This is not going to be any right, because for even the Strong nuclear Force, it now became Strong interaction, and here opening up the box for Behavior of the strong force, without reading anymore here.

And next the address bar goes away here, so I will have to go back, for a possible edit.

After more than 16 years with this project, I do not find time wasting any such thing on laughter and ridicule, when we rather should be here, in order to make a possible comprehension of nature, for just its meaning, because the Force of gravity should eventually mean Newton for this, and not Einstein.

Like a twist and shout, you could sometimes be a liar as well, meaning that you could be cheating.

If you could be having Laws for that of nature, you could also make it Equations as well, except for still a disciple supposed to follow his leader, except not making it any discipline either, for that of a tenet.

If rather a controversy about a subject, we also should know that there could be possible disagreement.

But obviously, by just reading through, we could be making it a Premise here.

Allegory (mathematics)

Is it a far bit off, when just the little cf. once being used, if not any other words for the same either?

Perhaps I already used a couple of other words here, except for not making it any dependencies, or juxtaposition either.

Look, I wrote down both Life, and also Metabolism here, in order to return back to here, if not making it any Physics for one thing, and that of Chemistry for the other, except for still the possible mix-up which could still exist between the different subjects.

Better needs a new one here, because apparently hitting the nail on the spot when making it that of a Relation, for also Rekational theory, because when not my favourite or best subject for that of any databases, I could be still giving it a smile, in that any Logic should not be any Relational algebra or Arithmetics either.

Prove the deluge or flood, and you are supposed to be using Logic for such a thing, except not any counting either, for also the mentioned point that Physics and Chemistry could be still two different things.

The little "=" should mean an Implication, except for not making it any Logic either, and checking in, apparently it becomes the little thing here already being mentioned.

Perhaps I should go for the sausage today.

So, for that of a world in motion, raise your hand and swear your Oath, except for still the Laws of nature initially thought of, which could be affecting the individual elements of nature, by just influencing or affecting their separate properties.

Read the fine print here, for just writing it, and next all over, for that of a complete understanding, but you are perhaps able to catch the meaning.

An Equation, like E=mc2, is supposed to be having constants, if not making it any variables either, except for not Algebra either, for the cumbersome way of coming up with a final answer.

If any Energy should rather be that of Thermodynamics instead, perhaps we already should know, or it could be interpreted, except for perhaps not any Axioms being written in such a way either, when it rather could be a statement.

Also perhaps rather a declaration, if not any statement.

So, while still not in the late evening either, for that of a celebration party, perhaps time now to be left struck in awe by that of a nature in front of us, and what it could be having to offer?

In short, making it true, for also false, should always mean AND, except not any OR, or XOR, for at least one of the propositions to be true.

Deductive reasoning

Not checked here yet, but guessing that it should be so, except for not any Falsification being just a matter of fact, in order to make things even worse, and not better.

Complement (Set theory) - versus that of NOT, for that of Logic.

Algebra

Moebius function

If a second degree equation (word being asked for), because here not an Equation, is not supposed to be any Algebra either, could you rather make it an Axiom instead, only because it could be a description for that of the living world?

Or did both Newton and Einstein make it both Laws and Equations for that of an Universe which could be thought of and next also observed?

Here both these men are using Mathematics as a tool, only because it could be making for an interpretation of our relative surroundings.

The X at the left, for that of Algebra, should tell that it could be a variable, only because it could consist of several factors at the right, except for still the expression in the middle for that of similarity.

But still that A AND B should hold, for at least one logical proposition being true, and here perhaps wrong, if not any OR, or XOR instead, except for still not any arithmetic expression either.

I leave it there for now.

If rather flowers instead, for that of a bit of music, I looked up Symbiosis in the Wikipedia, except for perhaps having no more to say.

In my opinion, extraterrestrials are still not any humans either, but also that there does not exist any criteria for the way such things could be interpreted.

And with my little handheld one, now it became one ready to report, while the rest, except for still three running, got computation error again, without any new tasks coming my way.

Keeping a tab on it.

Just a short one right now before going to bed, because here a quite hot day.

There is currently a problem in my house, while I am also watching the news, but if rather having a pre-made dinner today, perhaps no need for any recipe, when you have to do it yourself.

Having pancakes for dinner, is not the dish of chicken and rice, but rather that you could think that a couple of Laws and Equations could be for a general purpose.

So while a correspondence could also be making for an equality, perhaps no need of mixing the two dishes, except that a formula could rather be an Equation made up of several elements.

If for some reason you are unable to link any of these elements with another, you could get a possible mismatch, except that certain elements were also not meant for a different purpose.

Is it just easy to make it that of magnetism, when also that of light, and next think it should be Electromagnetism for the whole thing?

Earlier on, there was a project with the name of uFluids, but if still not any Thermodynamics, someone were having fun, in just thinking that time could be a dynamic Force, which could fluctuate, in what could be a gravitational field of sorts.

Except for still not forgetting any viscocity, for also Weak interaction as a whole, apparently that both Thermodynamics and Viscocity are part of Electromagnetism, as a Fundamental Force of nature, except for that above.

Namely the thing that Einstein was always on his own, and was only relying on Newton, for that of his thinking, but rather that he came up with a notion of time, which rather should be an equality or juxtaposition for that of matter and energy, when the speed of light, two times, or twice, for that of potentiation, also became added.

You may be able to natice that it should be m here, and not M, while still E on the left side, followed by c2.

The way electric current could be distributed on Earth, could be making for a grid, but rather that time could be a dynamic Force, and next also be running in possible spirals.

So if perhaps part of, or visible, for only that of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, where could it next be found, or reappear?

Are the four Fundamental Forces of nature independent of each other, or could it perhaps be that the Force of gravity could be hidden within, or running across the other Equations, by just being represented in their parts?

When perhaps that of Algebra at first, I could end up making it a Derivative as well, except for still not any famous Equation, which could be telling about given properties of space.

So while looking up the subject of Analogy, also a thought about both Life and Metabolism, for only a bit of Chemistry.

Astrobiology could be going for a different name right now, but if our place among the stars, should be only our sun, there are also billions of others still to choose among.

Darwin could be making it "mutual selection among species", except not any hybrid either, and here that of a breed, for a similar feature, had to be looked up using the book, because here that of XOR was also on my mind.

You really do need that of neurons in a brain, for that of both Conscience and Mind, as well as just Intelligence, except for not any freefall needed either, for rather making it an extraterrestrial.

Philosophical anthropology could perhaps be only part of the issue, if still thinking you could be using your brain, but except for the Lobes of the brain, for that of its Physical part, and Functionality, other things could be pushed away, for only a guessful wishing.

If still only two legs for that of standing, should I rather make it four legs instead, or even a binary star, or perhaps a red dwarf instead, for only coming up with the fact that we perhaps are not alone in space, except for leaving the question still unanswered.

So, if not any make and break either, rather pick a choice for each part of the story, when it rather could be the different elements which could be making up nature.

The Black Hole could be the hidden monster in the cores of galaxies, while you could still be entering the Church, for only that of a Belief, except for not thinking that the Laws of nature should be making one thing possible, while perhaps not the other.

For one thing we could perhaps be making it a common denominator for a couple of things, except for still splitting up those elements in their respective parts, for only that of an insight, but if the Laws of nature should be equal to the way things sometimes could be working, just that such things as Events and Coincidences happen to be two such examples.

---

If just only "In the flesh", for that of a material world, next that you do not have to be an atheist, or agnostic, in order to make it any "Stairways to Heaven" either, but rather that levels of Intelligence should be measured with respect to nature, as we happen to know it.

The alien interview could perhaps have been shortened a bit, but I caught that of Myth being mentioned.

So except for perhaps a Dogma, which could also be that of a prejudice, or bias, why not just interpret nature for a given purpose, and just forget the other things?

But if you did not catch it, I am not in here in order to prove any extraterrestrials, for also the possible opposite, when just keying in Logical truth, makes for yet another article.

Just having two legs for that of standing, also that any DNA is not supposed to make you able to think either, but rather should be the basic reason for your personality, as well as your physical appearance.

Any separation between life and death, should be that of death itself, except for not making such a thing a Construct either, for that of a possible intermediate state.

For this, life should be that of spirits, while death should be only that of a stone, except for perhaps Matter a thing which could be still defined, for only its given properties.

Could we rather assume a connection or link, for that of the physical and the Metaphysical, we could also be making it the Aura, which could also be your soul.

But if rather still a notion of Heaven and Hell, for only that of nature, also that of a divine entity possible which could be representing an ultimate Ascent to a heavenly place.

While both Viscocity and Thermodynamics could be part of Weak interaction, also that Credible evidence should be just a tool, or perhaps a Method, in order to come up with the fact that we may not be alone in space.

Just on the spot, perhaps the Method of Proof should be only a tool for such a thing, except for not making it any final Truth either, for that of a conclusion.

If possibilities should not be any Logic either, only that we could be unable to prove the answer we could be still wishing for.

---

Except for the little add-on, it apparently took off a little, but also that slamming a door, could be telling about possible anger, except for only a bit of luck being felt, when escaping an avalanche.

While still not your best bedroom partner, a possible alien could be making such a thing as love and compassion the most important thing for that of life, except for perhaps that of hatred for a bigger meaning.

Except for perhaps the same voice for both question and answer, an interpreter could still make two people understand each other except a contactee being an interface for something which could be from another world, and once again I am confusing any Religion with that of science.

If such a thing as hatred should be part of a material world, also any good offerings or deeds you could be able to make, should not be any net neutrality either, in order to place yourself just in between.

If a Commandment should tell that you should not hate, perhaps not any opposite either, except for that of a nature being made up of Laws and Equations, for its possible meaning.

Only adding such a thing as Norms, could still be telling about a couple of things you could adhere to, except still not slipping on any ice either.

Could objects, for also any similar Abstracts, be having any value for its possible representation or meaning?

Still early morning here, and I need the cup of coffee first.

A brick of stone could be still only a dead thing, for its material composition, except for not any entities made up of instinct and aggression, perhaps not making for any specific level for that of any Intelligence either.

Skipping that of Conscience a couple of times, it could be tempting do add such a thing, for that of possible levels of Intelligence, when possibly surpassing that of our own.

But rather that such a thing could be still nature per se, except for not making it any Logic instead.

Look at the correct subject for this, where one thing could be deduced from that of another, and here I do not have the correct name right now.

If the subject of Mathematics could be deduced from only that of Logic itself, perhaps not the same as interpreting any Religion either.

For now, the Wikipedia makes it only Argument here, when it should be in the context of Logic or Philosophy.

So why still not any such thing as Fallacies either, why could we perhaps be using Mathematics as a tool in order to interpret a possible nature?

WYSIWYG should be still that of such a thing, except for not interpreting a couple of things, from only the Force of gravity, when it could rather be other Forces involved.

Butter on bread perhaps, for already being mentioned, but thinking that there could be a blue planet around another star, perhaps still wishful thinking, except for any similarity being just only a coincidence, when we also could make it something else.

Once again a bit of poor language, for that of a line wrap, but if still only standing, you could also be brave at times, for only that of an options galore, and next any ideas which could be coming up in your head.

Just as an example, we could be making it an order of magnitude for a couple of things, except for still the mentioned coffee.

Could a couple of stories being told, be having any validness, for also that of any credibility, except for the little naught you sometimes could be, except not any fool either?

Remember the little figure having a peek outside of the seven spheres, for that of an understanding, and next perhaps not the same as any World view or Outlook either, because I do not like this Terminology.

But rather that the world could still be quantified, for that of its material constituent, except for not any levels of Intelligence and Conscience you could also be making of it.

If any Laws of Probability should make us believe in any aliens, also that of similar Laws and Equations for such a thing, except for the one who could be coming from the stars, in order to be offering a possible Mercy.

If still only the little story for this, which not everyone wish to believe, where is our Father supposed to be, for only that of God, when nature could end up being an open subject, for that of its interpretation?