Message boards :
Number crunching :
Work available @LHC
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
MikeSW17 Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 1603 Credit: 2,700,523 RAC: 0 |
89,000 workunits to be had at LHC.... |
MattDavis Send message Joined: 11 Nov 99 Posts: 919 Credit: 934,161 RAC: 0 |
They'll go quick. They always do. ----- |
Trulayne Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 40 Credit: 36,353 RAC: 0 |
122,418 WU's as of this moment Crunch on! |
MattDavis Send message Joined: 11 Nov 99 Posts: 919 Credit: 934,161 RAC: 0 |
The LHC team seems to be adding more work faster than it can be crunched. That's great! ----- |
TPR_Mojo Send message Joined: 18 Apr 00 Posts: 323 Credit: 7,001,052 RAC: 0 |
The are a mixed bag, some crunch in hundreds of seconds, others in a couple of hours. If you want to crunch LHC I'd go and get some while you can, as if the majority are short they won't last long - especially with no SETI downloads at the moment. |
PT Send message Joined: 19 May 99 Posts: 231 Credit: 902,910 RAC: 0 |
Account creation is disabled @ LHC. |
Raithmir Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 89 Credit: 385,065 RAC: 0 |
Predictor has nice short WU's too, kinda a pet project of mine as most people seem to go with CPDN or Einstein instead ;) Raithmir's SPARC64/UltraSPARC Linux Builds http://www.kulthea.net/boinc/ |
Timothy Maness Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 159 Credit: 4,929 RAC: 0 |
Account creation is disabled @ LHC. unfortunately. I'd snap up those WUs faster that I grab BURP units. <img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=567" /> <a href="http://boinc-doc.net/boinc-wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page">BOINC Wiki</a> <a href="http://www.tamaness.hostrocket.com/BOINC_team.html">Gideontech BOINC team!</a> |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
The team there is thinking of opening up registration again. Obviously, they did not predict when they would make the decision ... but it may have to do with how fast we burn through the work for this set. In general, the current number of participants seems to be enough to run them dry in fairly short order. But, it is just that I want more to contribute more to that type of work ... Now, if they would make a "blue" and "gold" team, maybe we could keep a more steady supply of work ... :) Ah well, bring on Orbit@Home ... :) |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.