1)
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Moderator changes...
(Message 649419)
Posted 26 Sep 2007 by ![]() Post: Congratulations Blurf! I was browsing through our team forums and saw this. :) Your enthusiasm and dedication towards SETI will definitely prove to be an asset! Good Luck! |
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINCstats site down?
(Message 594742)
Posted 28 Jun 2007 by ![]() Post: I just noticed that the links to BOINCstats and main page are down. Can anyone confirm this or have any info? www.boincstats.com/ |
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Cruncher's Dream- Tyan T-650QX Personal Supercomputer
(Message 565395)
Posted 11 May 2007 by ![]() Post: That's more less the computing power of 20x Core 2 Duo CPUs (for example 20x C2D E6420 with the E5320 Xeons :]) I beg to differ I run a dual quad Xeon and my daily limit is 800 for that host...which isn't really a problem because I only process about 240/day. :) |
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Attention ADMIN: Change in TOP COMPUTERS logic
(Message 529690)
Posted 11 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: *HEY*! Cut it out! I apologize zombie67 I take offense when someone insinuates that our team is being secretive when actually is commonplace. On topic: Thanks Matt for addressing this! |
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Attention ADMIN: Change in TOP COMPUTERS logic
(Message 529494)
Posted 11 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: That is a relief...well sort of. BroadbandReports.com Team Starfire: http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/teams.php?team=30192&project=sah BOINC Synergy: http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/teams.php?team=30230&project=sah The Knights Who Say Ni!: http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/teams.php?team=30195&project=sah OcUK - Overclockers UK: http://www.boincsynergy.com/stats/teams.php?team=30189&project=sah no need to list further. If "hiding" were so unpopular you would think less would be hiding them. ohhh BTW Why do you care? I like to compare computers...Oh I forgot...SETI.USA is secretive...seems we have been here before... Yhy do you care? I like to hide my computers...Oh I forgot...people like yourself like to make a big deal of this....seems we have been here before as well. ;) |
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Attention ADMIN: Change in TOP COMPUTERS logic
(Message 529176)
Posted 10 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: That is a relief...well sort of. I noticed the change in the leaderboard a couple of days ago and couldn't find anywhere within the site why this has changed. This host: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/show_host_detail.php?hostid=3067426 should be in at least the top 5 with a RAC of 5,586.75 (at the time of this post) but is missing from that list. |
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Dual Quad core build questions
(Message 525548)
Posted 3 Mar 2007 by ![]() Post: The memory architecture for the 5000 series chipsets has to manage ECC memory. As a result I am seeing a 10% reduction in memory speed vs a comparable Core 2 Duo motherboard. However, as of this morning my humble Core 2 Xeon is sitting at 40th on the top computers list. Another member of SETI.USA just built a quad Xeon (8 cores). His computer is 3rd in the top computers list, right behind the expensive Apples. Blackjack has not overclocked his system yet either. I just happened to stumble across this thread. I am running this board: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/5000X/X7DAL-E.cfm I believe that I purchased this board for $349.00 (got it on sale). Reuben Gathright can confirm/deny. I had estimated a 4.5K RAC when I first got it running. I have however been pleasently surprized that this estimate is below its potential. I also am running a Core2 6600. I have compared a few workunits with similar ARs and have seen only about a 10% deficiency in the Xeon compared to this processor. I initially wanted to build a Kentsfield system..but realized that I could run 2 Clovertowns on one board for less than building 2 Kentsfields. I know that I am sacrificing a bit of RAC and credits with the Clovertowns..but I am not the least bit disappointed with its performance. |
8)
Message boards :
Team Recruitment Center :
TEAM SETI.USA - MEMBERS NEEDED
(Message 523394)
Posted 25 Feb 2007 by ![]() Post: Wooo Hooo!! SETI.USA is now the FIRST Team to break 1 Million RAC!! Congrats Teammates!! SETI.USA |
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Welcome to the 7 year club
(Message 499564)
Posted 8 Jan 2007 by ![]() Post: Congrats Everyone! Also a 7 year member here :) |
10)
Message boards :
Team Recruitment Center :
TEAM SETI.USA - MEMBERS NEEDED
(Message 479982)
Posted 11 Dec 2006 by ![]() Post: Hey Kevin I can't wait to see the numbers of those new systems! Hmmmm...I might have to shell out some $$$ to pick up one of those! LOL Hey u have any links of the hardware you are using? |
11)
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Continued from the Closed thread
(Message 465070)
Posted 24 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: sniped.....It's the definition of the term. I don't know how to say that any other way.... It is conclusive that you feel/believe/etc. that Breastfeeding is indecent, and the rest of us do not. You are entitled to believe that it is indecent. So are we to believe differently. ;) The laws relating to Breastfeeding are not the US gov't legislating feelings or opinions, but a result of the feelings/opinions of the majority. Laws also reflect the morality of its Citizens defining what is moral(immoral). This thread clearly reflects the public opinion towards this issue. |
12)
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Continued from the Closed thread
(Message 464182)
Posted 23 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: Indecent and obscene are not synonymous. They cannot be interchanged without changing the entire meaning of the sentence. What's "indecent" about exposing a breast on an airplane is specifically that it's a body part which is normally covered in that particular situation. It would not be indecent in a bathroom, in your home, or on a nude beach because one would expect to see exposed body parts in those locations which would otherwise be covered in a different setting. This is your opinion. However there are laws that specificaly say that breastfeeding is NOT indecent. http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/breast50.htm Nineteen states exempt breastfeeding from public indecency laws Not a single state prohibits a mother from brestfeading in a public place. She didn't have to do anything of the sort. I doubt all baby formula's are on the banned liquids list, AND she was offered a blanket which would have solved the problem before it ever started. As CA has already stated..in the state that this occurred (Vermont), she is not required to cover herself. Sorry guys, I'm totally not religious, but I DO believe humans are better than all the other animals on the planet combined. In my opinion this isn't any different than monkeys flinging poo at each other or dog's sniffing each other's butts. Humans are better than that. I agree to the fact that our intellectual capacity does carry a higher moral standard than other animals; however the comparison of Breastfeeding to the actions you describe are not even comparable. Feeding an offspring is essential for the sustenance of life. "flinging poo" or "sniffing butts" although disgusting, is merely social interaction. Happy Thankgiving to all as well :) Edit: to enable link |
13)
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Continued from the Closed thread
(Message 464063)
Posted 23 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: Hi BJ.... Hey Brain Ok then I made an error However you want to call it (breastfeeding) My response still applies. ;) |
14)
Message boards :
Cafe SETI :
Continued from the Closed thread
(Message 464030)
Posted 23 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: On the otherhand, since new regs prevent anyone from bringing ANY liquids on a flight, she had 4 choices: EDIT: ohh BTY astro..the regulations clearly permit liquids to feed a baby on a flight. On the Contrary... If one is offended by a mother breastfeading her baby the simplest solution is to LOOK THE OTHER WAY! ...on the other hand Get some popcorn and soda ;) Thank the powers that be there are laws protecting mothers to perform what all mammals on this planet do to survive. I share the same sentiment that there is nothing to be seen because anything interesting is obstructed by the baby's body. Calling this obscene is ludicrous. |
15)
Message boards :
Team Recruitment Center :
TEAM SETI.USA - MEMBERS NEEDED
(Message 454290)
Posted 10 Nov 2006 by ![]() Post: Hello! Hello Dirk, It is quite possible that a spam filter may be the problem. I have seen on several occasions our welcome e-mail is blocked by the spam filter, later to be found in their "Bulk" e-mail folder. (I have seen that you indeed have registered, yet to confirm.) Everyone is truly welcome to visit our site and message boards :) |
16)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is this version also available to public?
(Message 367943)
Posted 15 Jul 2006 by ![]() Post: Your team still looks bad even if I stopped posting about it. Me shutting up doesn't change anything - it just helps hide it. You are welcome to post about our team. I am just saying practice a bit more responsibility when making the kind of statement you made. :) |
17)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is this version also available to public?
(Message 367746)
Posted 15 Jul 2006 by ![]() Post: Interesting thread. :) Members (note the plural) of SETI.USA spent the time working to develop an optimized application and the $$ to finance such a development. As a team it was decided to keep it within the team. We did not publicly announce this. This has certainly been discussed. Imagine if we said "Yeah we have an application, but we are choosing to keep it within the confines of the team." Hmmmm I imagine that the response would have been "Geee thanks for informing us (the public). We do appreciate that your team informed the general public that you produced an application and have chosen to a limited release..." Understood that there are those out there that believe that what we chose to do was out of "greed"/recruitment/etc. The members directly involved did this out of kinship. Is was our decision and we respect other's difference of opinion. @KWSN Chicken - For clarification. We decided upon this before development. And I'll be the first to say that we did know that eventually it would be discovered. I hope my above explanation clarifies why we remained silent. @Matt Davis - You are clearly mistaken. ...None of the other top teams, like Germany or the Czechs, have done this. Leave it to American zealots to make us all look bad. Kind of like our President. In the days of TruXoft and Crunch3r...L'Alliance Francophone had a Team application. They did not publicly announce here they had an application (it had a modest higher calibration than TruXoft). But if one looked hard enough, it could be found. (Note: I discoverd this the same way KWSN-Chciken discovered ours.) Just another example of Matt trying to find a way to say SETI.USA is bad blah blah blah...really it is getting old. |
18)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
SETI@HOME and SETI.USA and the Wal Street Journal
(Message 351440)
Posted 29 Jun 2006 by ![]() Post: Matt Matt Matt (deep sigh...) Don't blame MattDavis for his ignorance. He is not even aware of it. ;) |
19)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Strike requests
(Message 329396)
Posted 7 Jun 2006 by ![]() Post: Doh.........I didn't mean to pull the plug on your strike! Please continue the strike. While your at it some here need to learn what a strike is. @Matt not sure who you are referring to. @Geek@Play you are right..The words "Strike" and "Boycott" are probably not the best choice of words to describe. A "demonstration" would better describe what has transpired. |
20)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Strike requests
(Message 329379)
Posted 7 Jun 2006 by ![]() Post: Consider me foolish.. But requests were made. And now we have received a response. I thought that a discussion based on the response follows? But if one whom is against what we are attempting would certainly tell us now "you received a resonse..now put it to rest." That seems a bit premature. I however am confident that if we discuss this in a civilized manner, the "dust will settle" and Seti will be a better place... |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.