And knock-knock, I could dismiss the Method of Proof, for still only the Fact it could be, for not any questioning instead.

That is wrong, because just Doubt could be still only part of nature, for also the reasoning you could make it.

If I knew that nature was just complete for that of meaning, for not any incomplete, here that of fulfillment instead.

Ask me how I am doing, and next reasonably well, for still not any "better" instead, for also the obvious or evident it could be.

Here it reminds me that we could make it just a cause for that of a Claim, for still not any asserted, for also that of Causality.

Only just what I wrote somewhere else, and it could be connected for just linked, when still not any "pizza grandiosa", but rather a better understanding instead.

And that sentence a little too long, and next linking for that of a bridge instead, when still only connected.

Are just magnificence that of being offered by just words for such, or could you still prove instead, for only a reason for that of such?

Just the set Principle, for still everything just being offered, and next no such thing either.

I am feeling lucky, and next also love for such, but still I could prove nature for its magnificence, when not any happiness or joy instead.

So, make it perhaps insight here, and perhaps not any hindsight either, for just being able to tell.

And guess what, here the word "prudence" comes to me, for still not any wise it should be instead.

So here everything just for science, when still not any respective instead, and at least you could make it that of cleverness, for only being skilled.

Any landscape for just bringing happiness and joy, and perhaps only that of sentimental instead, for not any Melancholy it should be either.

So, distinguished guests, for still only readers, and we could be still in the same boat, for only racing in the canal, for still only such a thing.

Where is the wise man here, and should he be any clever, for still not any nature for only a Premise, for the set meaning it could be?

Make it any Census, and still not any "assumedly " only for such, when that of a guess, for still not any inscription either.

Either just such a thing here, for not any Commandment either, or you could stilll take it just for granted instead.

Wish it to be true, and next science for only itself for only what we could make it, when still only ten fingers and toes on each hand, for also foot.

Either you make it just science for only that of its own behalf or meaning, or you could be proving for that of else, for still only God for such.

But here you are threading the landscape for still not any mill, and it becomes only Objects and Sets for that of meaning, for still the whole it could represent.

So, should I bend it a little just for meaning, or could it be another thing for just what it could represent, for still only an Object or Set for such?

Push it to the limit, and still only infinity for that of a notion, for not any exaggerate it should be instead.

If I could be making it that of completeness, next I could be asking for even more, for still only that of infinity for such.

Either just dismiss that of infinity for only a meaning, or you rather could be making it synonymous with God, for only what it could represent.

Starting anew, for that of fresh, because here the browser chose to clean the whole session, and I have to log in again.

Trying again, because the browser chose to throw it all away, for that of a new start.

Again, lost my whole set of tabs, for also the beginning of a new post, so please have me excused.

It always could be defined, namely magnificence for only splendor, when still not any bad luck instead.

But next a lock for that of a door still needed, and it becomes a key for such, when still only entering in.

So in you get, for next also walk, and it becomes a realm of pure fantasy, for still only such a world you could thread.

Please have me excused, I am still not showing your way out, for also such a thing I could be doing it.

If making it only such a thing as perdition and damnation, still not any successful, for only a bit of joy or happiness instead.

But with respect to God, next only science instead, for still the Wormholes we could make it, after all.

You make it given or set, for still the implied it could be and next a Premise it could be for just nature, when also a presumption.

Just feel well, and next also the better I could make it for still only a breath, for not any push instead.

The realization of Facts, should still be that of embodiment for such, for only the reality it still could be.

Is nature the responsibility of science for only just made, or could you rather make it God instead, for just being granted?

What if Determinism made us only able to conclude, for still only the answer it could be?

If Fallacies are only that of "self" for only just meaning, next we also could be able to conclude, for only such a thing.

But next you assume reality for only just a thing, and next it becomes that of "correct", for only an assumption for such, except rather Premise instead.

And yes, upright I still could be standing, and next I also could be walking on my feet.

The landscape for just making it any daily routine of just your day, and next only "daring" for the bit of threshold it could be, when only Wormholes instead.

Next we could perhaps prove reality for only such a thing, for not any "enough" it should be either.

So, what is God perhaps selling, for not any cigarettes either, when only just "Man on the street" for not any pleasure dome instead?

Come on, so next I could be proving science only just for meaning, for not any pleasure dome it could be instead.

If I stepped in for just inside, I could still be entering for just the door it could be, when also a lock or handle as well.

But make it any definition of life or reality just for meaning, and next still only Gods hands, for not any Wormhole it should be instead.

The Premise for making it still only Existence, should be that of science for only such, when still not any hands of God instead.

In Spanish, we make it that of "O sole mio", for still not knowing it for that of lifting my hat, except still going down the drain instead.

Here it makes for that of light versus dark, for still only a chapter for such, when that of separate here, just for meaning.

So I could be asking about science for that of an absolute meaning, and still only that of light versus dark, when also the Devil here.

Does science make it any heavy for just lifted, and next only weighted instead, for that of a given measure.

Hmm, yes, proving for science, and still that of meaning.

Fart, my brain is just stopping here, for not any presumption either.

Read my lips instead, and next it becomes Gods way of thinking, for still only the beauty it could be.

Only that of "self" and next I am, for still not any fingers crossed either.

Given this or that, and next a measure instead, for still only what you could compare, except only that of such a thing.

So here, "what" is perhaps still an expression, for still only the words of Princess Leia for such.

Any what for just meaning, and rather Determinism instead.

But next, for still only hovering, that of embodiment instead.

So, what are any lights in the tunnel for that of driving, except only lost hope instead?

Only white, and next come to me, for still only the beauty it could be.

Wish I could make it any landscape, but next it could be still only hovering.

Or perhaps I could be having a dream, for only making it so, and next only white and black, for not any blue instead.

I could make it that of fulfillment perhaps, but next also prove for science, for still only its meaning.

Do you assume that of magnificence and glory for that of the "better", for still only the hope it could be?

Or is it still only the science I could prove, for only the man standing at the corner, and selling cigarettes for only such?

But presumedly I entered another world, for only realm for such, and still only that of Wormholes, for that of its scientific meaning.

What if just well-being for that of behavior, was only such a thing, for also the pleasure it could be, when still not any "meant" just for science?

When you enter a different world, also another one, except that you still have to prove it, only for meaning.

So, Causality makes for the Laws still only meant, and next spring to me, for that of a buck.

In reality, just prove for science, for still only such a thing being meant.

Only leaves for that of hanging on the trees, and next we could be proving for science, for only the other thing just being meant.

Is poison just for that of a "gift" or should I rather tell you the answer for just meaning instead?

"Here I am" and next also you, for still a meaning, except a thing we for some reason rather could prove.

https://no.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rafiq_Hariri

Becoming a victim of circumstance here, for not any civil war instead.

Oh, native page for that of the picture it also could be.

So it goes.

So, a couple of beers, and I could have the rest of it before finished.

Either just for not any unjust, and the reason becomes only complaining.

Just two pictures for that of a comparison, and the second was not any good, for the first a bit better.

Leaving a thing open for not any closed, and it becomes still only a hatch, for not any remaining answers instead.

Here the blue book of science for what we just know, and the rest becomes unchartered territory, for still unknown.

But if a civil war could be having a reason, for still only sad, not any unfounded it should be either.

If just Cause and Effect became only the thing meant to be, also Events just happening, for that of the same.

May I ask you to invent any new science, and next still the Universe for that of its presence, where we could make new discoveries.

I was always hesitant for making it parallell universes, for also multiverses, except still not any Doubt for the same.

But as soon as we add just one thing for being included, it becomes forgotten, for still only that of science for only meaning.

Making it respect of the unknown for still only known, and it becomes where we could start, for still only the known.

Some people could make it only elementary particles, while others make it Fundamental Forces, for still only Interaction, for that of the complete picture.

Just that of Laws for the Strong Nuclear Force, and also the same for gravity, except, still only "Nobody's fool", for only the lack of Proof he could make.

You could make it to the edge of space, for also end of time, but the farmer still have to plough the soil, only for the harvest each year.

But only resting, you could be so by only a chair, for still not any irrevocable call.

True fact for meaning is that we discussed the WOW signal for still not any agreement, for only a cause for such.

Any fallibles instead, for still only with respect to the known, and it becomes only Religion, for still only the Faith or Belief it could be.

But supposedly only proving any multiverses, for still perhaps only the better.

The hidden disguise could always be there, except only up the sleeves, for that of rolling a little, next for only arms.

But next only the reason for why you could be dying, just only a practical reason for that of nature, for not any spectacle either.

So where is the inconclusive result, for still not any dubious or spurious nature, for only that of Ambiguities or Contradictions instead?

Do you end up making it just God, for only thinking, when it still should be just believing, for not any Fallacies instead?

Is the definite Proof just an absolute for such, or next you could be making it an answer without meaning, for only inconclusive.

But if any invalid should not be the answer we could make, next also the false it could be only for meaning.

Just attributed for that of meaning, and still the "both" it also could be, except perhaps written better.

Nature comes with just such a thing for only granted, and next we should accept it for still only meaning.

Here Logic in any form, for also Arithmetic, should still not be telling about any God for only a reason, except still only the Proof we could make.

So here the answer I only could make, should still be only true, for also the result it could be.

The Reason behind we could make it, should still perhaps be only the Laws of science, except also the moral judgement it could be.

But when you press the button for only making it better, you rather "ascertain" such a thing, for still only in a context of Religion.

We know that God versus the Devil could be still only two faces for that of showing up, for still not any Reason behind instead.

Either just murky Earth for only the soil, except still only part of it for just included.

I could be making it sunshine at times, for also sunset, but next that the Devil could be still with me, for not any God instead.

Either make it just God on the pedestal for only a single whole, or you could make it that of "both" for only a separate reason.

Here I am not asking about any multiverses, but rather whether things could be still layered, for not any intertwined either.

As soon as you make it infinity, next also a Stairways to Heaven, except not any Causality or relationship, for that of the intermediate.

Cosmology is still the subject for only making it the whole of things, when also attributed, except still perhaps Religion for only part of it.

But just bigger, next also better, and it becomes only beyond reach for what we could grasp, and next also fathom.

So where are you bringing that ugly thing, for still only depravity, for not any perversity it should be instead?

Do we not agree that just the whole of it, should be that of "more" for just only meaning, when also that of included?

Where is the simple sentence for only that of "ascribed", and next you could be making it Religion only for such?

Better prove for just meaning, and next still only nature for such, for also the answer we could make.

So, is God perhaps an excuse for only the science we could make, or should it still be only Religion here?

What it Laws of nature could be attributed to some Reason, for just the other it could be?

If science could be still explained by only Laws for such, you are welcome, for not any other alternative it should be instead.

Is it not the Fact that God created the Universe in just six days, and we could still only believe, for that of Faith for such?

Are Laws any questionable or questioned, for still only the Uncertainties it could be, for not any undetermined instead?

Here Doubt for just a meaning, and next both Darwin and Einstein for still only that of monkeys versus apes, for also that of dices.

But next you make it only complete, because infinity could be that of a set Condition, for only being included.

Here infinity should be doing it just the thing making it, except still only out in the woods, for that of "Susan seeking".

So here the Census I perhaps made it, for not any Immatriculation either, and it could be the Ten Commandments, for only the words of God.

But next you choose to decide upon a given thing, for not any undecidedness insted, and next still not any nature attributed just for meaning.

So, tell me about the rules that perhaps is, for still only a set Condition, when left to die, for only that of old age.

Here it becomes the natural principle for only reason, for still not any freak accident instead.

Any better for just the implied nature it could be, and next also a set Condition for such.

Both that of Proof and Truth becomes that of strong here, because of not any questioned, for only the Principle it could be.

But if making it failures and flaws for still only the Uncertainty it could be, only a set Condition for still only nature.

So, prove with respect for a given thing you could make it, and next only nature for its diversity.

But next bring the shuttle for still only the Uncertainties it could be, and next also the answers for nature we could make.

We know that riding a horse should still need a saddle, for not any stirrup, but next you could be slipping and falling, for only another reason.

So why not accepting any Fundamentals only for what it is, and not rececting it either, just by only example?

Could it still be better for not any worse, and next we also could take it just for granted, for only being accepted.

When I make it nature for only what it is, next that of Determinism, for also that of "self", for still not any conclude it should be instead.

Trip-trap, so next you could be making it a Fallacy instead, only for falling into the ditch, and next it becomes a question about God again.

Just the unidirectional, for that of pointing a finger, and the Universe became created for only the reason it could be, when also attributed, for still not any Reason behind.

So, is it that of edge here, when still only closed, for that of a circumference for such?

Any wider Perspective, and next also the hope you could make, for only a given meaning.

Nature is perhaps not telling about any "self", but only its own for what it could mean, except still not any reasoning or Philosophy for such.

When I start asking, always the question I could make, for also answer back in return, except not any Philosophy in between.

But when you make it nature only Deterministic, for not any undeterministic, next also casual, for also the random it could be.

And yes, I questioned the Laws of nature, for still only meaning, except also that of Plausbility as well.

But rather make it one thing versus the other, still "that's it" for only just meaning, for only what we could make it.

So, that thing for just the other, and still the basic Premise it could be, for only such a thing, when also that of concluding as well.

Did God make it any "here you have it", for still only a dish, when also offered as well, except only the different possibilities it could be?

So here we are questioning that of infinity for still only nature, for not any inconclusive it should be instead.

Only add for just included, and next infinity for that of the same, when only a context for such a thing.

But here making it attributed, for still another context, and next you could be assuming God for still only meaning, only because it could be better.

So here I questioned the Philosophy of any Laws, for not any relevant instead, and next making it only attributed.

What if Laws are for their absolute meaning, and next also the way the Universe was created, for still not any Reason behind?

Could you question any Laws for that of being undeterministic, or could you still take it for granted, for only what it is?

Philosophy is not supposed to be any perfect, for still only the tool we could make it, for that of "absolutity" and also grandness.

Bring me the shuttle instead, and next still only the adventure we could be participating in, for just part of it.

Proof is supposed to be definitive, and next also making it that of Truth, for only adding a question mark at the start.

So, here the gentle touch instead, and next strike me on the mark for just a finger, for not any feather instead.

So, false expectations, for still not any true believer, and I could prove for only the sentence I could make.

Either just () or still only the infallible I could make it for only just nature, when not any set Condition either.

Still lost the other word here, for not any thinking either.

That of Proof is just steadfast, for only making it, when also Truth, except not any tangible instead.

Just trace it back for still only uncertainties, and next also the Fallacies you could make for nature, when still not any Proof.

So, just leaving it off, for only the Premise it could be, only that of uncertainty instead, for also Ambiguity and Contradictions.

Either just set nature for only meaning, or it becomes the presumption you also could make.

So, "duck" for only just caliber, and still only the Premise we could make, for not any Truth instead.

If Certainty could make us only able to conclude, still that of a presumption, for only a Premise instead.

Any Logical Fallacies for just nature, and you could be questioning it for that of the inconsequent it should be, for not any irrelevant instead.

Trying with arbitrary here at first, for only inconsequent instead.

So, does it hinge on only an opened door for only a given call, or should I rather make it irrevocable instead?

Any attributed, for also ascertained, and perhaps still not any Premise we could make it, for only just meaning.

Just evident, and it becomes only nature for such, when still not any Revelation instead, for just the clear or bright it could be.

Come on, for just telling me nonsense for that of meaning instead.

Proof is still what we could make, for also an answer with a meaning, for not any left out or forgotten, for only Doubt for such.

But if you could squeeze a couple of things for still only the random example it could be, next also back and forth, for that of a meaning.

If I could make it nature any Deterministic, for only a hinge for that of such, rather perhaps uncertainties instead, making us unable to conclude.

So, making a Conclusion for only just drawing, that it perhaps could be only God for a reason, and still only that of undeterministic principle for just nature.

Perhaps rather make it Fallacies instead, for only just a given way of proving Religion, for not anything else.

Proving just false is a thing I could do, for also proving that of true, except still only proving nature for its splendor and magnificence.

So, just that of Proof could be still only steadfast, for also the Census or Immatriculation you could make it, for not any tangible instead.

Is nature still only that of arbitrary, and next that of Contradictions and Ambiguity, for not any "answer" we could make instead?

Next Proof for only the answer we could make, except only fallibles just for nature, for still only the inconclusive it could be.

Make it just determined instead, for also conclusive, and still only a valid nature, for only the sentence it could be.

If nature could leave us with only Doubt for that of speculating, still perhaps not any order or Commandment it should be either.

Choose to make it any different word instead, and still only presumption here.

Just Doubt for that of a Premise, and next leaving Proof for still only that of Certainty here (lost the point).

But rather that absolutes should mean just "all" for that of meaning, and next infinity instead.

So, you make it still the answer it could be, for only the undeterministic it perhaps could be, for not any undetermined.

Dances on wolves instead, for still the answer that could be found or revealed, and next also treated with respect.

Poor boy, but next only a single hand, for still only proving with respect to only the science it should be.

If a Logical exclusion could also be that of exempt, next no such thing we could make it either.

So, rather just attributed instead, and it becomes that of Fallacies, for just the same, for not any inconclusive either.

What is the "order" for just nature, for still not any perfect symmetry here?

Could it be the telling of a priest, and next also ordained for such?

If a prescription makes for not any transcribed, only completion instead, for that of perfectness, when also that of fulfillment.

Here you are not asking for any nature which could be derived, but rather concluded instead, for only a single sentence.

But just inconclusive, and still only the other alternative, for not any perfect it should be instead.

So, the science we still could do, should still be only science itself, for also the respective meaning we could make it.

What if a Conclusion should be still only infallible, for that of Fallacies for such?

You could perhaps enter another world for only the otherwise it could be, except still only skip it just for meaning.

Just thread instead, and next only above my shoulders, for only a casual look for such.

Any tangible just for nature, also I could see it for just the Proof it could be, when also tangible Evidence.

So, dear me, for still not any steadfast, and we could be hanging just to the point, for still the clinging it could be, for that of Evidence.

Just predetermined instead, and you could make it that of a Consequence.

Hah-ha, so leaving it nature any exciuded, also the following it should be, for not any answer thereafter.

Any just of that of above, and next also assumed, for also the presumed it could be.

So, why not any Logical or illogical, when you rather could be consequent instead, for that of Deterministic.

Always the Conclusion we could make for that of nature, when also ascertained, for still not any Doubt instead.

Just the better of it, and next also final, for still not any Conclusion, for just only meaning.

So, drop off, and next wait a moment, for still only the droplet in the ocean it could be.

But here you could be assuming God with some respect, for not any it should be either.

Just come to it, for still only final, and it could also be the answer we could make.

If Certainties makes for also attributed, still that of "well" for only an understanding.

Wish it to be true, and next only an understanding I could make, for only contemplating for such.

So, Proof still makes for that of derived, for still not any will of understanding either.

If God made it just the answer we could not get, also fallibilities as well (again nose).

One thing for just the other, and still the thing we could derive, for not any Conclusion instead.

But if I made it only "options galore" for only the glorification it perhaps could be, next go, for only that of meaning.

One thing is that of having stuck hands, for not any siamese twins instead, but next only tantamount, for only the meaning of it.

Next, crop it instead, and it becomes significance instead, for not any Crop circle it should be either.

And here a stop, for only the lookup of music it could be instead.

But next you prove nature for the respect it could be, for also a recognition, for not any acknowledgment instead.

Here it becomes true Facts for just a meaning, for still not any absolutes it could be instead.

So, nature should be still only a glimmer of hope, for not any Asymptote we could make it instead.

Just that of making it that of hope, for still not any victim, so here bring my shuttle instead.

Always fathom that of the opera, for still not any speculate, when also Tingaling bell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOrnVen5mzY

Only a suggestion here, because the one rewinding back at, did not become the same, for only a moment of pleasure or satisfaction.

One thing is cutting it short for only happening, but next only a moment of displeasure or dissatisfaction instead.

Now I should be in bed, and next you come.

Sorry, but it became late again, and here flipping back at the main partition.

If such a thing as lost opportunity could be a possibility, also that of total recall, for only losing track of it instead.

But if I could be confused for still only the thing making it, perhaps also such for that of nature, for still the answer ahead, for also unknown.

An excuse could be still making it only Timotei shampoo for just your hair, except not any Laws or Equations, for just the deciding it could be.

But if Faith for also Belief should be still the excuse we could make, for not any nature instead, still only such things for that of meaning.

Result always comes with a price, and therefore also the Consensus we could make for that of a signal of meaning.

But thinking that it should still be one thing for that of another, for still coming first, not any premature it should be either.

In my best moment I could make it readily acceptance, for also that of acknowledgment here, except still only for the science we could make.

So here the final it could be, when also total, for also the ultimate it could be, and next nature for a Consequence, when still perhaps result for only opportunity.

Just death should be that of fatal Consequence for that of meaning, for still not any happening or Event instead.

And here the other sphere it perhaps could be, when only the realm of God, for still his empire, for that of a lack of translation here.

We may have had this discussion earlier on, for still not any just cause we could make it for only reason either, when that of Afterlife.

But as I mentioned or said, just completeness should be that of fulfillment just for meaning, for also the incomplete it could be, except still only part of nature.

I checked in with PrimeGrid here at first, and here a quite nice word, namely "dubieties", for only being mentioned on the page there.

But rather that I could be making it that of "resolute" here, for still the emphasizing it could be, for not any understrike or underscore either.

If such a thing as Doubt could also make for uncertainties, for also both Ambiguity and Contradictions, we may never conclude nature for any meaning.

Rather that I made it a set Condition, for still only the thing left deciding, for also the Conclusion it could be, for not any arbitrary instead.

But here nature is leaving us with no more choices, for just the "both" it could be, and next included for just that of whole meaning.

Meaning that here "I just meant it", for that of being set, and next a Condition only for such, for that of whereabouts for only presence.

So what if nature became only a reason for that of randomness or Coincidences, for still perhaps not any Laws for just included?

Are such things as randomness, for also the disorder or Chaos, still founded on the Principle of such Laws, for not any "minted" instead?

So, just come along, for still only present, and next the dance we could make it, for just for the ring, when also that of predetermined.

A set Condition could still be that of whether or not for only such a thing, for not any IF - THEN - ELSE, because the alternative could be still that of predetermined.

But rather that it became only a Commandment instead, and for that only the Existence just for meaning, for still that of the Universe.

And here a little too long line again, so trying to fix that before finished here, because I rather leave it an open question for the thing we could not answer.

Only guessing here that the natural philosophy we could make, should be still for science only.

But when you make it Belief for only the research into UFO's instead, still only the specific alternative, for also the result it could be.

Just the open it could be, for still only unfounded, and next the answer we still could not explain, for only just giving or perhaps delivering.

I always could enter the wrong door for only a given choice, and next it could be a result for only outcome for such.

A separation between different Sets should be still parts only for such, when not any membrane or pellicle instead.

Rather that we make it circles for that of inside one part of only such a Set for that of belonging, and next trying to relate with possible triangles, for the other.

But rather that I stepped outside the circle for just the perimeter it could be, and next past or beyond, for only that of a reference for such.

Here I personally make it a mismatch for only the edge of space it could be, for also representation of infinity, for only its meaning.

And here infinity perhaps still the undefined it could be, for only a Construct, for still not any part of a given whole it should be either.

So, reason to believe perhaps, and next you make it only UFO's instead, for still the thing you could prove, for only that of science.

With respect to science, still the infinity we could make it just for meaning, for also the "more" it could represent, for still not any infallible.

Nature makes it perhaps a definition only for such, except still only we or ourselves, that of past or beyond, for just such a thing it could be.

But if nature perhaps should be having no end, for only that of infinity for such, next also not any past or beyond we could make it, for the same meaning.

Next only be brave for that of daring, and I could be still overstepping for only a dance for such, when it could be only dancing in the ring.

The Creator per se we could be making it for only a Reason, could be still only infallible only for such, for not any Religion instead.

But rather that I made it that undeterministic for not any deterministic with the other project, and next was still able to conclude for only such.

Here only just Doubt could make us only speculate, for still perhaps not any Causality it should be either, but only a realistic answer just for meaning.

If an invention made it only infinity as a result, still the Universe for only a making, for not any inventor for being the Reason behind.

But here it comes to me that even Laws could be just inconclusive just for meaning, for only the invalid it could be.

Here negative numbers for only just an example, for still not any Logical consequence instead, and here needs checking.

But rather that I could make it still Darwin here, for also Einstein, when that of apes or monkeys, for also the "playing of dices".

The other alternative for just uncertainty, should be that of Certainty, except rather concluding for nature by only Proof for such.

So, only time for that of a notion, and you think you could be having the whole answer, for not any part instead, for still that of whole it could be.

Here the same word twice, for still not any fulfillment for also completeness, when only that of perfect, for just magnificence and beauty.

Rather that you just add 1 not once, but many times, for that of starting, and next you end up with a number for only such.

So here the little angel in me, for only that of speculating, for still not any "order" for only Consequence, when still that of Reason.

Here rain coming pouring down in quite considerable amounts once again, making for yet another autumn, for also fall.

The problem here is just for the start it perhaps could be, next scientists looking for the other word, when also the "better" of it, for still only explaining.

No secret that for just the Laws of nature it could be still, also the separate Proof we could make, for still that of respect only for such.

So for still not any stillmaker either, for just photography, I made it twice in the row here, for only the just it could be.

Just take the Universe for granted, and next also the simple meaning it should be for that of an explanation, for not concluding for anything else.

So, for still only the overstepping I could make it, only dancing in a ring for such, when not any wolves it should be either.

Either just a physical Construct for the limit we could make it, for not any running forever for still only infinity for such.

Everything here become only a physical definition of the reality we could make, for still only the Universe.

Any mismatch for only result, still only that of Uncertainty, for not any "perfect" it should be either.

My reference for just the part it should be, should be still only within the circle, except also knowing the circumference for only a separator, for not any perimeter it should be instead.

Any given, for just the Empty set it could be, and next nothing just for meaning, for still only reality for such, and next you could be proving for still only numbers.

But if next making it only God for a Creator for such, next also the Reason it could be, except still only Religion here, for not any science.

Einstein is not supposed to prove any life for just meaning, for also the Afterlife it could be, when still only an Atheist, and therefore I could be still only selling cigarettes.

I did not make it any entities just for word only here, when still only life, for perhaps the precious it also could be.

But making it aliens for only a valid subject, perhaps we should not only believe here, but rather prove it instead.

Next I entered the wrong door for still only the invalid subject it could be, and next it became the wrong result for only an outcome.

So here not any dam filled to capacity for only just overflowing, and next I could be making it a reference manual, for still only the infinity it could be.

Rather it becomes "with respect to" once again, for only that of fulfilled, because it also could be that of an expectancy.

And here maybe just presumably instead, for not any "insurance" it should be either, for also that of presumption.

Perhaps I could make it a distorted face instead, for that of a fashion, except only looking myself in the mirror for only the personality it could be.

Never say never, but next not any given Laws you could make it, when still only looking yourself in the mirror, for only a face for such.

Show me the way for only result or cause instead, and next the answer we could make, for only that of fulfilled, when still only within reach.

Here the emperor should be for that of just ruling, for also the king or empire it also could be, for not any reign or sovereignty instead.

But making it Fundamental Laws for only just rooted, and still minted for that of such, for not relying on any undecidedness either.

Any complete picture, for not any incomplete instead, and it becomes still that of "both" for not any more it should be instead.

Making it only just valid, and still not any Empty set here, for also the inconclusive it also could be, for still also that of "dubieties".

Only Consequence just for meaning, and next inconsequent instead, for still only the opposite or different it perhaps could be.

But if I could count to three, next also the different possibilities it could be for that of meaning, when also quantizing for that of such.

Either just the glass of milk needed here, or I could make it a new cup of coffee here, for not feeling any well.

Perhaps becomes instead, but better than nothing.

So except for a couple of beers, I rather should take the alien issue for just granted, and next we are not any alone at all.

Consecutively the rest of the meaning should be thereafter, for only the contents it could be.

The scientific alternative for making it only science, should be still the only one for such, when not any Religion either, just for an alternative.

The better philosophy could be just speculating about God only for such, for not any elementary particles instead.

But next that I am not that fond of multiverses either, except only the unexplained it should be for a reason, when only the process of death.

Everything goes for a notion, and still the things we could explain, for only that of arbitrariness, for also the beauty it could be.

But if any magnificence should be only given order for such, next only with respect for that of infinity, for just the thing it could be.

So is everything just spawned for only the random it could perhaps be, for not any Coincidental either?

Just the dead thing for only a stone, next life still sacred for only a meaning, when perhaps a Reason behind.

I do not have to make it any moniker or Allegory for only a nature for just meaning, except still only God instead.

Any life for just meaning, should be still only a product of nature for such, for not any sacred instead.

Making it any gods and angels for the science it could be, and next only deaf ears for such, for still only the Atheists we could be.

But thinking that something could exist, and next we could only disregard it just for meaning, when still not any Proof.

So if nature is only that of self, for only just meaning, perhaps we could rather make it Intelligence instead, for also that of Conscience.

Only just dead end, and it could be a wrong way of thinking, when still only that of science, for not any attributed or ascribed.

Perhaps this could be still only the leveling I could make, for not any digging deep, for just further.

My sense is that nature could be still hiding a couple of secrets, for only the invisible it could be, for still not revealing for just itself.

So, if not any double standards here either, only just the better it could be, for still only a Reason for such.

If I could make it any incomplete for just the complete it should be instead, next only part versus whole, for still not any end for such.

Only just for that of whatever, for also whenever, and next you could be making it Objects for that of Sets, when only fitting in.

Ask me about any infinity instead, and next only whatever for still only an answer, when not any counted either.

And here perhaps a different word instead, but just vanished out of sight, for only out of my head.

But if a complete Set should be still that of infinity, next also what it could be transformed for just reality, for not any ascribed instead.

Rather perhaps a different representation of just a thing it could be, when still only different for that of meaning.

I make it both randomness and perfect order, for only the symmetry it could be, still only running in parallell, for just side by side it could be.

This could be making it still that of "both", except only nature for an understanding, as we only are able to do it.

If this project is only about detecting intelligent life, next still Proof needed only for such, for also the Consensus it could be.

Proving any God could still be impossible. so next only making it the Strong Nuclear Force, for also gravity, for still only my presence.

So here Matter becomes only Energy for just a separate product, when still the equivalent it could be, for not any gravity warping space instead.

Just the whole it still could be, and next that of nature still built on a given Principle for such, for still only the Universe it could be.

Here that you could assume not any perfectness, for only the Uncertainty it could be, when also Ambiguities and Contradictions.

Next that the alternative should be still only God for a Reason, just because of the moment of beginning it still could be.

So except for not dismissing any aliens for only possibility for such, still only a project here for just meaning, when it should be that of detecting such.

But entering the wrong door for only the choice it perhaps could be, and next I ended up in a meadow, for not any lost at sea instead.

Here you rather could be climbing a mountain instead, and ending up on the expanses only for such, when still only lost.

Just the dreadful word of "infallibilities" here, and next not any inconclusive it should be either, for only making a valid Conclusion.

Here only just a ghost in town it could be, for still only Religion for such, when still that of attributed, for only just a sight.

So, leave us only with the choice of Religion here, for not any science, and you could still only prove just for meaning.

Therefore, still not any dignity here, for just "your honor" here, for only that of reign versus sovereignty instead.

And here still not any honesty either, for only "You be honored" for such, when still only the singing of a song.

Make it only respect instead, for that of "respect with", and next still only attributed, for also a countenance for such.

So here only a given face for that of meaning, and next I could be looking myself in the neck, for still not any different option instead.

Here perhaps Logic could be still only just two things for such, for not any Premise making for any more factors it could be.

Those different representations it could be for only Sets for such, and next part of a given whole, for still what it could be, just for meaning.

And here the bit of chocolate is just biting my teeth for that of past dinner, so rather going to bed instead.

So, did the weekend shopping by just running for it, on a Thursday.

Here ending up with the bottle of milk first, because of no belief of any cities in the sky for just lacking.

Better have the story told before midnight, except falling to sleep for only night, except not another condition.

Either just an Event for that of happening, or you could make it Causality instead.

So. three reindeer for across the river, for not any sheep instead, and here perhaps making a discovery of sorts, by just thinking.

Here things are just what they appear to be, for also looking, except still also Objects for also Sets, when also Laws governing their presence.

So here making it Laws for just the perfect it could be, except questioning any Laws of randomness, for still only the casual it could be.

But one Set for only just combined, and it becomes still the objects we cold make it for also properties, when also Laws still being a Fundamental part.

Here is the "both" we could make it for that of nature, and next we became fortunate by only the subject of infinity, for also a famous Equation.

The moment where it all started, perhaps became a primordial Universe at first, for not any Superforce preeding it either.

But next inflating, only because of a set condition for such, which should be still only a natural Law for its presence.

So here one set of Laws for just the perfect, and next Laws of Chaos for still only turmoil, and it becomes the combined context for just together.

But next an Event still making for possible change when only just happening, and it becomes dependency of detail, for only just interwoven.

Here a single factor making still for only what it could represent, except time being the subject, for only going out of fashion at times.

A Black hole could be synonymous with vast amounts of Energy, except still not any visible, for only exluding the c part from the Equation.

But next that it could start vaporizing, for just the Event Horizon it still could be, for not any singularity instead, for that of just leaving here.

Here a reference to that of Differential Calculus, and also the other thing, for still only just part, when only for such for still the whole it could be.

So, striving for luck, when it still could end up in failure, next only factors for such, when still only part, for just the different it could be.

Here the moment of Creation perhaps became only such for that of origin, for still the demise it could be, when only just that of "both", for just meaning.

But rather that infinity is the initial constant, or Construct for such, and next subdividing into the factors it could be, for that of Equations.

So, where does it go, for that of ends, and it becomes only "Knot's landing" for such, for not any twisted or intertwined instead, for just single context.

Such a thing as luck, for also the failure it could be, should still be that of result we could be making, for also a difference of just nature.

Here time and space is still such a thing for that of combined, and next the famous Equation once again, for not any random luck it should be instead.

So here still infinity for only the initial or original Construct it could be, for also a nature spawned into turmoil and Chaos, for still only Laws for such.

Just two legs for that of standing, and next also the options it could be, for still not any combined, for just Fundamental for such.

Perhaps it could be still that of "betterment", for also the Proof it could be, when still nature resting on its shoulders, for still only the perfect it could be.

Any indifference for just indifferent, should still not be the difference we could make, when rather deterministic versus undeterministic, still for only nature.

So, just prove the better thing, for still only that of value and worth, for also the precious it could be, for not any "both" instead.

Either just the story of free fantasy it could be still, when only proving a couple of aliens, for not any nature of given Truth instead.

Perhaps Einstein is thinking that his Laws or Equations are still perfect, for only the randomness it could be for that of Chaos instead.

Next only lacking Laws, for still only the latter, and we are trying to relate the two subjects, for only the connection it could be.

But if still that of infinity for that of subject, next also nature generous for only given meaning for such, when that of "attributed", for still only Religion here.

So, just trying and still only a set condition for that of nature, when still that of infinity for only that of completeness here.

Could nature be any "minted" for just the randomness it only could be, for that of a set condition, for not any perfect it should be instead?

Where is the "golden nugget" here, for still only explaining, when making it nature that of "both" just for meaning here, for only what it could represent?

Any attributed, and still just the perfect it should be, for not any randomness instead, for also that of perfect symmetry.

Is the Devil supposed to be any perfect for rather just God here, for not any fallible or infallible nature instead?

I could make it still Laws for that of the "both" it should be, except also with respect to each other, for that of condition or subject here.

So, rather Fundamental Laws of nature instead, and you make it only Chaos, for still not any perfect instead, for only the Laws it just represents.

Could infinity be a set condition for such, for not any imperfect it should be either, when still only randomness, for that of Chaos?

So, look back, for not any forward, and it becomes still that of "both" for just the result it could be, for also set condition, for still only "both" just for meaning.

If any infinity should also be the Law we could make, next also that we could assume that of perfectness, for only the final or ultimate it could be.

So, where is still that of one thing versus another, for just the "both" it still could be, for not any single context or meaning instead?

Perhaps there should be no such thing as final or ultimate Chaos, for stil only that of perfect it should be, for that of completeness.

But rather that I should be having the first beer in just a moment, for making it fulfillment instead, for only the luck we could be seeking.

Here Laws of nature. for still not any Chaos instead, for just the perfect it still only could be for that of meaning, when also that of "more".

So therefore, not any completely lost either, for still only the "better" it perhaps could be, when still only that of fulfillment, for just more.

Perhaps still only vanished, for that of in the crowd here, because it should not be any perdition or damnation here, for still only lost.

If Einstein makes it still that of Equations, also the completed it should be, for just that of fulfillment, when that of infinity for only added subject.

So, "Letters to an idiot", and also "Love is in the air", and I could be losing the whole of it just for meaning, for still not any Proof it should be.

I better have the cup of coffee first, for still only such an idiot I could be, for also writing a letter.

Perhaps I could be just lacking, for only the Faith it could be, and next forgetting that.

So, wowen for not any interlaced, and I should have thought about that, for not any late in bed either.

Rather shine on you for only a crazy diamond, because here perhaps still not any sunshine, for only just interwoven instead.

The big subject here should be that of nature for its complexity, and next also detail for just part, when still that of magnificence and splendor.

Einstein makes it that of completeness for just the finite nature it perhaps could be, for not any infinite instead, when still an Atheist.

But next thinking that it should be "just it", for only such, when still only added for the subject it could be.

Rather that we could end up just thinking it should be that of fallible versus infallible nature, for only a lack of completeness here.

Here perhaps still not any orders of a magnitude, for also the Set it could be, when just included, for that of properties.

But rather that I am still only supposed to believe, for not any valid subject it could be, for just proving instead.

You do not have to start with the beginning, for just the end it also could be, when still that of infinity, for only a notion.

The Proof we could make for science, should still be only the Laws of physics for only such, for not any attributed or ascribed it could be instead.

But here you make it infinity only a set Condition for that of being included, and next "all" we could make it, only for meaning.

You could still make it "Letters to an idiot", for not any valid subject it could be, for only believing in aliens instead.

But as soon as you make it that of death for only a Construct, still perhaps only letter for such, when that of writing.

Should nature be still only fallible here, for not any infallible instead, and next God for only its infallibility, when that for only a subject.

So here any precious for that of gold, when still only a nugget here, for not any attributed or ascribed instead.

But rather making it "mint" for still only a Condition, for not any added word it could be instead.

Nature could be still just anything, for also the precious it could be, when also both valid and invalid for that of subject.

Next only that of such for what it could mean or represent, for not any other of just glory instead.

I came up with just a meaning, when that of Conclusion for such, that we could make it still Heaven and Hell for only just a nature of meaning,
for also the given Consequence it could be, for just Laws and Equations.

Next, "foot" instead, and it becomes God for still only sitting on a pedestal, because of being in charge, and next also "master of skills", for that of Lord.

Any conclusive versus inconclusive, and next also -ness for that of not any "betterment" it should be, for just all of it either.

Just flip it, for that of being spawned, and next only nature for that of different options, for still only the "both" it could be.

Here just all the things, for still not any single instead, for just the combined it also could be.

You always could make it nature for only a given notion, for also the set Condition it could be, and next also fallible versus infallible here.

So here perhaps only the happiness blacksmith it could be for only just a forging nature, for not any spawned it should be instead.

Assume it to be only science, and next also think so, for just the Proof it also could be, and next reality still only for just meaning.

So, cultivate the harvest, for still only being fertile, and next also infinity for just the meaning it also could be.

Any deed for just gratitude or compassion instead, and next nature made in only such a way, for still not any forged instead.

I perhaps could be making it a face of God, for only just believing it, except still the cup of coffee needed here.

Just the way of Truth, for still the way you also could be walking, and next endless for only such, when that of a saga, for only infallible for such.

Are we supposed to question nature for that of being deterministic, for also the nondeterministic for such, when still that of "both",
or should we make it fallibles versus infallibles instead?

I could end up making it infinity still only a set Condition for such, when also what it represents, for still not any another, just for meaning.

So, "here you have it", for only next for meaning, when still that of "Oath of allegiance", for only just that of such.

For that, you end up going wrong, for still not any infallible it should be instead, for also inconclusive, just for meaning.

This is supposed to be that of God for just meaning, for also the Religion it could be, for not any science instead.

The representation we still could only make for nature, should be only Proof for such, and next also Laws versus Equations.

But making it any shoelaces for still only questioning, for not any answers we could make instead, and next also infaliibles for also Uncertainty.

Here nature comes with such a Concept for only a property, when still not any goods to declare, for only the Customs.

For that, you do not adapt or fit it to a given suit for only such a thing it could be, when still only Laws of physics, for that of given properties.

You rather make it next for only that of meaning for still only what it represents, for that of its physical characteristics and also condition.

Just Laws for that of meaning, and next also properties for that of such, for still only given meaning for that of the Universe.

So here I better should translate, for that of assigning, for not any ordaining, when still just attributing, for only just word.

But here also a Census goes for not any ascribe either, when still only that of fit or suit, for also the adapt it could be.

Just written instead, and next it became ascribed, for still only the Census it perhaps could be, for not any Religion instead.

Only just a smile, and next also a face in front of the camera, for not any metaphysical condition it should be either.

Does it matter for just bother, when still only a smile, for only that of nature for its physical properties, for not any "other" instead?

Nature could be still complete, for also incomplete, and next making it "-ness" for still the "both" it could be, when that of only magnificence.

But rather that it could be making it just Energy for that of a property, when still not any Matter or mass instead.

Is any c we could make it, only that of "happiness blacksmith" only for such, or could we rather forge, for only making it a moment of time instead?

Here both still goes for the Proof we could make it, except also that of Equivalence here, for just a principle.

The Universe should be still only physical characteristics for that of such, and next it becomes both space and time, for that of an Interaction.

So, slip for just a throat instead, and I could end up in a ditch, for still not any cliff, for just falling, when still in respect for only the Laws of nature.

But here God could be still that of "self" for only a Principle, for still not any materialize it should be here either.

Could you next "forge" for still only the Matter it should be, for that of Energy, or could you rather fuse instead, for making it timeless fashion?

What is still just the other thing here, for only alternative, when also that of proving, for only a sentence?

Is not any gods or angels we could make it, only in the Concept of Religion, for only meaning for such, for still not any other alternative?

Here you rather assume both Matter and Energy for still the space it could be, when also time for that of a context.

Next prove for that of science, and still the physical characteristics it could be for only just properties, when not any "ordained" instead.

If perhaps only "flesh and blood" for such a thing, where is next the Energy it could be, for only just being spawned?

Heat still does not need or generate any fusion, for only a bit of body sweat, for also the hard labor it could be at times.

Next only being kind with me, for not any Devil it should be either, for just only God instead, for that of being ascribed.

Just the thing it still should be only just for nature, and next also where it should go, for only just meaning, when still that of properties here.

Add it next the Devil, for not any God it should be either, and next nature for only physical characteristics, when also properties for such,
for not any else for only that of Metaphysics, for still just the other thing.

If nature could still only fuse, next also Energy for that of such, for not any wrong it should be either, for just Iron being a part.

When Iron tries to fuse, for only that of a fusion process, it next goes wrong, and the result becomes a supernova, for that of only a display.

Rather transform, for still not any merge either, and next only forged for still only the Laws of physics it should be here, for that of result.

But rather that we are supposed to believe for only a nature for that of such, when still only physical characteristics, for also properties.

If anything like Energy should also be for the gods or angels we could make it, next also a light in darkness, for not any incomplete it should be either.

Only just a spirit for that of a bottle, and next only the white versus black for only a color, when still not any God versus Devil instead.

Still only shining, for just bright, and next we could believe in such a thing it could be, for also that of an entity as well, when also spiritual.

So next do not tell me about the color for just the Universe when still only dark, for not any Devil sitting on just a throne either.

For that, still only steadfast, and next also the Method we could make it for just believing, for still not any Proof instead.

Here just writing on freehand only for such, for still not any spirit in the bottle here.

And perhaps not too bad in the previous, so leaving it there, for only the bottle of beer instead, and also I became exhausted.

Just seemingly for that of will, and perhaps no such wording it should be either.

But rather that I made it that of "ordained" when still only Commandment, for not any complexity it should be either.

Nature should be just for an order we could make it, and next also magnitude, for still the the precision or preciseness it could be.

So next only a countenance or sight for not any regards it should be, and next only whereabouts instead.

Nature could be just a halt for that of a cessation only for such, when still not any victim of circumstance it should be either.

Either just prove science for still only the meaning it could be, or just "run like hell", for still only the forevever it could be.

Being an Agnostic for just making it, and perhaps such a thing I could be, for not any nature instead.

So if the name of "noname" I perhaps could make it, next also fit for that of suit, when still the adapted it also could be.

Here "=" means still only equality for that of a symbol, when also making it Equivalence for that of nature, for only what it could represent.

But also that Logic makes for still only a separation, when that of a difference, for only the converse or opposite it could be, for not any flipping of a coin.

Any "negative" subject, for perhaps not any inverse either, and next only "none" for that of such, when perhaps not any Empty set either.

I could choose to have it included for only just added, for not any subtracted it should be, when only excluded, for that of given part.

But rather that you just add another word for only being invented, for not any "ascribed" for only given purpose it should be either.

So here any Newton either, for just flipping, when perhaps only the chair for such, when not any subdivision for just part of nature it should be either.

Here fortune stiil means that of luck, and next also happiness blacksmith only for such, for the notion of infinity it should be, for that of representing "all".

But here that it also came first, for only spawned, and next only an eventuality for such, when still perhaps not any luck for just fortune either.

Is it perhaps the reason that you just could think it could be still different, for only the other it could be, when still only an alternative?

So next only "bird Phoenix", for still only the ascribed it perhaps could be, for not any error or erroneous instead, only for that of science.

Next missed the point for just looking away, and it became only the other alternative, for still not any science explaining.

Here making it predetermined for still not any Prejudice either, and next only words for also the sentence it also could be.

"Does it happen", and next also happens, for also "let it be", for still not any randomness, for only a causal or Coincidental circumstance instead.

But rather that we could be questioning that of Laws for still only meaning, for not any Proof it should be instead, for also definite.

Here the point of making it any "absolutes", should be of no meaning, for only just fallible versus infallible instead, just here.

Rather that it could be that of Ambiguities, for also Contradictions, when still that of "both" just for subject, when also Uncertainty.

Here nature makes it for a set Condition, when still added, for just that, when it could be also included.

Any "NOT" instead, for perhaps not any negative either, and I could be making it Fallacies here for only a given choice, when perhaps not any respect either.

Just turn it on instead, for not any off, and next I rather could slip and fall to the ground for perhaps only a Consequence for such.

Too soon, and next also premature, when still only thinking about God for just meaning, when that of Fallacies only for such, for not any falling instead.

Here nature could think it could be successful, for not any deeming it should be either, and next still only infinity for that of its possible meaning.

Next only basic Premise instead, and next nature for only just granted, when still that of magnificence and splendor, for not any ugly instead.

Is God next any fallible or infallible instead, for just nature here, and next perhaps not any decisiveness either.

We could make it still a set nature for only a Condition for such, for not any imperative it should be either, and here it became, for just the word.

So where are the two interpretations of nature, for still only meaning for such, when not any "both" it should be either?

Could you perhaps prove innocence for not any guilt, or should you rather make it a bad day instead, for not any good?

Here nature came with that of "both" for just included, for still not any "all or everything" it should be either.

But assumedly the "both" you could be making of nature, could be Laws when only such, for not any telling it should be either.

And here I supposedly could make it still that of "both", for not any NOT or nothing it should be, for just anyone or nothing.

Is the Empty set just a thing you could prove, or should it only be part of nature, for that of its representation?

Where is the respect for God, when perhaps only affiliation instead, for not any part of nature, for still only what it could represent?

In earnest perhaps, and next you could end up becoming a refugee, for only that of lost land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temptation_of_Christ

Bring me the shuttle here, for not any call of the wild it should be either.

Just "ludicrous", for that of a word, and it could become false Premises instead, for also the lure it could be.

Or maybe just laughter for that of ridicule here instead, for not any Truth it should be either.

That's it, for only just added, except still only meaningless, for being only part of subject here. and next you are welcome.

So, what if any "helter-skelter" should be just a trap for such, for not any idiot either.

Either nature for just a circumstance, or you rather could become a victim of circumstance, for still only circumstances only just warranting.

So, bleh, just thread your way for still only walking, and next circumstances only for such.

Any due respect only with nature instead, and perhaps it became only such, for still only just part.

Some people could be asking for absolutes when it comes to that of nature, for not any resolute or final it should be instead.

Any inconclusive, and next also invalid for just nature, for also the incomplete it could be.

Here nature set for still perhaps not any ordained, and it also could be unfinished, for only that of business, for not any unsettled either.

Therefore just valid when it comes to that of Proof, for not any invalid instead.

Here I could be making it a set nature for that of deliver, for also the promise it also could be, when that of an expectancy.

But as I mentioned, that if infinity could still be only what we could expect, for also meet, for that of an expectancy just delivered in our hands.

This because of what nature could be having to offer, for still only circumstances for such.

So why not care, for still not any bother, for still only circumstances warranting instead, for just the result it could also be?

Just "All Saints", and next days for only such, when stiil that of a guardian angel here.

So, did I perhaps misuse a word for only spoken word, or it could rather be that of misinterpreted language instead.

Just "go to Hell", and next also "beware the wolf", for still not any delivered trust for only expectations instead..

Only just thrill for that of an excitement, and still that of nature just delivering, for only the show it perhaps could be.

Could I rather assume nature for just meaning and next also what I could make it as well, for still not any delivering?

What if Certainty could be only just for Fact, and next I could prove only for meaning?

For that, only hand in hand for only just delivering, and next also nature for its magnificence, for also the Proof it could be.

Any rumor, and next perhaps not any promise either, for still only nature for that of steadfast, for only shoulders for that of such.

If nature could be just a single thing, next also easy to explain for that of complete meaning, except only not any just here.

So, slap my hands for still only lack of abilities, for not any nature for just only sense, when that of just proper.

What level is next that of set, for only just defined, and still only set or made, for that of just proper.

Next Creation is still fruitful, for only meant to be, for not any part of the whole picture it should be either.

But rather that of Revelation instead, and next it becomes two eyes, for just showing in the face.

"To be or not to be", and next also what it became meant, for only precise or exact meaning.

Any Fallacies, and next only incomplete, for not any complete or fulfilled it should be instead.

Oh sag, for just fingers, and next posting here, for not waiting to any later, for just the moment it could be.