Message boards :
Number crunching :
Panic Mode On (109) Server Problems?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 28 · 29 · 30 · 31 · 32 · 33 · 34 . . . 36 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Stargate (SA) Send message Joined: 4 Mar 10 Posts: 1854 Credit: 2,258,721 RAC: 0 |
Ah ok, ty for reply |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
How does one have so many errors and invalids? . . By being a developer (Petri) and constantly trying new things ... or in other cases by having faulty hardware or totally misconfigured apps that trash most of the WUs you receive, there are many of them around too. Stephen :) |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Is it just me, or are these new 02 WUs processing even faster than the previous 05s? Around 10sec on the GPUs and 4min on the CPU faster. The servers weren't doing too well as it was, these new WUs will push them even harder. Grant Darwin NT |
Stargate (SA) Send message Joined: 4 Mar 10 Posts: 1854 Credit: 2,258,721 RAC: 0 |
Id say your right Grant.. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Looks like we've reached that critical point of returned-last-hour, WU-waiting-deletion, in-progress and splitter load. Waiting-deletion is going up, splitter output has gone down, and Ready-to-send buffer is rapidly emptying. And with the shorter WU run times, channels left to be split is rapidly diminishing also. Grant Darwin NT |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22491 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Eric muttered something in Beta a few days ago about finalising some "new binaries" that might be loaded onto the servers this Tuesday - perhaps he wants to have a fairly low RTS before doing the update.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Eric muttered something in Beta a few days ago about finalising some "new binaries" that might be loaded onto the servers this Tuesday - perhaps he wants to have a fairly low RTS before doing the update.... I hope the implementation is smoother here than at Beta. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14676 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
No new applications have appeared on the Beta applications page since October 2017, and those were all for Mac - so whatever the current problems are at Beta, it can't be attributed to new application binaries.Eric muttered something in Beta a few days ago about finalising some "new binaries" that might be loaded onto the servers this Tuesday - perhaps he wants to have a fairly low RTS before doing the update....I hope the implementation is smoother here than at Beta. What Eric actually said was We're testing BOINC updates, which have broken the splitters. |
rob smith Send message Joined: 7 Mar 03 Posts: 22491 Credit: 416,307,556 RAC: 380 |
Thanks Richard - I was on my phone and looking at two things at once on that is "problematic" - hopefully the new SERVER binaries will address some of the issues we've seen on main of late. (And Eric's note post dates the "new splitters broke Beta" announcement by a few weeks, and the more recent Beta stuff has flowed fairly smoothly.... Bob Smith Member of Seti PIPPS (Pluto is a Planet Protest Society) Somewhere in the (un)known Universe? |
Zalster Send message Joined: 27 May 99 Posts: 5517 Credit: 528,817,460 RAC: 242 |
and we are back |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
But the splitters are offline. If Eric did deploy new server code, I hope we are not seeing the same issue that Beta had with the new server code. Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
Keith Myers Send message Joined: 29 Apr 01 Posts: 13164 Credit: 1,160,866,277 RAC: 1,873 |
And the splitters are back online. But the SSP has not updated in 15 minutes. So who knows? Seti@Home classic workunits:20,676 CPU time:74,226 hours A proud member of the OFA (Old Farts Association) |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11411 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
Current result creation rate ** 0/sec 0.0148/sec 2.5690/sec 6m This is not gud. |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
Is it just me, or are these new 02 WUs processing even faster than the previous 05s? Around 10sec on the GPUs and 4min on the CPU faster. . . Yes, they are processing slightly faster than those Blc05 units were. Not quite so dramatic here though they are around 30 secs faster on the 950 GPU and about one min on the i5-6400, maybe 10 secs on the 970s and 2 mins on the i5-6600, and finally about 10 to 12 secs faster on the 1050ti, the C2D doesn't crunch normally but during the outage it ran a couple of Blc02s and they were about 2 to 5 mins quicker (compared to 81 to 84 mins). Stephen PS:- the post outage hourly return nearly hit the 200,000 mark :( |
Stephen "Heretic" Send message Joined: 20 Sep 12 Posts: 5557 Credit: 192,787,363 RAC: 628 |
Looks like we've reached that critical point of returned-last-hour, WU-waiting-deletion, in-progress and splitter load. . . On that subject (channels to be split) I am left pondering why it is that all the "tapes" (Disks) show as 52.24 GB but while some show 80 to 120 channels others show only one or two. What causes that level of discrepancy? Stephen ?? |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
And the splitters are back online. But the SSP has not updated in 15 minutes. So who knows? Splitters showing Green, and status page has updated. But still no work actually coming from the splitters. Server code update broke our splitters as well as Betas? Edit- over 2 hours since the project came back up, but still no splitter output. Grant Darwin NT |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
. . On that subject (channels to be split) I am left pondering why it is that all the "tapes" (Disks) show as 52.24 GB but while some show 80 to 120 channels others show only one or two. What causes that level of discrepancy? Only those in progress (dark green), or have been processed (light green), show up. Grant Darwin NT |
juan BFP Send message Joined: 16 Mar 07 Posts: 9786 Credit: 572,710,851 RAC: 3,799 |
Apparently the splitters are splitting as showed by the Splitter status but where the splitted data is going? |
betreger Send message Joined: 29 Jun 99 Posts: 11411 Credit: 29,581,041 RAC: 66 |
I made it thru todays outrage but it looks like I will go dry this evening unless something gets fixed. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13841 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Apparently the splitters are splitting as showed by the Splitter status but where the splitted data is going? I think it's a case of the splitters are running, but they're not actually doing anything. Apparently, the updated server code broke the splitters on Beta. They got that fixed, but it would appear there's some differences between the splitters here & at Beta that didn't cope too well with the new code. It could be a while before work is flowing again. Grant Darwin NT |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.