I think I got it slightly better here because it was the end of the days with the two remaining beers.

Except for perhaps the Pope himself, I wonder how much it could be possible to "politicize" that of Religion as a subject.

Not necessarily that of any Politics either.

Definitely you should not make fun of such a prominent person, despite perhaps being inclined more towards that of science, rather than maybe anything else.

Therefore I will not do such a thing either.

Look back at the Greek, who except being Philosophers of nature, also happened to be quite good scientists as well.

To them it became that of Earth, Wind, Soil and Fire and next perhaps not too much more.

But when finishing off the session next to the grave of my father, because this was not an event happening with a priest being present, only the digger,
rather than the melody "Love from God", which could have been performed, it rather became that of "From soil you came, to soil you next go".

And here I apparently lost the words for this, when there, even in my thoughts for this.

Look at the Periodic Table of elements and that of Carbon is perhaps the main reason for life as we know it on Earth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table

You could next make it that of "Dynasty" and next think of certain people, particularly women, having silicon inserted into their bodies.

To be more precise, I make it element 14 for this, just below Carbon.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon

And not that of "Silicon Valley" either, because this is what makes me feel a bit angry, or possibly even mad and should not be about breast implants only.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin

Abbreviated Sn in the Periodic table and needed a translation before the lookup.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molybdenum

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niobium

Becomes only a curiosity here, because in fact not what I am looking for.

The more important fact is that Lead is the end product of a sequence of heavier elements, like Uranium, which by means of radioactive decay eventually becomes stable.

An element which is radioactive could be an isotope for such a thing, because it is not a stable element.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope

Because life itself rather is supposed to be that of Carbon, I also came across the fact that a Swedish photographer a couple of years back, chose to make photographs inside the uterus of a woman,
showing the development of a child before that of birth.

Only remember the first name right now, "Lennart" and do not have the last name.

Please have me excused and forget both the water and also the cough, but in fact I was thinking about the nice thing making this possible.

I was thinking of adding a couple of pieces of brown cheeze today, because it contains the element Iron, number 26.

If such a thing as a "furnace" should be a possible description for that of either fission, or that of fusion, we should know that such a furnace could be happening inside that of stars.

Because the fact that I chose to start here with a mentioning of possibly making that of life itself perhaps even something else or perhaps more.

My guess is that Lennart, as the photographer behind these pictures, could be a possible atheist, or maybe agnostic.

But if I could perhaps choose between that of both chromosomes and genes (DNA versus RNA) and also that of enzymes and next also that of the "birds and the bees" for such a thing,
what is supposedly the right thing?

If both humans, as well as the birds and bees as sometimes insects, if not necessarily any flies, could be there for a given or specific purpose, also that of a possible furnace for that happening inside stars,
could be having their respective meaning or explanation.

If that of evolution made room for both instinct and aggression for that of survival, meaning "Survival of the fittest", also that of both intelligence and conscience for that of the human brain.

Next we also could happen to believe in the subject of Religion and Faith, because this could mean yet another thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furnace

Again a bit of a disappointment when reading here.

My guess is that such a thing as evolution could be explained, but not necessarily that of a nuclear furnace, because they end up in a different context and therefore
should be having a separate meaning, or interpretation.

Right now I do not know the precise meaning of this word, but possibly that of "Purgatory" could be a similar explanation for that of possible Religion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purgatory

Also the fact that once again one or more things could perhaps be about science, while the other could be about Religion.

The fact is that the photographer could be quite good at it, but although not familiar with the subject, I also recall attempts at photographing plasma with exposures
at a millionth of a second or less, without success.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasma_(physics)

If such a thing as both intelligence and conscience could rather be that of possible behavior, we could be back at that of "Cognitive science" for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science

Except for also Neon being a Periodic element (Ne, number 10), neither of these things are supposed to be about any UFO's either.

Except for possible "Ball lightning", we could be left at perhaps believing in the body lying on the table and next think that we are not alone in space.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_lightning

End of story, at least for now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZWCYIan_Tc

Became a little long in the previous so here is one worth watching for the rest of the day.

Oh, what did I say?

Back tomorrow.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=81447

Perhaps make it Hawking for the last name as well.

Becomes "as is" for now, both when it comes to possible order of direction and next what I have.

Should we perhaps believe more in the Stone Age rather than the Ice Age, because both happens to be part of history?

But rather the fact that you could happen to be Albert Einstein and come up with a notion of time and next think that a similar understanding of gravity makes it all being a science for
which it is all worthwhile.

As long something starts up being a theory which still has to be proven, we do not have any revolutionary discoveries when it comes to science.

The discovery made in 1919 that a total eclipse of the sun changes the background location of the stars in the field, is proof that gravity warps space.

Next the same gravity also should warp that of time in a similar way, by means of at least making time slowing down.

If anyone could give me an example of how time could be slowing down, except for that of gravity itself, meaning that of a singularity, where time ceases to exist, that would be fine.

If that of time could perhaps be measured against something else, take that of empty space as an example, or at least a place with no gravity.

The fact is that your whole life may be a couple of seconds either shorter, or maybe longer when living on the surface of the Earth, rather on a space station orbiting it.

If you had the chance at entering the Event Horizon of a Black Hole, for example, you could return back home, finding that your newborn child had been buried a long time ago.

Such a thing only from taking the risk at doing such a thing and not necessarily any long voyage for this either.

My guess is that time itself makes no difference from that of a feather and a hammer, at least when it comes to that of gravity.

Like that of radiation, which could be coming from such a Black Hole, neither time or radiation should diminish any mass or a similar gravity that much.

The possible story about extraterrestrials being told is not supposed to be about neither the Stone Age or the Ice Age, but if we should still only believe in Black Holes,
there probably remains a bit yet to be discovered.

Also being reminded that there also could be such a thing as White Holes, but these are not necessarily any Wormholes either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_hole

It comes to me that when perhaps thinking about time as a property of space, we next have both that of space and also the objects which are part of it.

If such a thing as a singularity should be present inside a Black Hole, we are only speaking about a property of space which only can be explained by means of mathematics, meaning that of infinity.

We may think of a Black Hole as dark, or non-luminous object because except from radiation from either the Event Horizon, or the Schwarzchild radius, such an object probably is having no openings,
but rather is a closed object.

Also the fact that such radiation could come from an accretion disc orbiting the star, but here I was thinking more of a single object and next the Black Hole itself.

If I could compress the Earth to the size of a golfball, or less, we would have a Black Hole.

On the surface, you probably would be flat, but at the middle inside, you probably would be even more thinner.

Except for making that of gravity perhaps makes you believe in such a thing, we also have both apparitions in the sky and also those things going by names like "Portal of Perceptions" and the like.

Like a couple of other things, some of these may be related to the possible philosophical when it comes to that of thinking, while others may relate to the possible spriritual.

If such a thing as infinity could explain that of a singularity, also there should exist other mathematical explanations, or perhaps equations, for possible other things as well, because except for that,
we could be left at yet another reason to possibly "believe", which not always suits our taste.

This during the middle of the day, so please have me excused.

Also when reading about that of White Holes, I may also ask myself where we have the possible link or relationship with that of Quantum Mechanics for such a thing.

The fact is that Einstein was not very fond of the subject of Quantum Mechanics, but next he came up with both the Equation e=mc2 and also was able to tell that "God is not playing with dices".

If you could be the one speculating about possible multiverses, that of Wormholes probably should be a better idea.

But for now apparently no proof and we could be left with at least believing in Einstein both when it comes to space and time.

It became 11:30 AM in the morning here and I did not continue on the tasks yesterday.

Guess you still could moderate me, but right now it became 01:07 AM past midnight here.

I will give it at try later on, but probably would have to log off the current session first.

One thing being noticed is that never should a sentence begin or start with the word "and", including possible large caps for such a thing.

It becomes ugly when doing so and for now I do not know if it ended up here being so.

So if the old story perhaps should go that I could perhaps be a believer, you also probably know that I was not the one choosing to fall completely in love with everything.

Is science perhaps supposed to be boring?

Perhaps no so and therefore it possibly rather became a discussion about both that of Stone Age Man and also that of the Ice Age.

Look around and we definitely have such a thing as diversity in nature.

The reason for such diversity is a given notion of infinity, which is an abstract, or the like, which only may be expressed by means of mathematics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

Is it not the fact that while the subject of infinity could perhaps be expressed, or perhaps explained by means of mathematics, other possible solutions or approaches could also be available?

Except for perhaps a given notion of time, of course.

Try writing on the spot and next it is supposed to be a dictionary of everything, like the Wikipedia and such a thing is not going to happen either.

Astrononauts visiting the Moon by means of the Apollo program apparently became aware of an extraterrestrial presence by stating they had visitors.

For such a thing to be possible, one thing is looking at that of technology and next that of nature itself.

Everyone would most likely agree that nature is not for the purpose of technology alone or itself, but rather that such a thing as evolution could make that of technological civilizations possible.

If we should happen to know about a given diversity, it should also be for both good and bad and it could therefore mean both success and failure.

If I for some reason could be a believer and next look at God's creation of nature, we still could see such a thing, but rather than that of success versus failure, a couple of other wordings rather could be used.

We define a generation, or at least a human such, as that of 30 years when it comes to a given life span.

Typically living through some three generations of life or more is not that common, but next we could compare ourselves with that of turtles.

First of all, any turtles are not supposed to be Little Green Men either, but next I could choose to perhaps "believe" in one thing, rather than perhaps or maybe another.

Use such a word as "infallability" and so on, or the like and you probably have a little more of the rest of the story and supposedly it could still be science.

If such a thing as "We choose to go to the Moon" is a good example of technology being used for a given purpose, we should also know about the "good" and "bad" for such a thing.

Or perhaps the "good" versus "bad" and you probably know the rest.

If such a thing as Creativity could mean both that of innovation and design and also that of both "Intelligent design" versus possible Creation myth, we could be having either different
subjects, or possible different meanings for more or less the same subject.

Being a philosopher is not necessarily the same as being a miner working deep underground.

Also being such a philosopher is not always the same as having a dream either, regardless of what kind of dream this could be.

Like that of both birth and death could be viewed in a context of possible Creation, we do not have any equations for such things, like that of a notion of infinity.

As an astronomer myself, I gave the impression that such a thing as Wormholes are not representative or synonymous with any nature we currently may see or observe.

But recent days has given me the possible impression that in fact there could be more to it than even that of Black Holes and next that it did not come easy.

If you happen to be a believer in such a thing as Religion and Faith, one possible way of doing such a thing is by means of having either a bottle, or perhaps a couple of tears.

Really, have a look at that of Intelligent design as a subject and we should know that this is supposed to be an approach which not necessarily is that of an atheist point of view.

Again, such a thing in the context at looking at nature and the way we are supposed to be doing it by means of science.

With the discovery of Cepheids in the Andromeda galaxy around 1924, our understanding of the Universe dramatically changed, in that everything believed to be "nebula", next became
galaxies in the sky.

So while perhaps a specific wording, or use of words could perhaps help, a notion of reality should also make it even clearer.

The name I came across yesterday is for a person of not that much significance, but apparently using mules in order to carry or bring equipment and food at the top of Mt. Wilson,
there could be even more to it here.

Forgot the name right now, but perhaps a bit more important, being reminded about the name Minkowski.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minkowski_space

Only the disambiguation page right now, at least for the first link.

Reading down the article and perhaps the interesting fact that rather than the same story about the Theory of Relativity by Einstein, as opposed to both Quantum Mechanics and the like,
here we could be having a description, or perhaps formal definition of given properties of space, as expressed by means of equations for such a thing.

When it comes to space itself, we could think it could be at least three-dimensional, but next adding the possible notion of time.

The singularity as a mathematical concept, is that of infinite gravity when it comes to that of nature, meaning space.

This because we think of gravity as one of the Fundamental Forces of nature, but still leaving the graviton yet to be discovered.

Are we next back at perhaps the assumption that mathematics alone, meaning equations, could be explaining a couple of things, or are we rather supposed to believe that the properties of
elementary particles could be doing this even or any better?

If I am not wrong, that of elementary particles could at least explain that of microcosmos, but when it comes to that of macrocosmos, it becomes that of the three dimensions and also the
given notion of time.

If the force of gravity should explain the elementary particles, or that of microcosmos, it also should be doing the same for the stars and galaxies of the Universe.

But next we could be left to choose what is the more important, either the elementary particles and their properties, or possibly the mathematics which could perhaps explain everything.

If philosophers happened to be possible believers, rather than atheists or agnostics, such a thing as both Eternity, apparitions in the sky and also that of the Spiritual could be a possibility.

For some of these things we could be dealing with that of science, while for others they still could be about that of Religion.

My guess is that science could be about an understanding of both matter and energy and their possible relationship, but next not anything else.

If the whole Universe could be explained by means of using algebra only, it would be a nice thing, but next is not going to happen either.

My guess is that scientists for now rather choose to believe in extraterrestrial intelligence rather than not, because it could be serving a given purpose, including that of science.

If that of Creation, meaning Matter Creation and also that of equations being part of Mathematics could perhaps be explaining a couple of things, at least we are halfway when it comes to a
given understanding.

If for some reason God created the Universe by means of equations for such a thing, we could be having at least a partly explanation, but next in which way are you supposed to explain God?

Nevertheless, I could also be an atheist and therefore not believe in any God either.

Look at that of "Heaven and Hell" and it is not supposed to be about only that of possible sins and forgiveness either.

Still it is supposed, or could be that of Creation myth for such a thing, in or by lack of anything else.

If both Laws and Equations could be making up that of nature, in a similar way God rather chose to make it simple or simpler, but just or only coming up with the Ten Commandments,
which are not about any science at all.

If the discoveries being made by both Newton and Einstein for some reason ended up in a shelf, with no such thing as public access at all, definitely science could be fun,
but still a couple of things could next be or also be believed as well.

If I am not wrong much or most of that of science should be open, meaning open for business and also the same for possible scrutiny.

Being possible open, it also could at times be about the possible truth as well and here I am being reminded about Steven M. Greer, who chose to tell us about the true story about
that of extraterrestrials and that it next became called, or being nicknamed that of the "Disclosure Project".

Again, forgot both the mule and also the name for such a thing.

Except for the possible fluke in my wording of course.

Back tomorrow.

Again my possible failure in or when it becomes to the word "fineness".

Have a nice day, perhaps, but not necessarily such or that so when it comes to possible "fine" music.

Here meaning Vivaldi for such a thing.

Here at 12:29 AM it is supposed to be at least the middle of the day, meaning sunshine.

But perhaps also the beer in the fridge, if you are used to it.

So right now perhaps forgetting about the tab I was supposedly doing the job.

Oh, by the way. Microsoft, except for perhaps not liking a couple of flashes on my screen or monitor as a result of a cleanup,
I still could become lost among the tabs in the browser because the contents may have become lost.

Back later.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YWl7tDGUPA&index=2&list=PL7XlqX4npddfrdpMCxBnNZXg2GFll7t5y

At least dang it, but next a possible question as well.

Never mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cDI4Vm9tAys

Also noticing the fact that apparently Roger Moore passed away at the age of 89.

Perhaps getting it wrong, but next also perhaps stuck on the same, at least when it comes to possible wording.

Yes, sucks!

Sorry about having a couple of beers again.

But, except for that, possible intuition?

Early up in the morning, I probably slept away all of Saturday.

But again that of the same above, because the word "Contactee" for some reason came up in my mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contactee

Of course we could be left with the contradiction of perhaps having an alien species lying on a table, but still also looking for an intelligent signal coming from space.

Perhaps not directly related, because I have not checked yet, but there may also be similar stories about such a thing as "Alien abduction".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alien_abduction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ufology

First of all, that of Ufology should be a well-known subject, but the other two became somewhat new.

If you perhaps choose not to mix the subject of Religion into this, at least it appears that both such a thing as Ufology, like a couple of other things, could be related to the subject of the Paranormal.

If perhaps such a thing as Intution should be for real, also that of similar "Omens" may be the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omen

I do not relate directly with such a thing as Prediction, both when it comes to the weather and also that of possible time travel for such a thing, because either one thing could perhaps be part of science,
while another perhaps not.

Or rather the fact that these things could be different from each other when it comes to subject and therefore not be directly related.

The fact is that you could end up either questioning given facts about that of Religion, because it is not supposed to be any superstition and myth either.

If humans are supposed to be living with that of technology, we could find it more difficult to see any such thing in nature.

If the hexagon could be the shapes of the beehives, or maybe for rather for that of wasps, it could be for a purpose in mind.

One might therefore ask where that of functionality perhaps ends and is being replaced or substituted by means of either "Design", or even "Creation".

The word being heard or stated quite often in a series about technology development and innovation on the Discovery channel, is about "ingenuity", needing a lookup.

An engineer is one who is supposed to be doing either the nuts and bolts when it comes to that of construction work, but if you are still supposed to think with your left part of your brain
and next both write and perhaps be using the screwdriver with your right hand, it could at least be that of both functionality and also a similar Creativity.

If that of Design, including possible "Intelligent Design" should be the same as a painter painting a picture, we probably are having something else.

The fact that Physicists could come up with both the Table of Elements and also that of the Three or Four Fundamental Forces of nature as a possible theory, only tells us about the
diversity of nature and that both several reasons, as well as explanations are explaining such diversity.

My guess is that those people who happened to be either Contactees, or perhaps becoming victim of an Alien Abduction, not necessarily were believing in "Flying dishes" alone.

Ask the reason for why such a thing as technology does exist, next ask the same when it comes to that of evolution.

At least take that of technology for granted, but next it may appear that at least that of the Paranormal should next mean "Mystic, magic and miracles" and so on and the fact that even
the tricks of the magician could sometimes be fooled.

Poor Betty and Barney Hill, who supposedly ended up being victims of such an alien abduction.

Technology is supposed part of our society and next it could be both Sociology and that of Statistics and so on.

For one thing you could be having both the Table of Elements and also the Four Fundamental Forces of nature, dealing with the subject of elementary particles and also
similar Laws and Equations for such a thing.

Therefore, most likely both technology and most likely even the weather should not be dismissed altogether, but next what about possible hard facts related to the subject of Ufology?

Is it supposed to be more than "Flying dishes", or could we still have the subject of the Paranormal in order to explain such a thing?

Electricity is part of Electromagnetism as one of the Fundamental Forces of Nature.

You really do not question neither that of electricity or even a lightning strike, but rather take it for granted.

If a prediction of the weather for tomorrow should be possible, it is because of both weather models, as well as a knowledge about the climate as a whole.

If you next could ask yourself the reason for that of weather, or perhaps the climate, the reason is that of Physics.

Similarly, neither that of Intuition, or Omens are not necessarily that of any Physics either.

Nostradamus, as you probably know, was a Prophet, because he was able to either tell, or perhaps predict the future.

Both the past, present and also the future are based on events happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event

Here it becomes the disambiguation page for this and I would next choose from the second section "Science, technology and mathematics".

Perhaps the second, fourth and third link should be visited, in that order for more.

Looking a the Philosophy part first and it becomes a slight disappointment.

Here I would have expected perhaps a little more about that of thinking for such a thing, but rather it becomes that of Logic instead.

Assumedly, that of Logic is not the same as Probability either, but if such a thing as "Event Horizon" should be about a property of nature, at least we could define both that of Black Holes
and also infinity for such a thing.

The Relativity section is next only a short article.

The Event (probability theory) section is slightly better and despite being that of Probability only tells about the way in which a subject is being written and presented and not only the facts.

If for some reason the weatherman could also be a Prophet because he could tell about the weather of the future, this may not necessarily be true.

At least the weather, including that of lightning strikes could be about electricity as part of Electromagnetism, but that does not necessarily tell about any "Flying dishes" either, or
even that of both Alien abductions, or Contactees.

Ask a sociologist about what he knows about the weather, or even climate on Earth and next ask the weatherman about such things as societies and culture and you will have the answer.

Next you could be an astronomer, or astrophysicist perhaps believing in perhaps both, but not at the same time.

If a priest, or that of a Theologist should be doing such a thing, this is not necessarily about that of the Ten Commandments, but rather such a thing when it comes to that of God.

Always the difference between the "believer" and the skeptic, for separate reasons.

If that of Probability only should be about the rolling dice, we do not have neither Logic or even algebra for such a thing.

The famous words by Einstein "God is not playing with dices" should be remembered, only as a reminder that science and Religion are still not the same thing.

Still early morning here, but also that I am back at giving a thought about that of the "Forces of nature".

Because of that, perhaps better using long lines rather than those short ones.

Should it be the Three Fundamental Forces of nature, or should we add gravity as well, making it a total of four?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

Both electricity and also lightning are because of the electrons, which is an elementary particle and also negatively charged.

Before checking, the proton is perhaps not an elementary particle, but at least is having a positive charge, but I already had the thought that the proton was not such a particle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subatomic_particle

Also the fact that I could confuse electricity with that of magnetism and next think that magnetic spoon placed on a sheet of paper, next having a magnet plased close by,
makes a distinctive pattern as a result.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetism

If an electron should be having a negative charge, it still could make up that of electricity, but is this because of the property of the particle itself,
or is it rather because of the Equations we could read or determine from its behavior?

A believer could perhaps be speaking for God, but not necessarily any equations for that of elementary particles.

If for some reason a priest or Theologist could be the interface between that of society, meaning people and that of God, that does not necessarily mean any scientists either.

You perhaps know that I started up early in the week having no particular belief in such a thing as Wormholes or the like.

Also mentioning the passing of my father and despite not being present at the hospital myself because of personal reasons, including a health problem,
got the feeling that this was not the end of story, but rather a new chapter.

Such a thing as "Apparitions in the sky" and also "Portal of Perception" are not always believed by science.

Except for that, they could be having either a philosophical meaning or explanation, or perhaps a Religious one instead.

The story of the Bible tells about the Resurrection of Jesus, by means of the name Lazarus.

In fact, for one thing we are having both the stars and galaxies of the Universe, but also that of life itself.

If such a thing as the cells in your body could be having both genes and chromosomes and next it could be both DNA, RNA and also enzymes for such a thing,
we do not necessarily look at ourselves as any viruses either.

Looking up "seed" using Google Translate, the definition of this word, as a noun, becomes "a flowering plant's unit of reproduction, capable of developing into another such plant".

If we rather could have the "seed of life" instead, at least it becomes that of both DNA and RNA for such a thing.

Here it becomes that of electrons for that of electricity, versus that of atoms and molecules for our physical being, meaning existence.

If Philosophy means questioning our existence, it does not necessarily mean any spiritual or religous thinking either, like it also does not mean that of Physics either.

I think we also stumbled on the fact of the possible existence of "multiverses" during the week as well, because that should not mean neither any verses or psalms in a similar way.

The fact is that I could be at least a believer of sorts, but next not attending Church.

The funeral of my father and the way it happened only adds to this fact.

The ants are not making up their anthills in the direction of south, facing the sun, because of a possible belief in God, but rather because of a pre-programmed function.

Unfortunately I was not able to read the written words by Stephen Hawking, in a similar way as Bruce Maccabee, but only listen in at what they have to say.

Being a scientist, you could choose to be an atheist, or agnostic, but because of the same reason, you also could be looking at that of the Universe by making it Cosmology.

Everything around us are two things only, namely matter and energy.

The "Aura" as a possible indication of the Paranormal is not only pure speculation as far as I am concerned, or able to tell, but more a real fact.

Could perhaps be written slightly better above, but making it presence rather than indication probably does not help much.

Quite well visible above the tip of my fingers against a dark background, I am quite nearsighted, but making it an inch away from my eyes probably does not help.

Both infrared radiation from heat and also similar microwave radiation is supposedly invisible, so here another reason for this happening.

Rather than that of the Paranormal, that of Metaphysics is perhaps the better common term or description for these things.

If that of the Paranormal should also mean Alien abduction, we probably could be speaking about a physical experience and not necessarily only a dream.

The fact is that the future may always lie ahead, but we probably have no real-life example of any visitors from the future making us a visit.

I personally would make a similar difference or separation between those things perhaps be possible "Pseudoscience" rather than science, in a similar way as you could be
either an atheist, agnostic, believer, or maybe even skeptic or perhaps even a debunker.

You are supposed to believe in lightning strikes, but not necessarily any Alien abduction, because such a thing never happened.

If you question such a thing as lightning, you also do the same about nature, but is not necessarily any pseudoscience either.

Do my numbers from running Seti@home for more than 14 years tell about possible intelligent life in space?

The answer could next be Yes to such a question.

Not everything related to science becomes public stuff, or matter for the public to see, but next another thing.

The matter of the truth is that I happened to look up Immanuel Kant in the Wikipedia and next confusing him with Sigmund Freud.

If both flying dishes and UFO's should be an electrical phenomenon only, we still have Ball ligtning as well and also that of Intution and Omens.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant

Quite good article, but the black and white picture a little down did not particularly suit my taste.

Rather it looks to me as perhaps two or more different people here and the two in color at the top are a bit better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmund_Freud

Next the fact that both these two are not supposed to be their own teachers and next put the results from their work in a drawer.

If you happen to be a skeptic, at least you still could be questioning that of nature, including its diversity, rather than put it away in a similar way.

Here at least we could have the difference between that of Philosophy and that of Psychology, because the latter could be about the human mind.

Question the human mind and you therefore could be a Psychologist and next do the same with that of space and you could be a Cosmologist.

My guess is that people having experienced a possible Alien abduction either could have become traumatized from such an event.

Also the opposite could happen, by means of a possible spiritual experience happening which could be about enlightenment of both spirit and perhaps also soul.

Of course you never should take everything for granted or given either, only that Probability itself tells about given possibilities rather than the opposite.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleportation

By the way, I think the Edit box became slightly larger and Thanks for that.

Back at the Wikipedia article about the movie "2001 A Space Odyssey", perhaps a reminder that the difference between science and science fiction could at times be diffuse or unclear.

Believe in both Noah's ark and also the Tower of Babel for the reason for different languages being spoken on Earth, but if perhaps dealing with science, should it always be the truth,
because that of Logic should mean the difference between True and False and not necessarily any "Method" for such a thing?

We could perhaps have the Method of Proof, for that of only the Method alone, but also both the Scientific Method, as well as the Standard Model (of Physics) for the same.

Next, either reject an idea for another, because the second becomes proven and the first, or perhaps even both, could end up locked in a drawer.

In fact, I could be the one in perhaps believe in Ball lighntning as a phenomenon of nature, but not necessarily the body of an alien species lying on a table.

Like possible interaction between humans and extraterrestrials, also a similar interaction could have taken place between scientists and the Military men behind a couple of recovery projects.

Should add that I am not that familiar with the part of the story related to possible recovery of alien craft, but this may have been the start of it and perhaps more than only Roswell and the like.

Both "2001 A Space Odyssey" and the movie I lost the title for during the middle of the day, about a secret base atop a mountain located in the United States, made in two parts, or versions,
really are close to masterpieces of work or productions and also a reminder of that of science fiction versus that of science itself.

Perhaps also remembered, is the quarrel among the husband and wife in the middle of the movie, which adds to the more spectacular finish at the end of the movie.

There could be times when like a news broadcast, such news are supposed to be read from a sheet of paper.

But also the fact that at times a couple of things could still appear to be pre-written, but next in advance when it comes to that of an event possibly happening.

Definitely Einstein was not any Nostradamus either, but we could be speaking about a possible prediction of the weather.

Supposedly both time and history is past, present and future.

Both the written book about Nostradamus with my parents and also the old book written by a scientist, apparently is no more and next is a shame.

Even science fiction should readily acknowledge the fact that travel into the future may not be possible, except for that science might perhaps not be able to do so.

I also mentioned both Intuition and Omens and that these two may not necessarily be the same, because here I was rather thinking about the Janus face.

Rather it should be Omens together with something else, which for now fell off my mind.

I think it should be possible to make much of it science and not necessarily any Pseudoscience, but still categorize each subject and next relate them with each other.

You know, the concept of, or perhaps meaning of the Big Bang as the main reason for the Creation of the Universe, is making it that of inflation, rather than that of an expansion.

Like that of both infinity of both gravity and also numbers, we are having the singularity making up the Black Hole in space.

Numbers alone are not supposed to be about any gravity at all, but both the singularity and also that of infinity could be having an explanation by means of both Mathematics and Physics.

This before earlier on I checked in with that of Mesons, in addition to Quarks and here the first of these also became a first read.

Also we are having the Leptons and Hadrons as well, adding to our knowledge about Physics and that it became the Standard Model (of Physics) for this.

I happen to be an astronomer myself, like probably many others here and the same is Dr. Eric Korpela.

Also if I am not wrong, we probably could make up close to that of a GUT (or Grand Unified Theory) for that of the elementary particles alone, meaning science.

For that of Cosmology, possibly meaning more than the stars and galaxies of the Universe, we probably do not have any similar yet,
but probably are left with the force of gravity in order for a possible explanation.

If Isaac Newton was sitting below a tree in a garden and next discovered that of gravity because an apple fell in his head, this is probably not the whole story.

Remember the fact that there are some 200,000,000,000 stars in the Milky Way alone and almost 2,5 times as many individual galaxies in the Universe and also this fact makes it
mind-boggling, if not that of billions for such a thing.

Perhaps not on my mind the whole time either, but also should not be completely forgotten either.

If I happened to come up with a couple of thoughts related to our possible Creator, as opposed to that of Creation itself, or alone, my guess is that you should believe in such a Creator,
because both that of perfect symmetry and also that of randomness and chaos are that of Mathematics, which supposedly became part of a similar Creation as a subject alone.

Sadly, it becomes either that of Intelligent Design as a subject, or possibly that of Creation myth and I do not think everything could be explained in this way either.

First of all, different namings for almost the same thing, because Theology itself could be about a possible belief in God, or at least a relationship between the Church and that of the possible divine.

For now I still make a difference between that of infinity and that of the divine, or perhaps divinity, except for the similarity or equal look of the words, but next that infinity could be having
several explanations, except for perhaps that of possible numbers for such a thing.

Anyway, a collection of books with my grandparents, had a picture of the planet Neptune, in black and white only, showing only a white surface and nothing more.

Pluto Express next gave us both Nix and Hydra, in addition to both Pluto and Charon and most likely only a few happen to know.

The Universe was not created in a lab, as far as I am able to tell, but except for that I could make that of conscience and that of the possible divine, two different things.

Like that of both Religion as a subject and also that of Theology, such a thing is only able to tell about a possible God, but not necessarily give an explanation.

The same goes for that of science as well, because supposedly this should not be in the cards either, regardless of what we are doing.

The Ten Commandments of the Bible tells us that there should be only one God when it comes to that of possible belief, meaning "me", or more precisely God.

The possible existence of highly evolved intelligent civilizations in space not only tells us about that of technology, but also that of functionality, because inertia is part of gravity.

Make it rather dreams and so on and you could end up losing track of it everything, including both that of Psychology and Parapsychology.

Perhaps rather a Standard Model of "thinking" could be needed, in addition to that of the Standard Model of Physics, but for now I am not familiar with such an idea.

The conscious mind means awakenness, or being alert or waken when it comes to a state of mind and that of the unconscious mind next means at least sleep and also possible dreams.

I mentioned both Immanuel Kant and Sigmund Freud as important scientists in their respective fields.

Are we supposed to look a that of hypnosis as being possible Pseudoscience, or should we take it more or less for granted?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleportation

Also I came across Teleportation when starting up the day and also being mentioned at the top.

Not forgetting that of Telepathy either, which needs checking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepathy

Like that of both hypnosis and hypnotic regression, that of Telepathy should be a state of mind, unlike that of Teleportation, which means physical movement of the body.

Like the series itself, I happen to remember one of the female actors, or actually actresses, but rather that it was about that of Teleportation, which rather than the past,
could make it possible to end up in the future.

Remember that of science versus science fiction and also the other analogy as well, but we should definitely know about both inertia and also gravity for that of possible "constraints" in nature.

Also that of infinity for the possible opposite.

If God as the possible Creator of the Universe came up with both possible constraints, he also gave us Laws and Equations, like also that of infinity.

For now perhaps not a good example of such constraints, but only a possible reminder of the sometimes bad day which could be happening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constraint

Perhaps a little bit unsure here. You should rather make up your own mind for this.

Because if I am not wrong, I could be back at the Hieroglyphs of Giza, Egypt, where that of a possible helicopter is being depicted.

Personally I do not see any much wrong here, except for perhaps not knowing the details.

But you possibly know that we are having a Thread at BOINC itself about possible Conspiracies and that like 9/11, which is not the subject right now,
also the fact that Christopher Columbus discovered America in 1492 and found it inhabited by native Indians.

Anyway, is the Earth supposed to be still flat, or perhaps it could be something else, but at least we are having the country of India.

Set sail for the West across the sea and next you perhaps could end up in India, only to find such Indians living there.

From my days of school, I happened to remember the history lessons and also the fact that the importance of the subject was not readily accepted.

Possibly because of the way it was introduced, but the subject of Anthroplogy tells us about Lucy as our ancestor and that she came from Africa.

Anyway, should it perhaps be perhaps silly or stupid science, or the words being used for this, including knock my head and so on, or could we still believe in both the Stone Age and also the Ice Age,
for being main reasons for our evolution?

That of Christianity came to us some 2,000 years ago, but the Pyramids of Giza are more than double in age.

The Egyptians of that time were perhaps heathen or pagans when it came to possible belief, but they happened to be an evolved civilization because of the Nile, with its water.

The Pyramids were being built for that of the burial of their Pharaohs, not necessarily for that of any Telepathy or Teleportation.

Reading my lips is not the same as reading the cards in the hands of other player and once again back at the mentioned analogy.

One of the subject fields of science is that of "Determinism", in that we could think of a couple of things, like that of evolution as being perhaps something thought of in advance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Also being reminded about that of Causality here and also the fact that I find it slightly difficult to get a hands-on here.

My guess is that evolution is not necessarily only random in nature, but rather follows a given or specific path.

Is Quantum Mechanics perhaps next the same as both randomness and Chaos, or should it perhaps be something else, or even more?

Deduction next means that of Logic and not necessarily any Probability either.

The fact is that Einstein is not speaking about time itself, but rather uses the word "Relativity" for this.

Make it General Theory of Relativity and next you have gravity, but next make it Special Theory of Relativity and you have the notion of time instead.

Being an Anthropologist does not necessarily mean you should be a Paleontologist either, for that of the Dinosaurs, but perhaps not only that of water for such a thing as helicopters among the hieroglyphs of Giza, as well as also that of hypnosis, telepathy and possible teleportation, already being mentioned.

Oh, that one as well, meaning typo, which I apparently missed.

Anyway, I mentioned lightning strikes and next also that of Ball lightning.

Really, perhaps we forget the fact that both hurricanes, earthquakes and also that of ligthtning is supposedly a killer of people.

When doing our business of both running our tasks and also carrying out any science, we should not forget this fact.

Electrons are making up that of Electricity, which next becomes that of Electromagnetism as one of the Fundamental Forces of nature.

Next look at both Hadrons, Leptons, Mesons, as well as also Quarks and now also that of anti-matter is being recognized as well.

Here on Earth radiation by means of invisible cosmic rays may not be a problem, but it could perhaps be felt in space by astronauts.

You probably know that I checked the other way, except for that of both infrared, radiowaves and also microwaves and it became only some three types of radiation on the
other side of the visible spectrum, including that of ultraviolet, as well as gamma rays and X-rays.

I had one of those moments a couple of days ago, when I happened to look out the window, behind the curtains.

In a short moment, or perhaps blink of a second, there was a black dot against the sky and perhaps only meters away.

Next it vanished and I did not get anything more except for not wearing any glasses.

This is one of the reasons that I could think of perhaps either alien or extraterrestrials, or if not so an extremely advanced technology behind, far surpassing our own capabilities.

Always the possible excuse for that of nature itself, but next I sense a possible difference, in that this may not be any Ball lightning at all, which should be a natural phenomenon.

If stories being told about that of "Semjase", or the like and also a nightly landing in Vilnius, Estonia (needs checking), it could be a possible Type I civilization behind.

The jump in difference between Type I and Type II should be quite large, in fact, because we could think of ourselves as some 0.84 on the Kardashev scale and next becoming Type I around 2100.

For now I have not checked, because it should be about both energy production and consumption for such a thing and here that of controlled fusion.

The fact is that it may not necessarily be about that of numbers either, but I mentioned both the Microsoft laptop computer being purchased and also the Samsung Gold mobile phone.

The laptop comes with Windows 10 installed and I have not followed the discussion here.

Also that the Samsung Gold comes with no SIM card and I perhaps do not have the time asking for it.

First of all, we could perhaps believe in the technology being used for at least the Samsung Gold and also that the keyboard interface with the screen or monitor for the laptop computer was found to
be both sleek and elegant.

Also the fact that numbers alone could be having their secrets yet to be found or discovered.

We have yet to find an intelligent signal coming from space and therefore we still have to trust the scientists for any better.

Next throw me off for such a thing whether or not I happen to believe in such a thing, including a female, or alien body lying on a table, or the like.

Everyone knows that both the bees and also the humbles should be more or less loved, or at least accepted and also that flies at times could be selective as well.

Next, you most likely would hate the wasps for obvious reasons.

I mentioned the hexagon for perhaps the bees and also the wasps as well and that such a thing could be because of at least a pre-programmed function, meaning that of functionality.

Next the fact that making it perhaps "Intelligent Design", as well as that of both Creativity and also ingenuity (if not that of engineering), could next be another word for that of
Creation myth.

If your tools of creativity should still be the pencil, rather than the nuts or bolts of bridges, high-rised buildings and also roads, that of the pencil for painting a picture should be about
possible creativity or ingenuity and not necessarily any engineering at all.

As you probably know, the human brain is at least two part, or to be more precise, three-part, by means of the little brain in the neck.

The left part of the brain communicates with the right part by means of a thick bundle of nerve fibers which connects the two parts.

The left part of the brain makes for both that of breathing and also the constant beating of the heart, depending on either sitting, or perhaps running.

Are we perhaps ready to acknowledge such a thing as dreams?

You may perhaps recall that the paperbased Encyclopedia Britannica, in its extended section, was unable to come up with a definite conclusion about such dreams.

What next about possible Wormholes versus that of similar Black Holes?

Is it because for one thing you could perhaps be an astronomer and therefore readily accept such a thing as Black Holes being part of the Universe, or should it rather because of that of
both Laws and Equations for such a thing?

In my opinion you do not necessarily invent that of Mathematics, but rather like both that of Physics and also the Universe itself, you take it more or less for granted.

Some four types of elementary particles came into interest during the last days, namely both Hadrons, Leptons, Mesons and also Quarks.

Also that antimatter now became readily accepted as a subject and therefore became an article in the Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

Cosmic rays are not X-rays at all and definitely not that of ultraviolet radiation either.

If you still could think that it is about both elementary particles and also that of radiation, it is not supposed to be that of Electromagnetism either.

For such a reason, you may need to leap at that of the Weak Nuclear Force for such a thing, because that of cosmic rays should not be able to decide our destiny or fate either.

Next, perhaps speaking about the weather and it should be about that of lightning and not necessarily that of any rain coming down, or even the Ice Age.

The weather itself is not supposed to tell about the future either, even by means of a possible Prediction for such a thing, but except for Nostradamus as being a Prophet,
we could next be left with the weatherman in order to tell about the possible weather for tomorrow.

Is it perhaps the Butterfly effect, or is it about more or less regular or periodic cycles, but the Ice Age of the past could next also become the Ice Age of the future.

Therefore perhaps a wish to know whether such a thing could be explained by means of either the Uncertainty Principle, or possibly that of the Weak Nuclear Force instead.

My guess is that you still could have such things as "Tears in the rain" for such a thing, or perhaps even the tears of someone else, but if it supposedly could be about dreams,
also it could be about the alien species lying on a table.

If we are supposed to question that of the Universe, the same may perhaps go for other intelligent civilizations in space as well and please do not tell me there are any such.

In fact, I personally think there are a number of them, at least two or three and possibly even more.

Next that even a Type II civilization could be using technology for their purpose, except for that of energy production and consumption.

Gravity is a Universal force and if next questioning that of the Universe, or at least the reason for its Creation, we also could be questioning that of God.

Perhaps a slight difference here, in that at least Creation should be that of Matter Creation and next that we also could think of a Creator for the reason of its existence.

I mentioned the "Monolith" yesterday and next thought it was a product of science fiction only.

For now no definite answer here, but apparently Arthur C. Clarke may have been one of those people having a possible insight in the subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke

The fact is either you, or perhaps me, could choose making it that of "Angels in the sky" for a couple of things.

Next perhaps believe in both R2-D2 and C-3PO as part of a Type II civilization battling an even more advanced or sophisticated Type III civilization, both technology based.

My guess is that you perhaps or theoretically could have both, but not necessarily any straightforward such one, next looking into your eyes and saying "hello".

The Janus face becomes yet another example of both Intuition and possible Omens being disguises in nature, or being used in such a way.

Here not necessarily any "covert", "deceit" or "clandestine" either, depending on the precise word, or its meaning, because this rather could mean something else.

This because one thing could be or mean that of humans, including our civilization and next that of nature, which could be two different things.

Both intelligence and possible conscience should be associated with that of life itself, but next that evolution could also mean that of possible technology.

Next, look at the stones and mountains of Mars, as well as the colors and next perhaps believe in "Intelligent Design" for such, meaning possible Creativity.

Do we perhaps see such a thing as Creation myth in the surface of the planet Mars, or do we rather still look at Matter Creation for such a thing?

Neither the surface of Mars, or even that of space itself is supposed to be any painting either.

The words "In the beginning" supposedly came from a scientist and next I do not know who or which one.

Are perhaps scientists supposed to be using such words, or should they rather come from the Bible?

My guess is that the Bible is not necessarily about that of Creation myth either, in the same way as it also should not be or mean any "Intelligent Design".

Look at such a thing as both Anthropology and Paleontology and except for both that of Societies, meaning that of Sociology and Culture and also that of Statistics and of course,
the weather, we have at least part of a given knowledge.

The table in the Wikipedia giving a Chronological reference for possible events over time is a quite nice feature, but not seen in recent times.

If rather that of Copper as one of the Periodic Elements became the reason for humans evolving from the Stone Age into at least Neanderthals and also Cro Magnon, we also should not forget about
both Iron and Magnesium for a similar reason.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copper

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silicon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnesium

Again, that of Silicon as a Periodic Element only and not that of Silicon Valley.

Again, it should be more easy to mention such things rather than only that of an Alien perhaps lying on the table.

Science could be having both its drawbacks and also its labyrinths or hooks with no exit door readily visible.

Be a scientist and next come up with a possible Theory, or the similar and it still need both a Proof and also that of a Consensus in order to be readily accepted.

Therefore, for now, take it all with a grain of salt, because neither Wormholes or multiverses may not necessarily be proven in any way, but possibly not the opposite either.

Noticing the fact that three links in a row above each other does not make it that pretty, so I will not do that anymore.

But next that the word "Missing link" came up with me when starting up.

Really, it should not be any pseudoscience either, but rather the fact that I happen to see such a Missing link not only when it comes to that of
"Lucy" as our ancestor, but also that of the possible relationship between that of Anthropology and Paleontology, together with those sciences
which could be related to that of Society and Culture.

Again, I could perhaps mention that of both Ecology and those other sciences related to the Earth environment, perhaps that of Biology,
rather than that of Predation, for a better example.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology

My guess is that you could be either a Biologist, or maybe a Botanist, working in your garden for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botany

Remember that I could also mention that of Predation as well and also that of "Predator" as a possible movie, but here I am left with either someone lying on a table,
or perhaps a movie for entertainment and next not together with the first cup of coffee.

As being a scientist, you are not supposed to be a believer either, at least most of the time.

But in the time period 0 - 1000, we could be speaking about perhaps the "Dark Age" or "Ages".

Possibly this might be reflected not only by means of events as they were happening, but also our knowledge about such events as they took place.

You may perhaps recall a movie from the past having the name "Raiders of the lost Ark", featuring Harrison Ford.

They encountered a surprise when ending up in their current situation and this either should go for that of entertainment, or possibly not be true.

Next I was also thinking about ordinary people of the past being perhaps not Christians in any way, or having any similar or particular deities, but rather it became a
possible belief in heathen and pagans as a result.

For now, not necessarily about any "sins and forgiveness" versus any "love and hatred", because I still happen to be thinking about both that of Stone Age Man, as well as that of
the Ice Age, while at the same time not forgetting about the Hieroglyphs of Giza either.

A possible lack of belief should not necessarily be an excuse for having a possible belief in such Heathen and Pagan either.

At least you should be able to believe in that of the Stone Age Man and next the story about the Monolith, for that of possible intelligence, or conscience.

Really, I do not think it is that simple either, because history is telling about both harvesting, agriculture and also that of both hunting and fishing for survival.

Is perhaps that of both intelligence and conscience a fact, or feature you may dismiss altogether, because it could be visible in some people?

Either it was a picture, or perhaps a YouTube video being watched, featuring Albert Einstein, among others, but both the smile in his face, as well as his eyes,
is telling about a gifted or talented man.

The fact is that Einstein rather could be a plumber because of his talent, but apparently this did not become so.

So, when returning back at the Missing link, it could perhaps be about "Lucy" as our ancestor, or it could rather be the way we choose to look at both birth and death.

The fact is that I happened to be either skeptical, or perhaps did not bother, but supposedly now having a belief in the possible "afterlife", meaning life after death.

If we are supposed to be looking for extraterrestrial intelligence in the sky, also we should be doing the same when it comes to ourselves.

Are we still such Heathen or Pagan by means of nature, only because our brain comes with that of both instinct and aggression inherited from our past?

Or is it rather so that both intelligence and conscience should be synonymous with a belief in the possible divine?

The fact is that you could be an atheist or agnostic and doing your business in that of elementary particles, as part of Physics, but what next about that of possible helicopters
among the Hieroglyphs of Giza, versus that of the Missing link of evolution?

Better have a break here, before continuing, because this apparently made it slightly better.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphysics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy

If you for some reason wish or want to dare, perhaps the two links above rather than the previous ones.

When I read about Philosophy, it should be about possible thinking, but rather it ends up being that of Earth, Soil, Wind and Fire instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras

Here rather I was interested in the figure or diagram for this, rather than both the story behind, as well as the philosopher itself, because this did not make it my day.

It should not be forgotten either that a mathematician with the name of Carl Friedrich Gauss could be one of the reasons for why we could be running our tasks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Friedrich_Gauss

If I became left to choose between either a female body lying on a table, or that of a mathematician coming up with an algorithm for possible use,
it could perhaps be "either / or" when it comes to such a thing.

This because in any case it is supposed to be at least science and therefore we should both rely as well as trust or believe in the Scientific Method for this.

Perhaps the closest to the truth could be the fact that astronauts on the surface of the Moon apparently became aware of an extraterrestrial presence and next stating that
they had visitors.

Next becomes the question about whether any technology should be associated with this, or maybe there could be another reason, except for possible "Ball lightning".

In my opinion being either an atheist or agnostic could perhaps be good for science, but still there also be a difference between that of possible Heathen and Pagan and that of a
possible belief in the true divine.

Again, remember that I have both a Microsoft laptop computer put away and also a Samsung Gold mobile phone with its secrets, so because of that could be left at comparing that of
technology with that of the possible divine, without forgetting a couple of other things.

Remember the discussion at least attempted to give a hands on, namely that of both the Stone Age as well as the Ice Age?

Next the fact that I did not recognize, or see a direct link between that of Uncertainty for that of the Uncertainty Principle and that of the Laws and Equations making up that of both
Electromagnetism and the Weak Nuclear Force as two of the Fundamental Forces of nature.

Here, except for that of both "Lucy" and also the helicopters visible in the Hieroglyphs of Giza, adds to the puzzle as well, by means of becoming such a "Missing link".

My guess is that being either a Paleontologist or Anthropologist does not make you any Immanuel Kant, or Sigmund Freud for such a thing either, but rather that each subject field comes
with their own explanations or interpretations for their separate or respective thing.

Such explanations have next to be put into a context and perhaps be related or explained in direct order with each other, which is not always possible to do.

The little silly thing is that I happen to know that the water could freeze at 0 ° or degrees Celsius.

Next that depending on source, it could be either -273.15, or -273.16 for that of absolute chilliness, where everything comes to a stop, or halt.

The fusion process happening in the core of the sun is making it some 15 million degrees Celsius and those stars which happens to slip away at times, could make it even
billions of degrees in a short moment of time.

If our point of reference should be that of science, either we should believe in that of science itself and possibly also the scientist as well.

But rather the fact that you either could believe in possible helicopters, or could be left with the fact that the Pyramids were for burial purposes only, this time for that of the Pharaohs.

My guess is that Albert Einstein was thinking about the notion of time in a context of gravity and perhaps also that of space.

Such a thing as Telepathy, or at least Teleportation may or may not be possible, but also you could be left at believing in such a thing as time travel.

Next the fact that I find at least some of these things to be possible, but not necessarily all.

The Special Theory of Relativity by Einstein does not go well with everyone, including scientists and should be a well-known fact.

But next I find it perhaps wrong at believing that whether it is supposed to be either science, or maybe pseudoscience, you could end up rather debunking such a thing,
for that of anything else.

If not debunking, at least be a skeptic and for such a reason perhaps question the subject as a whole.

My guess, or presumably you could question that of possible "Logic" when it comes to a given subject, before attempting a possible "Method of Proof" for such a thing.

Next the fact in my opinion, that both Logic and also Probability are having their weaknesses, compared with a couple of other things, including that of similar Laws and Equations.

Given a little more time, it probably could be put or stated even better.

Perhaps only "wish to dare" perhaps is sufficient.

Anyway, before I continue and still choose to be using the Wikipedia as a reference, should I perhaps jump from Gauss to perhaps that of Pseudoscience in order to
gain more knowledge about the Pyramids of Giza?

Or should I rather consult the books of history in my shelf, which I do not have?

My guess is that you may perhaps prove that of the Ice Age to be true and that several such have happened in the past.

Next the fact that any time travel, even by that of the Pharaohs, may not necessarily be proven either.

My guess is that Einstein never gave a thought about the Pharaohs of Egypt, even though such a thing as time travel could be a possibility and next on his mind.

Considering this, I may be left with either the story of the Bible for such a thing, or I could be back at possible Pseudoscience instead, which could make no sense.

Next, if I am not wrong, that of a Theory is supposed to be followed with that of possible Proof, at least when it comes to science, but what about possible "speculation".

Is perhaps a thing as "Speculation" supposed to come before, or prior to that of even a Theory for a given thing and next that of a possible Proof as well?

I prefer having a personal belief of sorts, although not necessarily making the Bible part of my regular day.

If that of possibly carrying out any science should possibly contradict a given meaning or opinion, should it be so or such, against that of any science, or should it be that of the Church?

You know, our knowledge about the Universe could be based on those things related to that of the Strong Nuclear Force and also that of both gravity and time as subjects, because it happens to be
about astronomy and space.

Guess I am lucky, but next I am not supposed to be speaking about the weather and such at all, because it could be something else.

For one thing I could be the one having the possible thought or belief that we may not be alone in space, but next you could be the one chiming in and next telling me that I am wrong.

Both that of the Pyramids of Giza, the Stone Age and Ice Age of planet Earth, respectively and also that of the Uncertainty Principle in order to tell that of Logic from that of Probability,
definitely are important subjects, but next how do they compare with a given understanding, or perhaps notion of space, because it could be two different things, or maybe even
about two different or separate Forces of nature?

Human interaction with nature supposedly goes with that of gravity, but also that of electricity by means of lightning, Electromagnetism and the Weak Nuclear Force for that of the Ice Age,
the Uncertainty Principle and also that of hurricanes, earthquakes and tsunamis for such a thing.

Really the fact that I choose not to be here for only the alien lying on a table, next that an intelligent signal from space has never been detected coming from space and so on.

That of the Missing link should perhaps go with that of "Lucy" as our possible ancestor, but not necessarily that of any Dinosaurs either.

Speak about that of evolution and next you also have possible intelligence and conscience and so on.

When we happen to see such things as earthquakes and tsunamis happening in nature, we also are seeing a similar change in the environment, which could be as a result of evolution.

One of the possible reasons for such a thing as evolution, is that of "Events" happening and not necessarily that of any Event Horizon either for such.

It may not be because of, or due to that of any Relativity either, because next it means either gravity, or possibly that of time for such a thing.

This means that we once again could be back at Quantum Mechanics for such a thing and this not necessarily means only elementary particles either.

If that of Quantum Mechanics for some reason could explain that of space rather than that of elementary particles, perhaps slightly easier if so.

But if it rather should be that of Laws and Equations as a possible alternative to that of elementary particles, most likely that would not help much either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUpWCRadIIA

This video I have in another tab and I do not watch it during the middle of the day, despite being a better one.

But rather the fact that perhaps being an astronomer rather than a Paleontologist or Anthropologist may perhaps make you biased on a subject.

It becomes like that of 0 and 1 as possible numbers and not any Logic, where you could end up in two different corners, perhaps believing that the Big Bang was the start of everything and
next we are left to either guess, or maybe speculate about the rest.

If not wrong, the Greek made it Earth, Wind, Soil and Fire, but next that modern science could also make it both the "Aether", as well as also "Essence", or "Quintessence".

Are we still supposed to be questioning nature, or are supposed to question that of God?

If Einstein came up with the famous words "God is not playing with dices", he probably was able to acknowledge the existence of such a God.

The fact is that for now, most likely such a presence may only be recognized by means of that of Religion and Faith for such a thing, including that of Theology.

I am also being reminded about the "Fudge factor" right now when listening in and here I do not have the answer yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fudge_factor

Here my bad. I ended up clicking wrong, because I was at Pseudoscience and next keyed in that above.

Next being redirected to a page where it tells that such an article does exist and next that this is not an Ambiguation page either.

Returning back and giving it yet another try and I get directly at the article. For now no explanation for this happening and next also needs a read as well.

Actually, our knowledge about the Universe, meaning that of space, means a story which could both be told, as well as also explained in much detail.

Next, start with either comparing that of Relativity with that of the Uncertainty Principle, or even Quantum Mechanics and it could be a different thing.

Also when listening in, my guess is that people could get confused at thinking of a supernova as the same as that of the Big Bang, meaning a big explosion.

Rather the better wording for this is making it that of Matter Creation for such a thing, because the Big Bang next meant an inflation of the Universe and not only an expansion.

If the Big Bang was only about Matter Creation, also the Laws and Equations being known, as well as also Physics and Mathematics as a whole, came along as well.

Always a separation or difference between that of Matter Creation and that of Creation myth, or the similar, because the latter means a belief in a possible Creator for its existence,
meaning the Universe.

Perhaps a bit premature, but it could be tempting at comparing or measuring levels of both intelligence and conscience, assuming that other intelligent civilizations do exist.

Next, both these things could next be done the same when perhaps thinking of the possible divine, meaning that of God, as the reason for our existence.

Still thinking in the context of science here and not necessarily any Religion, because at least such a thing could be of a given preference.

Also the fact that I do not necessarily believe in such a thing as Wormholes or multiverses for such a thing either, because the Universe alone should tell us about this.

In my opinion you could be looking at the face of Einstein and perhaps notice both the smile in his face and also his eyes, but still the fact that a priest is supposed to be speaking for God
and not necessarily any scientist.

If we should take such a thing as gravity for granted, we should also believe in that of infinity as well.

For now I find it a bit hard at grasping at such a thing as infinity when it comes to that of time, but perhaps rather that of gravity.

If you do not mind, always those things related to such things as hatred and the like, but perhaps still not the same as Cosmology either.

If such a thing as Quantum Mechanics, or even Dark Matter or Dark Energy should be a possible excuse for such a thing as time travel or the like, please let me know.

If such a thing as birth and death when it comes to that of stars and galaxies should mean the same as birth and death of both stars and galaxies, we probably could have an answer to everything,
but next perhaps not so.

life should mean the same as birth and death of both stars and galaxies, we probably could have an answer to everything, but next perhaps not so.

We had the discussion earlier on about that of both bacteria and viruses being the reason for why life evolved on the Earth and also the reason for this happening.

Next we also could think, or perhaps believe that either that of Equations, or possible that of Fundamental Forces of nature (Interaction) could be the reason for such a thing.

The Uncertainty Principle may or may not explain such a thing as both evolution and life on Earth, but still we are left with the Event Horizon of the Black Hole in order to understand the Universe.

Everyone knows that fish is good for your liver and next the bread for your breakfast comes from seed being grown or cultivated in the soil and next being harvested.

Not necessarily the "seed of life" either, but that of the soil should not be forgotten either.

Because when thinking about the soil, you also may wish to do the same with that of the oceans.

The Earth may perhaps be unique in the Universe, but I still choose to be looking at it from that of nature.

I could perhaps believe in that of God, but still making a difference between that of Creation and that of a possible Creator for such a thing.

Is this the reason for why we could have both Matter Creation and also that of Creation myth and that even the latter could have a place in science?

The true fact is that both earthquakes, hurricanes and also tsunamis could tell about those things which are not any good at all, but still could be science.

A given notion about that of Creation myth could also mean that of "Heaven and Hell" for such a thing and still be about possible Creation.

If you happen to be a Biologist, you also should know about, or be familiar with the secrets of the oceans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conch

It becomes yet another reminder that the Universe means that of diversity, because among other things, that of infinity is one of the reasons making it possible.

Make a separation, or difference between the environment of the Earth and the environment of space and you could have possible extraterrestrial intelligence.

Next, either debunk that of possible science, or rather do so for that of stupid people thinking they saw something in the sky and once again not too good.

If we could perhaps choose between that of Biology and that of Probability, we next could perhaps believe in intelligent life in space as well.

Was perhaps Einstein thinking about that of Probability when mentioning the "Fudge factor" and the answer I still do not have.

Should tell that it became a new session today, because I chose to break it off yesterday and turning off the machine.

Finishing off the remaining CUDA tasks, it makes for a bit of a strain, when combined or mixed with other things.

Therefore it may perhaps show up as as well, including the word in this sentence, which becomes repeated.

Also being notified about some sad news once again, which at least becomes both that of pain and suffering for those involved.

The sad thing is that neither the beautiful sunset of the sun, or even that of the Ice Age as a period of history in the past, is not telling about a similar story.

And typically, in the writing of this, also the name of the movie in question also comes back in my mind, namely "Close Encounters of a Third Kind" and next its successor.

Makes for a quite good start of the day, including the new tasks being downloaded, having the gaussian score.

So, perhaps make me a dreamer instead and the idea was on my mind of possible giant sculptures, which could be mounted, or attached to that of the Pyramids of Giza.

Here I was not thinking about the lying Sphinx of Giza itself, which I rather choose to relate with that of a possible lion, rather than any user here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphinx

You may recall the figure "Yoda", from the third of the Star Wars movies, where he became the mentor, or teacher, taking over, or replacing for Obi-Wan Kenobi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obi-Wan_Kenobi

"May the Force be with you" and so on and it supposedly is science fiction, or perhaps that of entertainment or fantasy.

At least featuring Alec Guinness as Obi-Wan Kenobi.

Is that of science fiction itself supposed to be having that of a "Method of Proof" for its performance?

What if you rather happened to be a Biologist and next were dealing with that of Enzymes, in order to understand replication in nature?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enzyme

If you look at the surface of Mars, this is supposedly the place we should wish to go, because of other things, both the colors and also the thin atmosphere.

So, except perhaps for that of the "Battle of Los Angeles", which should not be confused with the famous radio play, or show, by Orson Welles, here we may have a real story,
which actually happened, or took place.

I am comparing these two, because at least one should be about science fiction and the other about that of reality.

The fact is that water itself as a substance is not enough to make such a thing as life possible.

Rather than the battle of Los Angeles, we rather may look at a similar battle between a physicist and chemist for this.

If I am not wrong, digging in the sand looking for possible life is not the same as those experiments carried out by Stanley Miller in the lab in the 1950's.

Again a reminder that evolution should be a reminder of our past and therefore our possible development as humans, including those things needed for such.

Add to it a more or less thinking brain and you also have that of both intelligence and conscience.

If such a thing as technology becomes possible tools at our disposal, what then about the rest, including the features of the surface of Mars, as well as the enzymes making up your body?

If a thing is meant for a given purpose, it could be that of evolution for such a thing and also I mentioned that of "Determinism".

Neither the beautiful sunset, the Stone Age or Ice Age, makes that of "Causality" possible, because for one thing it could be both that of nature,
next it becomes that of a similar understanding.

You possibly noticed I mentioned the "Monolith" and next that this again could belong that that of science fiction.

My guess is that Arthur C. Clarke was not only dealing with that of science fiction, but in fact much about that of science itself.

For one thing we could perhaps question what is supposed to be the better science, whether it may be "Close Encounters of the Third Kind", or "2001 A Space Odyssey" for such a thing,
or perhaps that of Star Wars, or maybe even the radio play by Orson Welles instead.

Right now the Monolith perhaps becomes a hypothetical issue in that it may not exist or be proven.

Compare with that of both Wormholes and possible multiverses and these objects supposedly could relate to that of space.

Becoming lost between the tabs, perhaps a reminder that perhaps the laboratory experiments by Stanley Miller were inconclusive, in the same way as that of digging in the sand of Mars.

If we should question that of life, we probably may look at that of evolution for such a thing, except for perhaps telling why such a thing in fact may be possible.

Here could still be a difference around and next we probably should know which one as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_set

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56gzV0od6DU

Should tell that the above becomes only one possible option among many others and also it became a tab about that of both mesons and hadrons as that of subatomic particles of nature.

If both that of elementary particles and also that of Mathematics should be separate subjects and also based on a given principle, it means that neither of these subjects should be a reason of
perhaps believing in the possible divine.

The fact is that such things as elementary particles could be a fundamental part of nature and next be explained by both Mathematics and Physics, while the Mandelbrot set could next be only a
computer generated simulation.

My guess is having an analytical or deductive brain could next make for such a thing as Logic being possible as well.

But next that either such Logic, or perhaps that of Enzymes, belonging to that of Biology, could next tell about such a thing as extraterrestrial intelligence.

The fact is that you are not supposed to question such a thing as evolution by assuming any Logic alone, in the same way as that of Enzymes should not be questioned either.

Or perhaps be Benjamin Franklin for such a thing and next be running with those kites in order to detect those lightning flashes and next we are supposed to believe that any
Ball lightning is not supposed to be any extraterrestrial intelligence either.

Really, or the fact that both such lightning and also that of evolution could be both interesting and fascinating subjects, but next do not necessarily explain everything.

In order to perhaps proceed on the remaining subjects, you may be left to either question the Method of Proof for such a thing, except for perhaps believing in that of evolution itself.

Listening to the YouTube clip in the background, apparently Arthur C. Clarke is making a couple of words just before 16:00 in the clip.

If Einstein perhaps was dealing with, or concerned with that of the Mandelbrot set, it becomes new to me.

If by means of the graphics representations being visible by means of the Mandelbrot set should mean possible infinity, we next should not forget about the notion of infinity.

I am still supposed to be sitting in my chair with the sun being visible in the sky outside and next this becomes part of reality as well.

If that of infinity could perhaps be explained by either Mathematics, or that of a symbol for such a thing, definitely we do not have a notion about that of eternity here,
including a possible notion of any God.

Infinity could be the place where both Mathematics and Physics possibly ends when it comes to our understanding, being replaced by something else.

If that of the Julia set means that sets could be an important part of nature, at least we should know about the Mathematics for such a thing and not necessarily that of God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set

The fact is that electricity could be part of Electromagnetism and next not always be wished for when being exposed to such a thing.

Because Einstein chooses to use the word "Fudge factor", there should be an interface between that of nature and that of ourselves.

The fact is that both the Mandelbrot set and the Julia set could be computer based subjects, where that of both iterative and recursive functions are being used, or part of such objects.

Make it perhaps that of infinity and not that of an eight digit number on your calculator and you may be able to notice the difference.

Make both such things as digging in the sand and similar experiments in the lab inconclusive and next you are supposed to believe in that of intelligent life for the same reason.

The Theory of Relativity by Einstein includes a notion of time by means of the Special Theory of Relativity.

But no such thing as any digging in the sand or any laboratory experiments here either and it still could be about that of life when it comes to that of a possible subject.

Perhaps this is the reason why I chose to mention that of Lucy as the possible "Missing link", but here we rather could be dealing with something else.

Giving it a bit of thought and perhaps an answer could be coming up later on, but not in the middle of the day.

Together with my pizza, or perhaps beer, I happen to notice, or perhaps read the quotes below my own post.

The fact is that perhaps the oldest question of all still remains unanswered, namely are we alone in space?

Have a look around and perhaps do as I choose to do, namely look at nature as a whole and what it is supposed to mean.

If perhaps doing so, we could still be left with a couple of questions to be answered.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JLQtSyPq3Q4

Rather than that of infinity itself, I rather choose to both listen in and watch the video during the playback.

Listening it, it becomes apparent that rather than Philosophy, it could again be a possible battle between that of science and that of Religion in order to possibly understand God.

Next the fact that when perhaps trying to understand God, we could be back at the possible notion of the Devil and next also that such a possible notion may not be coming from that of any
science itself.

One of the current subject themes, or perhaps that of a possible notion for such, apparently is that of infinity.

Next the fact that at least when it comes to science, we choose to make that of infinity not necessarily that of any eternity at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_and_concrete

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_type

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_structure

That of "Abstract structure" above to me becomes that of possible "Creation" and here it next could be about that of Matter Creation versus a possible similar Creation myth.

Not necessarily any Hilbert curves here either.

Any difference between that of Vincent van Gogh and Rembrandt as that of painters perhaps and possibly this is not what it is supposed to be about.

Make a possible difference between that of Matter Creation and a similar Creation myth and next we are not supposed to question that of God.

Edit: Listening in, he says something like there is "no such a thing as that of a Truth".

Makes me think of that of a possible "Constraint" for such a thing, or should it be that of an "Abstract", as previously mentioned?

Not forgetting those "Axioms" either.

Correct or better answer still probably remains to be given.

Back tomorrow.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

Took a little while at getting at, but in regards to the possible links or suggestions available, perhaps should be of importance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy

A little bit of surprise in the latter article, because it may have been completely rewritten.

Perhaps the small trap in all of this is that it either could be that of Mathematics, or perhaps Physics, but next end up being something else.

The old question about "are we alone" perhaps could be nagging almost everybody, but neither that of the "Man in the moon", or the Sun as being the main reason for that of the Ice Ages on Earth
should not be to blame.

Believe in possible "Little Green Men" and you either could believe in the naked body lying on the table, or perhaps that of "Axioms" for such a thing.

My guess is that in order to understand that of science, we also could be using a couple of words, including that of both "Constraints" and also "Axioms".

Next the fact that the world could be explained by means of Equations, because this is supposedly part of Mathematics.

Any "Theory" or perhaps "Speculation" next making up that of an Equation which could next be proven by means of such Mathematics?

A classic example here is the solar eclipse of 1919, where the background stars were shown to be displaced against the background as a result of the General Theory of Relativity by Einstein.

Perhaps another example, or indication that the notion of time, as expressed by the Special Theory of Relativity, perhaps is not needed, but rather we should look at gravity itself or alone.

Next, while still listening, that of pi is supposed to be about a circle and not necessarily any Mathematics at all.

The fact is that neither Mathematics or Physics might be able to question that of any life at all.

Should such a thing as "Tears in the rain" perhaps make it any better, because it could be either entertainment, or that of a slipping voice?

Probably a couple of questions still remaining before we have the complete answer.