Drifting (on a sea of...)

Message boards : Nebula : Drifting (on a sea of...)
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Profile David Anderson
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 99
Posts: 173
Credit: 502,653
RAC: 0
Message 2077681 - Posted: 10 Jun 2021, 21:15:00 UTC
Last modified: 10 Jun 2021, 21:16:34 UTC

We've been working almost entirely on refining the drifting RFI algorithm. This - I hope - is the last big piece before we do our final Nebula run and finish the paper.

The goal, as with all RFI algorithms, is to:

  • Remove all the RFI. We've bookmarked a lot of examples of drifting RFI. There's a spectrum: some examples are clearly RFI, others are less obvious. When we change the algorithm, we look at these examples to make sure we're still removing at least the obvious ones. We also look at the top-ranking spike/gaussian multiplets. It's OK if a small fraction of these are RFI; we can skip over them in the manual inspection process. But if most of them are RFI we need to change the algorithm.
  • Remove only RFI. We don't want the algorithm to remove an ET signal. To check for this, we see what fraction of birdie spikes are flagged as drifting RFI. This is inevitably nonzero - some birdie detections happen to lie in regions of drifting RFI - but it shouldn't exceed a few percent. Also, we monitor the fraction of all spikes flagged as drifting RFI; 10% is plausible; 20% is probably too high.

Recall that the drifting algorithm takes a "vertex" detection D and forms two fans of triangles in time/frequency space, emanating from D in the positive and negative time directions. We count the number of detections in each triangle that are "far" from D (a couple of beam widths or more) and compute a probability for each triangle; the more detections in the triangle, the lower the probability.

Recent changes:

  • Previously, we looked at the product of the probabilities of opposing triangles; if this was below a threshold, we flagged both of them as RFI. This didn't work well in some cases; we tried various alternatives. Our current approach uses two thresholds. If a triangle's probability is below 1e-8, we flag it as RFI. If a triangle and an opposing triangle are both below 1e-4, we flag them both.
  • Previously, when we flagged a triangle as RFI, we flagged all the detections in the triangle, including its vertex. But there are cases (including lots of birdies) where a triangle has lots of close, non-RFI detections, that happen to be far from the vertex detection; these were erroneously getting flagged. So we changed to a "vertex-only" scheme where - if any triangle is flagged as RFI - we flag only the vertex detection, not the detections in the triangles.
  • The vertex-only policy introduced a wrinkle: before we apply the drifting algorithm, we group detections into "clusters" of nearly-identical signals. From each cluster, one detection is picked as the "master". Only the master detections are used in the drifting algorithm; including the non-masters would skew the statistics. Previously, we flagged non-master detections lying in flagged triangles. With the vertex-only policy, we must do things differently: when we flag a vertex detection, we flag the other detections in its cluster. This required adding a data structure to keep track of clusters.
  • Previously, "clusters" meant detections within 1 second and 1 Hz. This wasn't appropriate for short or long FFT lengths. We changed it to use rectangles based on FFT bin sizes.

With these changes, the algorithm is working pretty well. It removes only 2.9% of birdie spikes and 11.8% of all spikes, it removes the obvious examples, and few of the top multiplets are RFI. So maybe we're done with drifting.

Other news: we're talking with astronomers at FAST about using Nebula as part of SETI sky survey there. Needless to say, that would be very exciting!

ID: 2077681 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ML1
Volunteer moderator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 01
Posts: 20626
Credit: 7,508,002
RAC: 20
United Kingdom
Message 2077694 - Posted: 10 Jun 2021, 23:33:56 UTC
Last modified: 10 Jun 2021, 23:34:17 UTC

Good going and thanks for the good details.

... Other news: we're talking with astronomers at FAST about using Nebula as part of SETI sky survey there. Needless to say, that would be very exciting!

Yay! Good luck!!

Keep searchin',
See new freedom: Mageia Linux
Take a look for yourself: Linux Format
The Future is what We all make IT (GPLv3)
ID: 2077694 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Nebula : Drifting (on a sea of...)

©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.