\|SETI@home\|Scheduler request to http://setiboinc.ssl.berkeley.edu/sah_cgi/cgi succeeded 7/22/2005 11:37:43 PM\|SETI@home\|Started download of 17ja05aa.11111.27312.372156.246 7/22/2005 11:37:47 PM\|SETI@home\|Finished download of 17ja05aa.11111.27312.372156.246 7/22/2005 11:37:47 PM\|SETI@home\|Throughput 106269 bytes/sec https://youtu.be/iY57ErBkFFE #Texit Don't blame me, I voted for Johnson(L) in 2016. Truth is dangerous... especially when it challenges those in power. ID: 141245 ·

W-K 666 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19074 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67	Message 141258 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 5:31:55 UTC Hey their gaining on us at 05:10 there was 220 units ready to DL. Andy ID: 141258 ·

Neil Walker Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 23 May 99 Posts: 288 Credit: 18,101,056 RAC: 0	Message 141298 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 6:45:59 UTC - in response to Message 141258. Hey their gaining on us at 05:10 there was 220 units ready to DL. Andy And, at 06:30 UTC, it's 2840. :) Be lucky Neil ID: 141298 ·

Mike Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34258 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80	Message 141308 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 7:38:41 UTC Last modified: 23 Jul 2005, 7:40:06 UTC Hi <blockquote> July 23, 2005 - 00:15 UTC We are looking for bottlenecks in workunit production. We may have found one. A number of processes that read and write to the upload/download storage device (eg, splitters, the data server, validators) now do so across the ethernet switch that connects our data closet machines to the SSL LAN. This 100Mbps switch may well be overloaded. We are moving intra-closet data intensive traffic to a separate 1Gbps switch. Today we moved the data server machine and one of the machines which does both splitting and validation over to this swtich for their upload/download traffic. Where we had been seeing NFS (Network File System) errors on both of these machines before the move to the new switch, we are not seeing errors or either of them now. </blockquote> Looks better now. greetz Mike With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. ID: 141308 ·

W-K 666 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19074 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67	Message 141309 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 7:44:10 UTC Thanks for the news Mike, I missed that one. And they are getting serious @ 07:30 they have 8477 units ready. Andy ID: 141309 ·

Mike Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 17 Feb 01 Posts: 34258 Credit: 79,922,639 RAC: 80	Message 141318 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 8:24:57 UTC - in response to Message 141309. Thanks for the news Mike, I missed that one. And they are getting serious @ 07:30 they have 8477 units ready. Andy You are welcome. Nice weekend. greetz from Germany Mike With each crime and every kindness we birth our future. ID: 141318 ·

Sir Ulli Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0	Message 141330 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 9:49:23 UTC Last modified: 23 Jul 2005, 9:49:37 UTC looks much better now Ready to send 15,878 Thanks to the Dev Team Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli ID: 141330 ·

PhonAcq Send message Joined: 14 Apr 01 Posts: 1656 Credit: 30,658,217 RAC: 1	Message 141378 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 12:20:51 UTC Over the last few days there was a lot of bits burned by the pom-pomers claiming that people should just shut up about the recent seti operations issues and run other projects because Seti cannot produce enough work units. That is, the seti community computes too fast and that there will not be enough data (at least right now from Arecibo) to keep the angry monster happy. But then I read today's technical section and learned that the seti professional's know there is a bottleneck in wu production and are taking steps to fix it. The implication is that there is a lot of data to analyze. That is great! (And thanks to the seti-pro's for the good work and information!) So I guess the pom-pomers (you know who you are!) really don't know stuff, are only guessing, and prefer to spread thick peanut butter over any difficult situation. I, for one, would appreciate truely objective information, and not somebody's emotives. May this Farce be with You ID: 141378 ·

Jord Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 9 Jun 99 Posts: 15184 Credit: 4,362,181 RAC: 3	Message 141390 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 12:59:54 UTC - in response to Message 141378. Last modified: 23 Jul 2005, 13:00:33 UTC So I guess the pom-pomers (you know who you are!) really don't know stuff, are only guessing, and prefer to spread thick peanut butter over any difficult situation. I, for one, would appreciate truely objective information, and not somebody's emotives. I guess that means you will stop putting Seti/Boinc in a negative daylight at every opportunity you get? Or flame bait? Can you even post posts around here without some kind of flame bait embedded in them? If not, please seek out the correct threads in the Cafe. ID: 141390 ·

Heffed Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 19 Mar 02 Posts: 1856 Credit: 40,736 RAC: 0	Message 141401 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 13:21:58 UTC - in response to Message 141378. But then I read today's technical section and learned that the seti professional's know there is a bottleneck in wu production and are taking steps to fix it. The implication is that there is a lot of data to analyze. That is great! (And thanks to the seti-pro's for the good work and information!) I'm not sure I follow you. What does the bottleneck in WU production have to do with the amount of data there is to process? I believe people were saying it's a theoretical possibility of over reaching the output capacity of Arecibo given enough users. Not that it was imminent. But if you feel the technical news is some sort of vindication, then have fun with it! :) And before you start saying who knows or doesn't know what, wasn't it David Anderson who foresaw the possibility of Seti running dry at times? I don't know how much more legitimate you can get than the project head... Besides, Seti has a few tricks up it's sleeve. Such as planning to process data from other telescopes, as well as the Astropulse project. ID: 141401 ·

Astro Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0	Message 141409 - Posted: 23 Jul 2005, 13:37:36 UTC - in response to Message 141401. Besides, Seti has a few tricks up it's sleeve. Such as planning to process data from other telescopes, as well as the Astropulse project. And doubling the sensitivity of the search which takes more time/wu. ID: 141409 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.