Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 143 · 144 · 145 · 146 · 147 · 148 · 149 . . . 334 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2005993 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 12:51:14 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 12:59:25 UTC

A bit funny, but an Ambiguation should also be a similar Disambiguation, for that of looking up the subject.

It also refers back to Plausibility and Certainty as well, but next that the first lookup was more in line with a given thinking.

If such a thing as Axioms could only be a different way of making it just Laws, also the fact that an Ambiguity and also Contradiction, is not the same subject either, when also that of Consequence could be a subject, and for this also Logic consequence.

Is matter still only the thing we could be doing it, or could we also be making it energy, for also the Force of gravity as well, only because we should know that there should be both Laws and Equations linking the respective parts of each subject?

Or is it rather that you could still only stumble, for also "Knock on the wood", when still left with a couple of things unanswered, and therefore still remains to be asked?

One thing is still that of adhering to a scientifical concept, for that of thinking, when it rather could be a Religious notion for a couple of things instead, except for the still better words also available here.
ID: 2005993 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2005999 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 13:14:38 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 13:28:17 UTC

A bit of poor language perhaps, but next that you do not have to make it any electrical distribution along a grid either, for that of any Logical fallacies which could be possible.

If humans still are a product of nature, perhaps true, except for still interpreting any such nature in a context for that of a wider understanding.

Perhaps we are misunderstanding nature, for also a misconception, when only making it Religion for that of a subject, where things rather could be flowing freely, without any given borders between each respective part, because death could be only a Construct, except for not any Love and Compassion coming from a given Hell.

We know that the culprit could also be making for the possible scapegoat, except for our senses of feeling guilt, and also remorse, when still no such things as Laws and Equations needed.
ID: 2005999 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006002 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 13:48:23 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 13:50:54 UTC

Perhaps any destruction, when also that of a damnation, could be still that of Matter versus Religion once again, except for still the hanging lines, for also a couple of other words being looked up.

Again, that a betterment should not be for any bad either, but rather the way in which it could be told.

Corresponding to, should not be any opposite to either, except for perhaps such a thing in my dictionary, when looking up different words, but except for that, I am not supposed to be confusing the Devil, when rather be looking in the face of God instead.

Both Laws and also Equations, are meant to be used like tools, for only what they could mean, except for not necessarily be telling about any Truth, for that of Logic either, so here you could be still looking for the face of God, if this should be the thing you could be wishing.
ID: 2006002 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006003 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 14:03:52 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 14:12:07 UTC

So if perhaps not any face in the mirror, for not anything behind a wall either, for only that of being hidden, in that both an Ambiguity, as well as a Contradiction, could be hiding the actual meaning from view, and therefore make us unable to tell the answer.

Either be the atheist or agnostic you could happen to be, for only that of everything just coming out of nothing, or that we should believe in possible aliens for only a just Cause, except for perhaps not thinking about ourselves either.

Being unable to return a given answer, should be having its own Term, or wording, but here not being in front of me, except for perhaps not any speechless either.

Negation
ID: 2006003 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006005 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 14:27:29 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 14:28:40 UTC

When also looking up that of Fact in the Wikipedia, I probably mentioned that a Cause not necessarily should be any Causality either.

But rather that the word Reason could be the fine word here, except for waiting to the evening here for a bit more.

If perhaps such a thing not being any Etymology either, what if rather just only a notion of Hell could make you able to understand nature, and not making it any "sweet dreams" either?
ID: 2006005 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006008 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 14:47:41 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 14:56:30 UTC

You do have both higher-order thinking, and also higher-order logic, if not wrong, for that of two different subjects, next curiously thinking whether any notion of God could be possible, for only the tools we could be having.

Please tell me about my place for that of living in nature, for only that of the birds and bees, except that it sometimes could also go wrong, except not making it any Construct, also here.

If a given or specific property of nature should not be the one it perhaps could be, next back at Rationality, for only that of rational thinking, because Consequence should be that of Inconsequence, when that of the opposite or inverse.

Twisting around, for that of Irrationality, like also converse, and it could end up spinning around, for the words they are supposed to be.
ID: 2006008 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006015 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 15:58:00 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 16:03:35 UTC

I feel a bit inclined or hesitant here, except for not being any familiar with George Washington either, perhaps we should know the way violence sometimes could be incited, and also the way it could be dealt with.

Pouring hot ash into an open fire, could be making for a possible lightning storm, or even conflagration, except for not only the small branches of leaves, when only a heavy trunk could be the better, because just spitting on a burning fire will not help either.

Right-wing extremists, could end up being tyrants, except for only the police doing its job, and preventing any further violence.

If perhaps only just hatred, it could also be that of lack of knowledge, except for still the senseless act of violence, making for blood being spilt across the streets.

So if perhaps not any excuse here either, could hatred be replaced with that of despair, only because a friend, or family member could be lost?

At least it could hurt when such a thing happens, but any remorse should be coming from God, with respect to the victims, except for still the bit of Fanaticism that could be showing up in the face of the perpetrator, unless no such thing either.
ID: 2006015 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006017 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 16:06:32 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 16:10:51 UTC

One minor annoyance being noticed, for that of sliding down a little, for that of a posting, or perhaps an edit, when finished with editing.

Checking, and it should be that of editing here.
ID: 2006017 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006019 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 16:31:02 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 16:33:59 UTC

But if not just spinning around either, it also became the woman wiping a couple of tears, for only expressing her sense of shock, when also anger, if still only sorrow being the thing felt.

If rather Mentality instead, perhaps no such thing as tears, when rather a couple of wings, for that of updraft and wind, when next paying a visit to the skies, for that of experiencing the unknown, when also that of excitement and joy could be possible, for also a delight.

Oh, those absolutes once again, except for not stepping on someones toes either, when it rather should be running up the stairs for a couple of things, and therefore no reason for wishing any widow any good blessing either.
ID: 2006019 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006020 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 16:40:24 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 16:48:20 UTC

We could leave it to the cold-blooded killer for the act of aggression he could be carrying out, except for the one having a motionless face, for that of any science which could be carried out, because next you are not supposed to be any coward either.

We know that a social aspect is not always any cognitive intuition either, except for still running late at times, when you rather should be early.

Look again back at what I said for that of seeking answers, when next also asking, except for not the precise wording in front of me.
ID: 2006020 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006024 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 16:57:20 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 17:44:33 UTC

But rather abide by the Laws again, except for such things being given in your hands either, because for only that of a magnitude, you could be seeking a couple of answers, when it should also be that of a quest for such a thing.

God is perhaps not speaking with two tongues either, except for sometimes hiding between a mirror, or being invisible, for also the ambiguity or equivocation it could also represent.

Because of that, we could end up concluding a couple of Facts, when it rather could end up being inconclusive, or futile.
ID: 2006024 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006026 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 17:14:02 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 17:18:18 UTC

Could the Universe be having a self-Conscience, or perhaps Mind, except for only ourselves making it God, by means of that of Religion?

We could still make it that of governance, except for not any steering wheel or rudder for that of nature, except for only thinking that the Laws should be for the way it could be working, and not the way it became created.
ID: 2006026 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006028 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 17:36:02 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 17:45:50 UTC

Both that of Construct (philosophy), as well as also Psychology is next being visited, because I chose to skip the latter earlier on.

But really that it blows for what the subject could have to say, except for the one thing which could be slipping away, for only catching the whole meaning.

Funny, but if perhaps a bit better than ourselves, why not tell the Truth as well, when it rather should be the answer?

Are civilizations still just one thing, for that of space, except for still only a notion for that of a higher level of Conscience or Mind, which could go for the possible divine, when perhaps a different room for that of living, for just God, and here that of Eternity, except for still not any Wormholes either.
ID: 2006028 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006032 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 18:02:41 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 18:17:22 UTC

Looking around for both order and magnitude, I find that Nature (philosophy), perhaps could be the better one to read.

While also that of Cosmos, for that of the Universe, we could also be making it that of Fundamentals, for only the questions we wish could be answered.

If just only a sloping "v" could be that of two lanes meeting into a single intersection, it becomes that of a merge or join, except not any "U" instead, for only a Logical OR, because I could rather end up confusing it with that of Sets instead, which was perhaps not the thing being intended.

By the way, why could I end up getting it right here, when it rather could be the opposite way, and here that of Logical conjunction, for that of AND, OR, and NOT, which ends up a negation instead.
ID: 2006032 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006037 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 18:23:55 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 18:24:40 UTC

Anyway, but for just the producer-consumer problem, for that of any dishes, rather that some people here do not believe in any aliens, except for the strict Methods we could use in order to come up with an answer.

So while still blaming a couple of things on nature, apparently still not any Consensus for the thing which we seek being answered.
ID: 2006037 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006039 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 18:37:22 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 18:41:18 UTC

But rather bite my toes instead, because for the previous, you will have to key in and also show some Intuition.

Namely the fact that Stephen Hawking could be giving the answer, while I might be unable to do so, only because Sets should be about quantities, and not necessarily the way they should interact with each other.

Believing the idiot could still be a possibility, except for such one not any fool either, and therefore no reason of adding two infinities, for just only the same.
ID: 2006039 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006040 - Posted: 6 Aug 2019, 19:02:04 UTC
Last modified: 6 Aug 2019, 19:06:25 UTC

You do not want me in Number crunching, but if only a bucket for that of my local vendor of computers, I picked up the LGA1151 chipset for the motherboard architecture, for that of currently being in the mood, and next added a processor, which was not the cheapest one either, except for still not ordering.

But next that you also should know why such a thing is not happening either.

Should tell that I really liked the dual socket workstation motherboard, but here the screw went through, and next became bent.

Problem here is that for the new chipset, apparently still only one socket available, at least with my vendor.

And next that my tasks only blows as well.
ID: 2006040 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006126 - Posted: 7 Aug 2019, 11:18:55 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2019, 11:39:32 UTC

Perhaps it should not be any qbit here either, for only a computer, because here rather that of science.

Rather the question why we are having Quantum mechanics and that of Black Holes at the same time, except for not only the subject of gravity either.

If the latter could be still only be explained, using Newton's Laws, there should still be elementary particles for that of Quantum mechanics, which could be covered, using one or more of the Fundamental Forces for this, and here Strong interaction, but not necessarily any bosons either.

We still do have the W and X bosons here, which awarded Stephen Weinberg the Nobel Prize.

If gravity could be still warping space, it could also be for just warping time, except for still such a field, for making it a Black Hole instead.

In a wallet there could be several holder slots for each credit card, except not any different objects for their separate meanings either, only because it could be different Laws.

While photons could be making for heat coming from the sun, a Black Hole should be that of matter, and therefore particles, except for still the Force of gravity which could be involved.

Making it rather that of Quantum world once again, and you still could think that it should be only that of Matter, except for the intrinsic properties of an object, in the way in which it could be made.
ID: 2006126 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006127 - Posted: 7 Aug 2019, 11:38:00 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2019, 11:42:14 UTC

Should also tell that I got a reply for my question about the shopping basket with my computer vendor, telling that it could be a decent choice, except for perhaps the power supply more of 1000 W, rather than 1200 W, but here more sticking with the original choice, for only the two server cards still lying around.

But also that I am not in any hurry of buying either.
ID: 2006127 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7036
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2006132 - Posted: 7 Aug 2019, 12:01:07 UTC
Last modified: 7 Aug 2019, 12:42:39 UTC

When my father was still alive, he used to be working with the national oil company here, for just the purchase department.

But for that of making an invoice, he had to put the pencil away, for that of a step by step approach when next at a computer terminal instead.

If such a thing as step by step, rather should be that of design and prototyping, versus implementation, for that of project management, we also should know that the Laws of nature could be that of such a thing being set forth, for only that of coming into life, and next also motion, except not making it any Existence either.

Beware the wolf, but except for not any "In the beginning either", whether or not, or regardless of any science, do you make it just another shelf or table for that of your stuff, only because it could slide off at times, and ending up on the floor?

I need to look up that of qbit, for that of its meaning, except for perhaps not confusing one subject for another, when only about just a given world for its explanation, or perhaps interpretation, and for this reason that we still could also be making it science.
ID: 2006132 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 143 · 144 · 145 · 146 · 147 · 148 · 149 . . . 334 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.