Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 115 · 116 · 117 · 118 · 119 · 120 · 121 . . . 334 · Next

AuthorMessage
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944260 - Posted: 14 Jul 2018, 16:04:59 UTC
Last modified: 14 Jul 2018, 16:26:21 UTC

Not in the mood for running any tasks right now, because of the summer heat.

Opening up a can, or box of sardines, and this time oliven oil, rather than that of tomato.

But next perhaps Soya, or soya oil instead, and maybe it perhaps smells a little, except for perhaps still red, like also ketchup.

So, maybe perhaps also a Conference of sorts, when it rather could be knights, and perhaps sitting around the table as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

The fact is that if sometimes growing up, you could end up being an adult as well, except for not any "Overlord", or first class seat,
for that of also being in charge, and next also knowing everything, for next a bit of Comprehension.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloan_Digital_Sky_Survey

If I happened to be an astronomer, perhaps I would know better.

Could you next make it humans only, for such a high, or first class seat, or should you rather make it still nature, with respect for only itself?

Here both voids and filaments, for also galaxies, and clusters of galaxies, and we could still be a small part of it, for only our own civilization,
if perhaps not only just the Earth itself.

Really, like a push, and sometimes a whine as well, in that it could be simple and easy a couple of times, only because you happen to know.

Could you make it still a bit of "Flesh and blood" for a couple of things, when also some 0.84 on the Kardashev scale, and that this could also be open ended,
next for that of any Intelligence?

Am I right or am I wrong, but could I sometimes believe in just myself, except for not any relying either, for next make it simple and easy,
for next not any hard, when it perhaps could be such a thing as Comprehension?

If for some reason any silly, when it comes to possible mentality, not going in the trap either, for making it Religion, when it rather could be the Sloan Great Wall.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sloan_Great_Wall

Should perhaps not tell, but for you dedicated ones here, also a nice finish, for making it NGC 383 when looking around, using sky-map.org

In Pisces here, and you may need to key in here, but next a great look as a result, for that of a big show, or spectacle, because here quite nice.

Forget the hairy creature from alpha Centauri, if you will, when rather making it Cosmology, for that of the other thing,
and perhaps a bit more of Comprehension as well.

But really that neither ketchup, or even soya, for also that of oliven oil, could be telling about any subtlety, for also a subtle difference,
next with also that of a bit of colors in mind.

If I key in the native word, still that of Judgement back in return, except for perhaps a bad one such, for also making it a miscalculation.

Except for perhaps still not any "why", for also "whynot", when we still could make it only Probability and Logic, for also an estimate of the probable
number of intelligent civilizations present, or situated across space.

The Gyroscope could be a fine instrument, sometimes being used in submarines, or u-boats, and next also the integrated circuit, or processor,
for also the microprocessor, becoming next "computer on a chip", and also the brain of a computer.

Because here the fact that perhaps no such thing as "nothing at all", for also nothing to prove, when making it at least Frank Drake here,
and also his "Probabilistic" equation, for that of much the same, namely the Drake equation.

Like both an understatement, and also overstatement, one thing scientists could perhaps choose to say is "As a matter of fact", and so on.

Because of that, also space for such a thing, for next also Universe, in that seeing could still be believing, and we could next make it everything,
for just zero, nil, or nothing.

If Religion could perhaps be telling such a thing as being alone in space, for only ourselves, perhaps a bit wrong, if not ever heard such a thing either.

I have not checked, but having more than one single God, could be still about Theism, except for perhaps not any Monotheism either.

But next express yourself, except for perhaps your feelings either, in making it still yourself only, for that of emptiness of space,
only because we could still make it science one thing, for next Religion another.

If perhaps still only "Wonders of nature", for a couple of things, is this only because of technology alone, or could it still be an Aspect of sorts?

I think it spells "technocrat" here, in that still in the old Soviet Union, a man with the name of Alexei Kosygin, could perhaps go for being such one.

Except for not any "aspiration" either, when it only could be Spirit of St. Louis, for a couple of things.

If perhaps rather making it a general hospital here, also that of the operating table, if not any trauma itself, but still perhaps a bit of surgery needed.

But next also the white coats, for that of the personnel, except for not any clean or sterile environment either.

If you still could make this a technological issue, for also environment, perhaps no such thing as jumping the bandwagon either,
for next making it more advanced civilizations than our own, and next also similar, or corresponding technology.

Perhaps still citizens of Earth for next ourselves, except for any other civilizations either, which could be having their own planet, for next also star.

If rather someone having a dream in the past, next which dream, for that of whatever?

Perhaps a dream about Freedom, if not making it such a thing as travel along the stars, for next a Journey through the Universe,
for both past and present, if perhaps not any limits either, for next also the future.

In the classic movie "2001, A Space Odyssey", or perhaps the similar, next the big wheel, for that of an orbiting space station, if not any similar resemblance either.

But next perhaps a great concept here for such a thing, except for perhaps not any engines, for that of propulsion either, which could be carrying us around.

You next need the "zoo" as well, for making it both the garden for any green plants, if not any fish container either, for that of nutrition,
except for still the corn of the bread, for that of your breakfast.

If perhaps still the Earth an ecological system, next also free floating in space, with the sun only traveling in one direction now,
for that of a motion through the Milky Way, which could make it for a trajectory through space, except for still also the
Milky Way rotating, in a similar fashion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecology

Except for perhaps both the small and large one, for that of vessels in our blood, next carrying oxygen to and from the heart, by means of arteries and veins,
and here that of circulatory motion, as well.

But next perhaps only simple or basic science here, except for not any guessing either.

Perhaps not the best one above, but if rather making it still Intelligence that of a personality of sorts, and for this also humans as well,
next only a bit of swastika and symbols, next for only nature itself, and we could still be left explaining it all.

Translates into "discretion", or perhaps "at will" here, when you could be taking something for granted, except for not any crocodile
swallowing the whole meal at once either.

We could still be making it "bottoms up", for that of a drink, like also "Toast" as well, but if perhaps rather making it a "Universal principle",
for next rather the Universe itself, it could still be the question of "Where are we going".

Here, perhaps Cosmology at best, if perhaps not anything else either, including possible Methodology.

Perhaps my father here, for that of lights at the end of tunnel, if perhaps not any tunnel at the end either, for that of lights.

We still could make it a bit of Perception, of course, except for not any Truth either, which could be telling about the Universe.

Again, the mentioned story about a whole hillside, where it suddenly became lights and traffic, except for only the countryside itself.

Because here not a joke either, for that of a story which became quite settled, and also known, but still only from the past.

Here perhaps the game of cards again, and next playing except for perhaps not any poker either, for that of the ace versus the joker.

If perhaps sometimes science without any meaning, next also a bit of laugh as well, for not any believing (not Belief), except for not any credibility either.

Make it both an illusionist, and also a magician, and they could both "prove", if possibly, or absolutely needed, for next also a bit of work,
except for not any "true" or "genuine" illusion either, for also trick, which next could be only part of nature.

Guess what, but Proof should always follow that of a Methodology, for next also becoming a Truth as well, and still for that of science.

If still sometimes the mirage of nature, for that of a desert, or perhaps the rim of the open ocean, where trees could be standing up,
next perhaps only a natural phenomenon of sorts, except for still not any "Truth" itself.

Makes me think of that of speaking with a single voice at times, when it also could be that of two voices, for also a split personality, or mentality,
but if perhaps still making it only nature here, also that God could be telling the Truth as well, except for perhaps not any liar either.

If supposedly a hero for a couple of things, next also a bit of expectations as well, if not any hope either, and here again, perhaps that of a Premise,
because if perhaps not any hope either, rather that of disbelief.

Next perhaps easy if we could make it one single thing only for that of nature, except for not any spoken words either, where it could be even more to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

If perhaps still not any brownish color either, for that of a Labyrinth, except for not any botanical garden either, it became that of worldview, or outlook,
in the previous, when it rather could be Nicolaus Copernicus for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labyrinth

Notice here, that if still perhaps science, next also a bit of self-referencing as well, in that it could be a look back at subject, for next also science itself,
and perhaps always so.

If rather making it Dark matter, or Dark energy here as well, next which way, for that of a never ending story, with lights at the end of the tunnel,
for that of a definitive answer, except for still perhaps only the Labyrinth, if not the Mandelbrot set either.

Is it not the fact that fundamental questions also needs fundamental answers, in order to be resolved, and next "Which witch", for that of science,
except for not asking either.

Because here making it that Equations, for also physical Laws, could be telling about natural phenomena, including possible spherical such ones as well,
and next also sometimes laughing a bit as well, for only making it the unexplained.

Here correcting myself, for not making it any UFO phenomenon either, when it rather could be still only the mirage, for also mirror.

As an example, we could make it just Credibility itself, for that of both subject, and also science, except for not any "crooked idiots" either,
for that of a similar mentality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

Except for not any praise, when it rather could be that of punishment and rebuttal, if not any objection either,
like the old slap on the throat, for also rear butt as well, for that of small children, perhaps sometimes praise the Lord,
for a couple of things, except for still not making it any hatred on its own.

Perhaps still two hands and arms, except for two legs as well, but next still only hand for the purpose of writing.

Except for not a slap in the face either, when it also could be the Janus face, except for not any lost, or fading moon of Saturn either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Life is, or could be still short, and better do the best of it, except for not any "betterment" either, because also the cheek of your face,
except for not also the forehead as well.

If Proof could still be the better answer, for next also Method, perhaps also a couple of answers as well, except for not believing in the priest either.

Or perhaps rather the open answer, for next also question, in that Dr. Stephen Hawking could perhaps be the one who could be offering such an answer,
except for not hearing anything either, coming from his mouth.

Except for perhaps such a thing as "Shame on you", coming from a priest, when perhaps making even such a thing as Faith, part of Creation itself,
except for perhaps not any Creator for the whole thing either.

P97 = 1413700770271574341758521798292576912378307757294793637158084053977627880879379705711048210744973

Nice, but next only a factor found, for that of numerical purposes, but rather a bit of champagne and toast, for that of a dinner,
except for not any "lovely" food either.

Should Credibility next be for that of science, or should you rather make it sometimes "Harelip", for only split mentality, or personality,
when perhaps still not about any "Truth" either?

Except for perhaps making it both God and the Devil, for a couple of things, for also believing in both good and bad.

If Creation perhaps also became about the spoken word, next also Intelligence as well, for also a bit of Conscience,
except for only that of Belief, when you sometimes could be making it a Perception as well, and next for that of God.

What possibly is lacking, and even nicer or finer, is an even better word for that of Belief, except not making it any Faith either.

Something like "Divine mentality", or the like, except for perhaps only Creation myth itself.

Still the bit of dirt, for also loo, or toilet, except for not any Journey to the End of space either, for next only the Universe,
but if perhaps such a thing as "Supreme being", for also superb, or superiority, perhaps slightly better, if not anything else either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord

I prefer to still make it only God here, except for not any deities either.

Like I already said, namely that evolution perhaps that of a fact, for also important, for that of the Earth, and also the Universe, but not the only simple factor either,
in the same way as also misunderstanding a little, for that of making it modularity, for next becoming that of Intelligent Design.

Or maybe only an excuse here, when you rather could make it a Thesis instead, and next still only Religion, because here only still a scientific debate, of sorts.

If you perhaps could make it both the baboon, for also monkey, or chimpanzee, if not any ape either, perhaps a sense of someone laughing in the shadows,
for a bit of disguise, in that of making sometimes incomplete, for their perfection, or intended purpose.

Like also evolution itself, when it also could be "Survival of the fittest", when perhaps rather such a thing as "meant for a given purpose", perhaps could be better.

Again, that of both Ambiguity, and the Janus face, as well as the spoken word here, except for not any "gameplay" either.

Perhaps one way of approach, is digging in the sand, for that of Matter Creation itself, and next its possible meaning, except for no such thing as Religious thinking either.

Also that of both the mentioned protons and electrons, for that of lightning in the sky, when electricity is supposed to be only negatively charged electrons,
for that of its carrier, except for perhaps not any discharge either.

Enough said, for perhaps both good and bad, except for perhaps not any agreement for that of work to do, for what we are supposed to do either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SHGb02%2B14a

Perhaps here right now, for the slightly better, if still perhaps not down the drain here as well.

Back to business, and next you have it, for that of both ourselves, with respect to perhaps others.
ID: 1944260 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944275 - Posted: 14 Jul 2018, 18:17:57 UTC
Last modified: 14 Jul 2018, 18:36:18 UTC

I clicked back at SDSS, for that of a little closer check, except not still any oil either.

I think that trusting a couple of people, for next also Belief as well, could be one thing, except for still not only the sharp pencil,
for that of looking for the faint signal either.

Like I said, perhaps not evolution for everything either, except for perhaps not any Religion for the same, when you also could be making it a notion of time,
for that of the Universe itself.

Time flies, and next past morning, and also that of Lucy for our common ancestor, except for not lying in the face of others, for something which perhaps is not true.

Perhaps still that of Order and Chaos, for that of a bit of randomness, is worth mentioning, when sometimes from cradle to grave, except for not any Dawn of the morning,
for next only humankind.

Here also the word "strict" at times, for also strict Order, when it perhaps could be a sorting principle only.

But if rather a ball of yarn, also rewinding, for also replaying sometimes, for that of a repeating experience, except for only loose threads at each end.

Not any name calling either, but could you still make it a fake story sometimes, when coming up with a story of aliens or extraterrestrials living on Earth,
and perhaps even a futuristic world, for next that of a concept?

If perhaps such a thing as an alien greeting a president, next a bit of laugh, for perhaps no such thing either, except for a black and white picture.

Perhaps we already found, or made it out, namely that of sometimes faking perhaps, if not pretending to make it any science either.

Is it not funny, but when making soup for dinner, it is not supposed to only be hot, but it rather should be cooking, next for only 100 degrees, for such.

If rather making a choice for also that of a difference, namely a naked body lying on a table versus a Dyson sphere, for that of hiding in disguise,
perhaps no reason to believe in such a thing either, except for otherwise stated.

Because here, nature supposedly still for that of nature itself, while Intelligence is supposed to be for at least humankind.

Again perhaps the priest laughing at me here, except for not any scientist either, when perhaps only a bit of Agnostic for that of myself.

If perhaps carrying the suitcase halfway up the stairs, for next also science, next perhaps leave it to the priest, for the second half,
except for perhaps not any Belief itself, next for that of God.

Like Lord, as previously mentioned, also God, except for perhaps not any divine entity either, possibly responsible for such a thing as Creation.

Like I also mentioned, if science could make it one thing for next another, by means of also telling, perhaps still such a thing as Creation for a given purpose,
and next also meaning, except for perhaps still not any Religion either, only because of what I meant to be myself (read above).

If not wrong, also mentioning the word "encompass" earlier on, which could mean something like everything for all, except for perhaps not nothing either.

Because if "it is", for next also "there is", next also "meant to be" as well, for that of Reason with a meaning, except for not any doubt either,
because Reason is perhaps not about any Logic either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubt

One reason we perhaps may not agree on the intelligent signal, is not because we are any silly or stupid either, except for perhaps a bit of rational thinking instead.

Next that we perhaps could know why nature sometimes could be having the upper hand, as well.

Also mentioning the fact in the past, that even such a thing as "Naturalist", could be having its weakness, for also limit, in that even a crocodile man,
perhaps is not any genius for everything either.

So, for that of both factors and prime number, if not any digital watches either, a bit of preciseness needed, except for not any synchronization either.

Because of that, sometimes only a "slur", or indistinct, for that of a slow start, if not any "absolutely" either, when it rather could be about a Principle,
if perhaps only a cold engine for the car in the early morning, and next reluctant to start.

I think it was somewhere in the past, when it became corrected for that of a phase, and next perhaps the Moon as well, in that it could also be a transit around the Earth.

"the carrying of people, goods, or materials from one place to another"

"the process or a period of changing from one state or condition to another"

Depending on transit, or transition, for also that of a translation (notice the difference), here the two sentences above, for next also a phase,
except for perhaps not any "ThirdPhaseOfMoon" either.

Could next be either quoted, or placed below, instead.

https://www.youtube.com/user/thirdphaseofmoon

Guess what, but these guys perhaps made a bit of good work, except for only homework perhaps, except for no such thing meant for the scientific community either.

I mentioned in the past a bit of work doing simple video playback, from that of a recording, except for not any video recording software either,
but only both Paint and IrfanView, for that of picture editing.

But if next black upon white, or maybe the opposite, and it is not supposed to be working well either, and still you could be having those "fake" colors,
pretending to be photographs, only because of a bit of dithering.

Again, it supposedly does not work, but still that it could be there, and the reason for this is that nature could be its own master, for also in charge.

So, which premise, if any, next for any skeptic, or debunkers around, except for perhaps "Belief" only, next for science, except for perhaps not the Truth either?

Like Wings about Phoenix, if not any Flying Wing either, perhaps still only a natural phenomenon, when we rather could be looking for an intelligent signal,
for next also Intelligence itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenix_Lights

Except for still perhaps the Governor, except for the man hiding his face behind the mask, only because it could end up being a true story, for the whole thing.

If I translate the word "study", perhaps the working room for such, except for not the room I am sitting in either.

But if rather such a thing as water, for that of acid, only because it ended up being so already at the start, perhaps time now looking for any better,
in that there perhaps could be intelligent civilizations around, but still hiding in the shadows.

Because of that, perhaps time for a better definition of aliens versus also extraterrestrials, if not any E.T. either, except for such a thing as a face, of course.

I mentioned the quite good factor above, except for perhaps not any flying either, when it could be rather rowing, for next also sailing a little.

Next, "Row your boat", of course, and here the little strange melody as well, which could be performed in a displaced, or repeating sequence.

Also it becomes a thought of perhaps halfway on a couple of issues, except for not any direct lead either, which could make for a successful outcome.

You only are supposed to know, because of knowledge itself, and not because of any "Merry Christmas" either.

Here where I am sitting now, perhaps no such thing as a gray mask (not for that of myself) either, for that of a face perhaps seen from the side, or sideways.

If such a thing in front of me, for next also a couple of other things, perhaps slightly more easier, like having all facts on the table, before next the final decision being made,
and here also such a thing as Evidence, as well.

So here that of "mount" as well, except for not any "surmount" either, next for only the table, except for perhaps only lack of Proof, for also Evidence, when it could be
that of aliens and extraterrestrials, for that of a subject.

Back later.
ID: 1944275 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944696 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 8:11:56 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 8:12:28 UTC

Similarly here, for that of two clicks down, for roughly a half page, for the blc tasks still left to do in the task list,
but for now resting only, because of the summer heat.

If I also could be checking in with that of Consensus, during the day, also it becomes that of acid in water,
when it rather should be that of washing your hands.

I really do not think that most of this is any pseudoscience, except for "Man of our times", for that of a bit of time passing by,
since the apple in the garden.

As long as seeing could also be believing, we could also have the Method of Proof as well, and still be left only with ourselves, for such a thing.

Next also the way, in that we always should be questioning nature, for also our surroundings, except for not any Doubt versus Belief either,
because we always could make it one thing or another, with only respect to science.
ID: 1944696 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944704 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 9:58:07 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 10:00:54 UTC

Reads better in full as Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

Perhaps Consensus, or even the lack of it, is sometimes a similar lack of an ability to agree.

If Reason for Doubt, could rather be reason to Believe, only because of two different things, or opposite Forces,
next for that of a Methodology, we could be back at a "Looking glass" of sorts, before checking,
when it comes to making it one way of looking at nature, for that of science, except for only a priest, for such a thing.

Slap my hand, for that of the summer heat, at some 10:45 AM in the morning, but it could be written, or formulated better here.

Perhaps still such a thing as Comprehension, for that of science, except for no such thing as God either, but if we happen to know about
the Universe, for both its offerings, and sacrifices, perhaps no such thing as "everything", for that of Eternity.

Does not take the translation here, and next perhaps Eternity is the right or correct word to say either.

Ring the bell of the door, and next also enter as well, except for perhaps rather the home for that of God, except not any Religious belief you may have.

We could be left sometimes proving science for what it is, and next also what we know, and perhaps not anymore, because it could be still a Heaven filled with stars,
for what also eyes could also see.

Therefore, as you perhaps may know, my own personal belief in a God, as a Creator, except for still not any heaven filled with stars either.

If the reason for any priest around, only should be because of a superior being, or entity responsible for everything, perhaps still only a reason for that of guessing,
except for such a thing as still only believing, because of once again that of Comprehension.

Such a place as NGC 383, in the celestial sky, could be telling about perhaps magnificence and glory, except for still only that of radiation behind.

If such a thing as only the Aura, could be telling a secret, perhaps only one reason, for also example, that there could be even more for it, except not only energy.

Only being able to look up, and next watch the celestial heavens, perhaps not any visit to a laboratory either, except for only a visual marvel at times.

One such example is the Orion nebula, where there could be a color picture lying around, showing a bit of detail, but perhaps not any angels either.

So, except for that, the name Kenneth Arnold pops up with me right now, because I would sometimes make a connection with that of work to do,
for next sometimes that of a project.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Arnold

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Arnold_UFO_sighting

And still a bit of fingers, for not mentioning that story in the past, because here now, a couple more details are known about the story.

Almost like eating the dinner in one piece, for next catching it all, if not believing either, but we could next be left thinking that it became an extraterrestrial visitor,
rather than just a natural phenomenon visible in the sky.

Perhaps also the stumbling block here as well, for making it reason without Doubt, for perhaps no reason either, except for sometimes angels in the sky as well.

If nature could be both Logic and Proof, for next that of a Methodology itself, perhaps still a reason to believe at times, when it also could be that of doubt.

If it all perhaps started back in 1947, next perhaps not any "claimed" or "assumed" thing either, only because it could be taken almost for granted, by science.

Like the Sloan Great Wall only a galaxy cluster, for perhaps also supercluster, still both voids and filaments, for that of space, except for no such thing as Comprehension itself.

Perhaps sometimes Doubt, for also the opposite, but not necessarily any Logic associated with it either.

While I may perhaps have seen, or experienced a couple such things myself, also a sense that it could be more to it, than eyes just able to see.

Like I previously said, that there perhaps is not any Method of Proof, for that of Religion either, could we have, or see such a thing for that of Close Encounter?

Almost like the shirt you could be looking beneath, like also the soil you could be digging up, but always the finer details where you choose to look,
except for still only science itself, for next only the world.

Really, it once again becomes a sense of having an attitude, when you could end up being an Agnostic, for next also no clear, or precise meaning,
except for perhaps still science itself, if this could be understood.

Like making it a Creator of sorts, for that of the Universe, when we only could make it God, because as usual, there could be different "beliefs",
if not any approaches, or attitudes, for that of a subject.

We all know that lifting a heavy stone could be impossible, but next perhaps another way of interpreting this thing as well, for that of a burden.

If for some reason we could be laughing at a priest, if not any ridiculing either, it only should be so for that of Belief itself, and not any lack of it.

But if rather making Creation a bit "heavy handed" of sorts, only because of either a Creator for such, or at least what you could make it,
next perhaps still a heaven filled with stars, except for not any Comprehension at all.

If sometimes only on thin ice for a couple of things, and next what you also could make of it, at least a bit of Comprehension, for that of nature,
except for perhaps hard to tell, or make it, for that of a Creator behind.

It really should be a fact that Worshipping could be about Praying, next for that of salvation possible, or being wished for, if perhaps not any Saint either,
but also that of the Devil, next for Hell, as well.

Like the mentioned St. Peter, at the gate, or portal of Heaven, except for only a Near Death Experience, it also became the "Purgatory",
which you should know, or notice, is a pretty good word, or subject.

Perhaps not any angels in the sky either, but before checking, perhaps not any Devil waiting at the door either, when it could become the moment of death.

If we could assume both life and death being at least natural processes, at least a way of life, for also "Where are you coming, and next going", as well,
in that Creation could sometimes be having two main, or separate parts, for that of itself.

If for some reason, or in one way or another, both God and the Devil could be a "surrogate", for also a replacement, still perhaps the divine, when it could be such Forces.

An example here is stepping on the toe of someone, except not any scientist either, for perhaps a priest, when perhaps slipping a little,
and only making it the entrance door again, for that of a Stairways to Heaven, or the like.

But like the previously mentioned, for that of sometimes assuming an alien, or extraterrestrial presence, we could also be making the same for that of the church,
when it could also be that of Belief, if still not any story about life on Earth, for that of being born, versus the grave.

If Creation could perhaps be still the thing you could see, for that of the dirt, and also wash, next also still that of the possible divine behind, for that of Creation itself.

Like physical, next also Metaphysical at times, except for still only defining the physical world, and also its properties.

You perhaps do not see God in the laundry either, for next also a bit of wash, but perhaps not for that of any magnificence or glory either,
but it could be still Creation for the whole thing, only because the eye could be able to see.

Therefore, "proving" God, only because of the Method of Proof, could still be a difficult thing, like sometimes also not believing in any "Belief" itself either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact

This link for only what I could be thinking, except for not any Bob Lazar sitting in a racing car either.

Except for perhaps still only proving science, for that of a need for such a thing, except for not any "need to know" either.

If I could listen in at Bob Lazar, next for that of spoken words itself, except for perhaps not believing in a story either, when it could perhaps rather be the opposite.

It is like making it the bandwagon again, when perhaps no such thing visible in the sky either, for only the processes of life and death, happening on Earth.

Like the word "gaze", for also a flick, next a flick with the eye, also a short exposure at times, except for not making it any plasma, or even Planck constant either.

But only what eyes could see, because of open for a short moment, and next also closed as well, except not any eyelids either.

Once again, science is sometimes believing, except for perhaps not any Belief either, like also sometimes seeing is believing as well.

So, while perhaps still better being a free man, rather than a slave, or even prisoner of war, at least only caught up with life on Earth for now,
only because we should not know about any different, or dissimilar place, for that of living.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explanation

Perhaps not always any Logic either, but what rather could be sometimes needed.

But like sometimes Empirical, for also that of Evidence, sometimes interwoven as well, for that of complexity, and not any dirty wash either,
because you still could make it Scientific Proof for a couple of things, when perhaps needed.

Needs a fix above, if I catch up with the details, or possible errors.
ID: 1944704 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944712 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 11:05:08 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 11:19:28 UTC

Or perhaps the same for also making it "knucklehead", except for only hitting myself in the head, for next perhaps not anyone else either.

If rather making it a scientific debate, or as usual, next also in an orderly fashion as well, except not any dirt throwing as well,
when it sometimes could be only science.

Either a common topic, of sorts, if not any recurring, or recurrent, for that of any ghost, or maybe event but next perhaps always the same story around,
except for not any dissimilar either, because if perhaps proving a couple of things, next also proving, or perhaps doing so, with respect to science.

Could you perhaps make it a thought for where it once all started, except for not any bit of reality instead, for rather "In the beginning",
for also that of Instantiation, or the like, except for any nonsense, or misfortune, of mixing, or blending in with that of Creation myth either?

Kenneth Arnold was perhaps not telling any lie, when flying above, or past that mountain, except for perhaps not any Doubt for that of science,
when it also could be Reason to believe, for next also that of Doubt, as well.

Again, a place filled with such a thing as stars, and galaxies, next for the Universe itself, and also a bit of Comprehension, but if also making it a bit of
life and death as well, next still for that of lying in a grave, except also the Cremation process as well.

In the world of physics, we sometimes could make it a furnace, when speaking about a fusion process happening in the core of the stars,
if not any star being blown out of the sky, for that of a supernova event.

If we for some reason, or sometimes could make it both Logic and also Probability, part of a Methodology, perhaps not any such thing as Reason,
for that of Doubt either, except for sometimes only spoken words.

Perhaps sometimes only the twelve disciples sitting at the table, except for no such thing as laugh and ridicule either, but if science could perhaps still be
one thing for another, next also a deviation as well, except for perhaps not the initial, or intended subject.

If for some reason we could "believe" in both imagination, and also magic, for that of an illusion, perhaps no science either for both, except for the Method of Proof.

Only that Comprehension could still be that of the Universe itself, for also making it so, except for perhaps not the room or place of living for that of God,
except for still only Creation myth.

Like the fact being mentioned, that there perhaps should be no point of debunking, or ridiculing science for that of itself, next only the Scientific Method for the same,
when perhaps not any possibility of coming up with actual, or readily evidence.

"Calling all stations", and perhaps not so for any intelligent civilizations, or even a handshake, because perhaps no such thing either, except for still only a bit of eyes could see,
for next a bit of appreciation of nature also being visible.

It is like pouring acid in water once again, for that of how much, next for each, when it rather could be a better moment for this, and I could get back at the subject.

Like also that of truth, truthful, or truthfulness, for also "veracity", we could always believe in the facts of a story, for that of its authenticity,
except for also rejecting, or ridiculing a couple of facts either.

Again, it becomes a sense here that it perhaps could be nature in front of you, for what eyes could also see, and you next could be left to also believe.

If such a thing as passing the vine could sometimes be possible, next for also Tears in the rain as well, except for only that of the bottle, when possibly needed.

It becomes a thought, or reminder, of that of take and give here, for next also passing the vine, when we sometimes could be making it God for one thing,
and the Devil for the still another.

Because of that, also both black and white for the similar thing, when perhaps not the opposite either.

Like the other thing, for also multiverses, when we also could make it myriads of stars as well, next also no end in sight, for that of a never ending story,
except for not any enumeration either, for that of counting.

Make it Evidence, and next also perhaps Facts as well, except for sometimes the criminal wearing gloves, in order to hide his tracks.

If perhaps such a thing for Creation as well, next also a bit of Mastermind, for that of the Force perhaps behind, which next could be hiding its tracks,
for also initial being, because again, no "Supreme being" either.

We could be therefore left to proving two opposite, or counterparts, for only that of Logic itself, or even the Method of Proof, for such a thing,
because such a thing as Ambiguity, and Contradiction, could be part of Creation itself, and not telling about a Creator.

The fact is that you sometimes could be able to climb a hill, only because of enjoying the view, except for no such thing as climbdown,
for that of a visitor in your bedroom, or the like, when perhaps such a thing as Doubt, for not any reason to Prove, could be the prevailing thought.

Could we still make it Creation, for both Matter Creation, and also Creation myth, in next also making the door both high and wide, for that of its splendor,
when perhaps rather magnificence, could be the better word?

Still perhaps a difference between black and white, for also zero, nil, or nothing, next to that of infinity, but at least science for most, or mostly everything.

Scientists could be looking for Truth, and next perhaps no need for any debunkers, or even "doubters", but next perhaps still Doubt itself, or on its own.

If unable to prove, rather than such a thing as being just able, perhaps still Proof, for that of doing such a thing, except for not any ability either.

So, if not any correspond, for also that of counterpart, still that of a Contradiction, for such a thing, with next respect to that of science.

Only for that of making it science two or more different things, also that of Creation as well, when we also could be making it Creator as well,
in one given fashion, or another.

We all know that eyes could sometimes see, for next not proving any lie either, except for a story perhaps told, which could be both.

Either believe in such a story, if not such a thing either, except for perhaps not any reason to believe, for also that of Reason itself, except for not any Doubt either.
ID: 1944712 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944726 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 12:08:42 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 12:14:00 UTC

Like "knock-knock", for also knucklehead, also "Ready, steady, cook", for that of Readily evidence, but still only 13:25 PM here,
and also a bit hot inside.

But perhaps the fact that science is sometimes meant to be, for also the bricks for also toys, among the legs of a small child,
for next also tools being put together, using a bit of ingeniousness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lego

Here for that of my younger brother, when next only a small child, but rather that he became a musician instead, and always the talent for such a thing.

If rather "We built the city", for such a thing, next perhaps Creation for much of the same, except for not making it the ants either.

Again, as previously mentioned, we could be here looking for the intelligent signal never coming, or at least being proven, except for only Proof itself.

But rather that Creation could be a fact, or underlying, almost on a pin, for that of a couple of Fallacies, sometimes behind.

Be my guest, for still always looking, except for still that of Proof, except not any mentality either, next for that of science itself.

I definitely know that it could be a hard time when slipping, and next also falling, except for not any tempting at believe in that of a turnaround,
when next only a grave, for such a thing.

Guess what, but still someone here perhaps believing in a hairy creature coming from alpha Centauri, except for still only a Method itself, for next that of proving.

Perhaps also the reason of sometimes being stuck in the mud, next for that of science, except for not the same for any Religion either.

Perhaps still the Abyss, for that of the steep trench, at best, except for perhaps not any despair either.

Like also countdown to zero, for that of Mathematics, perhaps not any even, or sequential counting, for that of infinity either, except for the order of the factors,
having no importance, most of the time.

Perhaps not any DNA molecule, for that of the Mandelbrot set either, but next make it Equations instead, and next also a+b=c, when it rather could be E=mc2,
for that of such a thing.

Add to it a bit of enzymes, and next a bit of cut and paste, for also merge, in order to bring it altogether in a single piece.

Makes me think of that of having a decease, and next wish for a better way out of it, for next also outcome.

If death could next mean a life between the stars, because you also could be an angel, next free-floating as well, except for still making it energy,
when it only could be that of radiation.

If perhaps life could be sacred, next in a way of such for also being able to worship God, next for also that of Eternity, or at least that of eternal life,
which could be possible, when the moment of death happens, and we are not any more.

If for example making it a trip to the sea, for also the top of the mountain, you need the packed lunch coming along, for that of food.

If it rather became forgiving, next for also Sins versus forgiveness, always that of the Earth itself, for the resources it could provide,
except for still standing on the top either.

In a similar way, perhaps still Creation for a meaning, except for still not any Reason, except for no such thing as a Creator possibly behind.

Except for still both love and mercy, for also lovingkindness, we also could make it sometimes a curse, when it rather could be the Devil.

Like the "Phantom of the Opera", still perhaps two different Methodologies around, when we could choose to either believe in the Bible,
for next rather making it aliens and extraterrestrials, that of the subject.

Perhaps NOT, for only negation itself, is the important here, in that we could choose to believe, for also not believe, except for still not any Proof either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Almost like something hidden between four walls, and it could also be that of a secret, except for perhaps not any hidden meaning either.

Should tell that I have not checked, and do not know any much either, but supposedly Jesus stood up from that of death, next for also the grave.

Following that it became the Jesus resurrection, but perhaps not so well known, is the farewell, or leave off event, or message, which meant,
or became the final passing, as well.

For this, he (Jesus) became airborne, and sailed, or traveled away, almost on foot, if perhaps not in a spaceship either.

Perhaps the big laugh of the story here as well, except for always science for one thing, and Religion next for another,
because here not the best known fact either.

One thing is perhaps ridiculing Jesus as usual, except for not making it the end of the story either, next for that of the Bible, and here it perhaps could be better.

If perhaps having soar eyes, and also being near-sighted either, who is telling me that I could perhaps be a child of Earth, only because of being part of this place,
and also belong here as well?

Or perhaps rather "Out of your mind", for that of the possible divine as well, in that it sometimes may not be a part of science, for next at least a way of proving.

"Stick to it", and next you also have it, except no Pokemon either, which perhaps is lacking a translation, except for not any Method of Proof either.

It is like that of looking at ourselves, with respect to perhaps others, except for still not any "Seeing is believing" either, for still only a Method of Proof.

Like also the mentioned wording about not selling the skin of the bear, before actually being shot, why not pull yourself in the neck, for only lifting up?

Funny perhaps, but we already know that infinity could be limits without borders, except for perhaps not making it any science for the same thing either.

Could you next make it a bit of Comprehension for science, when next perhaps for not God, or the Devil either, for also the same?

If we could perhaps think, or even know, that God could be dealing us a blow, except for perhaps not the Devil either,
still perhaps only Creation, for that of the same, except for still not any Creator either, or possibly behind.
ID: 1944726 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944728 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 12:36:27 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 12:39:55 UTC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor

Here for now, except for not any knight, queen, or king, in a game of cards either, when perhaps not any Pokemon either,
but at least seen from the side.

Not necessarily any Janus face either, but also mentioned the gray mask for that of the similar, which could be oblate, or oblong in shape.

Nickname, perhaps, for the original subject, and next becoming moniker, for the same.

Here again, the magician, for also illusionist, and next able to sometimes prove his skills, except for not any magic itself, when it rather could be a mirage of nature,
except for not any mirror, or ghosts either.

Being left sometimes to choose, next also a choice as well, for also a random pick, next for that of Probability, and if next perhaps no such thing as science
being thrown on your shoulders, for that of a lesson being learnt, except for not any education either, you probably see more of the Devil,
when such a thing as corporate punishment is being carried out.

Except for still perhaps the bit of Agnostic in myself, for also that part of the day as well, but if using sometimes two different words, for also that of opposites,
it became the word "tuft", or tufting, which in fact is a bit old fashioned.

So here that of leaving no traces around, for next also back, when getting it slightly better, when it also could be that of a traceback.

Keep going, and next also looking, and next for what, if not any end result either, because such a thing should always be one for science, and also net result.

Could you still make it Order versus Chaos, except for no such thing as randomness, and still make of it both with respect to Creation itself,
when it perhaps could be only Matter Creation?

Like also Lucy, for also Missing Link as well, we sometimes know that things does not match, only because they could be out of fashion,
except for not any order either.

A computer language, or software program, for also an operating system, could make it both a symbolic and hard link, for that of the link itself.

Next perhaps not any soft link either, when it could be both soft and hard, except for not any Creation itself, with respect to something else,
when it only could become that of Creation myth.

Like still "When the tough gets going", the going gets tough, or the like, except for still only a scapegoat at times, for that of science, when we sometimes could
ridicule that of Religion, except not laughing either.

Added sentence, and at least I know what sometimes to say.

Always step on ones toe, with respect for each other, except for not any science versus Religion, and once again the same old story,
and therefore perhaps time for inventing anything else.

So for that, if not being readily understood, perhaps still Agnosticism for that of science itself, except for still only a scientific God, when it rather could be only Religion,
and next the needle in the haystack, for also hat on the shelf as well, if not any broken promises either.

Back later, for that of the heat of the day.
ID: 1944728 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944813 - Posted: 16 Jul 2018, 22:16:30 UTC
Last modified: 16 Jul 2018, 22:46:28 UTC

It became the restart in the meantime, and not finished up on the previous one, only to tell.

Here a bit of sad story as well, because of a the use of a knife in a shopping center, to the far north of my country.

Guess what, but always a difference between people, for only a wacky one such for that of a woman from my neighboring country Sweden,
if not any such thing from Afghanistan either, where we perhaps choose to support one of the leaders, for that of similar wackiness, also around.

So therefore perhaps no such good thing of making it a terror state, for also country, when sometimes a bit of crooked mentality around.

At least my own opinion here, for that of sometimes hostile regimes, or national states.

Rather make it such a thing as war, for that of any cooperation, if not any enemies, and we may have seen such a thing in the past, for that of the Falklands War,
if not making it any WTC either.

But only that it hurts, and should be unnecessary, except for not any science either.

Like the sometimes hidden equation, perhaps not any vacuum cleaner either, when you could swoop it below the carpet, rather than into the basket.

If perhaps blind man's buff, for also blind buzzard, we perhaps saw this during the day as well, except for only making it a Press conference.

Always that of push versus take, except for the rope itself, except no such thing of the worse, for perhaps that of a war.

It could be on my mind as well, but rather keep it in fashion, for also standard, for that of anything to say.

Except for perhaps not any bagpipes the last time either, for that matter.

But if only a Labyrinth, next also getting lost as well, if perhaps not saying so either, for that of a science which could perhaps be more of Facts,
rather than just Proof.

If perhaps still only fact for that of fiction, sometimes, perhaps no need to prove either, when it only could be a mirage, for only an illusion.

As you probably know, it is nice to know about those Equations of nature, next for also Fundamental Laws as well,
but I was thinking here in which way we could make such a thing as Logic, Proof, and also Probability, part of similar Laws,
when it could be still those fundamental concepts.

As an example, sometimes just "Row your boat", by using the paddle, but next on the water for such a thing, for that of getting to a place, from another.

Rather make a vertical dip, for that of a submarine, and next hit the bottom of the sea, for also point of no return, except for not any end station.

If perhaps stil such a thing as lack of Belief, for next also Proof, if not the opposite either, still calling stations, for next aliens everywhere,
but perhaps not so either, except for the distances making up space.

That spooky word for more that of a basic fundament, for next also understanding, should rather be about an "underpinning" of sorts,
when it rather could be those vast distances, except not any travel through space either.

Like perhaps still a sore throat, for that of yourself, except no near-sightedness either, perhaps we do not have to "prove" any such distances,
for that of any space travel either, except for still only the speed of light.

If such a thing for only making it air and water, next for little, or small planet Earth, next add to it such a thing as evolution,
except for not any measure, for that of any smooth, when next comparing with one, or perhaps even a billion other stars.

Perhaps still such a thing as a Hellfire, for that of a missile, if not any such thing as burning in Hell, for that of a bit of swearing.

Next perhaps not "Out of the blue" either, for making a painting either fake, or genuine, except for perhaps rather nature for such a thing.

Still perhaps such a thing as basic ideas, for also a given fundament, except for still not any principles either.

If perhaps even Dr. Stephen Hawking could not prove, or make any proof, about that of extraterrestrial intelligence, only for that of Physics itself,
next tell me that I am perhaps mad, for sometimes claiming such a thing, except for not being any wise either.

If perhaps not the same word either, also that of a flaw, when it sometimes could be that of a blunder, next for that of science.

So, next perhaps an astronomer, for that of Cosmology, like also that of Physics, for that of elementary particles, if not any Mathematics either.

If not wrong, we do not see the face of God either, only for that of making him a Faceless coward at times, for also a given Belief, and next also Faith.

Perhaps still both Worshipping, and next also a Prayer, except for not any soothsayer, or fortuneteller, who might perhaps predict the future.

Could you make it perhaps still the Bible for one thing, except not any Wise Men either, except for any time travel, including that of the future?

Perhaps sometimes a stuck brain, if not any crooked either, except for a set or given example for making it only physical Laws, for that of Existence,
and next also nature adhering to such facts.

Perhaps the reason for this, is that there might be no such thing as Logic, or Probability, for only making it Existence, in the way that it perhaps still became
"In the beginning", for next also start of everything.

Rather it should be that of taking such a thing as granted, for next that of Philosophy, except for still not any Logic either.

Again, the word Fallacy here, which could describe this even further, except for not any Existence of God either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

Perhaps next only possible making it "Flesh and blood", for that of nature, for that of both good and bad things,
except for still not the Moment of Creation, for next everything coming into existence, which at least should be telling about Matter itself.

It still hurts when cutting your finger, except not your throat either, but also that recycling could sometimes be such a thing for paper,
except for not any life and death, for that of stars, either.

If only that of passing away when asleep in your bed, for also the dreadful accident, if not any act of war or aggression either,
for also the random, or casual traffic accident. leading to death, perhaps no reason to celebrate either,
except for sometimes only Worshipping, for next that of life itself.

Like sometimes both infinity, for that of the singularity, and also empty space, perhaps no any master in charge, when visiting the circus,
except for the clown, because Inflation (still not Economy), could be telling about the vastness of space, for also expanding Universe.

Like I already said, forget the Man in the Street, for next both the genius, if not any Wise man either, for next perhaps no such thing as any alien.

Or perhaps rather Pokemon once again, for playing that of a priest, if not any pretending either, and in such a way, also being an Agnostic,
for also having a couple of Doubts.

For this, perhaps not any science sells either, except for not any priest for the same, except for still only making it Creation, or Matter Creation, for that of itself,
when it could also be Creation myth.

Males me think about the gifts below the Christmas tree, which should be from your parents, except not any gift from God either,
like sometimes "Manna from Heaven".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manna

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether

Perhaps not any substance either, except for also being reminded about the Ether, for also quintessence, and next perhaps not a good thing either.

Here the red dotted line once again, and not reading in detail either, except for two different things above.

If such a thing as wiping any life from the surface of the Earth, perhaps still is not any Manna either, for that of rather the hand of God,
except for only a nuclear Holocaust for such a thing, for that of only man.

Almost like being in the ring, for also making the first draw, if not pulling any plug either, except for both Kim, Putin, and also Trump,
sometimes poking a nose at each other, for also a bluff, in that it could be a late afternoon show, except for perhaps not any Morning After.

Perhaps no need of gambling with nature either, when it rather could be a hangman, for next only yourself, except for not always in charge either.

If rather setting a couple of premises, for also gambling, I perhaps could wish only nature for such a thing, except for only a push of the finger.

But again that life could perhaps be only a sweet dream, if not any short either, for also a bit of roses on the way to oblivion, for next that of death.

Or perhaps rather only the last day of your life, because you could end up so, and next nothing more.

Because really oblivion is not the best word here, for rather the Universe itself, except for only St. Peter here, next waiting at the gate.

As I mentioned at the start, if even Heaven and Hell became part of Creation, for next both God and the Devil, next still only that of Creation itself.

Here that of both mean and sinister, for next also the Devil, if perhaps not any God, except for perhaps not any life, for that of any spiritual either,
and possibly making it eternal life for such.

Like that of the stuck sentence above, also that of the Steady State Model, for that of the Universe itself, for next perhaps not any hand or finger
below the table either, for next an important meeting.

This because I could still make it perhaps the Janus face, except for not any "Lord" for both that of take and give either.

Perhaps it became the movie once being watched, where the young girl came up with a murky face, only because of an embarrassment.

Here a better word wished for, except for not with me in the translation, except for perhaps not any shy either.

Again, do not forget that Probability should also be telling about Facts, except for not any Credible evidence either, for also observational facts.

If perhaps asking how you perhaps are making it, except for perhaps not being so either, perhaps more obvious, or apparent.

Perhaps still only Adam, from the finger of God, except not any Creation either, for next the Universe, except for only the initial moment itself,
for where it all started, only because we could still make it God's hand, for such a thing.

To be, except for perhaps not to be either.

If you ever had a bit of fun, watching those lorries filled with goods, and next flipping over, next a bit of laugh, for only humor itself.

Like a car not running by itself, or on its own, we also know that it could be running, when first at speed, and no need for any brakes.

This on the spot, I could make for that of "Momentum", and needs checking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momentum

If perhaps also such a driving force, for also the speed of light, only because it could be that of traveling a constant distance,
next only the Force of gravity, except for not any property of space itself.

Like still both winners and losers in a game of cards, also belief versus lack of belief, for sometimes that of science, and getting a bit tired here.

Perhaps no such thing as a Mothership, like also a Monolith, except for still throwing the dust below the carpet, for that of a science without meaning.
ID: 1944813 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944826 - Posted: 17 Jul 2018, 1:07:40 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2018, 1:18:14 UTC

And perhaps not able to finish off the tasks in my task list either, because here 3 AM right now, and time for bed.

But also that the Statistics tab in the Manager is showing wrong, for that of jumping down, and next up again, for that of credit, during the last month.

Or perhaps rather today at the left, for that of November 25 at the right, and it still reads 18, for that of the current year.

With some two hours of running, only for that of a single task, that of RFI, for also noise, comes to mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFI

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interference

Also the general reference here, by keying in just the short word, but better getting at the subject itself.

The little strange thing is that I could perhaps make it a figure of sorts, except for rather the figure itself, at the top right.

But next that it could also be that of a pulse here, for almost 7 million in total credit, and perhaps knowing a little.

Or possibly confusing EMI with that of EMP, which rather should be an electromagnetic pulse, but only the first link for convenience only.

Checking in with that tomorrow.
ID: 1944826 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1944904 - Posted: 17 Jul 2018, 12:55:58 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2018, 13:08:53 UTC

Did I get the last thing in here before getting to bed?

Again the slow start, and needs a fix.

Only reading, but refraining from the other discussion right now.

Except for not any "Curiosity killed the Cat", for that of any Cynicism either.

Thinking by means of the book, and perhaps not out of the shelf either, except for the latter perhaps going with me.

If still that of the weather, for also earth.nullschool.net, also that of making it predictability versus sometimes unpredictability,
when also a result might not measured precisely, only because of that of Relativity.

Here perhaps not any Theory of Relativity itself, but rather a Relativistic principle, for that of objects at speed, with respect to each other,
and next such an inability for making such a measurement, except for perhaps not the Uncertainty Principle itself.

I think this could still be two different things, but next a bit hard to tell.

If such a thing as Plausibillity, where it next becomes only that of Plausibility structure, and I would rather make it that of Logic here, perhaps more easy to discuss,
or for that of Logic, when one might otherwise ask "Is this, or such a thing possible", next for that of time, and space travel.

Again missing out here, for that of checking, and have to get it back on track.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trim

Really the fact that such a thing as Quantum mechanics could be the thing responsible for the weather, because it should be the Laws for that of the subatomic particles here.

If we still could make it a bit of Logic, as well as also Quantum mechanics, also the notion of time, for that of space and time travel as well,
and perhaps we should make a difference between life and death here, for next only four-dimensional space, which at least could be
telling about such travel.

If such a thing as whisper in the ear, could be only for the fact that nature could be making up its own principles, for also Methodology,
perhaps still the falling carpet in the morning, except for sometimes being fooled to believe, and next perhaps nothing showing up.

Except for perhaps someone singing a song, for that of any similar, and next only "Your life, for that of mine", except not any nature for such either.

The general hospital could still perhaps be a clean place, for that of its sterile environment, except for not any white colors either,
when a couple of tears could be making for the last farewell, when it rather could be the "Old man's home" for this.

If perhaps a bit too early, and rather in the operating theatre, rather such a thing as a Near Death Experience, for next returning back,
and telling about it.

You could next translate it a little, for next surviving on a bit of food, except for not making it any Proof either, when it rather could be a couple of Fallacies,
next for a story which perhaps might not be trusted, or believed, or even only a Principle, for that of Methodology,
which could be telling whether an answer, or Fact, perhaps is true, or not.

Once again it becomes that of making it perhaps a scientific God at best, when it only could be still that of nature,
because Proof itself might be almost the hardest thing to obtain, or accomplish.

Rather still a couple of Facts, for next making it an assumption, except for still not only an idea, when others could make it either
Credible evidence for such a thing, if not any observational facts, once again.

If still any reason for Doubt, except not any Reason itself, you could still be a liar, except for proving the opposite, for that of Truth.

Next, perhaps both the naked body lying on the table, for also Tabby's star (KIC 8462852), which could be that of a Dyson sphere, except for not making it any nature itself.

If we rather could "prove" such a thing as Creation itself, perhaps even better, except for still only taking it for granted.

If Methodology could still be only about Proof, if not any opposite, perhaps still the door needed to be opened, for that of a Religious thought, or concept,
if not any Theology either, which could make for new ideas about where it all came from.

One such door for that of an opening, could still be that of the Aura, which could be for that of any living entity, or being.

Perhaps white could still make it both red, green and blue, when using a Prism, but next perhaps no such thing for any black either,
when it also could be only darkness, for that of color.

Same goes with that of the mirror as well, which in my own opinion, is perhaps not such a thing as myth, or superstition either.

Follow a lead, and next also leader as well, except for perhaps still not any wide, or high door, for such a thing.

Next could also lead back at that of evolution for that of ourselves, in that we could be wondering where we are descending from.

If energy is perhaps not only about radiation, but could be rather for that of the living being, it could also be the soul for such a thing,
except for still only nature.

If the Ten Commandments should be telling about the Bible itself, next perhaps wrong, except for not making it any Fundamental Laws of nature (Physics) either.

So, except for perhaps the Bible itself, except for not any Philosophy either, we could still make it only science, and also rely in such a thing,
but here also that of a Scholar, for also scholarship, being a possibility.

Here that of the famous equation, which perhaps could be telling about time, except for only the Laws of gravity, for that of the same,
where also the factor of time could be taken into account, except for perhaps not so.

Only by making it a four-dimensional Universe, by adding the notion of time, you are getting there, for such a thing, and next either only for granted,
except for perhaps not any such thing as quantifying, or quantisizing either.

If such a thing as "Interaction", could be telling about a possible relationship between Matter and energy, except for any famous equation,
it could be interesting to know.

Checking out, and having more later.

If just only the simple fact of energy production versus consumption, by making it ADP--> ATP--> ADP, in that of the muscles,
except for not any nuclear fusion either, perhaps still sometimes aliens or extraterrestrials feeding on the same resource,
only for that of living, and still only consumption.

So, if perhaps such a thing as life and death of given stars, perhaps no such thing as energy recycling either, when it could be a continuous balance,
between the respective parts of the cycle, because here at least decay, for that of fission, and I would need to look around for that of the same,
when it comes to that of fusion.

Make it still only a simple or basic fact, and that of a supernova explosion, where Iron becomes the stumbling point of the process,
but still able to make such heavy elements as Gold, Nickel, and Platina, if not any Lead, Bismuth, or Uranium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis

Here you still have science for only that of itself, except for not making it any Proof, for that of the same, because if being put together,
you could next make it Creation for the whole thing, when also Matter Creation.

Except for sometimes a glimmer of hope, when it could be still only despair, like also the Dawn of the morning, for the start of yet another day,
except for still not the sunset, which could mark the same finish.

I mentioned that of Perdition, or Damnation, earlier on, and also that we choose to make it the Devil only, if perhaps needed.

Cut it short for that of word, or name, and next that of evil, which could be symbolizing such a Force, or Forces of nature.

Either two different or dissimilar things, for that of Creation itself, except for perhaps not any different facets either, when still about Creation.

Once again, smashed glass, could be pulverized glass at best, if not making it any grains of sand either, for also the Quarks being the smallest of everything,
for only that of the subatomic world.

If rather such a thing as an extraordinary experience, for also another word for this, perhaps only a thing visible in the sky,
except for not any "Out of body" experience either.

Extrasensory perception, perhaps.

Again slipping away, except for still not making it any winners and losers, for rather a way of given Belief, except for only making it something flying in the sky.

If only Proof itself, could sometimes make us doubting, for next also Doubt, also such a thing for that of nature, in that there perhaps is no reason to believe.

Or perhaps only that of Heaven and Hell for the whole thing, where nature could be choosing to laugh at us, rather than just a simple ridicule.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptual_model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality

If next both such a thing as laugh and ridicule, for next also Proof and Logic, if not any Methodology either, perhaps still a bit of Creation for the whole thing,
and also the way we could be looking at nature.

We still could choose to make it only science, for next that of nature, and in the same way need both a Proof, and Methodology for the same thing.

If next rather making a couple of these subjects the basic fundamentals, for just our convenience, next perhaps only a bit of Logic at best,
if not making it any Truth either.

If perhaps any tenet, or doctrine, for that of nature, we could still make it a couple of Equations, except for still not any Fundamental Laws either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interaction

Again being wrong, for not getting directly at the subject, when it should be that of Fundamental Interaction, or the like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Force

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

Makes me think about Logic being perhaps the weakest link, except for not any Lucy either, for making it both belief and disbelief, if perhaps not any
trust versus mistrust, for that of Doubt, for that of something perhaps visible in the sky, and not being explained.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_argument

I need to sit down and think here, before anything more, because not the best above either.
ID: 1944904 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945353 - Posted: 19 Jul 2018, 10:54:46 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jul 2018, 10:55:48 UTC

Remaining, for that of an estimate?

Became this, when returning back here, from where I was.

I had the problem at PrimeGrid, with that of two active user accounts, each with credit, and next switching user account, only for that of tasks.

Next becomes that of "Timed out, no response", for any such task, when it next lies dead, for not being finished in time,
also because it could be overwritten in the local slot of BOINC Manager, or the Manager.

Either an Account Manager for this, or possibly a double run of the Manager itself, but for now it did not become the thing trying to do.

For now, not the same with any Seti@home task, but could be a problem when it becomes a more advanced user setup.
ID: 1945353 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945441 - Posted: 19 Jul 2018, 21:13:37 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jul 2018, 21:22:17 UTC

Like "Reply to" in a message, which like also the blue screen of Windows, becomes a lacking space, for that of a message given.

At least for that of a native translation only, but does not become any pretty, except for not any server issue either.
ID: 1945441 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945462 - Posted: 19 Jul 2018, 23:10:50 UTC
Last modified: 19 Jul 2018, 23:36:18 UTC

If not losing it, there could be a couple of other things as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Teller

Only for that of getting the third beer from the fridge, but still not there yet.

If the slap of the hand next could be the same as a falling leaf, also such a thing could be happening during the day,
except for still science next for also meaning, except for not any Comprehension either.

Hydrogen versus Helium, and next also fusion as well, except for not any nuclear, or fusion bomb either, for that of a Thermonuclear weapon,
fusion, or perhaps similar energy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic

Or perhaps rather "staunch", for that of a staunch ally, if not making it any "stench" either.

Did I perhaps make it Black Holes a bit of boring subject in the past, except for still not any blind man's buff, or buzzard either?

Perhaps only in your shoes, for such a thing, except for not any sleeves either, because here sometimes that of living nature,
except for perhaps not any life itself.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/necrofile

Here stuck for the moment, except for not any balsemy either (also looking around).

What is happening here, except for being stuck, or left so, on the words?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ritual

Perhaps only a tradition here, except not any sacrifice either, where we could also choose to bury our dead.

Should perhaps ask, but having difficulty here, for that of quantifying, versus quantisizing.

Except for sometimes a thing in the ear, for next out the other, perhaps still a lesson learnt at times, except for not any memory loss either, for that of a similar recall.

If not wrong, the Periodic element Bromide, could be a poisonous one, like also Lead, if not any Mercury either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bromide

Something is wrong here, and I have seen it before.

Or still perhaps the debate whether we perhaps should believe another, next for what one could perhaps be saying, except for not the other.

Look at Evidence, for next also a bit of such a thing, and also look at that of collecting just stamps.

When perhaps "cut off short", for a couple of things, next also straight, as well, for that of adding a couple of things, while also excluding a couple of others.

If perhaps such a thing as "believing" in a Truth, next for that of science alone, or only, perhaps no such thing as Religion either, much for that of the same.

Except for still making it God for next only Religion, while still only science for much of the same.

Make it a podium, and next also a speaker as well, except for still not any scientific debate either, where it perhaps could be that of God.

My guess is that you do not necessarily make it any such thing as Atheism, or Agnosticism, next for that of science itself, but only for that of Religion.

In both a relay, for that of a run (now also steeple chase, or obstacle course), also that of a race, except not any Race condition itself, for that of Processes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_condition

Here the line at the finish, perhaps a meter above the ground, and next looking sideways, at your competitor, for sometimes making it only a break even only.

Is it not a fact that a Condition next should also mean a Truth, making it also a given Truth?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condition

Or perhaps rather a "Recognition" of something, when it still could be only about the Truth, except for not any confirmation of such a thing either.

Supposedly sometimes the deep, for next also the Abyss, if perhaps not any trench either, except for sometimes only a "Premise", where it rather could be
that of a Condition only.

I said "Listen" in the past, except for not any look around either, for next also that of nature as well, which we also could be a part of.

Also "allegiance" in the past, for that of an "Oath of faithfulness", when it also could be that of a pact, except not any Politics either.

Oh, dreadful perhaps, except for not any Cynicism either, only because of that of war, except for not any poverty or decease either.

Guess what, but science perhaps does not always sell either, except for sometimes a couple of things being pushed upon you,
for next also on, or upon your shoulders as well, like thrown, for perhaps a treadmill.

Did I perhaps make it a scientific God, next for that of Creation alone, except for perhaps not any science either, when it rather should be that of Religion?

Or maybe thin ice perhaps, next for only that of Belief?

Is supposedly Creation for that of Creation itself, or is it perhaps only about Religion, because it possibly could be meant so?

Next any "weakness" perhaps, when making it perhaps only Belief, except for perhaps not any Thought either?

So it goes, for next also a roundabout, if not any never ending story either.
ID: 1945462 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945467 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 0:15:43 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 0:20:16 UTC

Read my lips, for almost there, except for still not any bluff either.

Contemplation perhaps, if not any Comprehension only, next for that of science.

If still only a fireman for that of a couple of things, what if the first two or three steps of the ladder could be missing?

A couple of ideas right now, and getting back at it.

Step on a toe, and next no shoulder either, for that of any else (oh that Translate again).

Except for not any whiplash either (mentioned before).

Just a glimpse again, when making for the short break, except for perhaps still that of a meaning, for next also something.

Happyday, next why not soup for dinner, except for also cooking and also making it everything.

Next for also a bit of nature as well, in that at least you could be sometimes knowing.

But here perhaps a debate for that of words, except for not any knowledge, when sometimes making it something, for next that of nothing,
if not anything either, and also a bit of knowledge, for also that of learning.

Becomes that of "substance", for such a thing.

Or perhaps Clair only, when rather more Clara, if perhaps still not any "Onomatopoeia" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onomatopoeia

What if we could make it the subject of Religion, except for perhaps not only a sense of it either?

Subtle, for next also subtlety, and still perhaps next only science.

You really do not have to invent any science, only for that of coming up with such a thing as Religion, do you?

Or maybe rather Anti-Christ, for that of Christ, when perhaps only Christianity itself, except not any spoken word for this either.

Perhaps rather the big gamble, for also the game, when it sometimes could be that of reflecting back on itself, for also that of mirroring.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther

Oh, what strange, except for perhaps not any Coincidence either.

Or perhaps speaking for that of deaf ears, when it rather could be only that of listen in, of course.

Becomes wrong, except for not any tradition in such a sense either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victoria

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Victorian_era

Or perhaps only the key, for that of the turntable, for next another start.

Forgiveness perhaps, except for still making it only Sins and Forgiveness here, except for still not any Cosmology either.

Or maybe modestly, or bashful, when perhaps only a thing hiding in the shadows.

Guess what, "deemed possible", and next also maybe possible, if not any opposite either.

Except for not any hangar line either, for next on the way, and next rolling the shuttle out of the hangar in a similar way, only for that of a launch.

Leads back, and next also redirects back as well, and supposedly I am also a bit crooked.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytics

Or maybe suppose for that of a suggestion, or proposal, and perhaps something more, or in between, as well.

Excpept for only an act, when also that of interdisciplinary, except for not any interdisciplinary act either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_operandi

Feather of a bird, and next also bird Phoenix as well, except for not the constellation itself.

Thinking here that such a thing as allegiance, could sometimes be also that of Myth, except for not any Truth itself.

Or perhaps only nose, for that of a horse, when it possibly could be only that of Facts, except for still not any discussion either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/61_Cygni

For starters only, and guess I am a bit silly.
ID: 1945467 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945472 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 0:57:34 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 1:01:41 UTC

Or Rationality, for also that of Irrationality, next also with, or without any meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubt

Ouch! but perhaps not the most expected either.

So, next a floor only, for that of a flat surface, and next also a basic fundament, if perhaps not any ladder either, next for that of only climbing.

Describe it for me, and next also a description as well.

Supposedly Creation could still mean Matter for such a thing, namely Matter Creation.

Next, I perhaps could be crooked, or even mad, when perhaps saying something else, or coming up with anything else, or the similar.

Supposedly still Creation meant so, for also being such a thing, and next also being so, except for not any Reason either.

Or Reason with, or without any meaning, because here perhaps a philosophical interpretation needed, for that of Creation itself.

Who next dare being any philosophical, for next any "Cosmological principle", or perhaps thinking?

Be my guest, perhaps, like also yours, for that of my own, or perhaps myself?

Perspective, if perhaps not any realm either, next for that of any sciences.

Trip, trap, for next that of one shoe in one hand, for next another shoe in the other, except for perhaps not any "Ideology", for that of science either.

Except for perhaps still only science with respect to another, except for not making it any Religion either, for that of such a thing.

Only the thin jacket when out shopping, and next also two zippers as well, besides each other, where at least one is not working.

Could nature be working, for next also supposedly still working?

Except for a couple of flaws still visible, of course, and next perhaps not only in between your hands either.

Getting to that of a foot, for next also a foot stool, when next asking a question from the Prime Minister's Office,
for that of Parliament, except for not any "suckers" either.

Oh, free offer, for next also free will, perhaps, except for not any giving, for that of any forgiving, or forgiveness either.

Or perhaps rather the little sonate of Beethoven here, for next no name, or given either, except not "Eine Kleine Nacht" either.

Always that of "Biblical proportions" for a couple of things, and still President Trump at least a couple of hairs on his head.

Could I still make it also opponent, for also adversaries, except for perhaps not such a thing either.

Clemency perhaps, and next also Clementine, for such.

But if rather an Apricot, next for that of a fruit, next perhaps not any science either, so why not rather single it out instead, for making it a singularity?

Book a ticket, and next also book a plane, except for not any ticket to ride either, for next perhaps already there.

Makes me think that science not necessarily is about any craft, but rather a draft, for that of a couple of things.

Waiting, and next what is meant with that of a wait?

Just wondering, but what perhaps is meant by any "crookedness", for also insanity, except for not any science itself?

Except for any forthcoming either, next for that of also obedience.

Next. figuratively speaking, of course, except not any "Hah-hah" either.

Next, "twinkle, twinkle, little star", for next also a bit of twisting as well, by next bringing it into a discussion for that of stars, or any stars themselves.

Shame perhaps, except for perhaps not any Myth either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdote

Always so, except for not any lack of Evidence either, for next also that of Proof.

I need to think a little here.
ID: 1945472 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945479 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 1:47:46 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 1:49:34 UTC

Linear, for also that of lineate (unsure).

Perhaps only a bit freak, because of that of science itself.

Or maybe perhaps unsure versus that of not so sure, meaning unsure.

Here that of the torture bench, if not making it any torture chamber either.

But if still science filled with a bit of Truths, next also that of an Oath, as well.

Next, which purpose perhaps, except for any science either, versus only the Truth itself.

Monolithic (for that of Religion, perhaps), except for not any surpassing, next for that of Intelligence.

Behavior, and next also trait, except for not any instinct either.

First and foremost, and next also superb as well, if not any "superlative" either, next for perhaps only race.

Except for not such a thing as any Cognition either.

First, and next first of all, and not any second, for that of any secondary, but still only that of a race, for that of also a substitute,
which could be, or mean that of a condition, next for that of nature, for next also Existence, in that the human civilization could still, or at least exist.

Next, within a framework of Creation itself, only because of that of a meaning.

Meant to be, and next perhaps should not be, for not any supposed to be, either, when perhaps that of Philosophy.

Oh, be it, and next also "there is," for next that of Creation, if perhaps not any lights in, or therein, either.

Fragile, and next so sad, except not any basis, for that of any fundament either.

Keep talking, and next also speaking as well, for next also a couple of thoughts about nature.

Here Google Translate fell out, but always the old lady with the stick in her hand, for that of support, when next walking.

Standing buffet, and next also desire as well, except for you never know.

Or maybe that of Religion versus science, for next only itself.

Chit-chat. except for not any correspondence, for that of literature either.

Slur, eh, or perhaps any mistrust?

Bernie, you already know that it could be science on its word, except for not any words either,

So why also trust, when next also a bit of mistrust?

Should it be still thing for that of science, except for only a couple of loose words?

So, perhaps decapitated as well, except for still the sense of losing in between, for that of the same, namely a couple of words.

So, and next what is perhaps meant to be, except for not any such either.

Be it, and so also meant to be, if perhaps not any else either.

Conquer, next conquest, and next also came, saw, and next left (Julius Caesar).

Or maybe only abrupt, for that of a brief moment (speaking above my head).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linguistics

There you hace it again, next for starters.

Or, transient,, for next only Truth, if not any obsolete either.

Laughter in the audience, for making it only the Truth, excpept for not any crook either, when next also listening.

Hmm, tell tale story, for that of a story itself, except for not any Proof.

Except for still not any science either.

Or, a measure, for that of measurability itself, and next I am also a crook, if perhaps not any insane either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

Tam-ti-di, except for perhaps not any measure either.

To the point eh, and next any science also contravene, if not any circumvent either.

Back, back, back, and next also circumventing a bit as well, except for not any Principle either.

Posting here, before it gets too late-
ID: 1945479 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945522 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 8:23:50 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 8:24:53 UTC

Also two kinds of people as well, for also different people around.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h5qX8kL7q8

Some people go, while others prefer to stay.

Perhaps not always any obligation either, but rather a premise instead, for that of a missed opportunity instead,
for sometimes being pretty, and next also missing out as well.
ID: 1945522 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945536 - Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 11:17:42 UTC
Last modified: 20 Jul 2018, 11:19:20 UTC

Reluctant, next also reluctance, only because of a means of nature for such a thing.

Statutory, next also statutory principle.

Proclaim perhaps, but next not in the mood here.

At least for that of spelling, perhaps.

Or maybe that of a free hand, for also a given hand, except for still not any given Creation.
ID: 1945536 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945718 - Posted: 21 Jul 2018, 12:18:21 UTC
Last modified: 21 Jul 2018, 12:23:47 UTC

Even more stars in that picture, than those words I ever wrote here, because also making it another similar galaxy of my own,
except for perhaps NGC 7814 more easy to find, or perhaps locate.

Also nature running its own course as usual, for both that of fine grain versus heavy stone, at least for that of sand,
except for not any time either, for that of its individual moments.

Quantizing such a thing as time, and still perhaps only the Planck constant for such, except for perhaps not the same either,
except for also a distribution for both that of stars and also people, except for not always being any smooth, or uniform.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization

Finally getting the word correct here, after spelling it wrong for a long time, except for not always a guess only, when we also could make it both idea,
and also a speculation, if perhaps not anything else either.

Only by living in a star city, like the Milky Way, for that of a galaxy, and sometimes the band for this visible in the sky, like to the left of Orion, for that of a place.

Perhaps some 4 light years in between each star, except for in a cluster of stars, like M35, for example.

Perhaps not any big, red stars, for that of giants, or supergiants, like Betelgeuse, but next perhaps a question about whether this star once formed in the Orion nebula itself,
like also Rigel, and the stars in the sword of Orion, which is quite a spectacle on its own.

Twenty times the mass of sun for the first one, and next some fifty sun masses for the other, both are different, for that of mass, and also age,
except for still quite red hot, for that of both, when it comes to those things happening in the central core, or nucleus.

Like Intelligence itself, perhaps only that of neurons in the brain, still also lightning, for that of thunder, except for not any Logic either.

Possibly still ourselves with respect to the Universe, but only for such a thing as still a bit of magnificence, except for not taking the physical Laws for granted either.

Remember that except for the water and oxygen being needed for that of life itself, it could also freeze to ice, and next become crystals.

Same goes with the pencil in your hand as well, which could become a black substance, for that of a couple of hand-written notes,
except for not any iron filings, or swarf, could be placed next to a magnet, for that of a visual pattern.

So here perhaps only a depiction, for also that of a painting, when still not any reality either, for that of the Universe itself,
and next only galaxies here, which could be the place of living, for both ourselves, and also an alien civilization.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloning

Here another example of becoming just one fabulous story, for next another, except for not any dying chimpanzee, for next also extinct as well.

Still perhaps one book for that of science, and also one for Religion, except for only that of reality being part of a true world, for next also imagination,
and dreams, if perhaps not any illusion either.

We sometimes could make it a part time job, for that of ourselves, except for not any dedicated either, except for still only the mirror for the mirror itself,
except for not any shape it perhaps might have.

If sometimes still a purpose for next also a meaning, next also perhaps an intended meaning as well, except for not any subject either.

Except for sometimes bending light, like also a gravitational attractor, things, for that of objects, could at least be magnified, except for still only a galaxy
a thin spot, or maybe smudge, only, when quite distant, and also sometimes edge on as well.

So, if perhaps not any magnificence or glory, next for any science itself, still only some two books around, which could be telling a different story,
except for making it sometimes one thing for another, when rather such a thing as quantizing both matter, and also numbers.
ID: 1945718 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
musicplayer

Send message
Joined: 17 May 10
Posts: 2430
Credit: 926,046
RAC: 0
Message 1945751 - Posted: 21 Jul 2018, 17:58:15 UTC
Last modified: 21 Jul 2018, 18:03:29 UTC

Did it not became Mr. Kevvy here, for also making it a waterhole, when it sometimes could be only that of silence,
when it could be such a thing for that of a pause, and next also a break?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_hole_(radio)

Like traffic in a city, where flow of such could be directed by only the traffic lights, except for only a .vlar task having a spike score of 10 to 11, at the start,
but now suspended, with a score of 20.65348, for that of still power equal to, or like the score, at times.

Also becomes the saturated web as well, which like also heat in my room makes it hard to do any effective work.

This web page is not slow anymore, but perhaps something better is needed for Internet Explorer 11 right now,
in that having Google.com as the home page, is much faster than that for Microsoft, where perhaps no direct address is given either.

The triplet of some 14.84, before checking, did not make it to my own log, but also my wingman had the same for that of his own task.

So here still about traffic, of course, except for not any signal processing either, which could sometimes be making a pulse into a gaussian score.

Except for something being wrong, and also the web grinding to an almost halt.
ID: 1945751 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 115 · 116 · 117 · 118 · 119 · 120 · 121 . . . 334 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.