So, on a Friday evening, before even touching anything, at 10 PM, I do not know what the previous was all about.

But the sky is still blue, for also wondering, if not giving a thought of what science is all about, because here you still have the ufologists,
for also that of also believers, if not any dreamers either, and also that we could still choose to exclude Religion as a subject, for next that of science.

Also still the red dotted line for the word above, but ufology is the singular annotation, designation, or naming, for that of the plural same or similar,
ending with the little 's'.

Here during the day, a couple of thoughts for that of possible words passing my way as well, except for both sounds being heard in my home,
and things also happening, only by means of the regular shopping.

While science do not necessarily sell, also not any such thing as a poker game either, in that we still could be infants of sorts, for that of either discoveries,
or perhaps even knowledge, or rather the fact that a couple of things flying in the sky could still be part of ones imagination, rather than part of a complete or
comprehensive picture, which could be that of nature itself.

If not mentioned, that of the Butterfly effect for next also the Mandelbrot set, both for that of science, and next also part versus whole.

But if adding to it that of Creation myth as well, for also being part of science, perhaps the same as well, in that it should not necessarily be any Mary Magdalene either,
but perhaps rather the Shroud of Turin.

For one thing still that of making it Mysteries, magic, and miracles for a couple of things, and next also the Method of Proof for the similar, and we could be having
the same debate for that of "Belief", for also that of making it aliens or extraterrestrials as well.

"Do the dirty", and perhaps "Dirty Harry" as well, except for not washing your hands either, and next come clean of a couple of things, including possible accusations.

I had two quite nice words for that of a subject when out shopping, but of course it fell out and slipped away.

But in short, or summary, perhaps still that of Creation, and also that God could be "heavy handed" for such a thing, but also that other ideas came up as well.

Both Logic and the Method of Proof should be part of science, and next perhaps also a bluff, or even a fake, when making it both the Shroud of Turin,
if perhaps not a reported UFO observation for that of an event as well.

For this, still Jimmy Carter as the peanut farmer he once was, and next also President, if not seeing such a thing for himself.

I visited a couple of pages for that of Nasa, for that of a discussion at PrimeGrid, for that of the Hubble constant versus that of the Universe.

Clicking on a couple of links, there is a mentioning of the "biggest blunder" by Einstein, and rather the reason for why it actually became so.

https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/bb_concepts_exp.html

Here giving a thought about how Logic perhaps relates with the Big Bang, and also the Cosmological perspective, except for not making it any pillars either,
or even General Relativity either.

Such pillars could rather be that of the Star Queen nebula, or M16, in Serpens, for that of a birth place of new stars, and also that evolution should be thought of as
the way life could evolve, both here, and perhaps other places as well.

Anyway, "Does the Universe exist", for still that of Logic, or do I have to negate the whole thing, for perhaps, if not apparently the opposite?

If such a thing as aliens or extraterrestrials could still be thrown out for that of UFO's, if not any Shroud, or even Logic, what could be the remaining answer,
or answer left?

For this, still the word "infallibility" here, where perhaps no such thing for that of the Universe either, but rather for that of a possible Creator which could be behind.

Sadly, such a thing could still be about Religion, for also that of a need of "proving" the Shroud as well, for that of also its origin.

Blame my near-sightedness perhaps, but still we could be having such a thing, except for not always making it science either, or at least the Method of Proof.

Making it at least Quarks for a couple of things, and at least the Universe does exist, except for not making it any "Credo" either, for next Religious belief.

Here also mislead, entice, confuse, or deceive, and the funny thing is that I could be back at "Our Prayer", for such a thing.

Ending with that of "temptation", perhaps taking away the rest, or other meaning of the word, or sentence, because here also that of the daily, or regular bread as well.

If you did not catch it, or the whole thing, look back at the word "fallibility" here, and next this word for that of science.

Again, the old debate for all of this, and also the same wording as well, except for not making it any "slur", or subtlety, for also that of "quirk" as well,
if not any "whims" or "quirk" either.

Here the melody, or song "Nearer, or perhaps closer to God", comes to mind, for also that of "You be glory", or "be honored",
but also that this is not the only way I am thinking.

I really would like to know if Steady State Theory perhaps could tell me about such a thing as that of randomness or chaos, for next that of the Initial Moment itself.

If rather making it such words as "Initial Moment", you also could make it Instantiation as well, if perhaps not "In the beginning" either.

Could we perhaps make it still Myth for a couple of things, and make it Zeta Reticulii as well, for that of such a thing, except for perhaps not Castor either
(alpha Geminorum), which I once caught as a double star (almost), by using a 2.4 inch telescope, except for not its 9'th magnitude companion either (YY Geminorum),
which happens to be a red dwarf pair.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castor_(star)

Except for perhaps not any "hairy creature" from alpha Centauri either, but rather that here apparently a main sequence star for both main stars, except for also metallicity as well.

Compare with Capella (alpha Aurigae), and also beta Aurigae as well, and both only spectroscopic, but next both double stars, and next we could be still looking for life.

But if still "Out of your mind", next perhaps dumb as well, except for perhaps not any "silly idiot" either, because we should also know that Seti, or Seti@home is also an
active program as well, and could involve also that of Meti as well, for that of messaging to the stars, if not any Messenger either.

So, if perhaps not any silly or stupid idiot either, for also the Man in the Street, also that of "knucklehead" as well, for also twisting and turning as well, and next for the grave.

When we breathe, for that of air, it becomes the oxygen being inhaled, or sucked up, for also that of almost 78 % Nitrogen, which is poisonous,
or at least hazardous, or harmful to health.

Next it becomes O2, if not wrong, and here the subscript perhaps needed, because pure Oxygen, or O, is also poisonous.

Have a cigar, if you will, if not making it any stranded, or a beach for that of sometimes whales as well, but that of mislead or entice, for next that of "Our Prayer",
is perhaps a thing which should be skipped, or forgotten either.

Should a claim possibly end with that of a similar "Proof", in that Eternity was being discussed in the past for that of Religion, or perhaps Religious purposes,
if not any sake either?

Or did it rather become the birds and the bees, for next also "Humble stance" as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didacticism

Or perhaps rather Charles Chaplin instead, entertaining us with that of "Modern Times", and also the assembly line, or conveyor, for that of mass production?

Trust my feelings, Luke, but also that Fundamentalism could make it that of "Fundamentals of nature", if perhaps not any "absolutes" either.

If rather still 0 for that of 1, also that of Logic as well, if not any swap around either.

indigenous

From Earth itself, we should know about both aborigines and also indigenous people.

But when making it perhaps the Pyramids of Gaza, also that of Reincarnation as well, for that of burial principles or methods,
if not any such thing as time travel either.

NB, for that of Notabene, should be an abbreviation, and not any slur at all.

But rather that the Conquistadors should be related, or perhaps associated with a conquest by the Portuguese, in order to catch up, or perhaps discover cities like
Machu Picchu, if perhaps not conquering it either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machu_Picchu

One thing could be making it Celibacy for a couple of things, except for not any bad event happening either, which could make you ending up dead.

Bliss, or blissful, except for perhaps not any verses either, or perhaps legends, myths, tales or folklore.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abell_2218

Lost in space, as usual, except for perhaps "did not know, either".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celibacy

Or perhaps rather the bad or wrong turn again, for that of next alsoproving God, when we rather should believe better.

Do you happen to read my thoughts both here and there, for that of radiation perhaps not the most important thing either,
but still part of energy, for that of also nuclear fusion also taking place?

Except for not any sins and forgiveness either, for that of also silly or stupid, we could make it Hawking radiation of sorts, when we also could make it Black Holes.

If perhaps so, should not that of production versus consumption be about Processes, except for such a thing as annihilation, or even Antimatter,
when we also could make it both Dark Matter and Dark Energy as well?

Except for not forgetting any bosons either, or even the Man in the Street, we also could make it the graviton as well, for that of a particle which could be responsible for gravity.

Becomes a thought here about the shoemaker, if not any such thing as bygone, or past either, because supposedly science could still be the winner,
for that of both war and peace, if not such a thing as any mind, or perhaps creativity.

Almost forgetting BASIC here, for that of both read and write, if not any get and put either, or perhaps even "Pokemon".

Where do we find any "absolutes", next for that of Logic, except for making it still true or false, or even 0 or 1?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

Mentioned before, but here would like only the word itself (Plausibility).

Here really "Does not matter", for also "Matter of fact".

Should there be any difference between having ten or twelve balls in the air, by next throwing them up?

Translates into "juggler", but only after keying in twice.

If not mentioned, also the word "tuft", for that of tufting, because here that of still empty handed for a couple of things, except for still also the vastness of space.

So, stiffle your mind perhaps, next for that of Creativity, and you could also be having the muser, ponderer, or brooder.

If you happened to read some other places, next also that of "Sarcasm on/off".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm

Really not any fun, perhaps, but like a bottle of vine, also that of a given vintage as well, except for perhaps not making it any "crook" or "spooky",
if not any weird either, for next that of "Satan", for that of the Devil instead.

Mind you, not any pleasant either, for neither story or contents, and therefore that of, or perhaps the fact of making it "Heaven and Hell" instead.

Translates into, and next perhaps not any "find, found, found" either, for that of a glorious story, if perhaps not any bygone or left either.

Here also the thought about Project Management as well, in that we could be having design, for next that of construction,
and also that it could be still "WYSIWYG", for next looking at the stars, for also the constellations in the sky, if not making it the visible Universe either.

For this, perhaps looking in "awe" for that of the visible sky, except for perhaps not making a thought about how it was "created".

So, stars are supposedly born, by next also being created, and supposedly should be left to die as well, possibly by means of a violent explosion.

But if rather meaning, for next also intention, if perhaps not any Reason either, we could be left thinking of the whole thing as perhaps an "act" or drama of sorts.

Here again Google Translate is not with me.

But mentioned in the past, if not wrong, also that of a tenet, or doctrine, which actually could make a translation of a Belief, if not any Credo,
for next also a meaning, if not any Reason either, for next also that of a Belief in God, next by means of science.

Is perhaps a silly or stupid idiot, next for also the Man in the Street, also that for a similar debate as well?

Postulate again translates into Axioms here, for such a thing, as you well may know.

Make it rather a chief of sorts, and next for that of American indians for such a thing, and here not in the translation, and he could be having feathers for that of his coat,
if not his headgear, headwear, or headdress, or perhaps any head coverings either.

Sarcasm on

Make it rather a salute, and next also "salud", for that of a drink, if perhaps not a sable either, for that of Roussian roulette.

Sarcasm off

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_roulette

So, steep angle for next also Twin Peaks, if not any shallow either, for next both incline versus decline.

Produce could make it that of production as well, except for not the verbal spelling of the word (Ronald Reagan).

But if rather than Plausibility, still that of Premise here, in that it sometimes could be a handshake for that of science versus Religion as well.

"I believe", and next I also believe in God as well, except for not making it any "Credo" either, or even that of a Premise, when it also could be a Plausibility.

Here slip my mind, for also losing it as well.

Or perhaps rather "bind, bound, bound", for that of making it Sarcasm, if perhaps not any Philosophy either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics

Do you perhaps spell it differently, for next that of faces, versus facets, except for perhaps not any Moses either, or even the Tabernacle versus the Sacristy?

Prove to me that God is good, for next also rather bad, except for still such a thing as the Universe, or at least the vastness of space.

flaw
flawless

next perfect working order, and you could be having that of a "Principle", if perhaps not any Method either, for that of also a fluke as well.

Given, and next also surmise as well, and it soon becomes that of Methodology as well, if perhaps not any "translates into" either.

But rather "Bingo", for next also that of Creation myth, and also "Here I am" as well.

scam

Funny perhaps, but is it not true that both the Scientific Method, and also that of Proof, could be telling about both "as is", as well as "Here I am".

Back to that of Plausiblity, next I find this to be part of Logic, if not anything else being said.

But if rather it became the postman, or perhaps clerk, delivering a postage on your door, for perhaps that of a newspaper,
perhaps no such thing as a "deal" either, for next also "New Deal".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occult#Occultism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occult

Keying in "Occultism", it becomes that of a bit down in the text.

Here it rather should be the header itself, for that of the article.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Truth

I solemny swear, and so on...

So, why not forget such a thing as a "prick" either, and next also for that of science, in that telling a lie, should not be such a thing as any "Oath" either?

Yes, "knock it off", for next also that of knucklehead as well, but should tell you the fact that we most likely are not alone in space, only for that of science itself,
if perhaps not any time will tell either, for next also a couple of things.

So, where is that of "superfluous" in all of this, if perhaps not making it any major or minor either?

Supposedly still the majority "whip" for that of Politics, if perhaps not making it any poor, or tramp, for that of also Homeless Man, or guy,
bum, or outlier.

But rather that we could still rely on the Scientific Method for also that of also Conscience as well...

Is Creation next that of words, for that of also wording, or should it rather be that of Events?

Perhaps still rather Armageddon, for that of an armistice, except for no such thing as a Revelation either.

Far away in Baagdad, perhaps, but next perhaps that of Religion for such a thing, except for not any science either, because here still in the blue myself.

Laughter, eh, and next also that of Inquisition as well, for that of following the masses.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inquisition

Do I next think, or perhaps make it Blasphemy here, for that of the Inquisition?

Where do you perhaps find or make it a trap door, if perhaps not any "Biggest blunder of my life" either?

If not wrong, I could make it magnitude, for next also threshold as well, if perhaps not any such thing as levels, or even Portals either.

But still rather "suppose", if not any wait either, for next that of a waiting game (lost the meaning),
but still that the Universe could be that of Creation itself, and also for its Initial moment of such.

Should I deliver a package, and it next could be meant for someone else?

What if this happens forever?

But rather that you could still quantisize the world, for that of also magnitude, or manifold, if perhaps not making it any infinity either.

Or just to be clear, namely for that of a worm, perhaps also a wormhole as well, except for perhaps not any Heathen and Pagan either,
and we still could make it Creation, next for that of the Universe.

Should both birth and death be part of evolution, next as also that of the Drake equation, as also a Probabilistic equation, or argument?

hitherto

Uh, oh, perhaps not any equation for that of time, except for only making it still only a notion.

Cosmological argument

Cosmological principle

Any hyperspace here, for next also flawed thinking, except for perhaps not any "argument" either?

Or perhaps rather the cookbook, for also making it needs and deeds, if perhaps not any "statutory rights" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judas_Iscariot

Carry on, except for not any "mislead" either.

But rather "Tell me", for that of a story possibly being wrong, except for not making it any "Truth" either, for next that of an Oath.

Here we should also know that certain Court rulings sometimes could go wrong, and we could end up having a miscarriage of Justice.

But rather "pray", for next also "prey", and also a bit of difference.

denial

Guess what, but you could always backtrack, for also that of sometimes a couple of things being "rooted".

Except for perhaps that of Creation itself, where it sometimes could be that of "Three Wise Men", if not any Skunkworks either.

So, perhaps still "In the beginning" of sorts, and next also for that of elementary particles, if not making it any time either.

Or perhaps rather still that of Eternity, for that of also part versus whole, except for not making it any "Heaven or Hell" either.

Here that of "Where do you go", for that of also "Where are you supposed to go", except for not making it any room or place either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamics

Should this not be the Cafe here as well, for next also "Come on" as well?

Not forgetting that either, except for perhaps not a moment of science either.

But rather still measure, for that of also "measurability", and next also against or towards with.

Pling, here for that of "ready, set, clear", and also readiness as well, and for this both formulas and equations as well, which next could be telling about nature.

But if rather still love and marriage, at least you could propose.

If rather "affirm", you also could take a couple of things for granted.

But rather sing a song, for that of a clown in a circus, and next also a smile as well, when it also could be a grin.

allude

Is next Castor C (or YY Geminorum) that of a "matter of fact" for next a couple of things, including the Method of Proof?

Mirror for that of also a reflection, and it also could be about reality, if not any realization either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation_of_God

Here the second link from the first one, and not really in my thoughts, or intended either.

Or perhaps still rather a slur, for also lack of evidence as well.

So, what is next meant by "thinking"?

Should it still be about the Scientific Method here, or should it rather be a "notion"?

Here that of still making the door both heigh and wide, except for not any doorsteps, or even mattress either.

sphere, for that of also spheres

Dig deep, except for perhaps not any "Blue Velvet", or even "Saga" either.

You know, Einstein could perhaps make it both limits and constraints, except for no such thing as possibilities either.

equivocal

Here the transient for perhaps also the ugly figure as well, but also that events could be making for that of a sequence as well.

"Carry on", and next also iterative functions as well, except for not any sequential either, for that of opposite, or inverse of recursive functions.

Like the cat versus the dog, for at least smell, if not any smelling, here still the Man in the Street for that of silly or stupid idiot,
if perhaps not any "Accountability" either.

Guess what, but 1+2 is still 3, if perhaps not making it any accountability either, for next also counting as well.

What if I rather was or became a bit naive, next thinking that life could be found or present everywhere?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeta_Herculis

Dang it, or perhaps still "knock-knock", for that of also knucklehead, except for perhaps did not know either.

Traceback, for that of also loopback as well, and next also "recapitulation" as well (not liking the word).

furnace

Ah!

Ashes to ashes, for next also dust as well, except for perhaps no "Proof" either, still for that of science, next for that of manifold.

Here slip my mind again, for next bird Phoenix.

Carry on, and next also Resurrection as well.

concoctions

ideas

antics

innovations

contrivance

Or perhaps rather a bit of bad science, except for not any musical band Queen either.

"We are the champions", except for not any Postman Pat either, and possible deliveries.

counter

desk

Oh, what did I say, for that of a possible furnace, if not making it any nuclear furnace either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photosynthesis

Sole mio, next also a wonderful world as well, and still also the Method of Proof as well, for that of also a couple of idiots.

White supremacy

race

Race condition

spare parts

gem, if perhaps not any gems either.

Cuckoo

diversion (we may have to divert, from also that of a redirection)

Splending, but perhaps not any crooked either, for next also that of a given, or common sense.

Pickabou mountain (check spelling. because here uncertain).

But still rather a couple of words, for that of also qualified versus unqualified (qualification), except for not any such thing as "Master in disguise" either.

Huh. if stilll such a thing as the "Man in the street", for next also "Three star general" as well, if not nine docking ports, or gates either,
think I am, or could still be stupid.

Uh. oh, any Chuck Yeager here, except for perhaps not a story being told either, except for also "Man of our Times" as well.

Supposedly fantasia could translate. or make it into that of delirium as well, but here also the strange thing of "Dinner being served",
except for perhaps the dinner itself.

Skunk works

Or perhaps rather "It could happen to me", except for not you either.

Relativity

wrong versus right, for that of also good and bad, and still in error

auspices

You know that we still could make it "suckers" for a couple of things, except for perhaps not any Religion either,
but also that auspices, or the like, could be that of direction, or management, for a couple of things.

cress

Nasturtium

Beware the wolf. or perhaps "hold" for a couple of things.

Centennial versus bicentennial

Or perhaps still poetry versus prose, or prosa.

Act of deliverance, next also act of meaning, if not any hesitation, or hospitability either.

Ready, steady, cook, for that of also hospitability, if not any inhospitability either.

surmise

Or still perhaps the debate for that of making crooked for also that of insane, and next also meaningless as well?

Ah, prove science, and next also culprits as well, for also silly or stupid idiots.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pattern

"Twist and shout", and next for that of music, and always a difference.

On your feet, marshal!

Fine music, if perhaps no such thing as an "Octagon" either.

synthesis

Be your guest, if perhaps not any mine either, except for not Albert Einstein either, or even the Three Wise Men.

purpose --> intention (namely, or namely such)

Or, perdition versus damnation, for that of also Resurrection (think of it).

Or perhaps rather "Sharp" here, for that of a business, except for not making it any "Last of the Mohicans" either.

Still that of counting, versus any accountability, so why such a thing as "wrecking my soul" either, for that of Idealism?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donkey

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunkirk

Spelling difference, perhaps, if not any donkey, or monk either.

But rather "what if", and next for that of science, and next also possible "Truth" as well.

From one thing to another, and perhaps no such thing as any guess, or guesswork either, if perhaps not any "surmise" either.

"Guess what", and next also "Proof as well, for also that of science.

Or cast. for also that of being deliberate at times.

"Happy hours", if not any happy times, or even jokes either, and I do not have it in front of me.

Pursue

Quit versus exit, for that of an algorithm, except for still only a "measure", for also stick to it, except for not any idiots either.

Oh. should Probability itself also make for an assumption at hand, if perhaps not "readily" so?

Litigation (needs checking)

What if perhaps curiosity still killed the cat, for also a couple of other things?

Do you think of your mat, for also mattress, being the entrance point, or Port, of sorts?

Yeah , Blue Velvet for such a thing, except for not any "menace" either.

Tangibility

So, why such a thing as a concert hall, when it also could be that of a play, or playback as well?

In concert

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHalXjs0cDA

For the stupid of you, if perhaps not any Mentality either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset

Translates into "Mindset" here, and getting back at it.

Buh, but too much to edit here.

In the bathroom again, for that of also, or a bit of "necessities".

Except for perhaps not any "conflict of interest" either.

Star Queen, perhaps, if not any making it any beehive either.

Lust

Or perhaps lost in the soul, for also that of perdition, or damnation as well.

Have a cigar, and next as well, except for perhaps not sitting alone either, next for that of a dreamer.

Purdue (needs checking). next for the fact that all roads could still lead at Rome, and next I could also be at home.

Evaluation

But rather still a claim, for next also that of a pursue, or pursuant as well, and here slipping as well.

Come on, make it common sense, if you will, if still not part versus whole either.

Pursuant

Or sacred, for that of holiness as well.

Perhaps another word, but at least here for now.

Conception, or inception, next a Spanish word, and I do not like that either.

What about Genesis instead?

Mentioned previously that I happened to be an Agnostic, if not ending up so.

If next perhaps also that of the Shroud of Turin, next also such a thing!

Fool, for next also fool hearted.

Synopsis, for that of also lure.

Or perhaps rather "specification".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naivety

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset

And perhaps not any "naive" here, for also "tags" as well.

Look back, and also that of a ...for that of a shape.

That one, except for not having it previously, or up my list.

Getting back at it.

Ah. human factor, next that of also exercise, if perhaps not still conscience as well.

Feeling good.

Or perhaps too good (except for no rant, or oerhaps rahther science.

Buh!

Perhaps still rather "understand".

My quote here, of course.

Oh, heck, for that of 15 years.

Or perhaps that of a Poltergeist (of sorts)

Except for no "myriads" of stars either.

Why or how if we still look at the pedal here, namely or the Scientifif Method, if not any perhaps¨.

Charlatan, next perhaps Charlie Chaplin, but at least translates here, or this way.

Here I am (what nice), except for perhaps not any Contradiction either.

Except for not any science either, or even the Scientific Method.

What did I say?

Apologies for that, but did not see or notice before too late.

If you do not mind, the woman in the picture for that of the Hawaii volcano, at the bottom left, is quite pretty.

At least noticing that fact.

Apologies, I should not have done that.

Cinderella versus Bloksberg, except for the color of black?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brocken

Keying in "Blocksberg", and it becomes Brocken here, and next perhaps not riding a horse either, but rather a broom or brush,
for that of also Merlin versus Aladdin, if not Mickey Mouse either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Or perhaps rather fun with pictures, in my collection, for that of a visitor close to home, and quite well documented using a video camera.

This one came from somewhere else, and I do not believe such a thing a pros versus cons, or really that of science versus "Belief" should really matter.

But if rather making it ourselves versus both the Earth, and also the rest of the Universe, the matter or case could perhaps be a bit different.

Place a cooker filled with water on a platter, or oven, and it will evaporate into steam or damp from that of heat being added, and next also energy.

But if rather an evaporating Universe from also that of such thing for Black Holes, again only radiation, and perhaps not the Black Hole itself.

If you next could also make it White Holes as well, with that of also multiverses, perhaps that of infinity once over again,
except for not any dimensions either, and a sense that there could be a ruler or master in charge of everything.

The other name for this could be a divine Creator, meaning God, and if the sentence "In the beginning" could be having its roots in the Big Bang,
as the starting point of the Universe, we could be still left with the observable Universe, for what we could be able to see.

Should there be a difference between numbers and Logic, in that the latter could still mean true versus false?

Is Intelligence supposed to be Analytics, for also that way of thinking, or should Logic be the same as "Does God exist"?

Making it rather an ability, and sometimes a skill as well, and you could be a genius.

Make it perhaps the same for God as well, except for perhaps not any rational thinking for also a similar behavior.

Like the Madman, we could know when it is all wrong, because you could always make a difference from that of the Wise Man,
but perhaps not necessarily for that of a genius either.

This makes me think that Blasphemy is not the same as any ridicule either, because scientists could be quite good at explaining the Universe,
from only a way of analytical thinking, and not just the fact that they could also be Atheists, or Agnostics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

I sometimes could make it Heathen or Pagan for next also angels.

I think that there are two ways of approach here, namely that Creation could be having a possible divine nature on its own,
with also that of a God being responsible, but also that the above could be much like love versus hatred as well,
in that we could be back at Earth, for next also its problems.

Infinity could be unquantifiable, by also its meaning, and not only numbers alone.

Here also a reminder in my head of a Wikipedia article for that of Cognition as well, and here still the green figure a little down.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analytics

Similarly, Philosophy and Psychology should not be the same either.

Read the posting at PrimeGrid for that of Hawking radiation, and next give a thought about what Creation should be all about.

Do not forget that of Dogma, or the like for the Alien Interview, because here also that of the Janus face, if perhaps not anything else, for making it aggression,
when it rather could be compassion, and still also Intelligence, for next also Conscience, which at least could be telling about ourselves,
but perhaps not Creation itself, in a context of nature.

Noticing the falling RAC, but also keep in mind that of four accounts here with 1+ million on each, and one even 2.7 million in credit,
plus also more than 800,000 on my second user account for that of posting.

Tut-tut, but I did the numbers again during the day, and also got it wrong one time as well.

Could be almost a breakthrough of sorts at least on paper, but it vanishes in the crowd for its vast amount.

There was a misprint in the recent quote, and I should have read through first.

But except for that, not forgetting that Politics and science could be related with each other, if not any intertwined or mixed either,
for that of making it science versus Religion either.

A recent video of a UFO on Yahoo! caught my notice, and except for sometimes staring eyes for that of a glass of vine (perhaps red vine),
or even Men in Black, for that of Comedy, or perhaps costume (not necessarily makeup), my guess is that scientific Belief could be still a hard thing as well.

If sometimes meant to be for debate of such, guess about the disagreement which always could be there, except for not any Consensus either,
where it rather could be Moderation.

Should I still be laughing at a couple of things, if perhaps not you either, for the same?

Look, the Universe is huge, or perhaps even enormous, if not any end or limit to its size, or dimensions either.

We could perhaps make it the Butterfly effect versus the Mandelbrot set, for also earthquakes or tsunamis, if not any events happening in space either,
marking the death of a star.

But next, pee-wee of sorts, if perhaps not any "Hide and Seek" either, for next both Heathen and Pagan, if not any notion or sense about a Creator for that of everything.

For now we do not see any equivalence for that of Matter Creation versus Creation Myth, except for perhaps a given attitude towards one subject, or another,
because the Laws of nature should only pertain to the physical world, which we again could make the Universe.

Really not the better wording above, but next no secret where it all stands either.

I could perhaps make it Mind one thing, and next that of Comprehension another, next for that of myself as a human, versus again the Universe itself.

Therefore it could be assumed that Creation myth is not about Matter Creation, only because it should be that of gods and angels, and once again the old subject.

Like a title itself, perhaps your Holiness for at least the Pope, if not making it any King either.

Life could also be debated, but next also in a context of science, except for any Religion, because we also have that of evolution as well.

Also we could be looking for a GUT (or Grand Unified Theory), seeking to explain everything, but next perhaps because of the falling apple,
rather than the horse kicking both forwards and backwards.

Any missing pieces for that of human evolution, including its history, and also development, and next perhaps still also Lucy for such a thing.

We next could make it bits and pieces, for that of the whole as well, by means of both the Heissenberg Uncertainty Principle, and also the notion of infinity.

But also that Logic makes it harder to disbelieve at times, rather than believe, including the subject of aliens and extraterrestrials.

Everyone knows that using a sledgehammer on a big rock does not always work, in the same way as the Hammer and Feather experiment could be inconclusive.

Or perhaps rather not, except for not the "Great Attractor" either, but rather the Force of gravity, still governing everything in existence.

Any slip of a finger, and perhaps a bit of wrongdoing either, except for the dish falling to the floor, or even the wrong thing being said.

You have the general rule of thumb that 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and so on, are that of numbers, but perhaps not any sets, or intervals either,
but in a similar way, the simple prayer should perhaps not be telling about God himself, for next also his face.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallelism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

Here a funny thing coming up for that of still "merrily", and perhaps not any "Merry Christmas" either, but rather "Row your boat".

It follows that a lack of Consensus could make idiots of all of us, rather than perhaps the opposite, for next also scientists.

Also in my head that a golden rule, should also be a rule of thumb, for next a couple of things.

Here the word "quirk" as well, using Google Translate, where it also could be that of ourselves, except for not any postulate, or Axiom, next for that of nature.

I did not hear anything, or too much for that of turning around in the grave either, next for that of Eternity.

Perhaps too hard to swallow, but do you still loop back at the starting point for that of a guess or assumption, when also making it a couple of Theories,
or even wild speculation at times?

Should Religion be still the "Truth", when rather science could perhaps give the answer?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgement

I hate to mention it in such a way, but do you sometimes make pancakes, for next also the dish falling in on itself?

If perhaps so, it could be still science, next for that of cooking, except for not any inward motion either, resulting in a cataclysmic event.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

If you absolutely have to believe, next you could also be a Believer as well.

Why not be a scientist instead, and rather give a couple of things a thought?

Makes me think that the Method of Proof could be still possible for that of science, but next hard for that of Religion itself.

The tree of life...

Should it be the Garden of Eden here?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inheritance

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heredity

Perhaps more the second link here.

Or perhaps rather the fact that a Dyson sphere could be about a natural phenomenon, rather than perhaps the unexplained,
for also making a difference or separation between possible Type II and Type III civilizations.

Laughter from the audience.

See you later.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beavis_and_Butt-Head

What is wrong with me, and next also with my head?

If having a wife, or perhaps someone to love, you could embrace her, rather than yourself.

Dreams are still unexplained, and the paperback version of Encyciopedia Britannica was inconclusive in its extended version.

Any loop, and perhaps not any spiral either, for that of also look back as well.

Perhaps I should be a bit careful with those words.

Not having the details right now, but making it some 67.5 versus 22.5, using the sine, or cosine, for that of trigonometry,
and you have a nice pair or combination, when making it into the tangent function, for that of degrees.

Any difference between a hallucination, and that of a mirage, for that of an optical illusion?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_phenomena

Here perhaps "Natural phenomenon" only could be better, for that of a subject, or title.

Compare with Occult, or the like, and perhaps a slight difference, except for not silly idiot for both you and me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occult

I find it hard to throw away a smiling face, or even a sad one as well, so why do the same for that of Lucy as well, if not any aliens either?

A figure on the net, or web, showing a sphere, with next a couple of things inside, and perhaps you did not notice, or catch the thing?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mindset

Or perhaps still rather "Jackass" for that of a couple of things, including ourselves?

If making it the Universe as a whole, which "level" could it be defined, for that of its evolution, or perhaps meaning?

Both intelligence and at least conscience are fine words, but next only for that of ourselves, except for still only a lifeless nature around.

Make it rather Laws and Equations for a couple of things, and next perhaps still "In the Beginning", except for possibly a Creator behind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drama

Speaking of performance, if perhaps not in charge either.

Is it the hidden, or desired card next also wished for, in that we could seek to unite science with Religion perhaps,
except for not making it only a GUT (or Grand Unified Theory) either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

Took a couple of clicks here, and you need to check for yourself, except for not "So help me God" either.

Again, loopback of course, if not any "nuff said" either, but here it translates into "Regulation", and please do not tell me about "Stars and stripes" either.

"Closer", and next perhaps also vanish as well, except for not any scientific debate either, which essentially could be about the concept of God.

Or perhaps notion, because you know that I did not jump off the tracks either, for that of subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Addendum

Make it the Scientific Method, or Standard Model, as usual, and the rest next as an Addendum.

bent, inclination, propensity

divination

glorification/extol

Or hereafter perhaps, because also the stupid idiot with that of Christian Science Monitor, for next also hearsay, or hearsay evidence,
if perhaps not any rumors either?

Still that of aliens or extraterrestrials here, or do you catch my sense here?

So, let us throw it around and also this project as well, for also a couple of silly idiots around.

Let us not make it science of everything either, when it perhaps could be only Religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onomatopoeia

Here quite nice, but needs a check for that of correct spelling.

dubious

In computer technology, we sometimes could be making it "master and slave" for that of disks.

While Muslims are perhaps not eating pig for that of dinner(read bacon), perhaps rather a cake instead.

terrifying

awesome

fierce

fearsome

Could add to it that of "monstrous", perhaps, for that of Tyrannosaurus Rex.

Prove all, and next also everything, for also the Jackal, if not the "asshole" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jackal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism

Or perhaps whisper in the air.

What is meant by "open" for a couple of things?

Should it be "open" for that of science, or should it rather be the "Open Foundation"?

Or perhaps rather "Open your minds", for the words of Dr. Michio Kaku.

It is a melody around, perhaps Genesis, starting with the words "Tell me".

Next perhaps lost in your soul, if perhaps not your mind either.

Back to the word glorification, or perhaps aggrandizement, or extol, and next also natural as well, or perhaps to say.

Is time still only a notion, or should it rather be a framework of space, for still that of Laws and Equations, or perhaps not any elementary particles either?

Guess what, but numbers are boring, for next also "believers" as well, next for that of science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adequacy.org

Or perhaps sufficient, or satisfactorily only.

Do not forget the pm for that of any wakeup calls either, in that the flies could be still doing that, in the morning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carnival

Forget the circus or tivoli, or even such a thing as life versus death, for next also a funeral as well.

juxtaposition

Funny perhaps. except for not making it Martin Luther, for next that of the Pope as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_flare

Another word for this in the past, except for not any "Jackass", or stupid idiot, for that of a couple of things in the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hoc

Or maybe vice versa, in that a side position, or juxtaposition could next mean the same thing.

If not any bad breath, or attitude either, for next "God is", and next also God exists.

Dowm the draft. and next also down the shaft. for next nothing next proves anything, except for still nothing.

Is not numbers still supposed to be "poor man's science", eh?

Is Religious fanaticism supposed to be about any hatred, or could it perhaps still be about love?

Except for not any harsh reality either, by visiting a gynecologist, and having a Caeasarian being performed?

Wish me luck, for next that of success as well, and forget any hatred versus love, of course.

Indiffererence

apathy

disregard

Here that of a syntax, if not any vocubulary either, but do you next see the face of God, for such a thing as any "tolerance"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schism

Cardiac arrest, or perhaps still only the UFO visible on Yahoo!

Personally I think that no such thing as any "Method of Proof" either, or even silly idiots either.

This is a natural phenomenon related to science (and not Religion) but still worthwhile discussing both.

If perhaps "One step closer", next for that of God, versus that of Intelligence, or perhaps Conscience, next such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

For the second link, perhaps only Plausibilty, and mentioned before.

persistence

steadfastness

Why knock on wood (absolutely) make it science, when it perhaps could be Religion (or vice versa)?

You make it a letter by someone, and next also "convoluted" as well.

But rather "In your wildest dreams", next also fantasies as well, except for not any "Speaking of God" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlatan

Makes it that of Plausibilty above as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain

What the heck, your own house, or perhaps home?

Is this not supposed to be the place for that of "Heaven and Hell", if not any such thing as any UFO's either,
for also that of aliens and extraterrestrials?

Paper back, except for not any "shit" either, but except for toilet paper, back to business as usual, for next thinking that life could be so as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adherence

Back and forth, and so on, except for not any Christianity either, or even a love song.

<-->. which means (except for not any Love from God).

Science translates from God, next by means of Creation, and perhaps also words and deeds, if not any meaning either.

Seeing the face of God, and perhaps that of hatred as well, if not any love either, except for any Creation.

"Easy come" for next also being easily explained away, and you could also have ghosts.

Should not "wholle" also mean magnitude as well, for that of part vesus whole?

Or perhaps rather infinity versus 0, zero, or nil, for that of also nonsense.

Dimg. dimg, Matter Creation, of course, and next also Creation myth as well, but here I see an opening.

The problem here is that I could be rather silly or stupid, or in fact (actually or even) believe.

Oh, read my lips for that of a natural phenomenon, and next no such thing as any "Belief", or even Religion, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribute

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale

Needs a fix for that of the latter, if not wrong, or perhaps "Whimsy".

Fall-off (for that of jerk).

Here some word starting with the letter "p".

Nail it, of sorts, but I do not have it here.

canvas

Close your mouth, for that of "enough said".

Or perhaps still proving science by means of the Scientific Method, buh!

I show you the way, next for that of a discipline, if not any Method either.

Yes, leads to, or follows of or from, and next the Scientific Method (gasp).

Set, of course, or again, and next also concatenation, except for not any "stupid me", of course.

perversity

corruption

sick

depravity

ruin

Or perhaps interwoven here as well.

Lights on, next also off.

Or perhaps also such a thing for that of a scientific debate as well.

Perhaps not.

Adjective verus noun, and you could also be having the fasit.

Hrmm, or perhaps no.

Governance, for that of ruling, and next also "tick-tick" as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegra

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicament

Sworn obedience?

Oh, for God's sake, Creation is still meant by God, for such a thing-

defamortory

You see, on the loose, but perhaps only the words of God, if perhaps not the words of science either....

closure

inferential

closure

containment

Why not "inference" here. for that of also conclusion?

Are the words of the Bible perhaps truthful, or fruitful, or should it rather be about "wit"?

Back into, or notabene (or NB!) for short, who is the wise man, and next proving any science.

Nexy back to nothing. for that of any similar when it comes to any Religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absurdity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class

Fancy eh. for that of my kitvchen, if not any spelling, or congruency either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)

Or perhaps rather hitheto, except for no junk either, because does science still sell itself, as usual?

Does infinity next also mean "knucklehead" as well, per definition, if not something being said?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synopsis

Rather silly fool for that of also ice cream, if not any Advent either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advent

I have not read it here, except for not pickng it on the spot either.

Dangit, perhaps a better one here.

Or,

Also a typo as well here, in the previous.

Working on it, but perhaps not successful here.

Feel free to write, but next no such a thing as facing backwards either, except for not any clown either.

Or stupendous, for next that of the Universe, if not any silly or stupid idiot either.

Oh come on, the Universe should always be its own measure.

Need getting back at this, and will have it later.

Scientitfic,

Or Scientifical

Thanks!

Became that thing, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragnar%C3%B6k

Frame of reference?

Poss off.

Except for not any "equivocal" either.

Left to be, and next also to be (persistence, steadfastness).

Oh, rather simplicity versus complexity, and you could be still having stamina,
if nor any verses either.

Belkeve me , but Creation must have been on something, rather than nothing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allusion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism

Needs checking here, except for not any Harry met Sally either.

Unlile

opposed

contrary

or maybe biased

Or perhaps rather the third Bible, for that of stupid people, if not any Hippocricy, or Idiosyncracy either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excalibur

Perhaps a bit of nice here, because a Regulation is not any stampede either-

Or perhaps rather a scientiffic or scientifical God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublime_(philosophy)

Supplemtal, or sublimental, or (nneds checking).

Again, nice.

Again that, for a typo.

Sorry!

Amd back again with a biank or emty buffer here..

Meeds a fix here, except for not any Google Chrome either.

Really. when posting the buffer could thing I am empty, because at the bottom (line wrap.

Guess it next did not happen, at least with me.

Or maybe worms for that of also big or overgrown ones as well?

If not wrong, the sometimes beautiful butterfly grows up in this way, by being almost a worm at first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butterfly

And next worm is not the right word either, because it rather becomes that of caterpillar here.

Except for not making me silly or stupid for that of science, when it also could be that of "Faceless coward" for that of a also face, if not any such at all.

But if perhaps doing so, you rather could be asking what science is perhaps all about, rather than what we rather could be looking for.

Becoming 14280 lines in a single log here, and for that, making it the top 100 triplets, for next a closer look.

Again, still CUDA of course, for that of tasks, but only a maximum of two in a row.

I did the weekend shopping, but the previous links should tell for themselves, except for also one task only running for 66.06 seconds.

Perhaps the book about the "Wild West", if not any literature, could be telling about the "Wild Bunch" as well,
in that jump buck, or leapfrog should not be any "Hide and seek" either, in that it also became a mentioning of the different task types,
and here that of still .vlar tasks, where it also could be CUDA32, CUDA42, CUDA50 (not seen yet here), and also SoG (also the same).

Here the word being lost during the day, namely modulation, which was the one being looked for.

I wish I could see or interpret the possible meaning of a message, except for not making it any sinusoidal wave, or perhaps curve,
but rather once again the spikes, or maybe the pulses which could be making for such a signal itself, by means of that of a message.

Really it contradicts itself here, but from snooping around here for 15 years, I also know that such a thing could be a "carrier wave",
next for that of possible transmission.

Did I ever see that, and the answer is perhaps yes.

Some 14280 lines in a single log, and it everything is smooth, except for one pulse above 4 for that of score.

Makes me think about that of numbers versus that of a corresponding score, if not any possible significance, or meaning either.

Either we are still alone, or mostly every result could be telling something, by means of still those numbers.

But next "Echo Base" for at least ourselves, if not any Sputnik either, and it becomes that of UFO's for that of a sign that we perhaps are not alone.

If perhaps so, when next that of "dismissed" versus still curiosity, when that of science is being concerned?

If not wrong, we could make it "Credible evidence" by means of wording, and next also possible witnesses as well, including Charles I. Halt,
as the Deputy Commander of the Rendlesham Air Force Base.

But funny enough, I still need to wear shoes in order to walk to the shop, except for perhaps not such a thing as being any witness myself either.

Here that of Credibility itself, except for not ending up looking at a couple of pictures and still frames by own work, which in fact could be telling this to be true.

If perhaps intelligence in nature, except for ourselves, and also life on Earth, it could still be for a purpose, if not any measure or meaning either.

I still could make a thought about life itself, as well as also the Universe as well, if not also that of two eyes for that of someone as well,
which could add even more to the story.

Easy come, and easy go, and life could be easy as well, if not any cheap either, but if rather dull at times, also that of sunspots as well,
and for this, also that of granulation, if not any flares either.

Use a large catalogue for that of star, or stellar indexes (or indices), and next key in G2V as a search parameter.

This should be the spectral class, or type for that of the Sun, and if any similar somewhere else, also that life could be a possibility.

If perhaps not only the atmosphere, and also water, next that the sun should be responsible for that of life, and we could lose out,
if it fails here, or the sun vanishes.

But if rather making it bacteria and viruses as well, we could also be back at Probability as the subject, and next also make it both randomness and chaos,
if not any Coincidences either, for that of evolution, if not also that of life itself.

If a musician, or perhaps singer, is performing for the audience, he/she is doing so, by means of "virtue", or perhaps craftmanship.

Like behavior sometimes showing high moral standards, always that of such for the audience, in that it next could also be that of applause.

If rather Creation was that of good versus bad luck, if not any randomness, or arbitrariness, look at both the crocodiles and dinosaurs,
for that of eons of time, if not the same for any trilobites either.

With only the cup of coffee, not in the mood for any preaching yet, so here still thinking about evolution, and that the world around us could be
both that of such randomness, if not any lucky chance either, for that of a sudden event.

So here not only slow versus fast, or even randomness versus those things made in advance, but rather the way it all comes to use, for that of life itself.

If perhaps not only myself, also there could be other people suffering from the 2 PM illness, and here mentioned with a national broadcaster.

So here also the word fatigue as well, if not making it any "Joker" either, for next that of a game, where it still could be that of Probability.

Keying in the word "allude" here, in that perhaps a mirror should not be reflecting any reality, but rather that it should be reality itself.

Our tasks, as well as also results, should be part of the job, and next for that of also understanding the Universe, if not such a thing for any numbers either.

We could perhaps make it "In the beginning", for next also past, present, and future, because of time itself.

So, lilac for next that of a color, if not any turquoise or magenta either, and still only that of colors, except for not any Creation of nature either.

Except for perhaps still butter on bread, where also that of time could be an added feature as well, next for that of a function, or purpose.

For this, still "tick-tick", next for that of a clock, if not making it such a thing for time itself, and also Einstein the one who came to define the whole thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_proof

Better wish for a Merry Christmas, rather than the fact that we still could be alone, except for not any Proof for such a thing either.

I could also make a difference between that of quantisize and that of quantifying, in that the latter could be about numbers themselves, for that of amounts.

It should be well known that binary numbers, for that of also digits, could make it into octal numbers as well, and also letters, at least A through F,
for that of hexadecimal numbers.

But next any intelligent message, or perhaps meaning, for that of "O B A F G K M N", which you perhaps know the meaning of, except for the spaces.

In the old days, the three sons, or nephews of Donald Duck, were perhaps also scouts, or at least of sorts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Woodpecker

Next perhaps not Woody Woodpecker either, but rather a book for making a couple of knots out of wood, if perhaps not any symbols either, for that of morse code.

But passing by a painting in my living room, on the way to the entrance, perhaps not any mint condition either, except for that of sometimes the "hidden meaning".

If perhaps still not any Proof, or Formal proof, for next that of such a hidden meaning, where is next the opposite, if perhaps not any "truth" either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verbosity

If perhaps such a thing as "Forever young", only that time could last forever, if not making it any Plausibility either, or the other word for it.

Should be a separate or specific word for this, but not having it right now.

Make it rather that of UFO's for next also extraterrestrial intelligence, and are you next supposed to "believe" in such a thing, or even prove it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hickory_Dickory_Dock

At least a popular nursery rhyme here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinder

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ember

Cinder, for also that of dross, if not any ember, and it becomes that of volcanic ash here.

If you do not mind, I made it winners versus losers in the past, and also Probability for the same, if not any roll of the dice, for next striking luck.

Getting a bit tired of it right now.

You know, in the old star atlas, beta Cygni, or gamma Andromedae perhaps is not going by the name "Pulcherrima" either,
but rather epsilon Bootis for such a thing, and also that it could be having a star designated W Bootis close by.

Here beautiful places for that of double stars in the sky, but if next perhaps any life, or signs of life, not for any good either,
next for still that of Plausibility.

It makes me think that a love story perhaps is not any "Idealism" either, but rather that it could be a painting for still that of a depiction of nature,
where we still could rather count up as usual.

Vivaldi could make it the four seasons, while we could also be having five senses, if perhaps not still seven days in a week, and twelve months in a year, and so on.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_and_soft_science

Here that of controlled experiments, among other things, making me think about eye patches for that of cover, and next that of REM sleep.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy

Here almost as bad as it gets, if not any good or better either, for that of "When the tough gets going", because here also the Psychopath itself.

If rather making it "flip-flop", next also duck, take cover as well, except for still not any Little Green Men a regular part of my day.

It makes me think about still that of "Ashes to ashes" for a couple of things, except for not any dictionary translation, or syllable either,
when it rather could be the wonders of nature.

If still 1, 2, 3 for that of numbers, also that of gravity at one end, and next energy in the middle, for next that of matter at the other end.

Carbon-carbon fusion

Or perhaps that of Nitrogen instead.

If not "Like a virgin" either, for that of deliverances versus expectancies, if not any "Short stories" either.

So, who is having the song for that of "Come on"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetosphere

Really, like both demons, or daemons, if not making it any "Satanic verses" either, perhaps no repeat of history all the time either,
for at least making it science for one thing, and not another.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demon_(disambiguation)

Should it be demon here, or perhaps daemon?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint

If you could be of the opinion that I could make it Saints for next that of angels, if not still that of stars and stripes, for that of stars and galaxies,
think again, because I happen to be an astronomer of sorts.

But rather a wake up call of sorts, for next that of a bad morning, where a couple of planes were crashing into a couple of towers,
making it also a science "in between".

In fact, your "extremity" could also be your butt, if not walking the long line either, next for that of science, if not the end of the world either.

"Dreamer, dreamer", start thinking about nature's creation, where it also could be wonders of nature as well, except for not the plural "s" either, which I do not like.

Like a pizza "Grandiosa", at least for that of my meal, also "majestic" as well, if not making it any grand, or grandiosity either, or even spectacular,
for that of an object in the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accountability

Here a little bit of surprise, in that perhaps not about only Statistics either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merge

Or here for that of computers, if you happen to be running wild, or even shouting at times.

If we still could make it both magnificent colors, if not any magnificent objects, for that of the celestial sky,
we could also make it that of "betterness for that of BOINC", if perhaps not any science either.

Whitehall could still be that of decision making for that of Politics, if not any can for that of any litter either, or even satire at times,
but also that White Holes could be theorized, or maybe speculated for also that of Black Holes in space.

So it goes, next for one thing versus another as well, and for this Einstein was able to make it time where it also could be that of space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deduction

Ever thought about that of "right" versus "wrong", when it also could be that of true or false?

Here perhaps still Meryl Streep for a couple of weeping tears, if not any Morality either, for that of science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelangelo

For some reason, Our Prayer could also be about temptation, or rather that of not being tempted, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_statement

If then else, or perhaps next or nextif, for that of a programming language.

But if rather "Bump", next also bump up the ante as well (put up an amount as an ante in poker and similar games), next verb, for that of syntax.

Or, "translates into", next for a better translation of words, if not any "Hah" either, for that of an interpretation.

The opposite of a true story should be a false story, and next also sometimes a falsification as well, for also that of facts.

Yes, spooky, but perhaps still not any ghosts either, for sometimes making it science, where it rather should be the Bible.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consequence

Spell it a bit different, and you also have that of Congruent as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruence_(geometry)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isometry

Silly me, or am I perhaps still only stupid, except for not any Isomorphic either?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isomorphism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graph

You know, all of this makes me think about Creation itself, and what it is supposed to be, except for not any "silly me" either.

I made it "allude" earlier on, or at the start, because of that of perhaps ending up with that of Monotheism again, for next that of Creation.

Did not Einstein make it a "blunder of sorts", when next perhaps thinking that it could be a Creator behind everything?

Or should it still be that of science for next everything?

Pump up the volume, for that of the show must go on.

Dreadnought (for that of silly idiots), or even perplex.

Thanks!

Except for always, or of course Probability, of course, still that of science for that of fair, next also unfair?

Stick to it, but also that of

Answers welcome.

Ad hoc, or maybe "Prefetetia" itself, for next also asking the church, because here I perhaps do not know.

Positive versus negative, and next also adrenaline.

Edited, and perhaps also wrong above.

Or, implication, next positive versus negative statement, if perhaps not any argument either.

Or a proposition versus an asssumption, or persumption, and it still holds, for that of a debate.

Dang it here, for still that of a better word.

Hmm, something is wrong here.

Getting back to it.