Message boards :
SETI@home Science :
Scientists Unveil Earthquake Forecast
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Captain Avatar Send message Joined: 17 May 99 Posts: 15133 Credit: 529,088 RAC: 0 |
http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/step/ PASADENA, Calif. (AP) - Californians wondering if tomorrow's forecast will be sunny can now find out if there's also a chance of afternoon tremors. Scientists launched a Web site Wednesday that calculates the probability of strong ground-shaking at specific locations over a 24-hour period. The forecast maps, updated hourly, would be most useful after a temblor strong enough to break windows and crack plaster, according to U.S. Geological Survey seismologist Matthew Gerstenberger, who developed the site. After a big earthquake hits an area, scientists know there will be aftershocks, but they can't pinpoint when or where. Now residents rattled by a quake can go online and check for the possibility of more jolting in their area. |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/step/ Let me be the first naysayer to say nay! |
Skeptic Send message Joined: 15 Mar 03 Posts: 106 Credit: 30,946 RAC: 0 |
"Let me be the first naysayer to say nay!" - misfit Huh. I thought that was my job. So let me get this straight... "The forecast maps, updated hourly, would be most useful after a temblor strong enough to break windows and crack plaster ..." I might be missing something here, but it seems to me - and correct me if I am wrong now - but ... wouldn't this be just a little more useful BEFORE "a temblor strong enough to break windows and crack plaster"???? - Skeptic - "... and there is no intelligent life in Washington D.C. either." |
Keck_Komputers Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 1575 Credit: 4,152,111 RAC: 1 |
"Let me be the first naysayer to say nay!" - misfit The warning would be more useful before the shock. However the predictions are more accurate and therefore more useful after the shock. BOINC WIKI BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
Ocotillo Wells just had one. I had looked at their prediction map the night before. It wasn't predicted. :) |
Kathy Send message Joined: 5 Jan 03 Posts: 338 Credit: 27,877,436 RAC: 0 |
Oh, I thought the point was predicting the probability of aftershocks. |
Misfit Send message Joined: 21 Jun 01 Posts: 21804 Credit: 2,815,091 RAC: 0 |
Oh, I thought the point was predicting the probability of aftershocks. well they have been having a lot of little quakes on that fault line recently. Its hard to say what is the original and what are aftershocks. Out here what we need is predicting the original earthquake since thats the largest of the series. |
Kathy Send message Joined: 5 Jan 03 Posts: 338 Credit: 27,877,436 RAC: 0 |
well they have been having a lot of little quakes on that fault line recently. Its hard to say what is the original and what are aftershocks. Out here what we need is predicting the original earthquake since thats the largest of the series. Can't say that I disagree with you, Misfit. Hoping it calms down as well as improving the detection capabilities. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.