The previous one not the best either, for just knowing that if could also be "Tacit" just here.

But next only "fiddle" for that of a book for such, when not any knob either, for still only the responsibility it could be.

Is an excuse only part of Religion for just being offered, or could I make it any glorification or extol, for only just the "better" it could be?

What if nature is still only a set Condition for that of such a thing, and we could be still making it "better", for only just a different thing instead?

So, slip my throat perhaps, and I still could be making it only just better, for not any set or given Condition of nature instead.

Jump in the sea instead, for also the ocean, and it could become a readily assumption for still a presumption instead, for only a nature of a Premise.

Perhaps I could be back on my heels for still not any believing, for not any hovering it should be instead.

But only just all and everything for only the thing we could asssume, and next also readily so, for just only Fact.

Could we seek Proof by only provability for such, or could it still be only "Susan seeking", for not any "Harry versus Sally" either?

Again, perhaps a Wormhole for still only white, except not any priest for only just ordained.

So perhaps "Letters to an idiot" instead, and next only a better way of just asking, for not any answer that could be coming back.

Here it could be still only scientific Proof for just meaning, except also speculating about Religion, for only a guess.

Any premature for only just given, and next infinity for still that of a Concept, for only what nature could represent.

Here the hard science it should be still for only the Scientific Method, for still not lying on my back, for just only listening.

Any science for just telling, and it also could be offering, for still not any nonsense of just Religion it could be instead.

Is nature making it still one thing versus the other, and still the Empty set here, for not any completeness instead.

Only an assumed reality for that of a given nature, and it becomes still infinity for only just included, for also the aspect it could be.

Questioning one thing with respect to another, and perhaps still only nature for its richness and diversity.

But thinking that a set Condition could be coming just before or ahead, for that of a preference, next only nature for that of such.

So why not take a bath instead, and just drown only for such, when perhaps not any Prejudice or bias just here either?

Either preselect for only a given choice I could make it, for not any voting in advance it should be either.

But rather give me a laugh instead, for only just a story being told, which you still could not believe, for only an obvious reason.

Only "beware the wolf" instead, and I could be making it still "Beauty and beast", for not any Star Queen Nebula either.

Rather just wondrous stories once again, which should be either unbelievable, or at least a thing you should not believe in.

So make a difference between good and bad, and next also a choice for that of such.

Any governance for that of direction being made instead, and next only infinity for being assumed, for not anything else it could be instead.

Make a joke of it, for also laugh, but here a notion of space for also the time it could be, except still only spacious volume here.

Where is the GUT in here, for just the thing it could be, when still that of just everything being included, for only a single connection or reference?

Could infinity be taking still precedence here above just all the other, for only the "more" it still could be?

Or is it perhaps that of "noname" just here, for not any reference it should be either, for also that of synonymous?

Any reference to that of "what", and still only such a thing we could make it, for only what it could represent.

Could I be telling the wrong story here, except only listening in, for that of a chapter for such?

And here just a slap in the face for only a couple of fingers, for still not any infinity for just what it could mean, for only a definition.

What if such a thing could make me able to conclude, for still not any infallible instead, for perhaps rather underterministic instead?

Could you add a spoon, for next also a fork and knife, for still the meal it perhaps could be, except only complete for just added?

But here rather that of precedence instead, for still not any set Condition, for only just that of telling, next only that for such.

Either I could be making it just shoes here, for also shoelaces, or it rather could be that of laurels instead.

Here the one telling me that just everything could be possible, still only nature here, for also the way it could be interpreted.

But again, next only man on the corner for that of selling cigarettes, for still not any "complete" nature it should be instead.

So, where does it go, for still only the better, for also the more it could be?

Could nature be making it any better for just offered, or could it still be complete for only a given context, for that of infinity only for such?

Any better that just the "more" it still could be, and next only better for that of such, for still not any more.

But again that I could slip and next fall, for not any climbing of the stairs, and next only a preference for such, for not any direction instead.

Next any causation it could be, and next only for nature, for still not any gods or angels of the sky, for also the "Overlord" it could be.

But next that you seek Proof by only nature for such, for still not any other context it should be instead.

Here only the Forces of nature for only an intended meaning, except also Reason behind, for only just the beauty of it.

So, pass the vine here, and next climb to the top for only the edge, and next you could be looking beyond, for still only wider horizons for such.

You could be making it still grand aspect when only an understanding of nature, when also Philosophy just here, for not any even better instead.

Make it any sacred only just for that of life, and perhaps only wrong, for only that of causation instead.

So here the free will for still only float for that of such, and next only thoughts just wandering, for only off and away for such.

Both that of Conclusion and Premise we could make, should be seeing its limit or threshold, for only the physical constraints it could be.

Here perhaps not any "betterment" just for the notion of time either, except that it could be only included, for being part of science.

And the day it just started up and came into being, it was because of a pristine Reason.

But next our way of measuring a couple of things, is making it leveled, for only a comparison for such.

So why not make it only a given measure instead, for just what it could be, when still only a comparison with something else?

So only for just a spook, next the world could end up going dull for only the small details, for not any Heaven and Hell just the same.

Any comparison, and still only a way to compare for only the bigger or best it could be, for not any respect with somehthing else.

Only how much does it cost, and next nature could be open for just everything, when also solutions being wished to be found.

Any hidden structures for that of the Universe, and still only the thing just hidden for only meaning behind, for also Reason for such.

Does it perhaps flip out just for you, or should we still be take the blade from the mouth, for only being stunned when just knowing?

Any premature for just thinking, and perhaps only knowing, for still the set thing it only could be.

We perhaps know that there still is not anyone just on the corner for selling cigarettes, when still only the Reason we could be making it for just behind.

But next it ends up in the way you could be attributing only for science, for still not any God instead.

Here I feel tempted to making it God for just an alternative to Religion for also that of Creator only for such, because it should be a better description.

But only that you could be making it fantastic for only a nature for its display, for still not any ugly it should be instead.

Does that make for a need at getting back at the Method of Proof, for still only the Reason it perhaps could be?

But next that I could be questioning that of the difference it could be, when still only that of God versus the Devil.

The holistic Principle of making it science for just everything, is still a possiblity here, except leaving you an Atheist only for such.

And here perhaps only that of dismissing, for also readily accepting, could be attributed to only readily Facts of nature, for not any rules.

Any vice versa for a couple of things, does still not leave you from the fact that a couple of things could be different just for meaning, when also set.

Any "yes" or "no" just for an answer, and I better should make it true versus false, for still only opposite meaning, for still not any implied.

But here it makes me think that such a thing as change, should still be for that of a reason, for still not any Event instead.

But next I was once again wondering if just infinity could be making for just a common denominator for both God versus the Devil, for still only a difference for such.

Therefore, a couple of other words and definitions, for still only the naming it perhaps could be here.

Here making it comprehensive as well, for still only that of holistic, for not any blue nose it should be instead, when still not any tantamount either.

But here for not any trap versus exit door either, nature could be still only its own trap, for not any exit instead.

Choose only to make it infinity for only a master, and next in charge of nature it could be, for just only control.

But any alternative to just the complete it could be, next only the Empty set, for also both 0, zero and nil.

So does it perhaps falter on still a Belief in Religion it could be, for not any faltering mechansim for just nature either?

Only that of supremacy here, for not any white, and God could be still in charge for only a pedestal, for also the conductor he could be.

Any nature for that of "both" just created, could leave us still with the second option, for not any third, for still only a God hidden up the sleeves.

Here not any good description, for only that of noname or Faceless Coward we could make it instead.

Those things for still only religious meaning, could be having its counterpart for only nature of physical presence, and here lost the other word.

Meaning that we could make it at least symbols for only just meaning, for not any Objects or Sets instead.

The first thing coming at mind here, are those relics which could be found on windows in just churches around, but next not what I originally intended.

This discussion should be part of the past, for only the hanging cross for that of Jesus it also could be, for not any holistic interpretation instead.

As you know, I could make it both God and the Devil a product of more sacred definition, which should be more about that of the Universe.

But next ask me which elementary particles could be pointing back at such a thing for only a reference, when still only the Higgs boson here.

Here only two options for that of an answer, does not leave out the third answer it could be either, for still perhaps not any Christian Science Monitor either.

Either just the wrong name here, but meant for those scientists which could be approaching God in some way, for also the Religion it could be.

Here I do not make it any exclusion for still the "both" it could be, when only that of possibilities only just for meaning.

But next that we should not be readily see the hands of God, for still only the Creation it could be, for that of the Universe.

Either just the hidden cards up in the sleeves, for only mentioned before, except also leaving it only for its own, for that of its running.

Any Farewell could be just a word for such, for still not any bow of the hat it should be, for also that of a greeting.

Here Caesar still came, saw, and next won, for also left, for not any Jesus hanging on the cross, for only his Father leaving him.

But these could be still that of a moniker or Allegory, for only the real thing it perhaps could only represent, except also that of the unknown,
for still only that of start versus beginning, for also the demise it could be.

Here the notion of time could be still keeping its secrets, for not any nature being spawned for only a moment of Creation for such.

Just knowing that if could be infinity for only just a single thing, and next still the unknown for only the ultimate destiny it should be for nature.

Being fixed on a single Idea, only because it could be giving results, and next it could end up in failure, for still the rest of it lacking.

Therefore as mentioned, perhaps still infinity for its single thing, except not the whole explanation it should be either.

And next forgetting the cup of coffee here, I could be once again writing with just closed eyes, for only that of tearful.

But also that it reminds me that we could be proving a single meaning for just alone, for not any "whole" for only a single context.

If infinity should be still only a combined representation of just the rest it could be, next also everything only for such.

Here a notion of Religion could make us supposedly believe, for still not any Atheists we could be, except only set by nature, for just part.

And yes, it could be still "Machine messiah" here, for not any scrambling of eggs, when still looking for a Reason for only just behind.

If I still could be choosing between three dishes, for still only eggs, I could next choose to skip just all, for only that of dismissing.

For that, leaving me with no options, and next I could be excused only for such, for not any trap it should be instead.

The same goes for that of making it only nature versus science, for still not any Faith or Belief it could be.

And what if honesty should be replaced with dishonesty, for also the disgrace it perhaps also could be?

Are those Objects and Sets still part of a given whole, for also the way it could be intertwined, for only respective meaning?

If you could make it a solution to just everything, next still only infinity, for making it close at heart for only a fathom.

But for some reason nature could be still both sinister and sometimes also beauty, for only the opposite it could be, when also counterpart.

Here the separate nature still for only a difference, except still intertwined around infinity, for only just a starting point.

Always so easy just choosing between an empty bottle for also glass, when still lifted and full instead, except both just being granted for you to choose.

Here the end of the road unfortunately was not such a Construct either, for only the notion of flying through space, for still only part for only such.

Any respect for making it only perfectness for also that of completion, and it could be failing on itself, for just an infallibility only for such.

Here one thing could be making it just Laws for that of deciding, when also Equations, except both deterministic and indeterministic here.

Because of that, infinity could be just the end of the road in some way, for also that of a famous Equation being that of an Equivalence.

Any measure for just how good it could be, and next it flips around for just the bad it could be, when also worse.

But any nature for not just any deciding either, and we could be still looking into the unknown, for still only that of randomness.

So here any Laws for making it gods and angels, and perhaps no such thing either, for still also the Belief it could be.

Here infinity still for only the indefinitive for only that of meaning, when still a Construct also for such.

Therefore, just any set for only a giving, and next perhaps only an offering, when that of a gift for such.

Here perhaps still a finite answer for only that of science, except noticing that just AND for also OR, could be that of converse only for meaning.

For that, you do not flip any Uncertainty, for also both Contradiction and Ambiguity, into the "true" answer it should be for meaning, when still only the opposite.

Therefore, nature could be indeterministic, for leaving us unable to prove a decisive answer just for meaning.

For that, it becomes the open nature with not any closed ends, for also the hatch it could be.

So here time could cease to exist only because of a strong gravitational field, and I did not make it fit, for only leaving out the c from the Equation.

Any "equal" representation of just Energy, for only the Matter or mass it should be instead, and still only the singularity in the middle.

But here I also made it the Event Horizon at first, and perhaps should give a note about that as well.

Only when just thinking, still only so close it could be for still that of infinity, for still only the endless it could be.

But here such a thing represents a point in space which you never could reach at, for also the compressed volume it could be.

Because of that, it adds to a double context for that of the meaning it could be, for still not any duplicate either.

This makes me still think that the Universe could be for that of giving, and next the better approach could be still that of Intelligent Design.

So, if infinity could be just indeterminate only for just meaning, next also Laws of nature for still only undecided, for just the other word above.

Therefore still not any Equations for only the Belief we could have, for also the stuck of mouth it could be.

Any Intuition for just the "a-ha" it could be, and next only an Idea for such, for still not any Proof it could be just for meaning.

Here perhaps given words for only a sentence could be making for any Fallacies, for still only Laws and Equations just for nature.

Any assumed God or Creator just for meaning, and next we could be leaving any Equations, for still just only the thinking it could be.

Here still not any nature coming out of any randomness, for also Coincidences for such, except that it was still only the better choice for that of making.

But again that just Proof is just steadfast for only the Method it could be, and next we could be still questioning God for only a Reason.

Any life of just meaning for just lying dead in the water, and perhaps not such a thing it should be either, for only that of natural philosophies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_philosophy

Any exit, for also the escape it also could be, and next only a route for such, for that of the way it could be, when also end of the road.

But here still only completion for that of nature, when also fulfillment, for not any perdition or damnation instead, for also despair.

So bow my hat, for still only the undecided it could be, when only that of a divine force being perhaps responsible for that of nature of a making.

If you could still assume a Wormhole for only the notion of time it could be, next perhaps only a representation it should be instead.

Here any predetermined, for still only infinity for such, should not be making for any Stairways to Heaven either, when still only a Construct.

So any leveled, for just with respect with infinity, and still only the comparison we could make.

So did infinity become the indefinitive answer here, for also the Conclusion it could be instead?

Here at least Determinism for only a link for such, except you could be stiil striving for just a gain, when also accomplishment or result.

So here still perhaps that of both deterministic versus indeterministic for still only a bit of word, for perhaps not any Conclusion either.

Is infinity any final point only for such, or should it be a final moment of time instead?

Anyway, if I could still make a choice between a beer for just a glass of vine, when still only a bottle, not any strong beverage it should be here either.

Any separate for just the complete it could be, and next the single thing in the middle, for just the endpoint it could also be.

But next I know that nature could be flawed, for still only Intelligent Design for such, for still not any Reason behind instead.

Any Interaction, for still only different Forces residing side by side, and next nature for only a meaning, when still that of a whole.

Here choose to make it any betterment for only just randomness instead, and it perhaps could not match, for also the sentence above.

But if just different things could be still for that of a representation of a single whole just for meaning, next perhaps true only for such.

Rather that just both should be for still only a Universe we could be watching and observing, for still also that of meaning.

If you rather could make it that of incompleteness for only just part, still only part of that of complete, for still the given whole it could be.

And here perhaps such a thing we could be witnessing and observing, for still only watching for such.

Here guessing that a couple of questions could be still incomplete for that of meaning, for not any holistic Principle it could be instead.

But here the man at the corner of the street for just selling cigarettes, should not be any deciding, for still the completeness we could be making for nature.

Perhaps the original Idea, for just intended, was just good for that of meaning, except that it only ended up in flaw or failure, for that of result.

But rather a mixup, for just the "both" you could make it, should be still only nature for that of design.

Here you still could not exclude anything for meaning, but only add instead, for just having it included, for still only the complete it could be.

And just for that, something could be wrong here, except not any Equations we could only could be making for just in front of us.

Here perhaps not the best for just written, but here that of "believability" for just word, when also unbelievable as well.

Any stumble on the Fact for still only the Religion it could be, and next not any secret it should be here either,

But here only still rather assume that it should be that of "both" for just meaning, when next only the answer we could give.

Rather that there should be no secret, when still making it Fallacies for the answers we could not make, when still only questions.

Again that just a couple of shoes could be interlaced for that of meaning, for not any shoemaker at his lest, and it becomes only a reason.

Here still not any infinity for only the conclusive answer you could make, when also that of definitive it could be.

So just the Construct, for still only adding, and next only pouring instead, for not any excluding it should be, for only just emptying.

When you exclude just 1 from that of 10, and doing so continually, you still end up with 0 for just the end or endpoint it could be.

But here it does not matter, when still only with respect to infinity, for still only the included it could be.

For that just infinity being that of noname only for such, for still not any replacement of God it could be, for only just the "both" it could represent.

But here nature still came into being, for that of inflating on just its own lest, for that of shoes it could be, when only that of growing in size.

And here only that of the nature it could be, next also indeterministic for that of meaning, for also the way we could conclude.

If God made it just infinity for that of an Idea for such, next he put it into practice for still only use for such, when making the Universe.

Any homogeneity, for still only equal size, and next it only started to grow, just for only volume.

Here you do not press any button for only the Celibacy it perhaps could be, for only that of endless possibilities instead.

Any past or beyond for just that of science, when also limits versus thresholds, and perhaps still not any Belief for only just Religion instead.

For that, just any "high fidelity" you could make it for only surpassing a couple of Ideas, and it could be still only the passing of vine for such.

Here a given soul for just that of meaning, should not be any comfort either, when still that of a grave, for only a deceased person.

But rather that of causation could be still only an option, for still not any Heaven and Hell, for just the Devil.

Equivalence should be only just for nature of a meaning, for not any process of death instead, for just making it another place.

So choose to make it still God for only just the better, and next not any Devil it should be either.

Any failing for just nature, and next only failure for such, for still not any Doubt with respect to any Heaven, for still only Divinity for that of such.

Better that you should be contemplating instead, for not just any thinking either.

So just the added feature we could be making for nature, should be that of completeness here, for not any emptying of a bottle instead.

Just throw your gloves for only the garbish it could be, for still not any shining instead, for just the bright it could be.

Any brightness instead, and next a wakeup for just a call, for still not any Dawn of the morning, for also the sunshine it could be.

Could you see it or perhaps feel it, for only the sunshine it perhaps could be here, for still only the dawn of the morning, for also the wake up call it could be?

Any glory instead, and it becomes a spectacle only for such, when still only the thing we could be witnessing and observing.

Perhaps it could be a Miracle just here, for perhaps not any Event either, when still only the sun shining for just the bright morning.

Any shepherd for just the Lord it could be, and next not any bird Phoenix raising from the ashes, for still only the dull it could be.

So here which reference point for still only that of relative, for not any "eventuality" instead, when still only endless possibilities?

Which grand picture could you just paint for the Universe, when only a sense of Belief, for still not any Method of Proof instead?

Only that of sunshine here, and next also a feather, for still not anyone sitting at your bed for just a companion, for not any Shepherd instead.

Any exclusion mechanism for only just leaving it off, and next only there, for not any other possibilities instead, for just the better it could be.

Did it become only a nature we could fathom here just for meaning, or could we make it still only God for just the better?

Keep the sun shining for still only letting it so, except also my face for still only so, for not any countenance or sight instead.

I could make it completion just for nature for not only what it could mean, but also what it could represent, for still not any respect with just the other thing either.

If you could rather accept just comprehensiveness for only the possibility it could be, next also that of infallibility as well, when it could be that of impossible.

Here a readily assumption for just a single thing you could make it, and next also a given whole you also could make it, for that of similar context.

Only just a juxtaposition, for still only the flipping sideways it could be, and next the endpoint it could still be, for only that of traversing.

So forget only the forgetful it perhaps could be, when still only that of included, for that of possibilities instead, for only a nature just installed.

We could be making it the Method of Proof for just believing, when that of Belief for the same, for still not any fantastic or spectacular instead.

But next any given measure for only a comparison for such, and it ended up just wrong, for that of only flaw or failure for such.

Those things which could be past or beyond, could be still only included, for that of endless possibilities only for such.

Any God versus the Devil for only a Conclusion for such, and it became infinity instead, for only a Construct for such, and next not any answer either.

Here both just included for that of meaning, and therefore we should not exclude one thing for just another, when still only included instead.

So, any moniker or Allegory for just the "better" it could be, and next only that of "both" for still what nature could represent only just for meaning.

But next "It is your place for that of living", and next where also you should be or belong, for still only being a victim of nature, for only circumstances for such.

This where only it happens, for that of result or outcome, for still only the magnificent world it should be, for that of reality.

Therefore the second line just above, perhaps not any perfect either, for just the correct it could be.

When you perhaps make it implicit meaning, you could make it a choice between that or the other, for only a cause for that of such.

Any death for just going down the drain, and still only the Devil for such, for not any glorification or extol instead, just for that of God.

Any holistic Principle, for still only making it that of whole for just only describing, and still only that of "both", for just only being added.

Therefore, any readily assumption you could make it for science, and still nature for that of its glory, at least, for not any other or better instead.

Rather that it became encompassed for still only the thing it could be, and here nature, for still not any better or else instead.

And here still nature for only that of itself, for also the reference it could be, for not any other reason it could be, for just Reason behind.

Again that God could be sitting on his pedestal, but next not any bleeding or bloodletting it should be either.

It is possible that if enough monkeys sat in front of enough typewriters this thread could be created.

---

And that one just fell away, and making for a new start just here.

Pressing F5 just wipes the buffer clean, and I have to begin from just scratch.

So, for just only a bit of stupid meaning instead, at least the Daredevil here for just being brave, for not any final or set Condition either.

Either just nature for that of the magnificent or spectacular just for meaning, or it could be just going down the drain, for only opposite result.

Any completion for just the initial moment it could be, and it became only infinity included for that of a Construct, for not any meant to be instead.

So either just noname for also Faceless Coward, when still not any bothering, for just the "other" fashion it could be, when only just "both" it could mean.

And here be brave for only just sitting, for not any call it should be either, when still only a face for only given look.

Really it is the same debate we could make it here, for only the better it could be, when also worse, for not any God by just example, for also the Devil it could be.

Any leveled Universe for still only structured, and it perhaps could be holistic for only the single whole we could be making it, for that of meaning.

So, making it another meaning for just only an excuse, and next only "I said, you said", only for such a meaning, and we could end up disagreeeing.

But any respect, for still only part versus whole, and still the holistic Universe we could make it, when still only single part.

So only for pressing the button a little, next also a bit hard, for also the better assumption it could be, and next also an eventuality still only for the answer.

Any leveled, for just the gods and angels it could be, and next still only relative for only the notion of time it could be, for just that of different.

But again, fhat pouring a glass, for only flipping a little, should be still that of emptying, for also the exclusion it could be.

Therefore, still not any passing of the vine, for just in between it also could be, when only pressing the wrong button instead.

Here you could think that Religion could be an excuse for only the science it could be, for not any in between, for just intermediate.

Just cling to a rope, and next you could be climbing both up and down, for not any falling instead, except reaching infinity for still also the floor.

So guess what, for still only the spoiler it could be, and next also tears as well, for still only that of Religion, for not any science instead.

Any natural Concept, for only making it nature for that of such, and still only Religion an excuse, for only that of Belief instead.

Therefore, still only that of such, for not any emptiness of nature it could be instead.

Is the other alternative still any explainable, for only just the different it could be, and next still only an option for such.

Still only that of tears for only just Religion, for not any bleeding or bloodletting instead, but again that I lost the continuation here.

My guess is that you could make it still a juxtaposition for only that of Equvivalence, for still not any surpassing it should be, for only just better.

Here infinity still in that of the natural context only for such, and next also the thing we could prove as well.

Only quite logical in which or whatever respect, for still only the physical it could be, when also fundamental as well.

The problem here is that you could be walking the wrong way for just thinking, when still only that of Wormholes for only a "notion", for not any Belief instead.

If you still could assume nature for only a readily meaning, still only that of such, for not any "both" for just even all either.

Here this Construct should be still for only a nature for just meaning, for not anything else we could be presuming instead.

But if I could be thinking that a Wormhole could be only a "happiness blacksmith" only for such, next perhaps a bit in vain, for only uncertain here.

Again that any Divinity should not be readily assumed, for still only the Construct being made for nature here.

This for still only the Laws and Equations for only explaining nature, for not any else it should be instead.

Just think you could be making it better, for only Logical Fallacies only for such, and next you could be climbing the ladder instead, for still only a couple of stairs.

Even making it "unprecedented" for only that of word, and next still not any better you could make it, for only an understanding.

But as you may know, I still do not have to believe here just either, for still only the notion of science it could be instead.

So, wipe a couple of tears, for still only losing it, and it could be overwhelmingly so, for not any wholeheartedly instead, when at least a kiss only.

Any just Theory, and still perhaps none either, for just the second option it could be, when still only that of the else.

Here the GUT we should make it, should be still only for science, and next you know the other alternative, for still only result for such.

Therefore, still not any completeness just for nature, when only given purposes for such, except only my Perspective instead.

Perhaps the mentioned bottle of soup right now, and I could be reading through the previous first, before next continuing.

@betreger, you could still dismiss for only the answer you could make, for still not any final.

This sense of perfectness, for only a completion, could be passing the vine for only the fulfillment it could be, for not any final instead.

Either just losing the point here once again, or you could be proving for still only that of final, for not any endless instead.

This is what I am supposed to be trying here, for not any other mentioned word either.

If it did not blew, perhaps even just better for that of meaning here.

I go with the monkey hypothesis.

---

@betreger, you could still dismiss for only the answer you could make, for still not any final.

This sense of perfectness, for only a completion, could be passing the vine for only the fulfillment it could be, for not any final instead.

Either just losing the point here once again, or you could be proving for still only that of final, for not any endless instead.

This is what I am supposed to be trying here, for not any other mentioned word either.

If it did not blew, perhaps even just better for that of meaning here.

So tell me about any such, for only that of wrinkles, and perhaps only wrinkled instead.

Given nature for only that of explained, and perhaps I could be still forthcoming, for not any evident instead.

Any biased, for not taking any nature just for meaning, when also granted, and still only a Premise for that of such, for still not any magnificence or glory instead.

Here the respect we could be making it for that of science when still only Proof, for still not any wishful dream for just Religion instead.

And here only the small window for that of posting, so better make it a new one instead.

Any wrong description, for only just the better, and you could be still passing the vine for only surpassing, for not any limits of the Universe instead.

Here still faltering for only its own meaning when that of failing, for still only the physical, for not any Metaphysical just for another alternative.

Any decisive factor for still only the Method of Proof we could make it, and still only limits for that of the Universe instead.

So cling to the rope, for still only possibilities, for not any endless fashion it could be instead, because here still not any juxtaposition, for only Equivalence.

But also that it reminds me of which Proof we should make, when still only purpose here, for that of the separate.

Any "to the point", and next also result for only oriented, when still not any steadfast for just attitude, and I could still bring it just together here.

Nature makes perhaps no point in which direction it could go, but we could be still biased for just only meaning.

But next also the answer we could be seeking, for still only that of respect only for such, when that of science.

Any open for just nature, and still not any hatch, for only the Premise we still could make it, just for meaning.

Any infallibility for just the Truth it could be, and next perhaps not the same either, for only leaving me just checking.

But did I question any Laws still only for meaning, and perhaps I did so, for only discovering that it could be just a mismatch.

And here if not any wrong, any conclusive should not be any inconsecutive either, just for only a word.

Rather that it could still only fail for that of just faltering, for only a mechanism for such, when still that of both Ambiguities and Contradictions.

But If you could assume only luck for that of joy only for such, and still only happiness, for that of making it Belief in God, for not just the other way either.

Running on just empty once again, and I do not want to start a new sentence with the same word.

The given comparison for just making it Divinity for just meaning, when still not any Religion, and perhaps not any mismatch either, for only the failing it still could be.

Should it be still more easy just making it the small or minuscule here, for not any forever or limitless it could be instead?

Beware the wolf for still the completeness I could make it, and still not any result I could get at, for only just the opposite.

Flip a tool, for just a box I could make it, and once again I could leave it to you for only a couple of aliens, for not any holistic Principle instead.

Here it was, namely for that of an assumed God, when still rather implied for just meaning, when still only the tools of science only for such.

Any layered, for still only the infinite series of elements it could be instead, and next only that of Cardinality for just nature, when also the Planck constant.

For that, and where for next to, when still only from versus to, and next the other place for just starting point, except still only an infinite series for that of separating.

Here I make it 1, 2, 3, and so on, for still infinity at the end, for not any 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 instead, and it becomes such a sequence.

So, loop back a little for just the 0.3 it could be, and you could be back at 0.2, for not any lost in space instead, for just everything being relative.

Any nickname for where it just could go, and still only nature for that of its absolutes, for also the better it could be, for still not any worse.

Thefore just the Fallacies it still could only be, when that of contemplating for just the other thing.

Perhaps the final answer could be still only hidden for just up the sleeves, except not wondering if it rather could become revealed instead.

Too much to handle here, so again the mentioned dinner for that of a bottle.

@betreger, please not me here, if you please, but at least that monkeys makes for Darwin here at first.

Back later on.

I go with the monkey hypothesis.

Or remember the 3 wise monkeys ;)

Hi cRunchy, but what else could you next be comparing with?

Any leveled beauty, and still only nature for its magnificence instead, and again only the small window here.

So here bringing the hot bottle of soup in front of me from the kitchen, and I could be having the cake next after, for still only tasting a little.

Hi cRunchy, but what else could you next be comparing with?

It's wise to simply see, hear or speak no evil.

And yes, but what if any starting point could be just a bad one, for not any better, when still only climbing?

We do not have to make it only a given choice here, but rather a dislike instead, when still only such for that of the Devil.

Here both little versus small goes for that of a Construct for just the hand in hand it could be, for not any more it should be for just better.

So therefore just "type mismatch", when still only just not hanging together, for just composition for also the same.

Only wrap a curtain for just around, and it also could be a question about a flat Universe, for not any positive or negative instead.

Again that I made it "circumstances" a little down, and next wondering if i could be skipping the ending "s" here.

Here you do not have to make it any "To be or not to be" for only a reality just being assumed, for still only taken for granted instead.

There is no excuse for only a certain death, except that it could still happen for only just an Event, when also a cause for such.

So here the entanglement we still could be only making for that of science, should only be for such a thing it could represent.

Only a readily assumption for still the other thing, when only just meant by infinity for just an example, and it becomes only such a thing.

Here a glorification could be for just a set nature for just only implied, for still not any past the vine, for only limitless possibilities.

So therefore presume nature for still only its splendor, for not any more or better it should be instead.

Rather that you could be attributing a God for just meaning, because it could surpass a given notion for only just a fathom for such.

And here I could be finishing the sentence for only complete for such, except still only the spoon for just in my hand.

Losing the sentence for only a single word at first, and it could become that for the rest.

Any there you have it, and next also "that's it", for still only the finish it could be, for not any going forever instead.

Any sober goes for also that of restraint, for not any casual look it should be instead.

But if Certainty could only make for an excuse instead, next still only that of infinity for only decisive factor, for not any complete it should be instead.

Any symbiotic for just stars, and next also that of "both" for such, for still not any respect instead, for only the other thing it could be.

But next rather different instead, for only making it that of comparing only for such.

Any lacking for just complete, and still only part for such, for not the other thing it could be either.

Only weak versus strong instead, and you still could make it "both", for also the respect it could be.

Perhaps just Cardinality could make it easier for just that of a difference, for not any indeterminate it should be instead, for just the other thing.

But just inconclusive, for making it that of one thing versus the other, and still also the "both" it also could be.

So trying to finish off a sentence, for only the ascribing it perhaps could be, and still only completion instead, for only just meaning.

And here break my heart a little, for only the incomplete Proof it should be, when rather perhaps insuccessive instead.

Anything fixed, for also set, and it could also be determined, for still not any invalid or inconsequent instead.

With due respect, for still only that of noname or Faceless Coward, and I could be still only comparing for such, when also a meaning.

But rather that you could make it a pseudonym instead, when still only looking the other way, for that of despair just in front of you.

Any cold at heart perhaps, and next also senseless, for still not the other word I could be looking for, except not any ruthless.

The one thing of making it any ugly for only that of worse, and next the bad it could also be, for still only included.

Coming at just that, for only a set example, and still the different it should be for only just meaning, when only the other thing.

The Empty set still makes for only emptiness, for also part of a given whole it still could be.

So, any Reason for only just the past it could be, and next only beyond, for still only the limitless it could be, when perhaps not the same either.

Which Premise could you be making for that of nature, when still only God for just the other, for only that of Religion for such?

So bow your head, for still only roses in the night, and it became a rumour of a civilization meeting its demise, for only a destiny for such.

Any deep voice for only just heard, and it interrupted a regular transmission from a broadcaster.

So any Omen for just nature, and next perhaps not any juxtaposition, for only just part for such, when still only that of whole.

Here the ten fingers on each hand, for also two legs for just standing, and next the complete answer you also could be having.

But rather so much to say, for still only included, when that of repective parts for only that of Proof for such, when still not any where it belongs.

Here each separate Proof only for such, when also the respective context it also could be.

But here more and more for only making it, when still not any infinite for only the complete part it should be, for rather included instead.

Either that of complete for still only its separate meaning, for not any other or else it should be instead.

That was what I just saw or noticed here, except perhaps not still any explicitly written either, but could be back at that.

Here gcd() makes for still a common denominator, for just asking if 45 could still be part of infinity, for not any 27 instead (3*3*5).

Making it just good for also bad or ugly, and still both for that of included, for not any separate only.

I still could differentiate between a couple of Sets, for still not any combined either, when just many for such, for not any "all" it should be either.

So here only an "end" Construct, for still only that of limitless, when only part of nature for such.

And here still not any written for just clear, but only noticing that it could be more for just a Reason, for still only "everything for just a whole".

For that, it makes me think that nature could be created for only a Reason for such, when still only God's hands just in between.

As I said, starting with the wrong word at first for only a sentence, and it becomes "jingle bell" for just editing that.

But next that there could be two Conclusions here, for still only included, for also the second word here, or comprised.

Namely that infinity is for just all or everything it could be, when also each separate part, for only the respectively it could be.

Either I could add just 1 all the time for still only reaching this point, for not any down the drain it should be, for that of complete failure.

Any separation, for just only a difference, and it becomes only a conglomeration for such, for still not any composition it should be either.

So therefore perhaps three such instead, for not any two, when still not knowing where you should go either.

Definitely a lack of time, for only losing a moment for such, should not be any completeness, for only just added either.

The easy thing here is making it 2 just more than 1, for still only the consecutive range of factors, for only the concatenation it could be.

But next who invented this stuff, for not any referral, except only feeling a sense of luck here, for only so close we could be.

If any dismiss should also mean invalid, it also could be for just a diminishing sentence, for only that of value for such.

But if completed should still mean included, still only mean for that of such, for also the implied it could be.

Any separation for only a difference, and next only a reference point to that of something else, when still only a difference.

When I do it in such a way, it perhaps could be only a tenet or doctrine for that of nature, when only looking in such a way.

Any given measure for only that of a weighted nature, and it becomes still only infallibility for the thing you could not measure.

So if not "you are able to measure", it still goes the drain for not being able to quantize, for perhaps still only Religion instead.

But only a guess instead, for just only an Idea, and it could become a surmise, for still only the thing we could be left to speculate.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guessing

So easy it is making it just a point in space, for not any part of an Equation, because next only a bit of expression, for not any "spoken word" instead.

Here Einstein thinking for only just absolutes, when only an Equation for such, for still not any nonsense, for just the spoken word instead.

But next only "wholeheartedly", for still only single meaning, and next what we could make it for which the Universe constitutes, for still only single meaning.

It means that both a Law, for also an Equation, should be still the readily answer we could make, when also an explanation as well.

Only nonsense for that of jibberish, and next no way you should go for also accomplish, when still only result for such.

So, a driving force for perhaps only a notion, and next such a thing, for still not any life versus death, for only meaning.

And here it becomes the two differences for only a notion, when time should be still that of back and forth just for meaning, for not any perishment instead.

If nature could be setting it forth for still only different possibilities, next also options for such, for that of a given choice for meaning.

Next we perhaps could know, for only choosing to marry, for not any drown in the sea instead.

Here stars for just galaxies, and still a set point only for such when that of a difference, when rather Objects or Sets instead.

Any type for just properties, and we rather should want to know where it could move, for only that of direction.

Just one given set of properties for that of the complete, and next also part for where it belongs, for still not any trajectory instead.

Here that of belongs, should be still that of composition, for only just the red or blue it could be, when also circles or triangles.

The other should be still that of a reference for just coordinates for only the way it could be traveling, for still only an Object for such.

But it one thing could be known for just the other as well, next the third part still unknown, for not any attributed or ascribed.

Any holistic for just objects of the Universe, and next the parts it could represent for the whole it still could be, for not anything else still missing.

If I could miss out a square for only just hollow, it could be a circle instead, for just colors being added in the middle.

So therefore only known versus unknown, and leaving you still only speculating, for that of a guess.

And here the soup just took off, so either just water here, for not any window instead.

And blow my nose, for wiping the buffer clean again.

I got it to work for both the two cards, when still placed in the middle, for only suggested.

Downloading a PrimeGrid Genefer20 task, and the fans on the second card was running, and in some way noticed.

Therefore switching the cable to the monitor for just checking, when that of directly connected this time.

Here the squeeze earlier on, for just too tight, but got it managed when lying on the hard plastic sheet for just the table.

Next leaving with the airflow still connected, for that of picking a Genefer20 task, and next also a second task as well.

That is when it became too late, and I chose to leave, and here getting the Amethyst for that of the second account.

The single airflow is located above the first card for that of the processor fan, but here the single fan blade could be slightly misaligned.

A second fan blade should be against the wall, away from me, when still the rear part of the system turned against me.

But also a memory card in its wrong slot, but still detecting it, when not any correct should also mean no display.

But if the first card was still running, and I also had a display, perhaps not the memory card here to blame either, for its position.

Rather a driver problem again, as previously also noted, except that I was still flying away for just the other thing.

Really the point here, so returning back at it in just a moment.

Perhaps were running, for only just plural, for still not any indeterminate versus indefinite instead.

Any just vocabulary again, and it could be just the wrong word given, for not any other interpretation it could be instead.

If I could be making it an inconclusive meaning for only that of a result, also that it could be indeterminate for still only the Conclusion we could make.

So if I made it any misuse, for just misinterpreting, it could be still that of pouring into a glass, for not any emptying of a bottle instead.

Just the given thought, for also impression, when only leaping a train for that of full speed, perhaps I could be still entering, and next waiting for a little.

Here infinity is supposed to be a complete notion for just only meant, and next also included for just the same, for still not any indefinite instead.

So like you said it, next also I for just the same, and it became the whole meaning, for still not anything excluded instead, for just only the opposite.

There should be no reason just for distributing a couple of things widely around, for still only the single or compressed it could be, for that of an object.

So therefore, any included meaning, for next only absolute, and still perhaps the included it could be, for just only added.

Any total for just the final thing it still could be, and next also ultimate as well, for still not any completeness for only just being meant.

Here infinity could be just for that of everything being added for next that of whole, for still not any widely distributed, for only spread wings.

So therefore, still the wrong notion here, when the whole subject could end up being misinterpreted just for meaning.

Here I tried making it a general sense just yesterday, when also being referred to a couple of YouTube videos, at the end of the session.

That is because this notion could be still going for the singularity being present in a Black hole, for also the intended Construct for only itself.

So remember that I still could duck, when not having any cover, except still the other discussion for just the same.

But any open for still only a hatch, and next the indeterminate it still could be, when not any definite Conclusion either.

Only here you are, and next I am for still only meaning, and next it became, for still only a Construct for that of meaning, for where it also should belong.

A typeset should be still for only a newspaper, for not any particular purpose it should be instead.

Any Object for still only that of space, and next still only gravity for that of meaning, for also what it constitutes.

But next you make it also a set property for only that of a definition, for still only the way of Matter for only what it constitutes.

So where is the end of the ladder, when you could be reaching the bottom, for not any stairs just climbing, for just the Heaven instead?

Could I be making it the wrong interpretation, or could it still be only for that of a subject, and here just a missing word.

Just tell me about any absolutes for only a meaning, and next only where it goes for just the same, when still only interpreted just for meaning.

So here perhaps not any Commandment either, for only a preset condition instead, when only such for that of being predetermined in advance.

Here gravity is only the reason for that of meaning, and next everything could be falling on itself, for just only a lid or cover.

We know that the Event Horizon is still the point in space where light could not escape, for still only the moment of disguise, when that of sacred could be just hidden.

Any eventualities for only being spawned on that of possibilities, and next where it also could be starting, for still not anything ceasing to exist.

So make it gravity for still only the reason for such happening, and it becomes the final result for only just ultimate happening.

Could you make it a happy day for only just living, or could it be a day of just sorrow or despair instead, for not any alternate it should be either?

Any parallell instead, and it becomes the same time for only simultaneous, for not any third word instead.

Perhaps that of combined here, except also fixing just that as well, for only the error it could be, except only included at the same time.

Any just a thing for just the other, and it becomes a single thing instead, for just not any singular it should be either, for only an object.

So therefore once again, my possible misinterpreting here for only making it infinity a single thing, for still not any combined, for just added.

But here only an indefinite point for just that of space, and still infinitesimal small, so here you have it again, for still only meaning.

Any wrong reason for only making it God for just only an interpretation for the same, and next also that of infallibility it could also be for meaning.

Rather that you assign an object for only what it could mean, for also where as well, for still not any indeterminate instead.

Why can I not just finish it here, for not any editing instead, when still only that of completed, for only result?

Perhaps we could be making just such an answer here, for only the completeness it still could be only for meaning.

Again, just have a drink for being added, and next it could be pouring into your glass, for not any excluded being just part, for only that of a finite set.

Here I am not supposed to leap from one end of the table to just the other, for also the second table it could be just around the corner.

Any minted condition, for perhaps only a Creation per se, and next only meant for that of implied, for not any readily assumed instead.

But next it only borks at me here, for that of implied, for just the wrong word it could be, and next also that of following.

Here any implied should not mean any limitless possibilities, for only such a condition either.

So once again, for only that of given name, next not any take the blade fully, for only just mouth shut, for that of being delivered only in advance.

Tell me just which way instead, and next it became spawned on only just richness, for also diversity, when still not falling down any ladder for just the zero point.

Here at least time running in one direction for only just flowing, for still not any counting up or down, for only a couple of numbers it could be.

But if it could be just indeterminate, also that it could be a set condition, where in fact no such condition could exist.

Any which God for only deciding, and next it became only Laws of Creation, for just coming into Existence, for not any given possiibilities.

So here you have it for just being offered, and it became all for just everything, when still only included for that of such.

Only with respect, for that of a set nature, and next still implied for just only meaning, for not any drowning in the ocean instead.

But here also being reminded about negative numbers, for only the wrong end of the scale it could be, for just that of a flipover.

Here it again goes to show that infinity is just a combined context for that of a single whole I could make it, when only included.

Rich man versus poor man, and it becomes that of "both" for just the same, for still perhaps not any same moment it should be either.

But next you add it for only separate part, for still only the included it could be, for not any subtracting, for only just a difference.

So leave it off once again, for only the "wrong" subject it could be, and next it could be only misinterpreted, for that of an interpretation.

Any past versus beyond, and perhaps I could make it so, for still not any believing, for not any included it should be either.

But rather a nature defined for only that of single coordinates, when still different Black holes, for just many, when only widely spread or distributed across space.

We could be making it nature for only that of holistic Principle, when still that of whole, for not any asking, for just the other it could be for that of meaning.

Here it could be just our way of only understanding, for still only the complete it could be, when also uniform.

So, top to bottom, for still not any head or toes, it rather should be hands and fingers instead, for not any completion it should be, for only just tantamount.

Either both that of unambiguous or unique for that of the other comparison here, or perhaps only meaning for just the same.

Rather only a separation between the widely distributed it could be, when only spaced, for not any concatenated it could be instead.

That word here at first, but next still only compressed for that of inside the Event horizon of a Black hole, for still only the singularity in the middle.

So, is infinity still only a common denominator for that of the small versus large it could be, for still not any combined context either?

Ring a bell, for only asking me about the purpose of life, for not any meaning it should be either, for only just meant.

But next only an Implication for just nature, except not any Logical Fallacy for only just the wiping of a couple of tears it could be.

Again, just have a bath in the sea, for not any drowning, and you rather could end up on the hard shoulder, for only just driving a little.

Our guess for just thinking, should be still that of Fallacies, for only the infallible it could be, when also that of completeness for only meaning.

You said it, for not any nature which could not exist, but rather should be doing so for only coming into Existence, for that of determined for such.

Any spoken word, for just only that of length, and next only indeterminate instead, for still perhaps not any Fallacies it should be either.

And here writing perhaps off the track, for only losing myself, except not any excuse we could make it, for only Reason behind.