1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (21) Server problems
(Message 919095)
Posted 18 Jul 2009 by TerryG Post: Not sure it's going to get better soon either. The site was more or less closed this morning (UK time) to allow the replica to catch up (I believe). However, I've noticed that is slowly slipping further behind. Best to follow ML1's advice and attach to another project while you wait. It will sort itself out eventually. That's what you get for being part of such a popular project! |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (20) Server problems
(Message 918139)
Posted 15 Jul 2009 by TerryG Post: Could someone explain why the uploads aren't getting through quickly even though the Cricket graphs are showing (generally) less than 50Mbs? Not complaining, just wondering. Link to graphs: http://fragment1.berkeley.edu/newcricket/grapher.cgi?target=%2Frouter-interfaces%2Finr-250%2Fgigabitethernet2_3;ranges=d%3Aw;view=octets |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why is there no work?
(Message 908268)
Posted 17 Jun 2009 by TerryG Post: Not sure if the fact the replica database is still offline has anything to do with this - I'm sure I've seen a lack of work units being sent out before when this happens. |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validate Error
(Message 887069)
Posted 21 Apr 2009 by TerryG Post: I got a 'Validate Error' on one of my WUs: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/result.php?resultid=1209407979 What happens to this? Is there any further attempt to validate the WU? |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BoincView web site gone?
(Message 848867)
Posted 3 Jan 2009 by TerryG Post: Anyone tried BV with BOINC 6.4.5? Are they compatible? |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upload/Download problems
(Message 813251)
Posted 29 Sep 2008 by TerryG Post: The cricket graphs show no traffic since just after 15:00 Berkely time (I think that's 22:00 UTC): Cricket Graphs Could be the servers need a kick or the early start to the weekly outage advertised on the front page is a bit earlier than we all expected! |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Astropulse FAQ
(Message 804670)
Posted 3 Sep 2008 by TerryG Post: Of course, with bad luck, my system did an update,and I lost 8 hours to a reboot :-( Are you running BOINC as a service? If you were, it would have started straight after the reboot even without you logging on - you then wouldn't have wasted that 8 hours. Wait until your AP unit has completed and then reinstall ensuring the install option 'Protected application execution' is checked. This will ensure BOINC runs as a service. |
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Astropulse rip off
(Message 801797)
Posted 24 Aug 2008 by TerryG Post: I've completed 3 or 4 AP WUs now, all around the 250000 - 300000 second mark and the highest I've been granted was about 760 - half of what I claimed. Here's an example that hasn't been granted as of writing (the others have dropped off the end of the list): http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=313876961 It does make me want to abort any further AP WUs until there's a fix or possibly at least a good explanation! |
9)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Blips and Bursts (Aug 07 2008)
(Message 799430)
Posted 17 Aug 2008 by TerryG Post:
Errm - unfortunately, yours stats will always have the same value. You're using a URL which always link to your latest figues. Have a look at your signature now and check back tomorrow - the same message will have the new figures (now that it appears the XML stats are being sent again). They look prety good as well (well, better than mine, anyway ;)). BTW - I've had little blue ones for the past week! |
10)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Blips and Bursts (Aug 07 2008)
(Message 798519)
Posted 15 Aug 2008 by TerryG Post:
I wouldn't worry too much about your WUs about to pass their dates - if there are problems at the SETI end, these WUs are usually honoured. You'll get the credit - eventually! |
11)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validate Errors II
(Message 713187)
Posted 15 Feb 2008 by TerryG Post: I've got two WUs that failed with a validate error: I've had six of these in total now. None of them (including those in my original post) have as yet been granted any credit. |
12)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Validate Errors II
(Message 712576)
Posted 14 Feb 2008 by TerryG Post: I've got two WUs that failed with a validate error: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=220451705 http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/workunit.php?wuid=220108370 For me, that's nearly 12 hours wasted unless there is retrospective crediting. |
13)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Weirderer (Sep 07 2007)
(Message 635898)
Posted 7 Sep 2007 by TerryG Post: Strange how Seti went down with disk problems about the same time Rosetta@Home did! Spooky. |
14)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Takin' Care of Business and Workin' Overtime (May 11 2007)
(Message 566238)
Posted 13 May 2007 by TerryG Post:
I got one unit on one machine out of three. I guess the server is being swamped as the others haven't managed to download anything yet. Oh well! One's better than none. Well done guys. |
15)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Pickup (May 11 2007)
(Message 565674)
Posted 12 May 2007 by TerryG Post: does anyone know what projects are good for a very slow machine?? You could try uFluids - although be warned - most of the units take about 15 minutes on my AMD XP1900+ machine, but occassionally you get one that takes up to two hours or longer. |
16)
Message boards :
Technical News :
Timing is Everything (May 09 2007)
(Message 564474)
Posted 10 May 2007 by TerryG Post: At the very least, this Project (and particularly Matt) deserves an award for keeping us all informed. Well done and good luck with the new server(s). |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.