Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 341 · 342 · 343 · 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143943 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 13:59:37 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 14:04:36 UTC

C --> I

With the other project I made it infinity and next becomes a subset of other Laws because a continuation should be impossible.

But for that it becomes impossible to determine whether a UFO could be coming from another universe or perhaps his realm.

Perhaps I already have seen an alien in the face but still have to prove it.
ID: 2143943 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143948 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 15:56:09 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 16:06:56 UTC

So here just back from the office or small room and trying to continue.

Here something that it could be leveled but not quantized on more, but also shape versus form.

Perhaps forces should not be the same as Laws but still Fundamental interaction.

More it could be a different toolset when continuing, but here a slit for an opening became multipurposed.

Such a purpose could be a dream among other things but also a UFO coming for a visit.

Or rather it came from another universe so next we do not know which one for another realm instead.

Perhaps I should switch another and different for only becoming wrong but also described.

Maybe it could be having three gravity amplifiers below so next out of sync or rather position instead.

Or perhaps I confused Phase shift with a pulse motor so next it could be disaligned and forgot the color.

Meant that a color could be still yellow but here needs a rewrite so doing that later.

Forgot, but it could be still a vertical bar in the room for sitting, here meant for navigation.

Just prove UFO's and I could be still sitting for not having any nature pushed on me.
ID: 2143948 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143951 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 16:44:07 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 17:06:46 UTC

So here divine is out of reach for making it beyond instead but should be still that of Laws.

But also it could be nature fooling us when not able to see any face behind the window or perhaps he still existed.

Just a nature visible in colors it could also be written in words but still only an expression.

Or maybe I could be still sitting in a chair so next be incapable.

Just a property could exist for everything regardless of size, but meant nature in the previous.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definition

Perhaps a Definition could also be a term but here the lacking EOL hampers me, again missing word.

We are still a part of nature so next that should also be having its cause.
ID: 2143951 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143955 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 17:33:41 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 17:37:10 UTC

Here something could be different on the inside for not the outside.

Perhaps an interchange could be a continuation of the Laws he made but here need to pour the glass of milk.

Or rather our purpose or wish could be knowing nature from the innermost but here stuck.

Just equal for not any unequal and the same could happen in his realm.

Anyway, but I fell down a shaft and next came back up again.
ID: 2143955 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143960 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 19:21:20 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 19:27:05 UTC

Just yellow could be a color for not any alien instead and for both we could perhaps prove.

But next wondering if nature could know about itself when that perhaps became the issue we tried to solve or answer instead.

Sorry about the beer so pouring the rest of it, or four bottles.

Or perhaps looking at the stars, or Horsehead nebuala I forgot to say.

So make an excuse for a divine being when not any quantized instead.

And saw it was created so next him failing for only infinity or Uncertainty instead.

Perhaps a Creator could be indefinite and still unknown.
ID: 2143960 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143961 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 19:29:06 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 19:33:58 UTC

Forgot, but something could be wrong when watching for a show but perhaps raw.

So here thought I could be knowing a couple of things for still parts missing.

Perhaps an interchange could be having hidden parts for not any gravity instead.

Make importance on a Sequence when only cyclic and it perhaps was more when hard.

But for that it was only recursive for not any Strong force instead.

Or perhaps I could still prove aliens so hold on or wait a minute instead.
ID: 2143961 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143962 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 19:47:27 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matter_creation

Or perhaps it could be Laws regardless for not any forces, so next it could have been created.

Just proving could be the purpose for the answer you anyway got or perhaps received.

Here we could be a product of nature and also aliens for all meaning.

So if only single for created also it could had been in advance.

Perhaps aliens could be still a part and also prove such a thing but also lightning.

Or rather that a Creator failed because he was divine for not any quantized instead.

Such a thing as Event could be enforced upon us in advance or perhaps another word (fixed from Chaos).

Only that it could happen for the thing it could be and next set in motion.

So here a diamond could be still hard for also worth but also a melon to swallow (or prunes).

Forget the Chaos when still only biscuits instead.
ID: 2143962 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143963 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 19:57:23 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 20:00:46 UTC

So here we tried proving Dark Matter or Energy but I make it interchange instead.

Such a thing could be a continuation of nature (or Laws) because it could happen through a multipurposed (or functional) slit.

Here a continuation of infinity could be impossible so next only different Laws at another level than nature.

Just set a level on it for only defined and next it was indeterminate instead, but had the shower.

Or meant failing Creator so next it could be failing for the whole prospect.

Just exist should be only for Logic so next a Frame of reference instead for not any shape.
ID: 2143963 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143964 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 20:03:56 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 20:10:21 UTC

Perhaps a Creator did not know what it became when only meant to be.

Forgot the name but could be Fife for also Kyle, but also Logic above.

So if I knew in advance for only told I could be disappointed but also bewildered.

Or rather what could be inside the spaceship for still only lying, apologies.

Rather a story being told so next I could believe for all its details.

Here property could exist regardless of any size (or dimensions).
ID: 2143964 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143965 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 20:12:55 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 20:30:29 UTC

Please tell me if I could be a good or eminent scientist instead when still proving.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close_encounter

Maybe the video instead but having a problem quantizing "better".

Or perhaps it could be a different part instead and next prove for a separate thing.

Please define a level for me when not any better or attained so next quantized for more.

Only that different Laws could exist when across a Sequence.

So next his nature could exist on equal Principle or terms but perhaps wrong.

Or maybe I could set a preferral on bad (or worse) for not making it any better instead.

Perhaps it could be stupendous but still prove aliens for the meaning it could be.
ID: 2143965 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143966 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 20:38:53 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 20:43:06 UTC

So how could I make Uncertainty a preference but out in the loo again.

So if a Creator could be failing also his prospect, but here only Euclidean space for not his realm.

For this his realm could be a playhouse when still spawn Divinity by means of a toolset.

Read my postings at PrimeGrid instead for being allowed but here a bit long so apologize for that.

Anyway, but I could still watch the videos and not believe what I could see but also predetermined in advance.

Or rather that Divinity should be a continuation of nature for its Laws but meant toolset instead.

Meant spawning for an interchange so apologies, but Chaos could be still an important factor.
ID: 2143966 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143967 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 20:53:24 UTC

Just tilt for nature and it could be for the negative and he made it so for not any Miracle.

Not having it but only chose such direction for a preference and not purple.

I think that proving versus disproving could be the options you could have and next for also aliens.

Perhaps aliens could be only natural and next prove for the sample it could be.

So here continue for an interchange when leveled but also split for not having any ends.

Only that a Creator could exist regardless of divine or quantized so next the problem with it.

Just more could be concentrated at the middle for not any ends so next we also have to prove it.
ID: 2143967 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143968 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 20:57:10 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 20:59:56 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_of_reference

Looking from his side and a diamond could still fail when purple.

I could be a scientist and please tell me which other word to choose for only different.

So if a Creator could be failing it could be wrong but also his Frame of reference.
ID: 2143968 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143969 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 21:03:41 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 21:12:27 UTC

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact

Many witnesses could be there for see but also we have to prove them.

I think it could be an Uncertainty of nature for only created when still visible.

So here he only chose to make it uncertain for not any divine instead and out in the loo again.

Please moderators, but should we perhaps choose if proving aliens for not any Creator instead?

Just active versus passive and I could be restrained.
ID: 2143969 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143971 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 21:14:04 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 21:19:41 UTC

So here bright lights visible but also could be a vertical bar (in the middle) for only needed.

Or perhaps it was a nature in disguise so still only proving aliens for that of needed.

Such a thing should only be for travel but also a gyroscope.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation

Here a game simulation but next I could be occupied, or maybe busy instead.
ID: 2143971 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2143972 - Posted: 12 Dec 2024, 21:21:38 UTC
Last modified: 12 Dec 2024, 21:24:58 UTC

Just sort completion on that of more and it also could end up in (with) destruction.

Or perhaps he was having an affair and next uncertain which mate he could choose.

Poor Betty and Barney for the story they once told.
ID: 2143972 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144064 - Posted: 15 Dec 2024, 17:54:22 UTC

You could ask him to move to New Jersey, perhaps he wakes up.
ID: 2144064 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144444 - Posted: 26 Dec 2024, 0:15:30 UTC
Last modified: 26 Dec 2024, 0:18:55 UTC

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ANwUDQQntHQ

Too good to be true, but here I thought nature was believed rather than leveled, or perhaps it fails on Proof.

Or perhaps more instead for also better so next it could be (a) the mothership you could prove rather than a drone.

But if perhaps a mothership it becomes Uncertainty and you did not know what you observed (witnessed) or saw.

My question is, if we think it should be real objects (like the Adamski UFO), do we still have to prove such a thing?

Here leveled could become a different universe if not only the vastness of our own.

Perhaps such a thing could be a replica (or part) from another universe when not able to see anyone in the cockpit or perhaps manouvering.

Or rather it could be lights for also movement so next also gravity could be part of such replica or maybe hidden Laws.

For such a thing it could be an imprint or watermark but here two beers left and seven almost consumed.

I had a look at the video mentioned above and think I could see windows in between so here it became enlarged.

Perhaps also aliens could make drones and next carry them in the craft they are using while the mothership is still far away.

Here not any reason to make it imagined when it could be witnessed from several locations and different people.

Only that it suffices to make it a craft observed when still not any between the windows and steering.
ID: 2144444 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144729 - Posted: 2 Jan 2025, 19:29:59 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jan 2025, 19:36:18 UTC

Just back from the shop and could check in with you later, but here A question about the WOW signal in the previous tab.

So having two laptops and the other one is not able to connect to the Factor Database despite sharing the same line with my ISP for connecting and think it is a DNS problem.

My guess is that it could be routed by means of Google, but for that the servers should be responsible for keeping the tables and not the local user or laptop.

Any suggestions welcome, because here most other things work and able to get to my national broadcaster.

Forgot, but cannot connect to you either using the other laptop.

Thanks!
ID: 2144729 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7333
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2144740 - Posted: 3 Jan 2025, 1:08:53 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jan 2025, 1:20:21 UTC

Not visiting you for a long time but a replica should not be any ghost.

But also that light should not be any dark and next only a property for being visible.

Only that the part visible could be lights when still an object, but also coming from the Supernatural.

But here that such an object should be quantifed when not any believed and therefore be a product.

Or more that it could become leveled on the thing it could relate (or what ) but here having the beer.

So when a thing could be a single object it also could relate and next being a part of infinity.

I am having a problem with "for" meant to describe when it could be "to" instead.

Or rather that when a thing could be quantified also it could be a part of where it belongs (no edit needed).

Edit: I refreshed the page when not able to post but still contents in the buffer and that is good.
ID: 2144740 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 341 · 342 · 343 · 344 · 345 · 346 · 347 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.