https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy_(disambiguation)

I already wrote one for that of that just above, but next perhaps a little long, so leaving it alone for now.

Ending up here at 9:20 PM in the evening, after a bit of a rough break in between, including also the shopping trip.

It could perhaps be added that we also could make it acceptance for also Norms as well, just only subjects as well, except for still the Man in the Street,
for the way we could perhaps balance a couple of things, except for still rather weigh in either.

Speaking of a travel, next also a journey as well, and if perhaps so, also a Cosmological journey as well, for only an adventure.

So, does the fish always bite, except for not any catch either, when just only out fishing, except not any name for a person either?

Persona non grata, for at least some people, and next also people being forgotten, except not any stories being told, for also making it still nature what it is,
for only that of readily Facts.

Any bitter and sweet, and perhaps not any coconut either, for rather a love story instead (no pun intended).

But rather we could end up make it science for just one thing versus another, and think it could be the same, for only just science, except for not any Methods for the same,
which could be still telling different things.

I could have the story about gravity for you, like also a given story about Heaven and Hell, and except for still only noticing, for also reading,
it could sometimes be believing as well, for only a given Fact.

One given way could always be telling one such thing, except for not the other either, when still that of a Premise, for also Truth, when at least that of an answer,
for only revealing a possibility, in order to make a thing still true.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tandem

Here coming up with me just now, and here also wishing for the even better picture, for that of some two people riding a bicycle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism

Why not that of Dualistic principle here instead, for only that of nature, or did it perhaps go down the drain, for just vanish or disappear?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duality

Here wave-particle duality, if you did not already know, but here also other subjects being offered, for that of other possibilities.

When I first heard about the Schrodinger equation, I mistook it for the cat, for only Schrodinger's cat.

If perhaps not any particle physics, for only that of a subject, one first idea, for next also on the spot, is that of making it Empirical here, for just only wording.

Being afraid, and you sometimes could be falling as well, so why still question such a thing as Intelligence, for only that of stupidity, when it could also be geniality as well,
for only that of intellectuality, if not any brilliance either, for next only mind?

Feeling good of sorts, if still saying so, if perhaps not making it either, but if still questioning, could you also be doubting as well, for only that of a fact, except for still any
brilliant mind, for that of a genius, where possible answers could also be found, and next returned back?

Really the question could still be for that of an answer, except for still not any opposite, for that of vice versa, but do you next think Einstein is rather stupid,
for perhaps only disliking, or mistrusting him, except perhaps not hating either?

"Reveal yourself", for a couple of things, and it could still be the Revelation here as well, except for still asking whether this could be for good or bad,
for next only the Devil, when it perhaps could be still God.

The more, the better, and for that also betterment as well, except for still not any infinity, for just numbers, but next rather seeing stars instead,
you could perhaps be drunk, except for not any "stupendous", when still only that of betterment, except for perhaps not any "Out of your mind".

Quantifying should still be for that of numbers, and next you could make it Belief still the other thing, for perhaps making it God instead, for also Jesus.

Except for also stupendous, also that of tribulation, for next also joy as well, when checking in with the other draft I have.

If perhaps so, I could end up still here, for only a science we perhaps could not believe, for next not think of either.

Could I make it just provability a winner here, for only that of a game, except for not quantizing instead, for that of numbers?

Really, having a gun against your head, for that of the trigger, and you also should know the result, except for still that of a 50/50 chance, for that of likelihood.

Rather we make it a final chapter instead, for that of an ultimate end, because we could know the final result, for only outcome, except not any guess for
such a thing either, when next only lying in a grave.

Of course, you could weigh in with the Consequences, for only doing such a fact, for also deed, but if still only that of an Event, for also result,
do you perhaps make it any better, for rather worse, when still only quantifying, for only that of numbers?

Probability should still tell about a likelihood, except for not any ultimate end, for only that of a Consequence.

Do we know it for only just Fact, when perhaps making a farewell with a close one, for only that of death next happening, and also the sorrow which could follow?

A tightrope walker could always weigh up his chances, for only that of in the ring, for that of survival, except for still not stuck on any Probability,
for being lost out of any mind.

Perhaps a bit hard to explain that above, but we could still make it the Drake equation here, for only a Probabilistic argument, except for not the Man in the Street,
for only guesswork, or perhaps only dreaming.

Yes, perhaps also Nobody's fool as well, except for not any fear, when just only anguish, because if still that of Proof, for also Evidence,
it could also be that of counterproof as well, for next not believing a single thing, for just only Fact.

So, betterment is perhaps still that of a way of quantizing, except for perhaps not only numbers either, but rather that of just "brilliance" instead.

We also have the word opaque here, for also the word luminescence, which I tried making a link of.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminescence

So, the rest of it perhaps now, for only the second part of the story.

Perhaps not any brilliance either, for only a short break.

Or could we still make it Creation myth here, for only that of Creation itself?

Except for only the Butterfly effect, we could be making it that of "anguish", for only such a thing as mood, except not any celebration either.

Any state of mind, for perhaps not any speech either, for also State of the Union as well, and still perhaps only speechless.

Still hard to explain, for also difficult as well, and here on the spot, also that of union, for that of Sets, except for the Joint set being mentioned before,
or previously.

Now I am late, but getting to it here that just "-" should perhaps mean -1, for only that of a number, except for not any NOT, for that of Probability.

Perhaps rather a negation instead, because for that of a union (Logical AND, for perhaps rather Sets), like also the flip-over, for rather the hat,
it could become that of a joint once again (Logical OR, for also that of Sets).

Here I was thinking, for also wondering, whether Einstein perhaps was riding any bandwagon, except no such thing as "Ancient aliens" either.

At least Set theory should be that of Mathematics, for only a part (not that part), but rather that we could end up making it still only a story by just believing,
except for not any proving, for only a certain Fact either.

So, if perhaps still riding high, also that of a complement as well, for only a certain gratitude, except for not any rise and shine, for that of out of bed,
when perhaps only an uplifting, except not any One's complement either (Logical NOT).

Perhaps mathematicians could still be stealing the show here, for that of their advantage for just only proving, because here that of just carry along, except for not any trust me,
for only that of Facts, when perhaps rather that of Stairways to Heaven.

sight
countenance
face
presence

Why not just make it ugly instead, for a couple of things, except for still not any "Reveal yourself", for only that of Religion instead?

glorification
aggrandizement
extol

Did you ever hear the Pope using such words, for also the church?

Perhaps Fanaticism could still be telling about a deed, for also a sake as well, except not any renunciation either.

Except for perhaps only a blue star, for rather a yellow star instead, for that of the sun still shining, except for the other thing we perhaps could make for Heavens.

MIA still stands for "Missing in Action", except not any listed, and here you also have music by Vangelis as well, for only that of "Missing".

Little blue angel instead, and perhaps only nonsense, except for not any readily Facts either.

Think of the science we could make it (UFO's perhaps) and next we could only laugh about it, except for not pretending it to be, for only just a fact either.

Counterpart, for also that of correspondence (except for still perhaps not), and some of us could be on the track of just proving for science,
when perhaps still only Evidence.

So, perhaps still the nightingale for a couple of things, except not singing a song either, where is perhaps the Swan, for only a constellation,
except for perhaps rather a music piece instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nocturne

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cygnus

Except for not any simplex either, for rather that of complex, when only a decease instead, except not any Principle, because if perhaps still a Principle,
also a Method as well, for rather a simplistic Principle.

Needs going back for that of checking here, because I probably made it Dualistic here in the past for a couple of things, including that of waveforms.

Do I see any "Dualistic" approach, for also an explanation, when still only that of nature, for that of a Fact?

Perhaps Einstein made it time only, for also Matter and Energy as well, except for not making it any "Forces" either, for each or separate one.

Next only "Buttocks and oats", for that of eating too much, and perhaps you know that as well.

The Internet could still be a superhighway of sorts, for just ending up so, but if perhaps such a thing, do you next make it any likelihood, for only just an answer,
except for still questioning Probability itself?

Perhaps still only Sirius for the star which could be shining, except for not any luminosity, for any brilliance, but next make it opaqueness, for that of luminescence,
and I am perhaps still just only a silly idiot?

Oh, close to heart, for at least your pet dog, except for still not any sun shining down on you, for just your face, and where is next science in all of this?

Could we perhaps make of Creation the thing we perhaps should think, except for still not any believe?

Perhaps rather love instead, for that of a moment of Truth, except for not questioning life either, for only that of possibilities.

Those things we could value, for also think it could be worth, could still be that of life, for only that of its meaning.

Therefore perhaps life an "Essence" for such (needs checking), except for still those questions being asked, for only that of life after death.

Always a gift for that of your birthday, and it needs to be unpacked in the usual way, for only a package, if not any paper either.

But is life perhaps of any meaning, for also significance, except not any value either, for only that of quantizing?

I always could make it 0 with respect to perhaps 5, for also 5 versus 100, in a similar way, but if perhaps such a thing as Afterlife,
for that of Eternity, in which way do you perhaps "quantize" death, except for still the thing it could be worth?

Heisenberg could still make it part versus whole for a couple of things, and except for still perhaps any infinity, should I rather make it any angels instead,
for only that of Eternity?

So, just two toes for that of a Dualistic Principle, for also Method, except what the heck.

Here I made it that of Cause, when shortly away, for also briefly, and of course the other thing fell out of my mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Is perhaps Logic, for rather only numbers instead, that of 0 versus 1, or should it still be only infinity?

Knock on wood, for making it just Logic the thing it perhaps could be, except for not any Truth, for only such a thing itself.

The little angel you still could be making Einstein, except not any stupidity, for just a fool, could also be that of making it "Relativistic effects",
for also such a thing, or rather purpose.

Here I know that it still could be that of light versus dark, except for not any dark chamber, for just only fog either, because here you know that I was struck on
the fact that perhaps no such a thing as a Prism needed either, for only making it an elementary particle visible, by means of its characteristics, for also attributes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boson

Here the general principle only, except for not any Higgs boson either, for just only the 'God particle'.

But also that I am supposed to lift an elementary particle, for only that of its weight, so here perhaps not any sorrow either, for just a renunciation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief

For Christ sake, perhaps do not tell me such a thing either, except for not any split personality either, when we sometimes could be dealing with Religion.

Is it perhaps only the constellation of Vela here, or could it rather be that of a veil, for just a disguise?

Mentioned before, but ending up perhaps thinking that a famous Equation could also be next for another meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_equation

Stupid and fine, and next also ugly as well, except for the mentioned "encompass" which should also be meant for that of including, rather than perhaps implying,
when next for that of a given whole (not necessarily infinity), but rather the thing you could be making of it instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct

Next fine, for perhaps not wiping your feet clean either, when next entering in.

Make it dark for also white just colors, and next only the celestial sky, except for still not any splendor which you could be calling the Heavens.

Is dark still only a color, for just so, next perhaps emptiness as well, for only the celestial sky?

If only the color of black, could be that of a Construct, perhaps also only laugh as well, for only Creation, when perhaps still only visible dots,
for that of stars visible in the sky (again Luminescence).

To good to be true, for just only the Pleiades, if perhaps not any Hyades either, except for perhaps the naught, for also Dreadnought.

I really could end up here making it the thing for next the Universe, still the thing which perhaps needs to be explained, for only that of science,
except for sometimes the dreamer around, for making it just marvelous, for just splendid.

Of course, see you later if perhaps something else catching my mind instead, because here the fool I still perhaps, for only making it general,
when it still could be that of "absolutes", for only such a principle.

Again it fell out just above, and next do not think I am any stupid either.

The question we always could ask ourselves, is the one of whether or not we are alone, for also alone in space,
except for those institutions dealing with science, for also politicians making for a confused world.

Now I am having the rest of the beer here, for also the potato chip, so here a bit of leisure time, but if still only a simple question,
is this perhaps still meant for only an idea, or could it rather be basic principles for just an understanding?

Certainty is perhaps not necessarily for sure either, except for rather always, in at least you could be making up a Fact, for only presenting a case.

Weigh a question for still also an answer, and the answer is perhaps a solution to a problem, except for the problem still only unsolved.

Any fools, for sometimes stupid as well, and you could also be having the genius as well, except for still rejecting a couple of possibilities,
when answers could still be possible.

Any notion of time you perhaps may have, and next that of time travel as well, for only that of space, except for still only a grave, for that of a burial.

A work unit being checked on yesterday, had one of the tasks quite much in error, for only that of spikes, while the one for myself did not get any such thing,
but except for that, also a couple of short runs at times right now, for only 'shorties'.

Also noticing the vase in the desert, for also a couple of other pictures, except for still not any Ying and Yang, for that of a double face.

Mirror face perhaps, for also such a thing as a half moon, when it rather could be sideways, for also bottoms up, and you could end up in a bathtub.

Except for perhaps still only part versus whole for a couple of things, when also that of such a thing, for only a bath, because the knowledge we may have,
is perhaps not any circus either.

One thing is still a sense of making it the intelligent signal we perhaps might never detect, for also our way of interpreting possible results,
because if the Ambiguity, for also Contradiction, could still be such a circus, for not always telling a given Fact, for sometimes also Truth,
we definitely are not able to conclude either.

So, if perhaps not any failure, for only a bankruptcy, when only an economic issue, could just the open hand be also such a possibility, for only a door wide open?

Here that of Gridcoin for being a partner when it comes to that of number crunching at PrimeGrid, except for not any Joker for the Man in Black either,
when perhaps rather a Faceless coward.

We definitely could value life for what it perhaps is worth, and also make it precious as well, except for not any other faces of nature, for only other possibilities.

One example of just scientific failure, for also ending up in vain, except for not reading to the end, is that of Cold Fusion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_fusion

Here only cold temperature for also hot, except for still also wondering what life could still just mean, except for not any "Life of Brian" either.

Perhaps it could be the butterfly instead, for that of its wide open wings, but also that we could make it four Fundamental Forces, for only nature itself.

Just only Logic could still make it fools for also geniuses, except for still not the way we could measure such a thing, for only given numbers.

We still should know about events like the Rendlesham Forest, for also the Roswell incident, but also that just wide speculation, is still perhaps not any shut
mouth either, for only that of an openness instead.

Do we next make it just Evidence for also fact, except not any scientific as well, for perhaps only throwing it in the trash, for the value or meaning it could represent?

If still two opposite Forces, for also different ones as well, we could still conclude only one, for just also the other, except for both of these making for something,
for perhaps not repelling, or nullifying the other.

Just throwing a stone into the air, it becomes an arc, when next coming down, for only the Force of gravity, so here the power for just only throwing,
except for also the Force for making the stone returning back to Earth.

If rather a long nail being driven down in the soil, it becomes the vertical Force instead, which could end up canceling itself, for only the energy being lost.

Is life found or present on nearly all stars in the Milky Way, for also the Universe?

Perhaps the answer is no here, for also most likely so, but except for that, we could also make it the reason we could be still here, only a Probabilistic issue,
for only that of chances of life, for only that of likelihood itself.

Perhaps this could be so, for only making it Trilobites, except not any Garden of Eden, for only the sin you could perhaps make.

The thing which we still could be making up the weather, for also earthquakes as well, could be that of complex processes, for also mechanisms,
like also Fluids, for that of viscosity, except for also that of Quantum mechanics for such a thing, when it also could be the Force of gravity as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluid_dynamics

At least getting to the second Law of gravity, by Newton here, for only that of complexity, except for not any relativistic effects either,
for also that of Quantum mechanics.

I do not have it in front of me the total number of stars in globular clusters like M13, and Omega Centauri, but guessing it could be a couple hundred thousand stars.

Questioning any likelihood, for just asking, perhaps no reason of making it any fools for also geniuses, when perhaps only counting, when such a thing could also be only numbers.

Is it not the fact that you could estimate the probable number of civilizations, for also intelligent as well, by only using the Drake equation, and next a globular cluster for such?

If just making it only ourselves, could still only be that of Statistics, for only the Laws of nature making such a thing possible, at least we should know we could be still here.

We know that there could be some 52 cards in a deck of cards, but on the spot, I do not know how many cards there could be on a single hand, except for not any hearts,
for just only spades, when perhaps two players only.

Is the thing you never may answer, that of Ambiguity, for also Contradiction, except for still not any Uncertainty either?

Perhaps a will could be just a testimony only, except for sometimes the push of just a free will, for only carrying a thing through, for also making it forth,
because here that Creation myth could perhaps be that of a world being set in motion, for only a wish coming through.

Ready, set, go. and next also Instantiation for the same thing, which we also could be making it the Big Bang as well, for only the start of everything.

Perhaps science could still be that of results and accomplishments, except for also that of Proof as well, except for not making it any silent moment,
for only the things we could be still knowing.

Is Cold Fusion next unanswered, or could it rather be just unexplained?

We perhaps still not know for that of Relativistic effects, when only that of waves for particles, when also that of Forces, for also given Laws,
but here I made it a Dual principle, for also Dual effect just in the previous.

But next, questioning any infinity, for also that of a possible Afterlife, for just Eternity, and it becomes yet another piece of the puzzle, for also piece of cake.

Time could still be moving slower in a strong gravitational field, with respect to a distant observer, but if perhaps only marginally so,
also gradually as well, for perhaps rather making it just a way nature could be working, for only that of a set principle,
except for still those thing past or beyond explanation, for only that of rough edges.

Looking up, it still becomes that of equate, for also equating, when still only the nail being driven in the soil, and the energy finally becomes lost.

If c is still only a constant, also that of Time dilation here, for just only space, except for not any falling object into a Black Hole, for only that of heavy mass.

Not any streaker for just a princess, except perhaps not you or me either, but if becoming dragged into a Black Hole, for also being pulled,
you could end up only a thin line, for just that of a streak.

Are physical Laws next different, only because they could fit a certain purpose, except for still not only the Creation it could be meant to be?

If such a thing as making a thing a reality, for only carrying it out into practice, we also could be making it just "setting forth", when perhaps rather Creation myth.

So, if perhaps still also forth, it could be driven as well, and here it could become that of event driven, for such a thing, when perhaps still that of Creation.

Please do not forget that it could be still only the towel, when just having a cold, except for not any slag heap either, when we could choose to dispose of a couple of things.

Because of that, still Conan the destroyer, except for not any destruction, when sometimes also that of just annihilation.

Always diamonds forever, for only just such a thing, except for still the burnt wood, for only a child, when perhaps rather a urn instead, for that of Cremation.

Any skull instead, and sometimes a human skull, if perhaps not any brain either, for also such a thing being part of a dinosaur skeleton.

Here the previous line becomes like that of a lecture, except not any Children's play, for just only given wording, when perhaps not any rotating either,
for that of a 3-D autopsy, when it could be either X-ray, or the other similar method, for just only making it visible.

Just on the spot, I could make it a scanner here for such a thing, and if perhaps lying inside, for only an examination of your body,
it should also be having a name for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomography

Any Carbon dating instead, and perhaps that of making it a date, for also age, when only that of radioactivity, except not any tree rings, for also annual rings,
and sometimes a root, for that of a tree, showing such a thing, for only that of age, when perhaps also growth.

Make it rather Crop circles instead, and I could find a good reason of making such a thing only human made, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crop_circle

The guess, for also assumption, for only making it an external event, for perhaps rather extraterrestrial intelligence instead, could still be just in the blue,
except for still the things we could make science, for only being trusted, for also believed.

We could still end up with the fact that it could still be only clowns for that of a Circus, except for perhaps only ourselves,
but if perhaps rather asking about nature for what it perhaps could mean, next still only questions, except not any answers either.

The thing you could be making a Law, for also Equation, should be that of one such thing only, among many other, when only that of complexity.

Making a thing perhaps true, and it also could be that of a Truth, except for not any false, for any Doubt, when also an Ambiguity, for also Contradiction.

The failure being mentioned before, for rather at the top, is perhaps still only a bankruptcy, except for perhaps not any slip of a hand either, when losing a grip.

Carbon, as an element of the Periodic table, should be known for its high melting temperature, for also cooking as well, except for not any destruction either,
for that of possible annihilation, when we perhaps could know it could become nothing.

But next that Carbon-carbon fusion, could make for perhaps Magnesium, when only 6+6 for such a thing, and next 12, and for that, a thing which could be
happening in heavy stars, for only their cores.

Could I perhaps rather subtract 3 from just 10, and make it 7 here, except for not any Probabilistic equation which could be telling about a possible likelihood?

The thing we could be making a furnace, could also be a nuclear furnace as well, except no such thing as annihilation either, for that of possible destruction.

If such a thing as "We never will meet again", for just only Pink Floyd, still that of melting temperature, for also boiling point, except for also the fusion also possible.

So, perhaps it rather could be the difference between 0 and 1 instead, for only a thing being simple, except for no such thing as complexity involved.

Water still cooks at 100 degrees Celsius, for also boils, except not any melting or boiling point for that of Carbon itself,
except for still thinking that it could be fine, for also easy, when also sometimes cheap as well, for only a given Logic.

Except for perhaps rather making it Relevance instead, for only a relevant fact, and you could end up making a comparison between just only a
couple of colors, for that of a difference, except for still not seeing any stars either.

Could we make it just 7 and 11, for only rows and columns, except not any Laws of Newton, for only that of an ordered sequence, for also lying on a table?

Perhaps we could still make it couple of things worth a shilling, for also a penny, for that of pence, when perhaps making a couple of things for only that of meaning,
except for still only lying in a grave?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penny

Those things which you could be still making facets of nature, for only that of diversity, could be that of objects and entities for such a thing,
for also their respective attributes, when still only different things.

Making it perhaps infinity, for just only numbers, and we could be able to quantize as well, except for still not any unknown factor, for that of a subject.

Heisenberg could still make it part versus whole, for also a circle versus square, except for not any Laws telling about nature, when it could perhaps be a Myth instead.

As an example, an Omen could still be a phenomenon of nature, except for only proving for that of Fact.

So while Religion is still not any science, for only a lack of Proof, except for perhaps not Facts, why could be still making it facets of nature,
when perhaps also Aspects as well?

I could be having the answer in the second part, coming up later on.

With respect to what perhaps.

Here making it the Forces of nature, for also the elementary particles as well, for only their properties, if not any given, or respective Laws,
except for still the other thing, for just Cosmology, when perhaps thinking it should not be the same thing.

You see, we are still only 0.84 on the Kardashev scale for the thing we could be making of ourselves, except for still not any "levels" of nature,
for that of Intelligence, except for perhaps other things being warranted, or wished for.

Comprise, include, or perhaps involve, for what ever else, perhaps such a thing as hope sometimes, when also that of bad luck, for only hopelessness.

We perhaps do not see it either, for just only darkness, except for those levels of Intelligence, which could also mean Conscience as well, for only a meaning.

Make it perhaps a game of chess, for perhaps rather a mirror instead, and next question where, or in which way, you could perhaps could be fooled.

So, perhaps Truth could be still serving its purpose, for only such a thing, except for not any deception for any illusion either.

Weak and strong, for still only versus, and it could be that of a Jurisdiction, for also Judgement as well, except for still not telling the "Law".

Yes, that of deviate, for also differ, and I am still supposed to be still only a clown.

Be more precise, and it could be that of a Premise, for also given absolutes, except for not any "possible" one such either.

What if you could perhaps make it a close Court session for a couple of things, and next think that everything should be about the "Truth"?

Yes, fine, but do you next see any Logic in this, for also "yes" or "no" as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

Umm, should tell that I am an astronomer of sorts, for only homemade of such.

So, what is perhaps the top of the scale, for also bottom as well, except for still not any betterment, for just only the better thing?

Perhaps the same as before, for next the thing you perhaps ended up saying, except for not any go home, for that of silly fact.

Spread your wings and fly away, because if perhaps rather brilliance, for that of any betterment, what next to perhaps say?

Oh, maybe the high rise buildings of New York, for also Chicago and Seattle, except for still not any infinity for just not any meaning,
when perhaps not meaning "nothing" either.

Perhaps the thing still close to my heart, could be that of a pet, for also a jewel, or necklace, except for still that of contributing to science,
for just only results.

Hmm, rise and shine, but even the lobster could be having claws, for just its catch.

So, is a fly supposed to be living its daily life, for also regular as well, except for not the spider making its catch as well?

Anybody, for next anything as well, and next also any guess, for also everyone as well, in that it could be still only thinking, for also guessing.

Except for perhaps making science the thing it perhaps is, and for this you could me making it Laws.

Why making it simple, except for not any complex either, for also a perhaps a "Dualistic principle"?

Method, for that of Methodology, except for still only a Principle, we could leave it there for only a thing which perhaps needs to be solved.

Just bananas instead, and here I perhaps am, except for still not any puzzles needed to be solved.

So, you could next think it could be, for next also just be as well, and for that, just a witness of events in the sky,
except not any mysteries of the Earth either, for next only the soil.

Weakness could next also translate into complacency, for also a transform difference of sorts, but where next for that of possible indifference?

Looking around, also more looking around, for also "the", except for still not any answer, for just only a meaning.

Oh, maybe perhaps the world championship for that of boxing, except for not any science knowing either, for only just details.

Push a button, except for not any hands at rest, for only finished work, and you still could be making it science, except not any upper hand.

Fine, utter nonsense, except not any utter superlative either, for only that of essence.

Did you ever see the troll in here, for perhaps rather infinity instead, or could you be making such a thing a masquerade?

Revisited, for also a reunion as well, perhaps not any "so long" either, for only such a thing perhaps already being mentioned.

Checking the links, for only that of contents, perhaps no, except for still only fortune for just luck.

Could you rather make it science just the other thing, for perhaps rather unexplained, and you could end up with numbers,
when perhaps only that of an imagined reality instead?

First of all, perhaps we need to quantize time here, for only that of a meaning, except for perhaps not any subject.

But next that even Einstein could be turning around in the grave, except not any twisting either, when perhaps rather Quantum mechanics instead,
for not any fluctuation of time either, when it perhaps should rather be space.

So, is the thing you could be making Creation, perhaps that of only just a grave for such a thing, or could it rather be a twisted mentality,
for only just space?

Here that of E=mc2, for only such an Equation, except for not any "principles" either, for only a given practice, when perhaps rather a funeral session instead,
because here also noticing the previous line, for perhaps rather Mind instead.

Measurability once again, and for that, a bit of quantizing, for just only quantification.

Guess what, but I could still make it infinity for a couple of things, except for perhaps not any Idiocy either, for just only stupidity.

Could I be questioning any realities of life, also that of a given Truth as well, for only a moment, except not any given sake.

Read my lips, for only that of the mentioned "extol", and next also Creation myth for only a given purpose, except for not any part,
when we could perhaps be questioning a Creator behind, for only that of intention, for perhaps also Mind.

So, perhaps not any "Biblical aspect" here, for just only Theology, but at least that of Reason here, for only just thinking.

Perhaps sweet lips could also mean sweet dreams as well, except for not any Creation which you could see, for also make it,
by only those things which could be still only Forces and nature, for also Laws for such.

Is Religion next for only that of Creation myth, like also Theology as well, or is perhaps the reason behind, only that of the nice words which could be used,
and still by only a Theologist?

The thing which perhaps could still be only unary, could also be that of NOT, except for still not the thing being explained, for only a lack of Proof.

The old story could be still that of the birds and bees, for only a short trip, except for not any short moment either, for only that of time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation

If you do not mind, I could choose to let the rest of it go down the drain right now, for rather the birds and the bees, for just only a love story.

As I previously said, any shooting star for only a grill, is perhaps not my subject, for also that of elementary particles versus relativistic effects,
so here leaving it alone, for rather others to explain.

In a similar way, perhaps not any fly in the soup, for only a thing you could wish for, and next also desire, except for not any Laws of nature,
for only a context, in a way or manner they could also deserve.

So, in the end, perhaps no such thing as any customs, for also practice, when also that of a burial, for only a session, except for not any guess,
for just Logic either.

Just on the spot, the offspring which you could be making for a couple of things, is perhaps not any replication either, for only genetical such,
except not any manifold either.

So, perhaps clean fashion instead, for only the honey bird, except for not any Mendeleev either, for only making it a Periodic element,
except for still not any birds and bees, for only the spider, still only spinning its own web.

Remember that we could still make it the X and Y chromosome here, for only that of sex, except for still not any fashion, or clothing (cladding) either.

She could be still wearing some nice clothes, for also shoes as well, and next that of Design as well, except for still only that of chromosomes, for that of sex.

23*2 is still 46, except not any 24*2=48, for initially being known, for also guessed out, and here still that of the human genome.

Oh, the little chaffinch, because right here it became that now.

Trust me, for only that of will, except not any purpose, and we could be looking at Creation for only what it perhaps could be meant to be,
except for still not any Reason.

Is the hidden element still the thing which could perhaps be not explained, or could it rather be part of everyday life, for only an issue?

WTC.

Never mind, but if perhaps rather the subject of Cosmology, perhaps that of the large versus small, except for not the thing in between, for only a disguise.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event

Ever heard about the Event horizon, for only an astronomical phenomenon?

Reach for the Moon, and perhaps also stars as well, and it could be that of a slingshot for such, in order to just reach a target, for also goal.

But next lips, for also eyebrows as well, for only just weeping, except for still making it the Force of gravity, for only just Laws instead.

My guess is that the thing you could perhaps make science, is perhaps not any circus either, for just Idiocy, except for not any circumventing of Facts,
for only the opposite, when still only Proof.

Do we next make it 0, for just zero, or perhaps nothing, or do we still quantize such a thing, for perhaps not only measuring either,
when perhaps still only a scale, for also Logic as well, for that of true and false, and we still could think that there could be one thing versus another?

Down to Earth, for perhaps not across the water either, but perhaps these things could still mean, for next also imply, except for not being taken for granted,
by means of just a logical sense.

Do I just add 1+2+3, for just 6, or could I rather be making it a cube instead, for only that of ice, except for not the three dimensions which we should know,
and next also be familiar with?

Perhaps still true, for only a Method for such, except for still not any approximation either, when perhaps still nature telling the truth, for only an answer.

Except for perhaps not any stuck on mind either, for only that of a reason, for perhaps rather Plausibility instead, when still only a Fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma

If you do not mind, perhaps still questioning a Creator, for only possible meaning, except for not any such word either.

Only the word "pejorative" here, and next also dang for that of subject, for only sucks, except not any bottom of the seas either.

Guess what, but the word "crisp" could be for only the potato chip, except for not any "nuts" either, for only myself.

For that, also the laughter in the audience as well, except for not any Cremation for that of a meaning, when perhaps only a tribute for next only a seanse.

Perhaps knowing a famous Equation, and it could still be the thing we could think of, for also guessing as well.

The thing which you could perhaps make a burial, for also a practice, perhaps is not any seanse either, for only a session.

So, is perhaps making it a Creator instead, only by means of asking, except for not any dealer either, for only decks of cards lying on a table?

Any Probabilistic equation, and next also fine, for only such a thing as Statistics, except for still not any likelihood, for just only life.

One thing is still making it only the cross, for perhaps only a bit of hanging, and here also Jesus, for just hanging on the cross,
except for still asking for mercy from his Father, when it rather could be remorse.

You see, but the Atheist here could be making such a thing going down the drain, for that of validness, except not any contents either,

So, is perhaps just only green for that of a color, perhaps not any face either, for that of the sun shining, except not any Crop circle?

Still that of a whole for next only Creation itself, except for still not any "guess" either, for only a simple meaning, when perhaps rather a Creator instead.

Perhaps you could agree with me, for only an Agnostic, that the answers we could get, is perhaps not any definite, but rather only partial.
by means of covering only a part of the whole subject, for also wider one as well.

So, making it perhaps still only Idiocy, for also clemency, and still just fine.

Next fine should also mean "better" as well, for only just Logic (perhaps a question mark at the end).

Make it a Set instead, and perhaps also Logic as well, for that of Probability, and what next for what you could perhaps get?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation

Be my friend here, for perhaps rather Sets instead, for perhaps still looking for it, except not any unary either (-1).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ones%27_complement

Next any cultivation, for only plants, except not any sacrifice, for next only a deed either, because here not finding the proper word.

Dangit, but next that of just Algebra, for only "+" in between, except not any second degree equation either.

Again, still fine, for only that of Mathematics, for also problem solving, except for the thing we could still make only Religion,
for perhaps not any puzzle either.

Just making it Creation, and next also it could be implied, for just only thought, or perhaps made out.

Except for not any colors either, for just only dark, except not any red or blue instead, for perhaps still not any black either.

Perhaps God saw that it was good, for only just working, except for not his work for that of craftmanship, when perhaps only hard labor instead.

The thing we could still "leave off", for perhaps not any explanation, is still the thing which could not be explained. for sometimes also proven as well.

Anything for such a thing as Creation, except for the thing still "is", for also meant to be, is perhaps still the thing "is", except for not any meant to be.

Only a slight translation error, for also a discrepancy, and still that of promise, for not any Premise either.

Hold my arms, for also tight as well, and it could be that of uplifting, for also upbringing, except for not any celestial show either,
which could perhaps mean God.

So, is the thing you perhaps could think is that of "whole", still only infinity, or could it rather be that of still "more", for only such a meaning?

Again, just shoelaces, for only a couple of shoes, because here getting lost, for perhaps not anywhere else, for perhaps not knowing the answer.

Perhaps you did not hear, for also not know, but here a boy of 16, chose to make it short for a girl of also 16, using a knife for such.

Just on the spot, I could make it jealousy here, except not the other thing, but if perhaps still the knife, next what so sad.

The knife could still be only a tool, for that of a craft, but next also such a thing, for only ending a life, for only a brutal thing.

Say yes, for also no, except for not any hello, because next perhaps not always an answer either, when just asking,

One thing is still being polite, while the other could also be the closed door, for also open one, except for still not any "bang for the buck".

Is the thing still being asked for, also that of memories as well, when only a faint recall of someone once living, for also being present?

You know, saying hello, could still also say goodbye as well, for only a good reason, except for not any lost heart either, for that of punctuating a body.

Except for still only prevailing on that of money, for only Capitalism.

So, what is perhaps starting with the letter "O", and next ends with "a"?

Next we are not supposed to know anything about it either, because too distant, for also for also far away as well.

Science could quite often be quite specific, for also terse, in that it also could be to the point, except for not any adventure either,
for just a game.

Is a Biblical context next for any better meaning, except for still only written words, or could it only be a Saga, for that of a story being told,
when still only letters written down on paper?

I heard the story of up in the morning, for also late in bed, except for not any Dawn of morning, for just only beginning of time, except for perhaps not any brief moment either.

Crow's feet

Hen tracks

If perhaps still only a bit of writing, also the writer of a book you perhaps could be, except for not looking at science from a point of view,
just not thinking that it at least should not be any Religion, for rather the things we next could make of it, for still perhaps "believe".

Having the page for sky-map.org in a tab, could make a given sense of the celestial sky, from only perhaps only just a feeling, except not any given knowledge either,
when rather a bit more professional experience, for rather being skilled.

Some could perhaps believe in a better world, while others could choose to go to bed, for only having sweet dreams, but except for that, still proving for science,
when also such a thing needed, for perhaps necessary.

Swearing is perhaps not any Bible, for just only its meaning, but rather we could make it an Oath instead, except for still not questioning,
because making it science for only that of Belief, when also just a sake as well, we do not necessarily make it any provability either,
for only the thing we could at least guess, for also sometimes measure as well, including also Statistics.

So, bad wording perhaps, except for not any "Love your tender", when it perhaps should be rather Braveheart instead, when still the science we
still could not believe, for next not any prove either.

The boxer in a ring could still deliver a heavy punch, except for not any valuing either, when next perhaps still significance, for also a meaning,
but also that we should know from Politics, that it is not always just the Hawks either, when still that of governance.

Here the opposite could be just doves, and next we could be back at just valuing a couple of things, for just that of simplicity,
except for also the "Love and tender" part when also that of doves, for next also making it a couple of flying things.

My guess is that a beauty could also be a Queen, for only that of appearance, except for the other thing it perhaps should not be.

We could also make it the Star Queen nebula only for such, except not any hate for only the color of dark, when also perhaps the Devil,
when also the nice touch for also the thing we could be making Creation, except for not any divine entity itself.

Perhaps it should not be necessary just comparing ourselves with any ants either, when also dolphins and chimpanzees, for just animals,
but for the same reason, making it any Intelligence instead, and you could be having just a scale, except for not any limits or thresholds either.

Order versus Chaos, could still be a familiar theme, for also subject, except not any gentle touch, for only such a thing as angels, or the like.
but also that we should also know the similar theme, for only a meaning, when only the scientific approach.

So, play the old record, for perhaps song as well, and no need to stick the fingers below the pants of someone, for also blouse, or shirt,
because digging in the soil, could also be dirt as well, for only the mess we could still make, except not any "absolutes" for science,
when it also could be that of beauty, for only kindness and sincere.

If still only such a mess, for that of a towel, if not any else, or even worse, this perhaps became the thing for only that of Creation,
except for not the intended thing it possibly was meant, for only that of a purpose.

Perhaps only the woman with the light hair, and next she could be an extraterrestrial, for also alien, for only just a being, if not any creature either,
because sometimes a pockmark could be part of your face, except not any scar either, but still also the brain behind, for only hiding your personality.

So here perhaps not any creature either, for only making such a thing just the "Thing", for perhaps not any Intelligence still that of Love and tender,
for just only your face, except for still not any Mind.

I was thinking here that Probability could be making its way into that of Logic, for only a direction, except for still not the thing we could believe,
for only making it science.

A bit hard to catch, or get at here, but just on the spot, we could make it perhaps a "Probabilistic equation" for the way we could assume a couple of things,
for also guess, except not any Equations, for only Laws, when still only Logic for such a thing.

If we know the hard punch could be still for that of a meaning, also the Butterfly effect as well, for only making it a bit softer.

But if rather making it a Logical implication instead, perhaps not always nature any soft, for also good, when perhaps not any sweet either,
but still could be making its own mind, for only delivering misery around.

Those things still making for global weather, for also earthquakes, and other disasters as well, including famine, should be for that of the hard blow,
when perhaps not always any intended purpose either, for at least not any soft hand.

Make it perhaps an angel instead, for rather an alien, or extraterrestrial, and next the sweet little one for such, except not any smile either,
when just only Jesus, when we also know that the devil could be more harsh, for also sinister, except for not telling us the thing we should do.

It should be nice making it Logic for only that of simplicity, if not any opposite, for any inverse, because we could still value a couple of things,
for only the touch of the feather against the skin, except for still not any heavy blow.

Is the little alien you could perhaps make it instead, only a dream for such, or could it perhaps a sweet dream as well, only because it could be still angels?

Next any aliens hiding among us, for only society, except not any such thing as human civilization either, and perhaps rather a "Faceless coward" instead,
for perhaps rather the Devil, except for still not any soft or gentler touch, for the things you could find nicer, for also more precious.

Somewhere around, I noticed a picture of someone, and he also was nicknamed a "scholar", for only the knowledge he perhaps could have.

Always skilled, for that of a profession, except for always wondering what could be such a thing as "Wonderous stories", except not any whale song either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy

Forget the mentioned Prophet right now, for only the subject of time, except not any notion either, but if perhaps still only a Biblical context,
for next also meaning, perhaps also just nonsense as well, except for not any writing either, when perhaps rather a story told by means of words.

Any Towers of Babel, for also Towers of Hanoi, and perhaps only the alphabet for such a thing, except not any world falling apart either.

The language we could just speak, could also make ourselves understandable, also with respect to each other, except for perhaps not any Equations
telling about Laws of nature instead.

Is it perhaps just only "Mirror on the wall", for just only asking, except for perhaps not any wish either, but except for that,
do we perhaps not know the way we could question nature, for also getting answers back?

Still those people who could pretend to be ufologists here, for next also believe, except no such thing as Probability either, when perhaps rather Evidence instead.

So, perhaps still not any Proof either, for only that of Religion, when perhaps not any easy and cheap, for rather that of heavy or steadfast,
because here perhaps rather that of a sake, for only an excuse, or perhaps call, except for no such thing as a Reason, when perhaps still only Religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reason

Here it becomes "beliefs" on already the first line below the header, so at least it could be added here as well.

Really, striking luck, for just only winning the lottery, and you could end up forgetting everything in between, when also that of options, for a given chance.

The infinitesimal small, for also immensely large, should also be just the opposite, for just only valuing, when also seeing as well, for just only quantizing,
except for the thing you could be still "making" it either, for only a given purpose, and once again the feather versus the heavy hand.

Perhaps the movie could make it "Trust your feelings, Luke", except for not any trustful, or trustworthy either, for still perhaps only Truth,
except not any Judgement Day either, when you could still be getting a couple of options on your hand, if not any table, for still only you to decide.

So, except for not any this or that either, we could perhaps still just only make, for sometimes also decide, except for not any just "think" either,
when still perhaps science.

Is any "let go, for also let alone", any simple fact, for also excuse, when perhaps thinking that Belief should be before any Proof,
for next also prior, or sequential order, when perhaps rather a Set instead, making a difference between two droplets of water?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-order_logic

I came across this one for perhaps not any correct either, but except for that, perhaps returning back at the beginning here, for not any good start.

One thing is still making it only Wednesday here, except for not any falling object from the sky, for just a romance instead.

The piccolo is still only just a flute for such a thing, so except for still not any sweet music for only a couple of ears,
where is next the Logic needed, for perhaps solving a couple of problems, when it also could be about Fundamental questions about nature?

Also that some very red variable stars in the celestial sky, could be hiding nearby galaxies, and here RY Draconis, for also NGC 4236 as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piccolo

Is perhaps questioning the validity of the WOW signal any better reason for such a thing, except for also a couple of Laws in front of us,
for only a general knowledge?

My problems are not necessarily those of the bushman, for that of a park being constructed below my flat, making for a bit of noise,
and also ending up with a window here not properly being shut, because the locker mechanism broke in some way or another.

Could you perhaps make it Special Theory of Relativity instead, for only just time, and next any given realm for such a thing,
for only a separate or specific context, except for perhaps not the meaning of it all, when making it a GUT, rather than the life of a figure.

Make it rather some 100 or 1000 pieces of sugar instead, for only just cubes, and next in rows, for also columns, if not any stacked atop each other.

But next still perhaps only sugar, except not any matter compressed into a state in which at least it could be liquid, if not any metallic either.

So here perhaps also Judgement Day of sorts as well, for only speech and recognition, except for perhaps not the thing we should believe in,
and for that it could stil be that of believing in aliens or extraterrestrials.

A Method of Proof, should still be only about Proof itself, except not any Contradiction for telling just the opposite.

Therefore still the "hip as hap", for only Observational evidence, for also Facts, while still a couple of things in the air, for perhaps not any Fact at all.

Because of that, I do not feel it should be any point of just proving aliens, for only such a thing, when still also a couple of Facts, for only such Evidence.

Ended up last night by making it still those questions we could ask, for also answer as well, when also a couple of Equations still in front of us,
for also available, except for not any usage for a given purpose.

Just the notion of time, for still that of Special Relativity, and perhaps not any flier either, for only making it Chronos instead,
because here still only the device for measuring time, being worn on your arm, or perhaps wrist, except for not any mechanism,
when it rather could be a time machine instead.

Do we next know that time also could be warping space, except for still only the Force of gravity instead?

Perhaps only a wobble, for rather spinning around, because here reminded about the corkscrew, except for still not celebrating any Christmas.

The thing we could be making just spinning around, could be that of a dynamic world, for next also Universe, when perhaps not any static, for only resting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torus

Is the world any dynamic, for perhaps only floating on a surface, or could we perhaps make it the Universe a floating element instead,
except for still not any twisting around, for just only riding the saddle?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion

In fact I had the second link in mind here, except for also taking the rest of the day off, because here it became the thing just left off.

For now only a quick glance by making it Geometry here, for also Algebra as well, but here the first link perhaps stands out a little, with respect to the second.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moebius

Here also needing a revisit as well, except for still the temptation of just making it to the shop instead, for perhaps even better writing.

Just basic thinking for still only riding the saddle, except for sometimes also the flaws we could make it, except for still not any conclusion for the whole thing,
when it could also be just Idiocy itself, for perhaps also the idiot you also could be, when next still not any thinking.

Is just knowing, also that of resting, and for that resting on a fundament, when still only that of Logic for only just Fact, and still not any Proof?

We are not supposed to question any given Truth, for also that of a Proof, when still also the Method of Proof, when also a couple of secrets of nature,
which could be hiding any such Proof.

Telling that a thing is not for any real, for next also fact, could also make such a thing NOT true as well, but if perhaps so, could you next "prove"
any given "Truth", for only such a thing, when perhaps only the opposite, or inverse?

The old fashion here could be still using Prolog as a language, and making it the subject of Logic, for only a language, except for still not any asking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prolog

For this, such a thing as "Does God exist", and next only yes or no for that of the answer, except for not any similar way of making it Facts, or even Proof.

Again, the hip and hap for also that of motherships which could be around, except for not any way of proving, for also the opposite (disprove),
but here you could also be the logic one just in person, for making it just one thing versus the other, like the Method of elimination,
except for here not the intended meaning either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_NOR

Here I still had that of NOT in my thoughts, for perhaps not any meaning either, but except for that, it could be still only stupidity killed the cat,
for also the black road across the road, bringing possible misfortune, while we still could be asking ourselves the possibility of any alien intelligence,
except for not any such means for just proving.

You still need an umbrella for that of rain coming down, and therefore "Singing in the rain" as well, but if perhaps making it levels of Intelligence,
for also Conscience as well, still that of a scale, for also levels, when perhaps also such a things as thresholds as well, except for not that wording of
making just life possible, because it reached a point where it "attained" such a thing, and became self-aware, for also self-conscious as well.

Getting back to it after the shopping, for perhaps making it slightly better here, because if still only "Fire in the hole here", except not any digging,
at least the Universe for a couple of given Facts, when it also could be Creation itself.

Here still perhaps needing a watch for such a thing, and rather making it Instantiation instead, but already mentioned before, so I will shy a bit away.

But still the fact that evolution, for only making it Trilobites, for also dinosaurs, could be only one Aspect of nature, for also facet, except not any
complexity for rather making it Order versus Chaos instead.

Are any physical Laws still there, for making it Viscosity, for also Thermodynamics, if not any fusion either, when still only ourselves for just only believe,
except for still that of Proof needed, for only making it such Laws?

If perhaps still only Religion, for rather the shopping, it was meant for that of science, when perhaps rather believing.

Next any Rationality, for just common sense, and perhaps not any idiot needed either, when still that of Order needed, when perhaps not any Chaos either.

The Concept for which you could be making God, could perhaps be the subject of Religion, except for still only a way of belief, for such a thing,
but the other alternative could be making it physical Laws, for only telling about the properties of nature.

Still the bad ending for that of the previous post, but also a reminder of making it just "flesh and blood" for a couple of things, except not the thing still hidden,
for perhaps a mask of sorts, but if nature could be just present, for also existing, we could also assume such a thing, for only making it a Fact,
except for not any speculate, when rather making it other civilizations instead.

Really it should be that of Intelligence instead, and next shooting at the stars for just only infinity, and perhaps still only a genius for such a thing,
except not any levels of Intelligence, for also that of Conscience.

I still could make it only black for that of darkness, and here that of color as well, except for the heater in my bedroom, lighting up in whitish green at times.

Here that of a light bulb, for also a thermostat, except not any tint either, when making it perhaps yellow, rather than just orange, for that of color.

It should be that of heat and comfort here, except for not any "strangers" either, which could rather be the hidden or untold thing.

Neil Armstrong could be still strolling on the Moon, for only just such a thing, except not any Alexander either, for only a city, when perhaps rather a conqueror.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan

Only to have it mentioned, because it could also end up becoming just a Myth for such a thing, except not telling about any fact of life, for only that of history.

For only Alexander the Great, he is listed as a king here, for perhaps not any conqueror either, when rather a conquest instead, for that of an empire.

Also that I spelt "disprove" wrong at first above, but corrected it, for just only fixing instead.

60 percent of your body could be still only water, but the other could also make for DNA in our chromosomes and cells, for only the thing we still are,
and next for only that of Mind, if not any Intelligence.

The difficulty becomes here of making just Proof, for only such a thing, when still also that of Existence, for only such a thing as a living being,
and next living here on Earth as well, for only that of an interaction between life and nature.

Using a car, for next speeding away in just opposite directions, and perhaps not any handshake for only a farewell instead,
because if still just in the middle of the day, also that of disproving a couple of Facts, when also proving a couple of others, for still that of science.

We know that just an Illusion, could also be a mirage, for just a Fata Morgana, for such a thing, but next also that we still have to prove,
for only making it a given fact, except not any reality either.

So rather disproving, it should rather be the clock instead, for just a watch, and next such a thing being worn on your arm, for also wrist,
except for not making it any tool, for any Toolbox either, when perhaps only a mechanism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_clock

Next time flies, for also Tempus fugit, if not any Chronos either, and we could also be making it only a notion for such a thing, for only that of Special Relativity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempus_fugit

Those things we still could be making only nature's law, for just Laws of nature, should be based on a couple of Facts, for also Proof, and for such a thing,
also that of Evidence, except for no such thing as Certainty.

Do you next choose to disprove a couple of things, rather than the thing it still became at first, and you could end up questioning a couple of Facts,
for not being any valid, except for perhaps not any Evidence for such a thing either.

Just walking on thin ice, and perhaps not any sheet of paper either, but rather that you could just think, for making it perhaps the thing it should be,
and next you could also end up believing, except for still only making it a certain Fact.

Rise and shine, for only early up in the morning, and late in bed in the evening, but the Laws you could be making for nature, by making it Equations instead,
should be only for that of a Fact, except for perhaps no such means as prove, for any proving.

The Toolbox could still be the watch, for only your wrist, except for not the Torus, or even Torsion, telling about nature, for only its properties.

Such a thing as equality could only translate into a smile, if perhaps not any Equivalence either, because if keying in

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_equivalence

Is not Madonna singing for just only a material world, except for perhaps not the other thing either, but here perhaps Logic for only such a thing,
while also that of Equivalence, for only just Laws of nature.

One thing is making it a famous Equation for only Special Relativity, except for only General Relativity, for its ordinary sense, or more common use,
because an Equation should also be a line, for only a fraction, when also that of a second degree equation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction_(mathematics)

For that, still only Calculus for a way of making it, except for not any 3/2 either, when just only splitting a cake in half.

The thing we sometimes could make only just nonsense, for not any valid, is perhaps not any Force of gravity, for only just a way of life,
except for still the Laws of nature, for just such a thing we could be making it.

Acting in defense, could be still for only self-defense, except for also the miserable "counterproof", for rather disprove instead.

But rather a notion of time instead, for only a purpose, except not any Equations, which could be telling about properties of time and space,
for next perhaps also a better world.

If Einstein perhaps "knew" the way things became made, also what it could be made of, for also that of properties, except for still the watch being worn on his arm.

Could you next make it any Equation with respect to another, for just also a Law, if not the opposite way, and next at least the three Laws of Newton here,
except for not any travel through space and time, for only the notion of time?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics

You may be able to see that it ends up a bit wrong here, for also short, except for also the fact that Einstein was not that fond of Quantum mechanics either.

One thing is still questioning a couple of believers, for perhaps not making it any Proof at all, but also that you could be questioning reality, for only that of Existence.

Time could be still an added property of space, for only that of dimensions, and next no need of proving such a thing, only for that of Certainty either.

If still only such a thing as a blush, for also a faint, if not any fart either, perhaps making it such a thing as reality for only a way of life, including here on Earth,
except for still the floating Earth, for that of just empty space, when also such a thing as inertia making for a couple of things still falling down.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construct

So, hate is perhaps not any orgasm either, for only just a fluke, but if perhaps rather the Alien Interview instead, it could be that of a Dogma.

The thing you could be making alive, for just living, should not be any death either, for only an outcome, because if not wrong, it became more than
just a Dogma here, for perhaps rather a bit more, for perhaps rather still only life that of a state of mind, for also presence, when perhaps also Existence.

Therefore not liking the link above, for perhaps a bit premature, but except for that, it could also be a way of approach, when still only the unanswered questions.

Here still not having all the details in front of me, for only part of the show, but at least could be making it an Aspect here.

An alien could perhaps be more evolved, for also intelligent, except for those levels of Intelligence and Conscience we could also make it.

But next any end of scale, for perhaps making it 0 at one end, for also infinity at the other, and perhaps not any loop either, when rather that of negative numbers,
for also such a thing mentioned before.

Because here we could end up back with the corkscrew once again, for also a way of thinking which perhaps is not the best.

So, for one thing is just make it "see you next time", except for not any long road, for just only travel, except for not any handshake either,
because a Construct could perhaps be a way of thinking of nature as it could be, except for only the Laws of nature, for such a thing.

But rather earth, wind, soil and fire, for the thing the Greek once made of it, except for not any Equations either, for just telling about properties of nature.

Is Religion still one thing, for just only Belief, or could you rather make it Faith as well, except for perhaps no such thing as Creation myth,
which could make it a single thing, for just bringing it altogether?

Make it a reason, and next also why as well, for perhaps not any when, and because of that, also questions and answers, for only a couple of Facts,
except for still only questions being answered.

Still only myself, for perhaps only my name, and next also spinning around, for only my credentials, except no such thing as making it objects and entities,
for only that of nature for such a thing, when also properties and attributes as well, and next at least one part of the whole scale.

The thing you perhaps could be making NOT(infinity), could perhaps end up being 0, for just zero, or nothing, except for perhaps not any meaning either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_anthropology

RY Draconis still for only a red star, except not any faint galaxy nearby, and perhaps still only the Universe, for that of a Construct, when still only eyes for seeing.

Making it a difference, and it could become a subtraction, except for not any "indifference" either, which could be just only another thing.

Translates here, so at least I should know, except not making it any partial, for also sequential, when perhaps also Differential calculus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Differential_calculus

Notice the live graph here, for only that of changing numbers, but next tell me such a fact for also life itself, except for not any Proof,
and we could at least make it Existence, for only a way of life, except for perhaps thinking the way it also could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism

Who next chose to throw away the eaten bone, only because it became an awakening, for perhaps only a Monolith for such a thing,
and next perhaps an open question, for perhaps not any answer, when still only ourselves, for that of self-awareness, including Conscience.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propositional_calculus

Key in Propositional Logic here, for perhaps much of the same, when still not running up the hill, for only a thin story, except not any five tones, for that of falling glass back in return,
because if still a mothership for just flying around, also that of a bottle of beer for just a celebration, except for not any water instead.

The end sequence, for that of a follow-up, which we could be making "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", is perhaps the thing also being watched,
for just having seen, except for not making it any believable, for just only a thought up thing.

Both dwarfs and midgets could be for just only the Earth, by means of just people, except for not any stars in the sky.

If rather Steven Spielberg made it a presentation here, for only that of a spectacular show, where perhaps any sense of reality, for also life itself,
when it should be still only a couple of Facts, except for not any fiction?

Too good to be true perhaps, and next we could also be questioning such a fact, except for still perhaps mentioned before.

Prove a couple of Facts, for perhaps not any gosh either, and it could end up being an open door for a couple of things, when perhaps rather a different world.

Also that I did the shopping in the meantime, for also reading the other nonsense as well.

Out of time once again, for a line perhaps a bit long.

I did not have any big dinner today, but finished off the last one, by means of carrot, and meat ending up cold, but otherwise tasting good.

Anyway, she could perhaps be having the name Romance, for only her last name, but except for that, you could still also propose at times,
except for not any directly here, of course.

I shall tell you that both past, previous and the future, could be telling about at least a dark chapter of the past, for only making it the Middle age.

One of the Ten Commandments is telling about not being mislead, when sometimes also confused as well, because it could also be about temptation.

Translates here using Google Translate, into deceive, for just deceit, except for perhaps not any confusion either.

The nuclear physicist you perhaps could be, is perhaps telling about your inner ear, for only that of atoms, if perhaps not any sense of time either,
but rational thinking could at least make you explain, for perhaps also such a thing as red variable stars, like RY Draconis, except not any distant galaxy,
like NGC 4236, both located in the constellation Draco.

The fiasco we sometimes could make a flaw, for also a failure, could also be a mishap as well, and for such a thing we could also make it a bad or sinister world,
except for such a thing as Creation, which could be making a couple of things possible, except for not any end of story, for perhaps rather the opposite.

We could perhaps make it destruction, also such a thing as annihilation, except for not any MAD, for just only Mutual assured destruction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction

I may have read about such a thing as genetical mutation, for only radiation being a reason behind, for such a fact, because if still only science being research on Amoeba,
perhaps also results, from only given Facts, except for not making it any Stupidity, for the idiots we sometimes could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_engineering

Is it just Agnostic thinking here, or could it rather be back to starting point, for just only nature, when also a starting point for such?

Here that of a modification, could also be that of an altering as well, except for not any random seed either, for only a Deterministic principle.

Divide and Conquer, for also split and rule, because here it should be two different things, when perhaps still that of Order versus Chaos,
for only the thing we perhaps could see.

Both the article about Cognition, as well as yet another as well, is having a picture of a plant, for only the green color, except not making it any leaf either.

Yes, pussycat for at least one Mark here, while also a slick of a finger, for yet another such Mark, but except for that, also plethora, for also manifold, or multitude,
except for not any significance of a feather, for just falling to the ground.

For this, the Hammer and Feather, for an experiment being carried out on the Moon, for also making a photon a "light" elementary particle, for only its place or position,
when the Fundamental Laws of physics should be concerned, when also making it Laws of nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gauge_theory

Here keying in just gauge at first, and ending up with a bit of problem, for that of the translation.

Make the Universe as it is, for just only thinking, if perhaps not any knowing, and you could still end up speculating.

Just "troll in a box" for a couple of things, and you could rather make it "Wizard of Oz", for only such thinking, if still not any guessing.

I previously mentioned that nature could still be the winner, for only what it is, except for the thing we could be making it, and for that, still only the Laws.

Also another word here as well, but making it that "construe" should be a different word for just interpret, when only making an interpretation for a couple of things.

Provability should not only be for real, but rather for the subject of Facts, when also such a fact as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

Next my bad for making it such a thing as Fallacies, and next at BOINC here, for only that of a subject.

Make it rather a given Truth, and perhaps also Proof as well, for only the thing we could make of it, except for still not any nature telling about one thing versus another.

One way of just widening the door, is perhaps that of Religion, for only a subject, except for still knowing that infinity should still be the limit for any knowledge.

So, perhaps a better wording for only such a thing as "Does the Universe exist", except for not any "Does God exist" either.

Logic should still be a way of making a conclusion, and for that also Certainty as well, except for still not any Oath, for just only a given Truth.

If those things we could be making Fundamental Laws of physics, for just only Mathematics as well, perhaps fine, except for still the Method of Proof.

Could we make it our place of living, for only situated here on Earth, at least some 0.84 on the Kardashev scale here, except for not any guess, or speculation, for making it
any multiverses either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assumption

Here the section Logic, for that of the latter, and next the little Tacit assumption, for also being mentioned before.

Should it still be only the woman with the pockmarked face here, except for also white skin, for also clothes as well, or could we rather make it science,
by just believing, except for no such thing as any levels of Intelligence versus Conscience, for also different types of civilizations?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

Next still that of Order versus Chaos, for only its own sake, except for still the fact that nature could be the ultimate winner,
because here still the hypothetical question, for also issue, except for perhaps not my way of dealing with it either.

Could you perhaps make it infinity only a Construct for such a thing, except for not any Dogma either, when perhaps such a thing as life versus death, except not any Principle either?

Always the open door for what someone could choose to say, except for still not asking (Meet the Press for just boring), but if perhaps rather an open door to
a couple of things, why not make it a negation instead, for just only Logic, and next think you could step outside, for just any borders, when still the concept of infinity.

Gravity is still around, and could be found just everywhere, for only a nature we could be a part of, for also the Universe we should also know,
for only its presence, if not any Existence.

As previously mentioned, curiosity could still kill the cat, for also the black cat across the road, for just only misfortune, but if rather levels of Intelligence,
for perhaps also Conscience as well, should it still be only that of infinity here, for only a concept?

So, here we perhaps are getting to it that Logic is perhaps not any inverse, for also opposite, but rather that it could be telling about meaningless, or just nothing,
for only that of NOT.

Just 0, for that of zero, or nil, and perhaps still nothing, for also meaningless, meaning it should imply nothing, for next not anything at all.

A galaxy like NGC 488, could be almost perfect, but if perhaps so, we could also make it absolute as well, for only a reference with something even better,
which could still be that of infinity.

Creation could next mean "In the beginning" for such a thing, and next also Instantiation as well, for only the beginning of the Universe.

Einstein perhaps made it a stumbling block for a couple of things, except for not any error either, but except for that, sometimes also a fault as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism

Losing track here, so catching up once again, if you do not mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morphing

Next what the heck, for that of any meaning, when perhaps only a president, for that of a smiling face, except for nothing else,
because here back on track, for only a pedestal, and you could climb the podium, for only that of victory, when next only receiving the golden medal.

But rather that a pyramid could still be only bricks of stones, for only that of layers, except for the stone at the top, marking the final end.

Next, proving Idiocy, for only a black cat across the road, and perhaps not the thing we should be doing either.

The sequel you could be making of a couple of things, could still be that of Star Wars, for just only a battle between a Type II, and Type III civilization.

Make it love and hate, and next also crime as well, except for still not any hatred, for perhaps rather the Devil, when it also could be God.

The endpoint, in my opinion, could be that of making it Laws of nature, for only its own sake, or perhaps meaning, and next relate it with a notion of God,
for rather a Concept, for such a thing.

Perhaps Logic is not only meant to prove, but rather be showing that infinity could still be only a concept, for next that of nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptions_of_God

If perhaps so, also that of making it the Universe only such a thing you could be dealing with, and still only a Concept, for just making it "In the beginning".

Sadly, the endpoint, which you could also make an oblivion, could be the point of return, where the Universe perhaps ended, for only its expansion,
when also knowing that it could expand forever, for still only that of oblivion.

Perhaps back to basics here, for only just three dimensions, except for not making it any vastness of space, for also emptiness.

We know that a Type III civilization perhaps does not exist for real, and because of that, we could rather question the Universe for only a fact,
except for still not any Reason, when also reason behind.

It is really that of saying just "bear off with me", except for still not any oblivion, for perhaps not knowing anything, for also nowhere as well.

Perhaps a silly thought, but what about any notion of God, for also a Conception, when still that of oblivion, for making it nowhere,
when also that of a still frame, telling about at least an Instance, or perhaps event?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction

Still two separate articles here, for the latter two in the Wikipedia, because here still not getting at it.

Perhaps Seti@home is still a bit more forgiving, with only respect to its users, for only such a thing in hand,
except for not any scientific results or achievements we could perhaps hope for, and sometimes also achieve as well.

Never mind, for sometimes both five Woodall tasks, for also ten as well, getting bogged down for that of just in the queue,
for also pending credit as well, and next you will have to wait for the moment to appear, or come up, for only the straight answer.

Guess what, but we could be still making it a scientific experiment, for only a couple of things left to explain, if still not any answer.

Any answers on the table, and next you also know the answer, except for still only being crooked, for also weird at times.

We could perhaps end up with the Scientific Method, for only such a thing to choose, except for not making it any direct stupidity among users,
for also that of madness.

Be my guest for perhaps a science going wrong, and for such a reason perhaps still questioning that of madness, when also that of a nature for a subject,
and possibly an upper hand as well.

Next, I am perhaps empty for phrases, for at least numbers, for that of Statistics, when perhaps still only guessing, for that of an answer,
if not any purpose either, for next only a meaning.

Sorry, it went down into the dark once again, for only having a couple of beers on a Wednesday.

Getting knowledge about the terrible event happening, I ended up in the wrong seat shortly later, for only lights being turned off.

Next out in the hall, the roof light in the living room, which may be turned down to just a faint glow, using a knob,
was lighting in orange, rather than just yellow, so because of replacing the fuse only a couple of days ago, I felt it could be more to it.

It showed out to be right, for quite a large part of the city being just dark, especially on the western side, where I live.

Next it took an half hour of wait, for also lights flashing next to the area being worked on, below my flat, for only quite luminous street lamps,
some two in fact, and except for suddenly being turned back on, while looking outside from the bedroom, it was not a pleasant experience.

When such a thing is happening, and next the other thing as well, also that of considering a couple of facts for sometimes knowledge as well.

Our way of life, is that of heat and comfort, for also lights being turned on when needed, so therefore no shining stars just above,
except for only the brief moment for such.

If perhaps watching a movie in a cinema, your state of mind could perhaps be affected, for only leaving into the late afternoon,
when the sky could be clear, and the sun next inching towards the sunset.

But if rather living somewhere else, you could be living on a planet close to Proxima Centauri, and for that also a hairy creature, except for not any
shining diamond, for rather only a speck of light.

Lights could still affect your mind, for also the way you could be living your life, but next perhaps not any Imagination for such a thing, when also the Paranormal.

Could such lights next be the secret to the whole thing, for perhaps being part of Electromagnetism, except for perhaps not making a difference between the
fireman and a chemist, for just wearing glasses?

Perhaps still curiosity, if not any efficiency, but here Stanley Miller comes to mind, for only experiments being carried out in a lab,
for also the thing we could make no face at all, for only the things we could see, and next also make of it, for just understand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-force

Once again, just the hot meal for waking up, but next also this one as well, because losing an arm or leg, is perhaps not any pleasant either,
but at least standing on your legs, should be the better thing, except for not any fading lights either.

Here just 1G for those legs still being used, and if perhaps going to the Moon, some 9G for only that of pressure, and also quite uncomfortable.

Is the Universe only a casual session, for only a random event, in that we could still make it Order and Chaos, for only the thing it could be meant?

Logic could still be for a meaning, like also the dark sky for just observing, except not any flickering street lights telling about a possible failure.

Better look up to just see and watch, because the way you could be making of a couple of things, could still be just observing,
except for not any measuring for rather making it levels of Intelligence or Conscience, for at least ourselves, if not any others.

If still such a scale, perhaps only numbers, for making it such levels, except not any better thinking for just Logic, telling how good or clever I could be.

Perhaps still both volt and watt, for also Ampere, but more important perhaps, is the number preceding it, for only a value.

You still could end up on Christmas Eve, making it a couple of Chinese Lanterns, except for not the bottle in your hand,
but if perhaps not any flying dragons either, it could end up being the thing you perhaps could wish for, namely an alien.

Count to at least two, and it becomes Dualism, if not any Pluralism either, and for this also the Universe, with its diversity and manifold,
for sometimes things side by side, like that of a double star.

Could it be any symbolism, for also that of a double meaning, if perhaps not any standards either?

Perhaps not any lights for just cheating, except for sometimes dubious, for also that of a Contradiction, or the like.

It should still be better believing in a visitor at night, for the thing you perhaps could sense and feel, except for not any lights in the dark either.

Are there next any mysteries, and perhaps they could be explained by means of the Scientific Method, if perhaps so.

Adhering to such a Method, and you could also be having your own personal belief, except perhaps none at all, but if a fluid is perhaps a state of Matter,
for only that of given Dynamics, if not any properties, next perhaps not any slide off any bridge, when still only the straight line, for perhaps not any end.

For only the alphabet, you could make it ASCII 124 here, except for only dashes making for such a line, and it could look like "|------|" .

Here it rather should be thought of the single dimension, for only one-dimensional, because you perhaps know that the difference between
true and false, is still only a single digit.

So, perhaps not any smile either, for that above, because if on a roller-coaster, you are not supposed to fall off either, except for climbing Mt. Everest,
for only knowing that it could be possible, and also counting the steps needed, in order to reach the top.

Is next the bad day you sometimes could experience, lack of any luck, or is it only standing just in the middle, for still not falling off any seat?

If perhaps still only 1G needed for such a thing, in which way are we supposed to be looking at space, for only its emptiness, when also making it
the four-dimensional world it also could be?

Did I end up with just a Lie, for only a link, in the previous post?

If perhaps so, it should not make any difference either, for only a different way of looking at thing, for still only that of Truth, when perhaps not any opposite either.

Next also some 500 billion galaxies across the whole Universe, for the thing it still could be, and for the same reason we could also make it star cities, for only just life,
except for also knowing that it should not be any real fact.

Accountability could still be a bit of paperwork, but if any such thing as Credibility, is still believing in ourselves, for just eyes could see, and also tell,
the UFO reports we sometimes could make up, could be scarce, for also that of similar credibility.

Always the trustworthy you could find, or get across, for sometimes being a witness as well, but also noticing here, that it also could be about Logic,
for only that of wording itself.

A classic example is the Rendlesham Forest incident, where apparently trusted people, came to the conclusion that lights from a nearby lighthouse,
excluded the fact that there may have been visitors there, coming from another place.

If I also made it thin ice for a couple of things as well, it could be that of flimsy or fragile basis, for only coming to such a conclusion, in that there may not
have been any definite answer.

Do you next have the dinner raw, or should it rather be cooked, for only the way we could be looking at things, and next also believe?

Perhaps you could be still laughing at someone, for perhaps being just a believer, but also that you could make a similar laugh of just Credibility,
when only a story about a possible event happening.

Just five tones on top of a mountain, ended up in pieces of glass, for only shattered windows, except for also a possible encounter, for also a near experience,
involving alien species, versus the human race, except for still only Steven Spielberg behind the whole thing, for making it a movie instead.

I happened to read the postings by Mark Sattler, because of getting on my feet, but ending up with the last two pages.

If rather next with Susie-Q, which if I am not wrong, told about her mental problems, or the like, and please have me excused if wrong,
but rather the glasses I am wearing myself, for also a couple of other problems, should it perhaps be alcohol instead, for the feat we sometimes
could achieve, if not any talent either, for only just performance?

Quality versus work, and it always becomes a standard, except for still only watching the sky for only being witness to an event,
because at worst, lack of quality could also mean degradation of performance, except for still the sunshine in your face, for only mind.

Rather the fact that stupidity could still kill the cat, and I could end up back with the manual, for at least the way we could be knowing a couple of things,
only based on written contents meant for a general audience.

You are welcome to solve the crossword here if you will, but personally I once thought I was dead, for only making a couple of guesses for such a thing.

We still have the validity issue here, for only results and tasks, in order to find the intelligent signal, when only using our processing capabilities for the same thing.

But also that I perhaps left the subject of Religion for only the subject of Belief, when perhaps still that of science the better thing for just knowing a couple of things.

Here getting back at the computer after sleeping it out, so I will have one more for you as well.

Only the fact that we still could be left to disagree, should be a story of itself, except not any hairy creature as usual.

Many stories are being told about just acts of violence, for also a bad day as well, except not any happiness, for only telling about possible splendors of nature.

Always the balancing act on a sheet of paper, if not any straight line, but also ending up in the middle, for just keeping your balance.

Once again being reminded that a microphone against your lips, is no such thing as just listen in either, using earphones, and in the same way,
also the way of sifting through data, for only the validation process being carried out.

If the fact that sorrow and pain could also make for anguish, also that of striking luck, for only happiness and joy instead,
but if we choose to still make it better, for also best, it could still be that of betterment, for only just a purpose.

Come on, but is it only the fact that I once went to school, only the reason why we could make only science only just guessing,
for also meaningless sometimes, if not any valid either?

Do we make such a thing a Credibility what is should mean, except for still not any Proof for science, when also a couple of Facts?

Like thin ice for just walking, also the balancing act at times as well, except for not any smile either, for just only extremes.

Not your rear butt here either, because if still only Einstein for a couple of things, he came up with his Equations, for rather Laws, when still that of science for such a thing.

Maybe rather outer edges instead, for only a straight line, except for perhaps making it "|------|"

Cynicism for next also a thing, and you could end up being cynical, except for any possible attitude towards science, telling you that it should be
carried out in one way or another, for just only a meaning.

You could still make it Charles Darwin for only two legs for standing, except not any four, but also that some people could end up looking into the sky,
for just only a hobby, if perhaps not any interest either, because if perhaps not Economy either, it could rather be curiosity instead.

If we perhaps know that the Vatican could be having its own observatory, perhaps not any sweet dreams either, for only a couple of wishes,
when sometimes using the towel for only wiping away a couple of tears.

If I could end up choosing to believe in myself, I could also be selfish, except for also the Scientific Method, for just only proving science.

Once upon time, for only in the past, but mentioning a picture found in an old book, for that of a classic, dating back to 1974, if not wrong,
written by Hardy (only the last name when sitting here), and Patrick Moore.

Next perhaps confusing the latter name here as well, but not checking right now, but rather that it became Yoda here of sorts, for only the whole
Milky Way visible in the sky above, and next only a painting.

Perhaps still only confusing Popeye with just spinach here, for not tasting any good either, but if rather mirror on the wall instead,
it could end up being a Credibility issue, for only a way of Proof, except for not any Miracles which could sometimes be left unexplained.

Adding perhaps a bit more here before turning off the lights.

Just the word "here" in the previous, and perhaps not needed, for perhaps rather looking better, but too late to fix.

One thing is still looking in vain for the signal which never may come, for also arrive, but here past midnight, perhaps a thought of just
debunking a Myth for only that of science, when also that of a certain Proof.

The Kardashev scale is still only a hypothetical one, and because of that, dealing with the subject of energy.

So, if perhaps not any James Bond for myself, for just never say never, making it different levels of Intelligence, for also types of civilizations,
could also be for real, for next also a fact, except for still not any down the drain, for a lack of validity.

We perhaps know that, and for the same reason also curiosity killed the cat, for also the black one across the road, but if nature is perhaps about the
questions we could ask, for also answer as well, they also need to be solved.

So, when saying never, perhaps also always, for also ever, in that it could still be a hairy creature on alpha Centauri, for the thing we could know,
except for still perhaps not prove, when also a way of making it Logic, for perhaps thinking about the Universe.

I am not that fond of any multiverses myself, but rather make it that Dark Matter and Dark Energy should be properties of nature, for just only the Universe.

Therefore that of debunking a Myth for just Logic, when still making it the Universe instead.

Again, that the Universe could be having some 500 billion galaxies in all, and next also teeming with life, for only making a couple of guesses,
except for those Fundamental Laws of nature, which could be telling about Physics, for also the properties of nature.

One thing is still making it stars shining in the sky, for also their ultimate demise, by just getting old, but in a similar way, or for same reason,
also that of destruction, for also annihilation, when at least something going wrong.

We know it gets wrong when Iron gets fused in the cores of stars, for only that of fusion, but next back to basics, for only a starting point,
when rather becoming a new starting point, for that of a generation, when we also could make it a seed, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ring_of_Honor

Dethrone perhaps, and could you next explain this to me, except for perhaps going wrong?

Except not any patronize either, for just only companionship, or friendship, because one way of looking at things, could still be that of death and destruction,
for sometimes that of greed and fortune as well.

Therefore rich man's dreams as well, because still also wealthy as well, but if perhaps still ending up in bed, it could be only for just a dream,
except not lying in a grave either, for just only dead.

Look at what I previously said, for only making it stupid fools, or idiots of ourselves, because here noticing the bad wording,
but if nature is still those Equations, for also Logic, perhaps not any simple for just simplistic, when also complex as well.

I ended up in the previous, making it a battle of sciences, when it perhaps could also be Religion as well, for only a subject.

But next I am perhaps laughing, for only wearing glasses, except for not any other users here either, because here just green,
for only a clown, when perhaps making it "Order" for just only a sense, except for perhaps not any Chaos either, for just the opposite.

If still just only Logic, for also a couple of other things, also that of nature as well, and we could end up thinking that it still should be the Universe.

Einstein could at least make it right, for only a way of perhaps thinking, but because of that, it could also become Proof, for only the Method of Proof,
except for not any Truth either, for only that of Certainty.

If perhaps making only fools of ourselves, for only that of a Fact, it perhaps could be only a Contradiction for such, except for not thinking it should be
for any real either, for next that of Certainty.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

Maybe I am just confused here, regarding the whole subject, because I could end up thinking that it could be rather be Logic, for only proving a certain thing.

Still confusion only, and next not any sharp mind either, for just only Intelligence, because next it could also be that of Rational thinking, for only just guessing.

Rather a drop-down, for just only a box, and it could end up being a Toolbox, except for not any tools which could be used, when only that of Creation in mind.

Is it perhaps kind of "la-la land" here, for just only thinking, or could I make it Certainty also that of Conscience here, for only such a thing?

Proving such a thing as death, is perhaps not necessary either, but rather that we could make it a "Construct" for such a thing, when also a Dogma.

Except for that, we perhaps already know that such a thing as evolution, for also the weather, should be that of complexity for such a thing,
and next ending up being Quantum mechanics for the whole thing, when also subject.

But still only Popeye here, except for not in the door, for just saying hello, when perhaps counting to 0, from just 1, and next thinking it could be a difference.

Still translates with that of a fool here, for sometimes a lunatic as well, but also that you could end up a Daredevil, for just only being brave.

Is my way of thinking, that perhaps infinity could only be a concept here, while also a Construct as well, for only that of death and destruction,
when perhaps only lying in a grave for the first thing, and next making it annihilation, for the second, when we also could make it bird Phoenix as well,
for only that of recurrence, if not any resurrection, when also knowing that new stars could be created, for also born,
when only that of relics being left, for that of dying stars?

The Periodic Table should at least be telling about the elements of nature, for also their properties, except for also the synthesis needed,
when only that of fusion for such a thing.

If Logic could perhaps make me a believer of sorts, for just only telling the Truth, I could perhaps end up being wrong, but except for that,
always that of fusion, for only fusing a couple of elements, next making new ones from just the older, or previous ones.

Because of that, perhaps no such thing as God counting its inventory either, for knowing that it became right, except for not any wrong,
when at least only found to be working.

If rather part of, also in the middle, for just in between, except for still not any whole for just business, when perhaps thinking it could be the wrong place,
for just God sitting in his living room, knowing that Creation was meant for a given purpose.

Is infinity only part of such a thing, or should it rather be a whole, for just only a meaning, when perhaps not any Logic either, for only just a grave,
when you also could know that you are only part of the whole thing, for almost a scheme, when still only your way of life, for that of Existence,
except for the thing we could still make nature?

Logic could still be for that of decision making, and next you could also be left to decide, except for not any Laws of nature, for only its Creation,
telling about the same thing, because here perhaps still a difference.

I think it could be still one beer left in the fridge, but finishing off here.

Sigh, but for just only a melody, she could be lying on a bench, except for perhaps not any naked either.

One story being told, could be that of making it extraterrestrial intelligence, for only that of telling, except for still not any proving.

The other could be just proving for science, and next it could become that of Facts.

Is Logic for any trusted, when also ways and means for such, or should I still only believe, for next only science?

I could end up here, thinking that Logic could still be only a tool, except for not any soap opera, telling about possible misery.

Because here not eating any spaghetti either, for rather only a beer, when also that of a cryptocurrency for that of the market,
when also the stock market for such a thing, except not any groups, or users, for only that of skilled, or talented minds.

Bitcoin, for also the grid, or Gridcoin, for such a thing as well, like also the market for such a thing, except for not any Susie-Q, or Mark Sattler here,
each struggling with their separate illnesses, for that of melancholy, or the like, for also that of alcohol consumption.

His name is still Pablo Picasso, for only that of a painting, except not any failure or flaw, for just only a misery.

Could I make it such a thing as Equivalence, for only that of a couple of civilizations living amongst the stars of the celestial sky,
and if perhaps so, who is next the fortunate winner, for only getting it right, except for perhaps not any wrong?

If you could make it perhaps a globular cluster, also that of lumps, for only just knotted, but except for that, not any knitted, for just only a hand.

Here "broad" for that of just wording, and next opening the gate, for that of a flow, except for not knowing any extremes, for also the edges.

So, you could perhaps "swerve" through traffic, for also into as well, except not any drunk, when perhaps not any skater either, for perhaps not any extremes either.

Next, I was stepping outside the circle, for only its Circumference, knowing that it became just that of oblivion, for perhaps only the Universe expanding into such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference

Except for still only laughing for that of a smile, and next thinking I could also be an idiot as well.

You know, it could sometimes bend, for also being twisted, but is it next only "Twist and shout", for that of a melody, or could it rather be the Force of gravity?

We sometimes could make the Universe uniform, for also homogenous, but here again the translation, for only column, for that of slot,
when also fusing a couple of things, for rather dividing, or splitting instead.

Star cities, if you like, and it becomes cities of light, for only that of light versus darkness, when only that of gravity, for making it clusters of galaxies,
for also the possibility of life, for also likelihood.

Take a chance on me, and next also a given Probability, except for still only luck for that of a chance, because here at least life for that of ourselves,
when only our own civilization could perhaps be concerned.

granted

obvious

evident

of course

vivid

So, here perhaps still that of extremes, for only your rear butt, except for the way you could perhaps be thinking, for only that of science.

Rise and shine for at least one thing, except for not any setting of sail, for only blowing in the wind, when it rather could be blowing in your face.

But rather the carpet, for also the curtain, and it could end up being the whiplash, for only a punishment, except still not any carpet getting wiped, for that of a carpet beater.

By the way, only because the sun could be shining, should not tell about any Creation, for also the thing we could be made of, for just only thinking.

Only because of the old man in the desert, it could also become a whiplash as well, for only thinking that Creation was only a thing just meant to be,
except for not any gravity, for only the Force of nature.

Making it a concept for just thinking, and we also could understand, for also knowing, except for not any reason behind, for only that of Creation.

You think it perhaps could be God for such a thing, except for not any Fallacies for only leaping over on your side, for that of the end of the day.

If perhaps still that of Logic, it could also be an Argument as well, and here ending up perhaps short, for only a way of telling, for also explaining.

Does our knowledge about science, next make for possible shortcomings as well, in that we perhaps may not know all the details?

Like "tit-for-tat", if not any "tit-tat" either, perhaps only your breasts if you happen to be a female, but also that it became this and that,
when also Michael Watson here, except for still not any breasts either.

Einstein perhaps did not need to make it any ding, for also dang, when also making such a thing, because at least he could think, for just knowing,
except for still not the thing we could make just proving, for only that of science.

Do you know for just only a Fact, and next you could presume, except not any pretend, for any pretension, and here the bad word once again.

Oh, put a label on it instead, for rather a stick, and next you could at least know, for only the Method of Proof, except not any Logic, for only Certainty either.

Running the 100 meter, for just only a game, perhaps still the starting point here, for that of the gun, except for not entering the stage close to finish,
when still some 90 meters left of the whole game.

Proximity becomes close, for only an approximation, except for perhaps not any Proxima Centauri for a similar meaning either.

But rather nearby stars instead, and it could become eta Cassiopeia, for just such a thing, for also a double star,
except for rather stinks at times, for only a wasteland, when perhaps thinking that Creation should be only for that of an end,
when also a possible sacrifice for such a thing.

A meteorologist is perhaps not supposed to be wearing a shirt, for only glasses as well, when also double sight as well,
but translates here into horn eyeglasses, for the figure you could perhaps only be.

The Force of gravity could be still only a Law of nature, for also a mechanism, for such a thing, but also that a cock should be still proud,
for just only knowing, if not any pretending.

Next he also predicts the weather, for perhaps not any sweater, but for the same reason, perhaps not any fortune teller,
for that of telling about future events, when it rather should be those of the past, for just only history.

Ding-ding, for the rest, if not any cut short either, but here that of Nostradamus, for only a fortune teller, for also soothsayer,
and it ended up in the drain, if you perhaps did not know.

Is evolution for perhaps a meaning, or should it rather be for that of the better, except for not any victim of circumstances, for only a casual event?

Think you perhaps could make it better, but next it could become only stupidity for just only a Fact, except not any betterment either.

If perhaps rather a slip of a tongue for a couple of things, we could also make it Creation, for the thing we could perhaps make of it, except for still not any guessing.

Just delusion for only becoming nuts, and next also saturated as well, except for perhaps not any Wisdom either, for only at the top of your head.

Beginning and end, could still be that of versus, for also one thing against another, but here that of starting time, for also finish, for also the things we could know.

If a Construct also means a way of "thinking", what next the point of just thinking, except for not any possibilities, for that of the absurd,
when also that of likelihood, for just only a chance.

Here it slipped away, but thinking about it here, for perhaps getting back with me, because here Religion down the drain, for just only not
any meaning, for also that of science, for that of Proof, when we could be knowing a couple of things, and also making it Certainty.

Religion is perhaps not any scientific approach, for also mentality, when also a standing point, for just only a stance, or state.

Make it the forbidden fruit perhaps, and you could perhaps know how things once were, for also became, except for not any how, or which.

Flip over, for next only a state, and perhaps the Steady State here, for only a condition, except for perhaps not any melody either.

But next, the old melody, for the thing we could still think, and next also make of it, for only that of Religion versus science, and next knowing that
the latter could at least be returning the answer.

Proving Religion could still be one thing, for perhaps no such thing either, but if perhaps an answer could also be a lesson,
it could also be a way of Thought, for just only thinking.

I know, because the separate lines, for also respective as well, could make it an idiot of myself, except not any telling.

Just translating here, for perhaps not any Omen either, and it becomes "whims", for also quirk or fad, when just getting an idea.

Enter the saddle, for only the stirrup, and you could end up being cocky, if not any arrogant either.

Therefore, fluid, for also that of plasma, and it could be only a state, for that of a condition, except for not any blink of an eye either, for only catching the right moment.

So, right for perhaps not any wrong, and you next could also think it could become better, when also right.

Ding, and next also dang, and for such a thing also ring a bell, for only that of Creation perhaps meant to be, except for still not any believed, for also trusted.

Could you make it any extremes, for only making a point, except for not any climbing of a summit, for reaching a point, for also goal,
when sometimes down the drain as well?

Syrup perhaps, for perhaps only acid, except not any way of believing, for just only Proof, because here we could be having Creation in front of us,
for also being laid, and next we could make it science, for just only thinking, except for not any basics, or basis, for just only grounds.

Questioning the Method of Proof, and I could end up being silly, except for perhaps only an idiot, but next make a guess only, and I could be still only an idiot.

Like the idiot, for also the member of the audience, for just only listening in, and still only a member of the public, he could still be only an idiot,
but next question that of Probability, for that of likelihood, and you perhaps may not question such a thing as Certainty either.

Resting, and next also delving, because an idiot should not be telling about possibilities either, for just only "conclusions" as well.

inference

closure

containment

inclusion

Be my guest, but is perhaps an absolute, for also absolutes, mean also that of Certainty?

Does such a thing as an absolute (or absolute factor) mean that of Certainty, when only such a thing could be assumed?

Easy, for also simple, and next also simplistic as well, and next any complexity, I could just hate it, except for not any bother.

Ring a bell, for that of Creation perhaps in mind, for the thing we could perhaps know, and also derive, except for still not any knowledge, for just only Fact.

Any absolutes, and next also in the middle. except for not any handshake, for that of, or in between.

You see, making it a certain Fact, and it also becomes knowledge, except for still not the thing you perhaps could prove.

Fancy a thing, could perhaps be still a thing of joy, except not any happiness, for just striking luck either.

Is Creation next meant for a pleasure dome, or could it be just only fantasy, when still only "guessing"?

The ultimate thing could still be that of a winner, except not any sacrifice, except for ending up with such a thing as Belief,
for only that of science.

Could you perhaps make it nuts and bolts for a couple of things, except for still only in the dark, for just only Certainty?

Oh, one thing for that of the other, except for not any versus either, and next think that I perhaps know the answer?

Forget it.

Yes, yes, yes, but are we perhaps still here only to prove, except for not making it nature as it is, when sometimes 40 km/s, for also 60 km/s,
except for still only a hyperbolic orbit, for traveling through space.

If our aim is to find extraterrestrial intelligence, also the way it should be done, except for those ways a house could still be built,
for also working, if not any idea for what it perhaps was meant to be, for only an idea.

The thing we could be making a balancing act, could be still standing in the middle, for not any falling, but also that the ants are building their nests,
facing in a southerly direction.

But next such a middle of the tree, is perhaps not any best guess for any ambition either, when it also could be results we could be able to achieve.

Do we next think that nature could be working in a similar way, only because the ants could still be facing in the direction of the sun, for only just living?

Perhaps the better approach, for also solution, could always be better than the second best one, but if still found to be working for perhaps both,
which one would you choose to use?

The thing which sometimes could bear no fruit, could be that of hopelessness, when no such hope at all, but if ambition could still make for curiosity,
also that of results as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Page_replacement_algorithm#Second-chance

Here the numerical alternative for such an algorithm, except for also the alternative science for making it just disorder instead, for that of randomness.

I have to run at times, for only the tasks, so here finishing up two AP26/27 tasks by means of CUDA, as well as also the Seti@home tasks in the Manager.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

But who are next supposed to laugh at any science, who or whether it could be an Atheist, for also Agnostic, and also a Believer?

You do not see any Religion here at first glance, so here it could rather be a question of right and wrong, for only behavior or attitude,
but if life became the result of only hardship, like close to the edge for this, except not any survival either, perhaps that of randomness only,
except for rather thinking that a slim chance could still mean only a faint hope.

Do we next take it for granted, when sometimes being able to prove a couple of things?

Should not the Laws of nature tell us that things could be still hard, when still also possible, except for excluding a couple of Facts for possibilities,
when a thing could end up perhaps being not true?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

Perhaps not directly the same as Chaos either, when it rather could be several Factors involved for such a thing, and next mixed in as well,
when also that of Predictability here, for only the first sentence.

Probability should still tell about a likelihood, for only that of a guess, if perhaps not any better either.

One option could still be debunking those who choose to believe, except for perhaps only just science for such a thing as well.

Could we perhaps make it the beginning of life, for rather the beginning of the Universe here, and next think that it perhaps was only a
random event, except not any Coincidence either?

You could still wear the Bible in one hand, for also the bottle in the other, and here not intended for any specific one here either,
but rather that just proving a couple of things, should not make any Opportunist of you, for only such thinking.

We perhaps are not here to prove any stories, for also reports, but rather could be ending up looking for the signal which perhaps is not there.

Is one way of believing in a couple of aliens, just seeing and watching, or could you still make it that of Consensus, for the tasks we could be running?

Perhaps still only randomness a property of nature, for perhaps also Chaos as well, but still perhaps Logic needed, for sometimes also Proof as well.

I think it can be done better at times as well, except for my neighbor at the other table, because for just the moment of time passing by here,
we also could think of making it the better science, because also nature should also be a better thing as well, except for still the way we could be looking at it.

Waiting and watching perhaps, for just only seeing, and still also knowledge for certain facts, by only making it Proof, so if perhaps none of the above,
what else could it perhaps be?

Do we perhaps know, for also assuming that such a thing as life became reality, only because the world could also be perfect as well?

Are the Laws supposed to be making for everything, or just only perfect, because it could be still that of Proof, or is just an assumption for that of a likelihood,
also a similar chance for just that of living, when still only life for its own meaning?

Perhaps sufficient, for also needed, but if still only water, for also air as well, at least the conditions needed for life in order to survive,
except for perhaps not needed that such at thing became any precondition either.

If rather a mixed environment, for sometimes wet, for also dry, that of competition at times for just feeding, if not any drinking, except those events still making
for your regular life.

So perhaps a long way to go for only Religion versus science, when it still could be only evolution instead, but if only confused on the wording,
for perhaps not any meaning, I perhaps concluded that one thing should perhaps mean more, except for not any better either.

Of course not in my mind, for also lips, when only the lights of the day, but if perhaps only believing in Religion, because it could be the subject,
at least you could be taking such a thing for granted, by just only wording.

Therefore still the perfect world, for also what you could be making it, except for also the Method of Proof still for only such a thing,
when next not excluding a couple of other Facts either.

The crocodile does not need any dentist in order to swallow its food, but also that NGC 488 could be symmetrical in shape for only its visual appearance,
and therefore close to perfect as well.

If we are here to prove any given reality, for also likelihood, therefore still that of the Method of Proof, except for only a chance, when perhaps only a guess.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Chaos, in my opinion, is the product of several or more factors, where each could be more specific, or symmetrical, but when mixed together, for also combined,
becomes that of randomness, for also Chaos as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos

Any final conclusion, for just only a guess, and you next take what you have, for what you next could get, except for not any starting point, for also ending,
when just only a heat of a game, except for not any middle of the session, for starting to get old, if perhaps not any finishing end for any nature either.

Perhaps the dinosaurs only became victims of a catastrophic event, but next also victim of circumstance, for only such a thing happening,
but we perhaps could able to see here that putting the nice touch on a Theory, still could need the Method of Proof, except for not any specifics, for that of details.

Is such a thing for just becoming nice, also that of Premises, or Axioms, for such a thing, or could we rather make nature any better, for only that of numbers,
if still perhaps not any Logic either?

Still the beehive facing south, for only survival versus living, except for not the other alternative, for perhaps better, when still only Probability for such a thing.

Unable to get at it right now, but left stuck for only that of a thing being just better, for only that of a similar Proof, for only a Method.

But think it could be only just Christmas, for that of a celebration, at least a couple of lights in the sky, except for still using your eyes and ears,
except for thinking that just Proof could still only be for that of proving, except not any real answer.

Still such a thing needed, of course, except for not any messing around either, for only holding the Bible in your left hand, for also the glass in the other.

Perhaps a direct link or number related to pending credit, for access from the account page should be there as well, because here need to check with the tasks for this.

That is what I meant to say, for perhaps a little bad wording, because tasks in progress, should at least affect current credit,
both for, or when it becomes success versus failure, and credit becomes added, for also increased.

With PrimeGrid, a couple of pending tasks, still showing that I got the bronze badge for the AP27 search, except having to add myself,
only because a couple of tasks were still only pending.

So, also becoming an AP22 being found here, at the top of the middle, for only the large crowd still waiting, for those being letting in,
where AP23 becomes a little fewer, and farther in between, I also wrote a post more dedicated to possible science here,
but for now ending up in the drain, for that of Windows updates.

Shocking, someone perhaps might say, if not any nullify, for not being of any value either, because here watching a couple of programs,
where it could be that of a documentary instead, but at least color where it only should be black, for that of grenades and misery a long time ago.

Pick it up, for rather a scale we could measure, and it could be still levels of such, when also placing ourselves in the middle, for only our own place.

Those ending up being victims of war, for rather casualties, could be limping, but when also naked, it becomes quite an ugly thing, for only just looking.

The one thing we could perhaps be making for angels, could also be that happy day, for also a lucky moment, but if rather a curse should be the same as evil,
it could also be just the opposite, and we could be back at the sickness of war for such a thing.

Making it perhaps a thought about a Creation without any meaning, for just not any given, or specific, either it becomes only a loving moment for just disregarding,
or it rather could be a sinister one, for making it rather Heaven and Hell instead.

At least a rose could be smelled, for also touched, but do we next make it only Consensus for such a thing, when perhaps only left to disagree at times?

Perhaps only the fact that any such smell does not make it any detective of ourselves, for only curiosity, when it sometimes could be barking as well,
for rather the investigative part instead, for that of a feature.

Just translating, and being lump is not the same as any fat either, for only just a woman, but you could still be left to decide whether she is pretty.

The difference between 2 and 3 could still be 3, but if rather 3 and 7 instead, it becomes 4, and if perhaps so, the fat lady could also be more pretty,
only because she could mean more, except for perhaps not so either.

If perhaps the Moment of Truth at times, for only a given knowledge, except for not any event happening either, we know that it should mean something,
except for perhaps not valuing it either, for also quantizing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effect

Any shocking for just only spectacle and awe, and it could be an event like the Rendlesham Forest incident, where for one part it became only a lighthouse,
and for the other, just some people not catching the whole meaning of it all.

Such things as Mysteries and Magic, for also Miracles, are perhaps not only just given either, for only in front of your feet, but if rather part of nature,
for kind of a context of sorts, at least we could make the Fundamental Laws of Physics, also a Principle, except for rather perhaps Axioms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

Here you may notice that it starts a bit wrong, for only philosophical, but ends up a little better down the page, for that of Axioms instead.

Just lying flat, for sometimes also standing, and you could be the one writing a couple of papers, for only using the microscope, for also telescope.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_anthropology

Could you make it a priest, for sometimes not any handshake with a scientist, except for not the biologist telling the astronomer the fact that I do not read your lips,
for rather your own direction, for also discipline, and it becomes different subjects, for also a different meaning?

Or rather just only "what did you say", for only heck of wording, but the line became a bit long.

If perhaps only so, for making it a famous Equation, versus perhaps God, at least two different meanings, for also subjects, but at least that science could be
coming up with different Proof, for only just an answer, when still only science.

The thing we sometimes could make for nature, is its excess, for rather superfluous, but in the same way, we could also make it the greedy, for also the miser,
when perhaps the one saving his money, rather than giving to the poor.

He could still own a fortune, but next spend just a dime on the one lying in the street, so if valuing, for rather the other word,
perhaps no such thing as "jump the bucks", for only little versus less, when also a little larger as well, for only just a meaning.

Lost the word here, but if still counting, for also enumerating, next that of quantizing as well, for still only numbers, but here more about valuing instead.

Before continuing, ended up with that of Certainty here for such a thing, when perhaps sometimes Logic, for possibly rather knowledge instead.

Measurability perhaps, for only the lost word, and if surviving an accident, the victim could be standing up on his feet, telling that he is just fine.

The Creation we could perhaps make for a couple of things, could still be for just a meaning, but also the way we could measure, for also value as well.

We next could end up making it Proof as well, for only that of Fact, when it also could be that of Certainty as well, and here needs checking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

I also could be making it the 'N' word for the thing we perhaps should not know about, for not any nice, but if getting back at the start here,
for also the top, it could be someone just limping around, except for perhaps not any victim of circumstance either, for only acts of warfare.

Could we make it Dyson sphere, for sometimes also a smile as well, we could still only be left to guess, for also that of an idea, but also that the
Method of Proof should still make it "matter of fact" as well, for only the answer we could know, or be getting at.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence

Next should follow that Evidence should be for only such a Fact, except for still not any Manna either, for only a couple of roses.

We had a couple of recent finds, for that of discoveries, with my parent project PrimeGrid, where resource share is currently set at 50/50.

Next I could still be only fortunate, for rather unfortunate, when perhaps only a winner, for striking luck, except for only an AP22 for now.

Prepare for an eventuality, and for some reason it resembles that of Effect above, except for perhaps rather a demise instead,
telling about a possible oblivion, except for still only the emptiness of space for such a thing, rather than the Force of gravity.

Perhaps it only should be weighing instead, but if still only the priest for also the scientist, only the handshake, except for still not any measuring.

For this, perhaps not any thief either, for just only stealing, but if rather stupid, for also silly, I could also be a fool, for just only dumb.

But next you could be making it measurability, for only just measuring, and it becomes that of a scale, and for this it right now looks a bit strange to me.

If Logic is perhaps about any valuing, it should not be so either, for only telling that I still could be just only silly, except not any genius either.

Are we able to make ourselves some 0.84 on the Kardashev scale, and next with respect to what, for only measuring, except for not any scale?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale

But next also levels of Intelligence, for also Conscience as well, and it could be that of fine music being listened at, except not any mice around the cheese either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level

But also that we could be doing so, only because we could make nature in a certain context, for just only understanding or knowing, for also proving.

If Certainty only became that of proving a couple of numbers, for only its meaning, what next, except for still only Logic, for telling precisely the same?

Any such thing as "quantizable Logic", and perhaps no such thing either, for only those things we could still measure and weigh.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization_(physics)

Perhaps still one piece of the whole cake, for also a bit on the way, but if rather such a wording as "Don't tell me", where is next any Logic in this?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization_(signal_processing)

Spelling it wrong here, for rather the thing we perhaps could do, and here a quite good article for this subject.

The fact that some people here perhaps do not believe in the WOW signal, could make me thing that we should be looking for the non-numerical alternative,
for just only proving, and it could be still only a couple of Facts, for also given Evidence, for perhaps also the fun of it all.

But rather than just Fact, for only translating, we could also make it a "recognition" of sorts, if presented with a couple of Facts, when also making it Evidence,
so if perhaps still not any throne for just sitting, because you could be the king, could you rather make it "Truth", for only just a way of understanding?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_(logic)

Not forgetting the fun, for just strolling on the Moon, for sometimes music as well, but here at least a couple of Facts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illumination

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiation

Forget the little angel in me, but we could be still here only to know that radiation is still only a biproduct of a fusion process taking place inside stars.

But next that we could also make it the Aura, for just only a lifeless, or static field surrounding myself, for that of being a living organism, for also entity.

Just beauty, for only the Beauty and the Beast, and perhaps not any Big Dipper, for rather a wagon either, when it perhaps could be Ezekiel for such a thing,
except for still only a Method of Proof, for just a way.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel

He supposedly met up with an angel in the desert, for rather perhaps only a craft, and next also wheels inside wheels, for only the thing he could see.

We still could make it a couple of people around, for also the science which could be carried out, except for the whole thing we perhaps could make out it either.

The old story could be still David wrestling with Goliat, for only a fight, except for not any David's star, for only just a sacred belief.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_of_David

For now left stuck on any meaning, for also opinion, and therefore not any biased, you should know, because one thing is still fighting in the street, for also desert,
except for not any exercise of Faith, for only just Belief, when it rather could be just believing in God.

I better have the dinner first, before continuing.

And the project just went down for maintenance when pushing the OK button, so here the bad start for the previous, and unable to edit.

Nice to see it having back, and here continuing with the tasks, while also success on a couple of other things.