Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 198 · 199 · 200 · 201 · 202 · 203 · 204 . . . 333 · Next

AuthorMessage
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053047 - Posted: 2 Jul 2020, 11:42:25 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jul 2020, 11:53:25 UTC

As perhaps mentioned, I need a trip to the dentist for that of hurting teeth, making it difficult to get at sleep.

But here Thursday once again, and I have to run for the weekend shopping to just have it done.

Next looking up the word "TADKOM" using the native variant of the Wikipedia, for that of a digital communications system.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TADKOM

Launched in the 1980's, it became a replacement of perhaps some older analog system, but here the English versus native version, could make for different readings.

One thing I happen to know, is that just the fiber optic of it, for that of cable, might be difficult to install and also handle, for just dealing with.

But here it also may be the Copper variant or version of this as well, for still only the English language for that of speaking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber_Distributed_Data_Interface

But for being just carried away, also that we may have both 10 and 100 Mbit speeds here for still digital, and next I am connected to the web by means of cable for TV.

For that, it becomes just a misnomer, when still the analog signal for being transmitted, when through open air for such, being that of wireless.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gigabit_Ethernet

The problem here for that of the mentioned TADKOM, is that it becomes multiplexing here, when two different connections are using the same line.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiplexing

For once, this article becomes slightly more better, if not just good, for also informative, in that it beats the native version here.

One thing is making it just "say you, say me", for not any never happening either, because I could still end up at sleep at night.

Prove any sentence, and you also could prove the liar, for only the thing he could be, when not making it any such either.

The readily Proof we still could make, should not be any empty air for only such, but rather the thing still in front of us, for that of its presence.

So here the run it could be through the terrain, for only just making a trip, for only a walk for such, and you could be using a map for also compass.

Next a mobile phone in your pocket, and it connects to a wireless link by means of GSM for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GSM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tracking_and_Data_Relay_Satellite_System

But for only just calling my friend, on the other side of the globe for just the Earth, I still would have to be doing so, by means of a geostationary satellite.

All of this in the end, becomes that of communication, and here that of Modulation for that of such, and should be some three different types here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modulation

One thing is still making it that of a secret, for only the clandestine it could be, when that of military communications only for such.

For that, it becomes just an aspect of the whole thing, for still the secrecy it could be, for not any radio frequency or sampling it could be instead.

Could you make it still just a telephone call for that of a conversation, and next only the cheating it could be, for only a liar for such?

"Calling all stations", and next perhaps meant to be, except still only the end to end it could be, for that of sender versus recipient.

But here still the readily Proof we could make, for not any Certainty it should be either, and we could still end up only speculating.

Back later on, for still the regular business having to be done, for only the weekend just ahead.
ID: 2053047 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053056 - Posted: 2 Jul 2020, 15:57:08 UTC
Last modified: 2 Jul 2020, 16:32:04 UTC

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-53263310

Perhaps I rather should walk to the dentist, for still not using any car, because here being referred to from my national broadcaster.

Just a thief, and always the thief, for only codes being own, and next also possessed, for still the criminal activity for just carried out.

Here those numbers pretending to be RSA, still perhaps known only for such, for not any space activities it could be instead.

For that, not any "stupidity could kill the cat" for only just the rationale it should be, for just believing a couple of things.

So believe it or not, for still only a way to choose, and it could be the Scientific method here, when not any other alternative.

"To the point", and always knowing that, for the thing it still could be, and only meant to be.

Rather trust me instead, for only the feelings it could be for such, and next not any relying upon facts, for only the science it could be instead.

But always happy, for just the lucky you could be, and next also glad as well, for still only the witness you could be, for not any Proof for only a given measure.

Before even the shopping, just thinking that a presumption is the best we could get at, for not any expectation it should be instead.

Only initially, for just the beforehand it could be, and next also known in advance, for still the code it could be, when also a scheme for the same.

Crime is still about doing some business here on Earth, and for that also the police investigating such matters, for also solving it, when still not any mysteries.

For only still a choice, next that of select as well, for just the thing you could prefer, and here you could still rely on empty air for only such.

So for still only stupidity here, you also could make it "readily acceptance" for only a phenomenon still around, for which there is not always an explanation.

For that, "here I am still", for only presenting a couple of mysteries, except not any "dinner served", for only a code just known previously or beforehand.

Here still only stretching the limits, for only the far it could be, when also thinking for the same for only the result or outcome it still could be.

So, what is just in between, for still not any empty Set, for only the pure water it could be, for only distilled?

Make it some three circles, and next intersect each other for just a part, and next it becomes a section for only just crossing parts.

Only for that of still pure, it could also become purely for still that of water, for not any cleaning of the soul it should be instead.

Just a natural Consequence, for only a given ending, and here that of "ramification" also is with me, for that of a word.

We know that bird Phoenix could be still able to fly, for not any genesis or Creation it should be either, when only resurrection instead.

One thing is making it still Christian belief for only the Belief we still could be having, for not any nature it could be instead.

Only just a dime, for that of a dollar, and still crown and coin, for also heads or tails, and for that we could still flip around, for only different possibilities.

Here just the face against the wall, for not any mirror it should be, except only still in front of us, because just two faces could still make for only a 50/50 chance.

So, is any Probability based on fractions for only such when still that of Calculus, or could it be only infinitesimal instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraction

Yes, I know, for only an Idea popping up in my head, for only an Intuition for such, when still not any guessing, for only the Probability it should be.

Just one thing, for not any moment it should be either, and next we could prove for only the single thing it should be, for not any eventualities instead.

One thing is still make it only Proof for what we could be wishing to obtain, for not any bullet for just a trigger, ready to be pulled.

If I put one single bullet in a chamber, and next point it towards my head, there should not be any 50/50 chance of survival either.

For that, still only just happy and glad, for only a "happiness blacksmith" for such, for not any single thing we should rely on, for only an object for such.

Could a thing just tell, and it also could explain, for still not any mysteries of nature, for only a Contradiction for such.

Perhaps the Creation it still only became, were only meant for such, for not any implied instead, when still only the Laws of nature for just telling.

Just the flip of the coin it could be still, and next also a 50/50 chance of just proving something, for not any Fractional calculus it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_calculus

Only one thing for what it could represent, and next where it also could belong, for that of a context, for still that of part versus whole.

Here also checking for that of the options it could be, when only possibilities instead, for perhaps a slight difference of at least wording.

Perhaps it could be 1/3 or 1/9 for still only a Fraction, for that of 0.3333 or 0.9999 here, for not any flip of the coin it should be instead.

And here apologies for not making it any ghosts either, for only the provable Method it still should only be.

You better name it, for only the "this or that" it should be, for not any conspicous versus hidden nature, for only just revealing itself.

To my best knowledge, still only the spooky it could be, for only a ghost just behind a veil, for still the secrecy it also could be.

Perhaps an umbrella could be still needed, for only a bit of thunder and lightning, for not any catching you on a word either.

So here just "We built the city", for only a construction for such, when also Methods being used or employed, for still not any answer given.

Different ways of making, for only doing it, and also different formulas for the same, for still the thing it could meant to be.

So therefore, still not any eyes for such, for only trusting your feelings, when only an Equation instead, for that of the Creation it possibly was meant.

Perhaps I still could conclude, for only a definitive meaning for such, for not any alternatives it could be, for only options instead.

Only the better off, for that of meaning, and that of Infallibility here, for not any Sets either, when still only inconclusive, for not being able to conclude.

Here only the "zig-zag" it still could be for only a lightning strike, when not any flash either, for just the diagonal it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular

This word passing my way a couple of days ago, for a bit uncertain about precise syntax, except still only the 90 degree angle it could be.

But here not any twisted either, for only the distorted it could be for that of a fashion, for only a nature which could be told, and also explained.

Make it any Method only the "better" it should be, and next also appropriate for only where it could be used, because I could be still believing in a God,
for not any nature it could be instead.

Therefore, a hope could still be an expectancy for only what it could be meant, for not any flipping of a coin it could be instead, for only just a distorted fashion.

Only just a thing, for that of its single one, and next perhaps not any entity either, but only a Set, for still what it could represent.

I could be single-minded, for also blowing a horn when just needed, for not any thinking that just the Belief I could have, also should be the Proof I could make.

"To the end", and next also "till the end", if perhaps suitable, but next I could also rely on a couple of Facts, for only "depend on with full trust or confidence".

Is nature just provable for only the Method of Proof it still could be, or should it only be "trust your feelings", for only the chance it should be?

I know it could be still happening, for only an Event for such, for not any eventuality it should be either, for just around the corner.

Here describe it to me for only the property it should be for that of an object, and next I should not prove, for only the sentence it could be either.

So here rather a programming language instead, for making it "inside and out" for a couple of things, for only an object and its characteristics.

Only a property instead, and next the way it could behave for only intrinsic for such, and here not any passing of the vine either.

But if rather passing numerical values to a function, for that of further calculation, it could be still that of in versus out, for not any flip of the coin it should be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parameter

For not any "As good as it gets", still only the parameter that could be passed to a function, for not any Ten Commandments it could be instead.

Perhaps you do not see my point, but I could still be only flipping a coin for that of its two sides, for not any provable nature it could be instead.

Only see, and next also watch, for still the Event it could be, for not any obvious or evident Fact, when still not any Rhyme here.

Here any eventual or eventually for only the way it could be spelt, should not be any Event, for only the eventuality it still could be.

Just a funny name for that of Dan Rather, but rather I could prove for only a sentence, when still only meaning for such.

Make it only valid instead, for only the Conclusion it could be, and next also the Proof we still could make, for only a Fact for such, for not any eventuality
it could be instead, for only a notion of time.

"Bring me the shuttle", for next also carry on, but it could be also that of forward, for still only a saga continuing, for that of a tell-tale story.

Only just one thing for that of another, and next not any versus, for still just the add-on it could be, for that of a continuation, when perhaps only endless for such.

If nature was meant to be only two different things, only the flip of the coin it could be still for not any other alternative options instead.

Just perfect here, for only suitable, when still not any proper fashion either, for only the orderly it could be, when still only different properties of nature.

But just mix in, for that of a blend, and still a conglomerate only for such, when being that of Sets, for not any end of time it could be instead, for just a limbo.

Perhaps I could still travel through space, for not any time it should be either, but next that time could be still flipping back and forth, for only a cycle for such.

Are those different possibilities still the limits we could make, for not any borders or thresholds either, for only the constraints it could be instead?

Just reach for the Heavens, and perhaps not any stairs I could make it either, for only the Comprehension it could be, for only Certainty for such.

Just part versus whole once again, and we think that it should be just nothing, for also the everything it still could be, for only that of infinity.

But next subdividing, for only making it fractions for that of just parts, for still the objects it could be, when also that of Sets.

For that, it becomes still different things for only being included, for still the whole it could be meant, when just that of total for next being added.

The Earth could be still having two poles, but here not any negative versus positive, for only the magnet it could be instead.

So follow the leader for only the subordinate you could be when only rank for such, for not any superior or supreme it should be, for just the end.

An example could be still only a specimen, for just being picked up, for not any Charles Darwin it should be, for only a beach dragon for such.

Here unfortunately not having the correct name, so asking here for that of such, because here not any vampire either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vampire

Need to run for the shop, before getting too late in the day.
ID: 2053056 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile cRunchy
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 3555
Credit: 1,920,030
RAC: 3
United Kingdom
Message 2053057 - Posted: 2 Jul 2020, 18:55:19 UTC - in response to Message 2053056.  

...
Only just a dime, for that of a dollar, and still crown and coin, for also heads or tails, and for that we could still flip around, for only different possibilities.
...

Nice line Bluestar. Symmetry and motion.

...
Just the flip of the coin it could be still, and next also a 50/50 chance of just proving something, for not any Fractional calculus it could be instead.
...

They always say it is 50\50 chance but what if the coin falls on it's edge or disappears out of view down the rabbit hole :)

Which reminds me. Time to look down the back of the settee for lost treasure....
ID: 2053057 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053107 - Posted: 3 Jul 2020, 17:04:28 UTC - in response to Message 2053057.  
Last modified: 3 Jul 2020, 17:28:04 UTC

They always say it is 50\50 chance but what if the coin falls on it's edge or disappears out of view down the rabbit hole :)


Thank you for reminding me about that fact, cRunchy, because for any possibilities, there should also be eventualities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpolation

Here the closest I get at first hand, for still the one baking the bread, for the mixture or blend it could be, for not any upheaval either.

The Laws of nature could be still Chaos for that of meaning, for still the Turbulence and Viscocity it could be, when also that of part versus whole.

So, everything included for just the all it could be, and still Comprehension for only meaning for what we could still get or acquire, for rather more wishing.

Any purpose and mind, for only the Laws of physics instead, and perhaps not any missing link it should be either, for only such for Laws.

Perhaps a sin could be coming with a regret, for not any renunciation it could be instead, when that of purpose and mind, for not any physical Laws.

Here the provable subject could be still Derivation, for only a bit terse, but also that we could be proving both the fool and genius for a given sake.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derivation

But next give and take, and next come along for still only included for those things which it could be meant, and here nature for a given purpose.

But unlike an ocean of the Earth, the Universe could still be empty for only its vastness, for not any sea of life it should be.

Here we could still rely on the Method of Proof for only the purpose of detecting an intelligent signal, for still not any other context it could perhaps be.

For that, still only floating when not any diver, for still only the submerged it could be, when just below the surface.

Make it just you and me, for still that of Existence only for such, and next it could be nature for still its purpose and meaning, when also Consequence.

Only for that of diversity and manifold, we could still make it that of "Options galore", for only the different parts of the world it could be still.

So here making it interaction earlier on, for not any fusion it should be here either, for only the Ecology being part of the Earth.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic

But here you also know that it should be at least Floating-point arithmetic, for not any carried away I should be, for only just a travel being made.

Only show me the way, and it could be still intentions, for not any purposeful act instead, when still only nature for its possibilities.

Perhaps you still could embark, for only going aboard a ship, aircraft, or other vehicle, for not any wider horizons it could be instead.

So for just the "gut" it could be, when still only magnificence and splendor, that of making it nature with respect to something, is still a thing for only a thought.

Perhaps still only the way we could be looking at things, for still only meant, for not any other interpretation it could be instead.

Just thinking that any notion of time for just the travel it could be, should be related to that of life and death for only a subject, and perhaps no such thing.

Any "betterment" for what it still could be, and next only being for such, for still perhaps only meant or assumed for just a meaning.

Laws of nature could be still proven for only the Proof it could be still, for not anything it could represent, for only a given context.

Any ultimate, for still the final it could be, and next only a Conclusion for that of meaning, for still the Proof it could be, when also that of absolutes.

But here perhaps no betterment for only the Laws of physics it could be still, when only elementary particles for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justice

Justice could still be only about Laws, for that of rules it also could be, when only for the purpose of dealing with circumstances for only the people of Earth.

So here perhaps only that of Equations still, for only the connection it could be for still only different factors just for meaning.

Here perhaps an interval we could make it for only a line for such, if not any linear either, for still not any cyclic loop it could be instead.

But making it any Special relativity here, for only the laurels it could be still, and next I could only be relaxing, for not any watching of TV either.

Here the wise man could be still intelligent, for just clever, but next perhaps not any Special relativity here either, for still only the telling it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

If just the dreadful for not any fair, when still only an Event for such, next perhaps not any evil or sinister either, for just the way being meant.

Only two hands, for still five fingers on each hand, and it could become attributes for just meaning, for still the factors it also could be.

But next that Werner Heissenberg could still make it that of whole for only the thing it could be, and still only the wise man for just meaning.

So, follow you, follow me, for still the leader it could be, for only a succession for such, for not any endpoint it should be either.

Just complete, for that of completeness for such, and still the fulfilllment it could be, for perhaps not any perfect either, when still life and death for only meaning.

Only just meant, for also the interpreted it could be, and just thinking it could be only in such a way, for that of being explained.

For that, is a dead end street, for also the Cul de sac it could be, perhaps not any smile, for only arrows for such, when only the flipover it could be instead?

Remember here the quote I made, for only an answer to the moderator, for that of a previous posting.

Just taking it for granted, when still only intended, and perhaps not any Hypnosis it should be here either, for only the unproven Fact it still could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypnosis

But rather just forget it instead, and perhaps not any exclusion it could be either, for only removing it from the list, for that of its presence.

It could still be a possibiliity, and therefore also included, for still only the Fact or meaning it could be.

Only the end to end it could be still, and perhaps not any end answer for only the Conclusion we could make, for only the final meaning for such.

Here nature for only its wisdom, when also cleverness, for not any else or opposite it could be, for still that of included, for just being a whole.

And for that, still not any selling of cigarettes it should be, for only just around the corner, for only the religious alternative it could be instead.

So for only a thing it still could be, next also meant, for only the possibilities it could be, for not any emergency exit or escape it could be instead.

Is any infinity we could make, that of an exit or escape for only such, when perhaps only virtual reality, for not any different world it could be instead?

Any whole, for only the single whole it could be, and still only infinity for such, for not any past or beyond either.

Just the "devilish" it could be, and next only the Devil for that of meaning, for also both sins and renunciations, for not any Revelation it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soul

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revelation

Maybe the scream for only just being heard, for also the anguish it could be, for still not any forsake, for just being left abandoned.

So here perhaps a renunciation for only the forgiveness you could get or receive, for only weakness, difference or complacency for such, when not any denial.

Here not any compassion either, but just that of "forsake" for just a word, makes me think a bit different, because here not any "leave it alone" for only
the abandoned it could be, for not any turning of the stone either.

We know it could be still a sin for just being carried out, and next you could get remorse for only the absolution it could be still, for not any forsake instead.

Run wild, for only becoming lost, and next you could get bewildered for only such, for still not any soul or Saints it could be.

Here one thing could be still the natural aspect, for only Cause for such, while the other could be the more philosophical meaning, for that of religious.

But for only just explaining, for still only explainable for such, we could choose to make it only science, for not any other thing it could be instead.

And for still not any moniker or Allegory it could be, for just on the behalf it could be, and next only God being an excuse for only nature instead.

Here tears still in the wind, for only wiping for such, for not any dry it could end up instead, when still not any vine.

But also making it that of "attributable" earlier on, for perhaps not any Moral it could be, for still only the forsaking I could give.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral

Only that of death instead, for just such a thing, and it also becomes that of emptiness as well, for only the given sense it could be still.

Now I will have the rest of the beer, for not any perfect it should be here either.
ID: 2053107 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053108 - Posted: 3 Jul 2020, 18:39:54 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jul 2020, 18:53:58 UTC

Anyway, I just gave it a try for that of the end of the previous, for still only the lost you could be, for also the endless road.

But next sorrow and pain for still only felt, when also despair, for also the anguish it could be, for only a cry in the night for such.

Only lost, and it could be still that of emptiness, for only the void it could be.

So next think a little instead, for not any excuse it should be, for only nature being adapted to circumstances, for only the Events it still could be.

For that, only a dot (".") when still only the end of a sentence, for not any final chapter it could be instead, for that of both past and present.

Here the single answer you could get, also should be a Conclusion for such, when also single meaning as well, for not any mix or blend instead.

Make it rather a conglomerate instead, for still only the mixture it could be, and next the proven Equation for still only Laws of Chaos for such.

For that, next only as follows, for still only the answer you could get at, for not any stairs you rather could climb.

Any results analysis, for still the different factors it could be, and next only the end result for the answer we could be wishing for.

So here just the travel it could be instead, and for that, varying directions for just where it should go, for still not any single eye, for just relative for such.

Here just two eyes could make my sight three-dimensional of sorts, in that I could be seeing one thing with just one eye, but not the other.

So rather leave it on the spot where you could perhaps be, and next only a point in space, for not any travel in different directions either.

A line could perhaps be synonynous with a curve, for only the gravity it could be still, for not any geometrical shape it should be either.

But only just point to point, for still only travel, and next not any arrows you could make it, when still only a straight line.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_units

Here not any Planck constant, for perhaps not any Avogadro it should be either, but only points, for not any dash or hyphens it could be instead.

The shortest way of travel should be still only the straight line, for not any curve it could be instead, for both that of vertical and horizontal.

But here making it Perpendicular earlier on, for still only the 90 degree or straight angle for such, for perhaps not any axis it should be here either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perpendicular

Please have me excused, for only the dismiss or dismissal it could be, for only the WOW signal it could be here, and next choosing to dismiss.

All I could say, is that for still only the magnificence and splendor it could be, also possibilities as well, for not any joy or happiness either.

The night could be still dark for only its beauty, when still not any "weird" for only its magnificence either.

Only a dreamer for perhaps the wish I only could make, and next not any lost, for only the perdition or damnation it could be instead.

So here an endpoint could be still only a limbo for such, when not any end of time it should be, for only a given past, present, or future.

Just included, and next also part for still what it could be, for not any final or ultimate it could be instead, and here the mentioned interval.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval

So could you make it time any fragmented for only the part it could be, or could it still be only its smallest part, for only infinitesimal for such?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subdivision

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subset

For the first one, perhaps getting it a bit wrong, for only that of Subsets it should be instead.

In my native language, we could be having the wording "getting warmer", for rather "the torch burns", when still only the answer getting nearer at.

So here not any individual for only eventual either, when still only with respect to or with, for only forgetting the word, for still not any comparison it could be,
and therefore not any closer at hand it should be, for only a subject.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Approximation

But if science could be hitting a wall for only what it could explain, and next also reaching for a target, for what it still could only be able to tell.

Only just knowing, for that of a couple of Facts, and I could also ascertain, for only the Certainty it could be still.

Run smooth, for also even, and you could also calibrate, for only the measuring or measurement it could be, when still only that of distance.

But just keep it, for not any shut either, and only close to your mouth, for perhaps only a secret, for still not any nature for only telling about its realities.

Perhaps I rather could proclaim instead, for not any state, for only the Event it could be still, for also the one being predicted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proclamation

Here only hold my hand, for that of a fast or tight grip, and we could be still in it together, for only the eventuality it could be.

So here point at me, for not any nose thieves it should be either, when only a science just for meaning, when we are able to conclude.

Perhaps we could still exclude, for not any valid meaning or sentence it could be, when still concluding for science, for only the result it could be.

Just enough said right now, and I should better keep my mouth shut.
ID: 2053108 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053112 - Posted: 3 Jul 2020, 19:53:22 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jul 2020, 20:08:49 UTC

So just think a dime could be still rolling, for only end on for such.

Here perhaps not any "miraculous" for only the Miracle you could make it, when still not any Ad Hoc instead.

Only just synonymous for that of a word, and next also what it could represent, for still not any moniker or Allegory being only a substitute.

Yes, I know for only the three Laws of Newton for only written, perhaps not any substitute either, for only just nature telling, except not any fingertips.

Perhaps only a final chapter for only the moment it could represent, and still only just "be" for that of being.

So what is next, is perhaps also as follows, for not any previous it should be, for also excluded as well.

Just "gimme" instead, and next take me on my word only because it could be true, for only the Truth it should be, when not any telling.

But only "hocus-pocus", for still only "this or that", and next we could make it only an Uncertainty, for still not any thing we could conclude.

Is nature still dubious for only meaning, when also spurious, or could it be only vice versa, for that of being separate?

Each for only one when also separate, when also the different parts it could be, just for meaning.

Only so happy I could be, when proving for a given sentence, for also the choice it could be, when still only differences for that of meaning.

Make it any provable Facts for only the Uncertainty principle, and the same should also go for that of Contradictions and Ambiguity,
for only a will or ability to conclude.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle

Except here it also reminds me of Chaos as well, for still only the Laws we could make for such a thing.

So, just enough said, and it could perhaps be only a word or wording for such, for not any reliable or trustworthy it should be instead.

Just evident, for also the conclusive it could be, and next we could prove a sentence, for also the Equation it could be, for still not any Laws of nature.

Only pass the vine, for still only the Credibiity it should be, and next also Credible evidence as well, for still that of trustworthy.

So here, if not mentioned before, you choose to use or employ nature for only its "giving", when still only the thing you could produce.

Only satisfaction, and next satisfactorily for only a meaning, for still not the thing we could include or exclude.

For that, only an accrue, for that of the aforesaid, when still not any applause.

But only just "enough said", for still only misunderstanding, for not any straight on it should be, for only on the spot.

So make it any Truth for only the forgiveness you could make, and next not any beg you should make either.

Only here, and next also there, for still only the being I could be, for only my presence, for also the spot it could be, for just a place.

So here perhaps only "self" for such, when not any biased either, for still the heaven it could be, for only architecture for such.

Make it any confidence, and perhaps not any confidentiality either, for still only the space flier, for just the warping of space it could be.

A dam could still burst, for only reaching capacity, but here not any breach of confidentiality either, for only lack of trust.

Perhaps only skating together, for only "jiffy" for such, when still not any at once, for only the eventuality it could be.

For that, only the virtual world it could end up to be still, for not any relative it should be either.

Only take the blade by mouth, and perhaps not any keeping shut either, for only just words for such, when not any relevance it could be instead.

Trust the Laws of nature for only that of Kepler and Newton for such, and next also Einstein, for perhaps not any telling it could be, when only nature for its Certainty.

But here only "this or that" still, for not any eventualities instead, for only the different it should be, when also parts.

Here I find myself looking for just the answer it could be, when not any Certainty it should be either, for only time for that of a subject, for not any "output" it should be.

Just tell me instead, and next only different things for that of meaning, which still could need a separate Conclusion for only getting at.

So here just specify, for still not any telling it should be, for only a meaning.

"What is your bidding, my master", and next only the single output for that of the Conclusion it could be, for still only a varying nature, for that of its different parts.

Only just good for that of a sense, and next also feeling for such, when not any "affirmative" it should be either.

So is just the "self" you could make it, only that of own, for just part, or could it be that of confidence for only what nature could represent?

Only just bid, for the auction it could be, and next not any self-confidence for only the "better" it should be, when also that of order for just nature.

Rather perfect instead, for that of completeness, because you could be looking at yourself in the mirror, for only how good you could be.

Only slap my hand, for still not any mirror it could be, for only infinity instead, and next trust my word, for only the meaning it should be.

Maybe just "whatif" instead, for only a sentence, and I could still prove a couple of things, for not any idiot I could be.

For that, only "when Harry met Sally", for still not any "next", for still only the scientific debate we could make it, for just only "believing".

Oops, but for not any skirmish it could be either, next only a debate it could be still, for not any scientific Conclusion we only could make.

This for only nature with respect with itself, for still what it could mean, and next also trustworthy as well.
ID: 2053112 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053114 - Posted: 3 Jul 2020, 20:54:28 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jul 2020, 21:05:42 UTC

So a little sag right now, for only a couple of beers.

Just my thought, for that of my intention, namely that of Dualism, for only the will of God it could be stil, for only directing and also showing.

We could still make it provable Facts, for only a couple of meanings, for still not any certain Fact it could be instead.

Quantize for nature, and still the objects it could be, for also Sets, when still not any fantasizing.

Perhaps only the fingertips it could be still, for not any lick, for only a surrogate mother for such.

Only "here I am" and next also "to be or not to be", for still only a meaning for such.

Maybe rather just a presentation for that of a show it could be instead, and next also tantalizing, for still only the worth it could be.

Feeling good, and next also feeling better, for also the alright it could be, for still not any "betterment", for only the other civilization it could be.

Just different, and next also varying, for still only the option it could be, for not any possibility instead.

Prove it to be better, and still perhaps worth for that of value, for still not any meaning it could be.

We already know that it could be just "enough said", for not any likelihood it should be instead.

Maybe you were just wrong already from the start, for still not any guess or assumption you could make it.

So, draw a Conclusion for not any "till the end" it could be instead, and next only make it such for the thing it still could be.

Only just such a thing, for only the Certainty it could be, and next not any infallibility it should be either, for only nature for such.

More simple, just the culprit it could be, for not any Truth it should be instead, when also Causality.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Here it also reminds me that I still could leave, for only left, when still not any Charles Darwin, for only his points of view.

Only just an egg for that of bacon, and still not any milk for that of a recipe, when only just blending in, for only the confusion it could be instead.

So, is it true for the "Yes" we could make, for also false being "No" for just an answer?

Only a mix for that of a mixture, and next also the recipe it could be, for just everything mixed together, for only the conglomerate it should be.

I could still trust for only the Truth it should be, for not any denial it should be, for only mistrust, when only falsehood or Lies instead.

Only switch it, for that of a fuse, and it could be that of Falsification instead, for still a Lie, for still not any reliable or trustworthy it could be instead.

So, whatif, for still only a point for such, when not any meaning either, when still only time for that of its meaning.

Could you perhaps "exclude" it, for not any valid, or could it be still a sentence here, for only being phrased or explained?

Make it just Laws for that of decide, and next also conclude as well, for still that of a meaning.

Here not any checking, for only the Logical fallacy it could still be, for only meant or emphasized, when also described.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_fallacy

Take it to the fullest, and next meaning for such, when we are able to conclude.

Here 2+3=5, for still not any 2+4=7, and next true=false, for only the "Hallelujah" or celebration it could be still, for not any Conclusion either.

Only just prefer, and next also select, for still only a given Method of choice, for that of selecting.

And for that, only nature for its Consequence, when still that of meaning, for also what we could be able to conclude, or prove.

But here I am, for still only a viewpoint for such, when also place, for also the position it could be, for not any "giving" either.

Trust me for only that of words, and next that of infallibility only for such, for still only the Truth we could make, for only Certainty for such.

The other alternative, for just answer, should not be any correct, and next only thrown in the sand, for only its untruth or falsehood.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deception

Any liar here, and perhaps only me for the camouflage it could be, for still not any deception for just nature instead.
ID: 2053114 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053121 - Posted: 3 Jul 2020, 21:39:32 UTC
Last modified: 3 Jul 2020, 21:50:58 UTC

Iota --> Nada.

Next not worth mentioning, for only the nonsense or meaningless it could be.

Anyway, so a grip for just the handle, could be a steering wheel, for only just a car being driven?

To the fullest instead, and it becomes the thing we could comprehend, for only acknowledge, when still only Facts for that of nature.

Push and next pull, and next a grip on a couple of things, for not any handle instead, for still only the thing we could comprehend.

That is only the fullest, for the next we could make of meaning, for still only the choice we could make, when also option for such.

How long are your arms, and could you still stretch it to the limits, for only the hand in hand it still could be?

Always the knees you could be having, for not any holding, and next also a poisture for such, inckuding that of knee bend.

Row your boat, for still only sailing, because here knowing it could be a little wrong, for only just wording, if not any part of it either.

Maybe just profound instead, for only the Certainty I could gain or acquire, for perhaps not any expecting either.

Here perhaps only spelling it wrong, for still only Certainty meant to be instead.

But only with respect to or with, and for that a nature you could acknowledge for also recognize, for still the Certainty it could be meant, or just be all about.

Only a label, and perhaps not any substitute either, for only an extreme it could be instead, for also that of absolutes.

Here just a laugh for such a thing, when not any ridicule either, for still only nature adapting to circumstances, for only a Consequence for such.

Not any cheap, for just expensive, and it could be coming with a price, for still what it could be worth.

Give me a look, and next I could be looking good, for not any God on a pedestal insteead, for only a given Method of choice, for also a selection as well.

Only just "tantamount", and next also a free will to choose, for also the decide it could be, when still not any Conclusion it could be instead.

Sorry about that, for just being far away, because any evidently should not be a thing we could make or come up with, for only Proof for such.

Maybe just arbitrary instead, and still not any produce or manufacture it should be here instead.

Only "Susan seeking", for only the random it could be, and next we also could conclude for only a sentence.

I better report the factors I could have, because here not any hairdressing, for just the manicure it could be.
ID: 2053121 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053173 - Posted: 4 Jul 2020, 22:58:58 UTC
Last modified: 4 Jul 2020, 23:07:58 UTC

@moomin

You know we are having both Celsisus, Fahrenheit and Kelvin for that of measuring temperature, and here not any uniform standard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_corona

But to my surprise, still the very high temperature existing above the surface of the sun, for not any coronavirus it could be still.

Make it any green, for also yellow, and not any pink either, for still the colors of the sun for only shining, when perhaps also the reflecting atmosphere.

Ask an astronaut, for perhaps telling instead, and he will tell you that the sun could be just white, for still not any yellow instead.

So here hesitating a bit for making it the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram, because here still only about colors for that of making.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertzsprung%E2%80%93Russell_diagram

One thing is making it cheating for only the Lie or falsehood it could be, when still not any Objectivity for just an answer.

So here wondering if a star like Rigel could also be having such a corona, for next the temperature it could be.

If you rather make it SETI@home-MapView instead, there are options under the Data menu, for that of WU move, and here the four different parameters.

The results analysis only going on, for still that of diminishing return, could take years to complete, for still the unsuccessful or fruitless it could be.

Just grab my hand, for still not any handle, and the world could be filled with only eventualities, for just the diversity making up it.

And for that, only just stuck on words, for only the different it should be, when still not any grasping for air.

Just part of it, and next it belongs, for still the connection or relationship it could be, for that of different things.

Better make it a set preference once again, for only a way to choose, and for that, also one thing next to another.

I am perhaps not any layman, but for some of the results, it could be radar echoes being thrown off or reflected, for that of asteroids orbiting the sun.

Could we rather assume it to be UFOs for still only the phenomenon it is, and next not any Consensus, for only a handshake for such.

Any debate could still be among believers and skeptics only for such, when also debunkers, for not any valuing of nature it could be instead.

You already know that I chose to follow my own line for only the direction it could be, for still not any believer, for only the science it could be.

For that, you always could tell a difference between a Lie and Truth for still only the Truth it could be, for not any Falsification it could be instead.

Prove nature for only a meaning, and next Certainty only for such, when still only a way of or means to conclude.

And for still not any Method, perhaps not any "humbug" we could make it, for still only a way to conclude a couple of things.

But as I said or mentioned, still rely on things for what they are, and not what they could be.

Make it only the credible witness for only the observation it could be, and next not any Fallacies we could make it, for just the Lie it still could be.

And for just relying on Facts, for still the phenomenon it could be, and next also Proof for only what we could be seeking.

Either I could just believe that nature could be still only casual for that of meaning, and next that of Chaos only for such.

But here perhaps not any Hypothesis we could make for only the Kardashev scale either.

If aliens could be using more advanced technologies than we could have, stiil a possibility, for only a need to stiil prove for that of such.

Perhaps it should not be any set preference here, but only "that's it", for only a nature in the making, for still its properties.

I could still prove a thing to be not true, for not any true it should be instead, but rather switch, for just the opposite, still only a Fallacy.

So here only a "trip-trap" for such, when still only the Proof we could make, for not any different parts instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

Here I could be only standing on my own platform, for still not any vice versa or etcetera, for only the opposite it still could be.

And for that still only knowing that the inconclusives it could be for that of results, could be only the more we could be wishing for.

Here I am able to see that nature could be still infallible, for not any Conclusion we could make, when still only science for such.

But for all I could know, this is still a project in the making, for only what it could produce and also deliver, for still the result it could be.

And for that, still questioning that of believability, for only the Method of Proof it could be instead.

So spell it practice. for not any practise, and still only Objectivity, for not any Premise it could be instead.

Make it rather a coin, for that of upright or edgewise, and still not any spinning around, for a dreidel for such, when still only using your hand.

Only just common, for that of the natural it could be, and still part for only such, when also that of meaning.

The single-minded you could be, could also bring results for that of meaning, for not any eventuality it could be instead.

Only the two legs you could have for jumping a stream, and perhaps not any cast either, for only the single foot it still could be.

Doing so, you could be crouched for that of sitting, when still your feet held together for only in close touch.

So, here only elementary Dear Watson for the answer we still could make, for only the Conclusion it also could be.

If I could be making a choice between three different elevators for that of standing in the hall, I still could get at the top, for just a single one.

And for that, the answer I could make, when still a Conclusion for only such, becoming that of alternatives here, for still not any rudimentary instead.

Still only the true it could be for that of an answer, when not any false, but for only nature, it could be still only a Contradiction instead.

But rather make it just conclusive instead, for that of the Conclusive evidence it could be, when still only proving.
ID: 2053173 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053210 - Posted: 5 Jul 2020, 18:08:49 UTC
Last modified: 5 Jul 2020, 18:11:53 UTC

And here my main computer apparently took a dive for not any starting up, so here perhaps the cup of coffee first,
and next I could be unpacking the other set, for that of details already mentioned.

The little trouble here, for just a sense of discomfort, if not fear, is the cooling paste, which I do not like.

Perhaps it should be one tube for such going against the motherboard meant to be used for, but here everything is unpacked.

Here it should be a motherboard, processor, two 16 GB memory cards, and also the separate Noctua fan, still in its box.

Also I could be trying out with the other power supply, which is a pretty big one here, for that of 1500 W.

I mentioned here that the details for just specification, makes for some delicious components here, but that it could just go wrong.

If doing this, it becomes the bedroom here, for that of sitting on the floor, because troubleshooting the current one, became unsuccessful.
ID: 2053210 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053215 - Posted: 6 Jul 2020, 1:01:13 UTC
Last modified: 6 Jul 2020, 1:26:30 UTC

https://music.youtube.com/watch?v=imtPF2b2Q4M&list=RDAMVMimtPF2b2Q4M

And it became only a bit of bad wording in the previous, for outside and emptying the thrash, getting cold.

If I happened to make it the dreidel in the previous, also that you could be having the pirhouette, for still not any Rhyme.

Making it to the pole for only Roald Amundsen for such, and still not any sauna for only the better it could be, when also warmer.

I still could need the key for just the car still not having, for also the start it could be, when not any temperament.

So here not any "bottoms up" for just the drink you could make it, for only nature coming out of a hotbed, for only a sea of lava for such.

But here that better could also mean that of more, for still not any "betterment", for still only nature for a given make or produce.

We still could be making it the alien subject, for not any alone we could be, for still only our presence, when also the Earth.

But for that, only the Credibility it could be, for just the sake of science, for still not any huge amounts it could be instead.

Perhaps it could exist those entities, for still living beings, for still perhaps not among us, for only blending in for that of a mix,
for also those level of Conscience it also could be, for that of being present.

Humans are still not any sacred for that of meaning, for still only nature for its composition and relationship,
but again that it could be still only gods and angels for the other alternative it could be.

Always the measure for that of making it given worth and value, for still what it could be meant, for still not any Credo instead.

Regardless of infinitesimal for just small, when also the very big and large for the assembly it could be still, only nature for an understanding.

We still could make it the Kardashev scale for only the theoretical or hypothetical it could be, for still not any nature for a given measure.

But only press the button for the tantamount or stupendous it could be, and still only nature for a meaning, when next also worth.

And yes, for perhaps only knowing that, for still not any handshake it could be instead, for only aliens for that of meaning,
for also the intelligent civilization it could be.

But only explaining nature by means of words for such, and we could rely on Laws instead, for also the Equation it could be,
for still only telling about relevant Facts just for meaning.

So for still only the minuscule it could be, for also mediocre, we could still be setting sail at times for only learning about the unknown,
for still the gatherering of information it could be, when also sampling.

But just get to it, for still only the stamp collector it could be, and here perhaps not any acquiring it should be, for still only gaining for such.

Perhaps it could be still the wise man, for only meaning, when still not any nature for just telling, for only just splendor instead.

Just limits of knowledge, and next also such a thing for the Comprehension it could be, when still only nature in front of us.

I better should open up the mentioned box right now, for getting the other computer assembled, and perhaps into a cabinet.
ID: 2053215 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053218 - Posted: 6 Jul 2020, 1:50:40 UTC
Last modified: 6 Jul 2020, 2:01:59 UTC

The previous one perhaps not any bad, so following up with some more.

You could still make it Causality here, for not any reason it should still be either, for only the other context it still could be.

But only for that of emphasize, still a couple of hyphens needed, for not any word in just bold.

Just the plus and minus it could be, for still only a flip around, and still not any fantastic or marvelous, for only the mediocre it could be insteead.

Only add to it that of tantalizing for just a word, and still only a measure for that of given worth, when only objects for that of their presence.

I guess we still could press the button for only the limits or extremes we could make, for just the limbo it could be, for still not any past or beyond.

Here nature could be still set or implied for just meaning, for still not any Reason it should be instead, for only that of believing.

Just the Credo it could be, and next also Faith or Belief for the same, when it only could be just reality instead, for only given meaning.

So what did the old man say, if perhaps still a priest, for not any wise man it could be instead, for only interpreting nature in such a way?

Just the premeditated it could be, for only a Perception, and perhaps not speaking on behalf of God, when only doing such a thing.

We already could make it both Matter Creation and Creation myth for only a given purpose, for still not any third man,
for only Faceless coward, or noname, when only travel through space instead.

Make it only Certainty for perhaps only what it could be meant, and still not any Credo it should be, for only traveling through time and space.

Only to the fullest it could be, and next also fulfilled as well, for still not any wish it could be instead, for only just profound.

But here still not any Magical mystery tour for only making it when still only sitting here, for only the alien question being of meaning,
for not any Revelation it should be instead.

Only just the wonders of nature it could be instead, and still only a Miracle for such, for not any realities it rather should be,
for only that of pressing a button.

We still could only make it a Credible witness for also the observation it could be, and for still the lacking Truth it could be,
here not any Revelation it should be instead.

Here forgetting the other word it could be, for still only a guess for that of perhaps two different things here,
but for only the pressing of the button it could be still, also that of nature for a Consequence, when still that of meaning.

For only the incomplete it could be still, here only the small versus large it could be still, for not any endless road instead.

But also that I made it forsaking earlier on, for still only the renunciation it could be, for perhaps not any loss either,
except not any speculate for making it perdition or damnation, for only Religion still.

Only the misconception for that of trust, and next not any feelings it should be either, for only a Force for such,
when still only that of divinity it could be here, for not any scientific Proof instead.

Make it only a cubit here instead, and perhaps it could be interpreted for what I could say, for still only comprehended.

The way we could know a couple of things, could be still a scientific interpretation, for only knowledge for such,
when still only what you could expect, for that of meaning.

But only the other option, for still an alternative for such, we could still make it Credo here, for only the Proof it could only be.
ID: 2053218 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053237 - Posted: 6 Jul 2020, 13:31:41 UTC
Last modified: 6 Jul 2020, 14:00:08 UTC

And continuing here just before 2 PM, because yesterday became too late at night.

Again a cold start here, for that of the cup of coffee, but I could carry the Noctua fan into the bedroom first.

Here I was hoping that unplugging the existing system a little more for that of components, could bring it back to life,
but also here the way it should be done.

Perhaps I should have made it a nose dive instead, because it really became the brand of the processor chosen here,
for just the model it still could be.

Here that of those stuck hands you know, for that of Arthritis or the like, while the brain still needs some coffee first.

But only for so it goes, and it could be still only the scientific approach for also the incentive it could be, when still only way for such.

And for that, still carry on with business as usual, for not any envy it should be, for only having the best components at hand.

Again that I am not into any Consensus for only making for such, for still only the sad day it could be, for not any magnificent.

Those words which should not belong, only should be left out, for still not any way to produce or come up with, for only that of Proof.

So for only the carry out it could be, when still only involve, it should not be the answer for where it could be only such Proof.

Only "that's it", for that of a readily answer, and next also explained for the "Eureka" it could be, when also such a Fact.

But only learn me to speak instead, for stil only the scientific Proof it could be, and next also readily at hand, for only in front of you.

As an example, a teacher for also a lecturer could still lecture for only the teaching it could be, for not any tenet or doctrine instead.

But only as I said, and still only for meaning, and next only so for being meant, when still only with the first cup of coffee.

Any excuse it could be, and next only for that of science it could be, when still only produce for such, for that of result it could be.

The world could be still spinning around for only what it could be meant, for still not any Proclamation it could be instead.

Only sinners versus losers, and still only losing out, for that of the notion of time it perhaps could be, when not any Belief instead.

But only Susan seeking, for still the handshake it could be, and next also the readily Proof we could make, for not any nature instead.

So for that, dismiss the Proof you still could make, for only that of the Kardashev scale here, when still that of levels of Conscience.

Here the wrist on your arm could still be that of craftmanship for only just made, when that of electronic, for not any manual parts.

So for that, still not any delicious food for only just eating, for only such a thing for that of nature, for still only constructed or made of.

The pencil could be still used for that of writing, but for only the clock, it could be still the pendulum, for only the "tick-tack" it could be.

So for only that of curiosity instead, only a nose for such, for still not any swinging it could be, when only a pendulum instead.

Any Proof it still could be, and next only Susan seeking for the search we only could make, for only just investigating or perhaps looking.

We know that for only the sifting it could be, also a billion results for that of being analyzed, for still not any single Proof.

And for that, not any popping in my head it should be for only coming up, when still only waiting for the answer just in the crowd.

So here just, for not any unjust, for only the Consensus it could be, for not any Uncertainty it could be instead, for only the
valid versus invalid, when still only nature for that of meaning.

But only for "the show must still go on", next only carry on for such, when still that of produce for only make, for still only the result it could be.

Here I could just "believe" it could be a couple of Type II civilizations only for meaning, when still only a scale for such.

So trust the witness, for still the credible he could be, and next also a valid sentence, for not any believability instead.

Only look up into the sky, for that of just the phenomenon it still could be, and next still only such a thing, for that of only science.

But here not any with respect to or with, for only the definitive it should be, when still only the early part of the day,
for not any better moment instead, because here only success for that of fulfillment.

So only for "wish I could be still there", not any Terminology it should be here either, for only one amongst others, for still only one in the crowd.

Just belong, for still only part, and next not any membership it could be, for only joining the club, for still not any throne it could be.

Here only the readily assumption I could make, for only knowledge for such, when still that of nature in front of me, for its spectacle.

But only just the reality it could be, not any virtual instead, for still only the world, for not any superb or superior it could be instead.

Only prove nature for the sad it could be, when also splendid, and only Facts for such for not any splendor or magnificence instead.

But still only the one billion results it could be, for that of sifting through, and the other alternative could be that of
Comprehension for just meaning, when still only the scientific alternative.

So any ready at hand, for only readily for such, and next also the Objectivity it could be, when still only the scientific Proof it could be.

Only for that of an Equation, and still only a smile, for not any Equivalence it could be instead, when only the single thing it could be,
for only the Proof we could be seeking.

But only for the eyes it still could be, and next also nature in front of me, for the seeking it could still could be, when also proving.

But only for the dismiss or dismissal it could be, when still not any readily Proof, and here perhaps a difference for that of opinion,
when still only nature for such a thing, for that it could be explained.

Just continue, for still going on, and the readily acceptance it could be, when only knowledge for such, could be only that of
the stupid versus genius, for still not any fool it could be, for only an observation instead.

Just hand in hand, for still the witness you could be, and next observation for such, for still the valid Proof it could be, for only just credible.

But here only making it Certainty earlier on, for also the Truth it could be, for still not any readily acceptance instead.

If a thing could still be valid, for not any invalid instead, it could just run aground, for only the dead end street it could be, for also Cul de Sac.

Here I could always dismiss a Fact for only the thing it could be, for still not any Proof I could make for only the answer it could be.

So here perhaps ending up wrong, for only the credible witness it still could be, for only becoming that of possibilities instead,
for still only nature in front of us, for only being explained.

But here only widening your horizons for only the Perspective it could be still, for only that of nature for its magnificence and splendor.

But only just writing it wrong, for only the dismissal it could be, for not any readily acceptance instead, when still only Facts.

So for only the minuscule and mediocre it could be still, not any bittersweet, for just the better it could be instead, for only nature for such.

Here still perhaps a welcome, for only the open hands it could be, for that of nature for only its meaning, when that of Comprehension for such.

But for still only confused, and next also bewildered as well, for still not any dismiss it could be, for only the scientific Proof instead.

Here I could still prove only aliens for that of the betterment it could be, for not any readily Facts it could be, when only nature instead.

Dig deep, and next also deeper, for only the understanding it could be, for perhaps not any different instead, for that of the meaning of nature.

We know that science could still be one option for only just a thing being carried out, when that of Religion the other alternative.

But next for only the pressing of the button it could be still, and next also betterment for the same, when still only that of precious nature.

Any philosophical debate it could be, and next not in front of me, for still only the laptop, for only that of religuous for such, when that of a priest.

So here not any swirling around, for only just a stream, for not any levels of Intelligence of Conscience it could be instead.

So relax, for only a dab off, because we know where it could go wrong, for still only the debate it could be.

Here only that of profound, when still only digging, for that of the result it could be, when also knowing for just Fact.

Only just believe me on my word, for only the sentence it could be, and next also readily acceptance for only the phenomenon it could be.

But again we should know that we could only make it science, for that of the Comprehension it still only could be.

Here still that of the small versus large for only meaning, when that of microscopic versus macroscopic, for not any leveling instead.

Infinity should still not be any barrier or limit for only the threshold it could be, or we could make, for only that of levels instead.

Just inside and out, for only a circle for such, and still only a Circumference it could be when only inside, for not any outside instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumference

For that, only a step you could make for only just walking, for not any sidestep or overstep instead.

Just pass the vine, for only the past it could be, and next also beyond, for only the out of bounds it could be, for only Comprehension for such.

That of Energy should still be only the driving Force of nature for only what we could make it, for also that of total versus sum,
for still only the Susan seeking it could be instead, for that of making it readily Proof.

But for only that of energy production or consumption it could be, next only a handshake instead, for still only the Proof we could make.

So believe it or not, for only nature for its making, when that of magnificence and splendor, for only the handshake it could be instead.

Left only to choose, and I could still only believe here, for not any Proof it should be, when only nature for that of given purpose.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

But next only to the end, for also till the end it could be, for only the hammer it could be, for not any stretching of limits instead.

Here it reminds me that it could be still the surface of the ocean, for only the above or below it could be, for not any past or beyond.

Only bow your hat for only the limit it could be, and next also stretch out your hands for only the Comprehension it could be.

And for that, not any speechless either, for only a nature still only set for that of meaning, when also implied.

Make it any absolutes, for not any fulfillment it could be instead, and next only given knowledge for that of nature, for still only meant to be.

And here for only just the value and worth it could be for still only meaning, for not any less or more it could be instead.

Yours truthfully perhaps, and next also gentle, for not any evil or sinister world instead, for only the Comprehension it still could only be.

Here I could prove both the minuscule and large for that of meaning, when still only separate, for not any divine it should be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divinity

Here still only the Tinnitus it could be, for only just in bed, for not any reasoning it should be instead, for only making it divine Facts.

Still only the Oath of allegiance here, for not any Faith it should be, when still only the waiter, for only that of science instead.

Could you make it any Creation myth for that of a meaning, and next also scientific Proof for just the Fact it could be?

Or should it rather be that of Stairways to Heaven, for only the Comprehension it could be, for not any Conscience instead?

Call the waiter instead, for next only what I meant to say just above, because here not any Divide and Conquer either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_conquer

But only for the absolutes it could be still, and next you could be knowing, for only the science it still could only be.
ID: 2053237 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053481 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 3:45:41 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 3:51:41 UTC

I may have asked the same question here, for that of incurring costs, for also money being spent, for that of an investment being made, and still only hibernation.

Dreams could live on forever, for also the personality it could be, when also that of human mind, for only just being, when still only around.

Here both that of Arthritis, if not anything else, for also my teeth is hurting me, for that of a long session, for only getting asleep.

Yesterday here, before going to bed, was that beautiful moment, for being no wind, and also thin bands of light cloud, for that of both violet and orange in color.

I also chose to connect my cable TV for that of being disconnected, and here in my living room, and had to replace the hard end connectors, for that of a switch.

The first one goes to the Internet modem in my leisure or working room, which is not the living room, because of a rebuilt sleeping room for just originally meant.

But next having the extra line being installed as you already know, without any splitter, and going the whole way through the living room, and next through a wall.

So turning up the window for that of entering today, and it was quite hot in here, for that of the running computer.

It also reminds me that the breakeven it still could be, next only for science for such, in a way we could be thinking, for still only the Scientific method.

Just be happy for only the Method of Proof it could be still, for not any glass in your hand, and next results could still only count, for that of qualifying for such.

So here the end result it still could be, for also analysis for such, when still the Conclusion being needed, for only meant.

This is supposed to be my contribution here, for only that of participating, when still a project for that of meaning, for only detecting intelligent life in space.

Perhaps still not any heavyweight for only light instead, when perhaps a champion, for not any inconclusive or ambiguous it could be instead.

One step forward, and it could also be one step backward, for only what it just could be, when still not any meant, for also implied for such.

We know that the subject of Derivation could be still only terse for that of meaning, for not any trusting the idiot or even genius instead.

Leaving a stone untouched, for only the hard it still could be, and next also a lesson being told, when still nature in front of us, for both the hammer and feather.

Perhaps it could be still only a singularity for only just meant, for still not any witness it could be instead, for that of observationable Facts for just meaning.

Dismiss any gravity, for only the notion of time instead, and still nature in front of us for that of its wonders, for also the unexplained.

So only the rich it could be, for that of nature, and next not any wealthy for just spending, for only that of magnificence and splendor instead.

For that, just the quantifiable it could be, for not any qualified instead, for still only just the meant it could be, for that of science.

Either just no such thing for that of meaning, and it could be the Empty set here, for still not anything we rather should believe, for just the Proof it could be.

So here my way of understanding, could be still only my Perspective, for also the way I could be interpreting things for only meaning.

But only just tell me, for not any hammer it could be still, for only a whisper in the ear, and next I could perhaps believe in aliens, for only a subject of meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guinness_World_Records

I know that this subject could be having the little extra, for only an addendum, but let us start here, for only the greatest and biggest it could be still.

Is not sleep still only part of your life, for that of a daily feature, for also the dream it could be, when also sleep paralysis as well?

Make it still only the idiot versus genius for that of a measure, and perhaps also Conscience as well, for only that of a well-being, for not any being or entity instead.

Perhaps only "It is my day, it is your life", for only what you could make it, for still not any "better" it should be, for only that of levels instead, for still only that of consciousness.

Reach for the heavens, and you only could reach for the stars, for only the stretched out hand it could be still, for not any given measure of any abstract instead.

I guess the only option for making it that of a subject, could be still only Faith for that of Belief, when only the grave for that of a burial, when also a process.

But only the circles it could be instead, for that of abstracts, and next only the levels it could be, for that of Conscience for such.

So here still only a definition for also a description for that of the subject it still could be, for only making it science, and not any Religion instead.

Our way of life could be still possible, for only the fundament it still could be, when that of the Universe for just meaning, for also how it could be explained.

So here perhaps only the casket it still could be, when also that of Cremation, for still only the burial process it could be, for not any magnificence or extol instead.

But still only that of infinity just for meaning here, for still only the way it could be explained, and also thought.

Just think it could be still only that of better, for only the "betterment" it could be, and next not any wonderous stories, for only the lack of Proof it could be.

The problem here is that the adore or admiration it still could be, for also adoration, perhaps still is not the same as any magnificence or extol, for only such.

But still only happy here, for only the provable it could be, for not any pressing of the button, for only the hands of God it could be.

Is it for just a thing, and next also meant for the same, for still that of infinity making it possible, for only the Proof it still could be.

So, realizing just a fact, for only the meaning it could be, and next also Conscience for such, for still that of meaning, for not any counting it should be instead.

Those things we could make, for just that of meaning, could be still total, for also universal, for also that of absolutes it also could be.

Dismiss just the Fact it could be still for only that of an answer, and perhaps not any readily answer it should be, for that of Proof for such, when still only Evidence.

Infinity could be still defined just for meaning, for also that of "foot", when still only turning around in the grave for such, for not any step backwards of forwards instead.

My guess is that we could make it "no such thing" for that of meaning, for still only proving, when that of NOT for such, when also a negation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negation

But just the flip of the coin it could be instead, for only the two faces it could be, and next also the different it could be, when still an answer for such.

Here you could make it both "Yes" and "No" for that of an answer, for still the straightforward it could be, when also a Method it could be, for still only an answer.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementary_colors

So which color do you choose to pick, for only select, when still not any realizing upon Fact, for only the Inverse logic it could be instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse_(logic)

Here nature still in front of me, for only the white versus black it could be, and next I could also make it Truth, for still only the sentence it could be.

So here still only different answers, for only the opposite it could be, for not any absolutes it could be instead, for that of nature just telling.

Only just the Cul of the Sac it could be, for only just dead end street, and we know that it could be a street a dead end street
with only one inlet and outlet, and for the same reason, we could also dismiss the WOW signal for that of meaning, for not any nature instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_end_(street)

So is nature still only magnificent, for only the splendor it could be, or should I still prove, for only the sense or value it could be, when only meaning instead?

I guess we, or at least someone of us, tried to make it a given measure for only "betterment" for such, when still only explaining for that of the feature it could be.

And here not any "parlor" it should be, for only a living room, for not any pearl instead, for only that of adorable it could be, for still not any beauty or magnificence.

Press the button for only the scale it could be, and next also levels for such, when that of at least Conscience.

But as I previously mentioned, we could still make it endless joy, for also the happiness it could be, when still not any proving of aliens, for only the Facts it could be.

Rather just the FIFO it could be still, for only nature for such, and next also order for that of sequence, when still only understood or comprehended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFO

Just "all along", and next "All charging" for still only meant, for also the included it could be, and here still only nature for just meant, for also the absolutes it could be.

Only the definition it could be, for also a description, and perhaps also a depiction, for still only what nature could be meant, for that of meaning.

Make it still that of Truth, for also the Proof it could be, and next also the endless joy it could be for only happiness, for still not any infinity instead.

But rather only that of observational Facts it could be, for also Evidence, and I next could also prove for still only the sentence it could be.

Any atoms or molecules it could be instead, for that of the minuscule, and only insignificant for perhaps not any value, for still the Proof we could make.

Here we could be still making it Quarks and clusters of galaxies for only that of opposites, for also the scale and dimensions it could be.

At best, just multiply with 10 here for only the scales it could be, when also levels, for also the different views or comprehensions it also could be.

But just "pretty face", for not any evident or evidently it should be instead, next only myself for that of presence, for also visibility, for only part of nature for such.

Here we could choose making it that of dragons, for also a dragonfly, for still not any gods or angels it could be instead, for only just a cause,

But for only the incomprehensible it could be, when also past or beyond, we could also be making it such for that of infinity, for not any reference it should be either.

Is such a thing as Creation, only being meant, for that of implied, or could we make it a Logical fallacy instead?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

But for only "When Harry met Sally", only that of Conscience, for also that of levels and thresholds, for only the scales it could be, when also dimensions as well.

Better believe, for only just think, when that of sacred for only such, for still the Belief it only could be, when that of gods and angels for only such.

So here not forgetting the little man or figure either, for only climbing the stairs, and next looking into the unknown, for only the different Perspective it could be.

Here only that of Comprehension should be still for that of meaning, for just the interpreted or known it could be, when also understood.

But just tell me the way, for only the different it could be, and next also the other way for just opposite, for only the gods or angels it could be, when not any science.

Make it only "dinner served" for that of a nature just coming along for that of its presence, and next also everything included for such.

And here for some reason, still the subdivision it could be, for just part, when that of Matter Creation only for such, when also Creation myth.

Here you know that I am not any stuck in mud, for only the Mind it should be, for that of Type III civilizations, for only that of technology for such.

But rather still only that of FIFO here, for just nature telling, for also the explaining it could be, when still an understanding also needed,
except still not any generous, for only gullible for such, when still only believing in aliens, for that of their Existence.

Here we could make it only nature dubious or spurious for that of meaning, for not any readibly acceptance it should be instead.

Ask a couple of claims, for only just the demand it could be, and still only the Proof it could be for meaning, when also Observational evidence, for just Fact.

Here it reminds me that Intelligence could be still only one thing, for also that of sitting here, for only my visibility or presence.

If I could make it nature for only the readily Proof it could be, also that of readily acceptance, for still only sitting here.

Nature could be still that of Laws and Equations for only just comprehended, for still the gods and angels it also could be, for just that of Belief.

But for only the part versus whole it could be, still that of the singularity, for also that of infinity, for still only being explained, for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

So for still not any Conclusive evidence, when also readily Fact, we could still be only left to speculate, for only the Idea it could be, for still not any assumption instead.

Enough said just now, and needs the little fix before completed here.
ID: 2053481 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053482 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 3:56:10 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 3:58:43 UTC

Here editing a single word for just "for", making it "and" instead.

But next the top text of the buffer is not readily or plainly visible, even for that of a single line, or start of it.

Scrolling down in the buffer, for that of the correct sentence or paragraph, it still needs to be either inserted, for also updated.

Perhaps you gave it a bit of a try, for just a note, for that of bottom contents, except not any preceding page, for just paragraph.

For only just a bit of editing, still a bit of headache, when only just such a thing being added.
ID: 2053482 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053485 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 5:04:53 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 5:25:57 UTC

I just read my previous one, for a bit long, and also an error visible or coming up here.

So come on, but is this still only "helter skelter", or could it be just my way of spelling, or perhaps pronouncing?

Just on behalf, for only behalf of, and next only science for the thing we could be doing, for not any other or respective it could be instead.

For one thing, nature could be still Laws and Equations, for only a set or implied thing, except not any "believability" instead.

Ask a couple of questions for just revealing itself, and next also that of true meaning, for only just hidden.

So, encapsulate perhaps, and next also included, for only the answer it still could be, for only a meaning.

"We built the city", and next on a couple of words, for just said, except still not any Reason behind, for just thinking.

Ever heard about the story about Christopher Columbus, for only rambling the world, and perhaps or next not any Fallacies either.

Just believe instead, for that of Miracles perhaps, and next only the Fallacies it still could be for just a meaning, when also an understanding,

Only one spoon, for not any two, and still a shovel for that of digging, when perhaps not any grave either.

So let it be instead, for perhaps only meant, and still Causality, for that of being a Principle, for still not any "dinner served".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

When I did, I perhaps also chose for also made, except still not any nature in front of me, for just given or fulfilled.

So here perhaps assumed instead, for also implied, for also the Set it could be, when only making it that of conglomerates.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conglomerate

But next only build a castle for that of sand, and next a sandcastle as well, for not any fruitful instead.

So here the science it never made or became, also was never made, for still not any fruitful, for also the positive it could be.

Never say never, but the Proof was perhaps still there, for not never any told, for just meant either.

Sing a song instead, for only the betterment it could be, for still not any Philosophy instead, for only making it Proof.

But next only you and me together, and still only a sandcastle for such.
ID: 2053485 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053489 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 6:47:43 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 7:02:17 UTC

And what you can not prove, next not any science, just for any believing.

Just enough said, and also prove for such a thing, for not any welcome either.

So, chapter summary, for perhaps only layer upon layer, and perhaps not any hitherto either.

Science sells, for next also goes, for still the Comprehension it could be, next for also meaning.

Or just the other thing, for perhaps NOT, and next not any such meaning, for only the scientifical it still could be.

Perhaps the lifted hand is not all what is needed either, for just the AND or OR it could be instead, for that of a sentence.

Maybe just rational for that of irrational instead, but next also peculiar, for that of a thing needing checking.

Anyway, should not be any substitute mother here, for that of a replacement.

Always a bibliography for what it perhaps could represent, and next also meant.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibliography

It reminds me of an Academia here, for not any study it could be either.

Only just by hand, by means of being proven, perhaps not any forsaken either, when it comes to that of Literature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature

Maybe good morning perhaps, and next who did say so or that, for just being silly, for not any "Good morning America" instead.

So help me God, perhaps, for only that of still meaning.
ID: 2053489 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053508 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 16:25:48 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 17:02:32 UTC

I should have made it the little perhaps just from the start, for only better reading.

But for only things still happening, not take a chance on me either, for only swirling weather instead.

Here the constant change, for just the repeatedly it could be still, could be just patterns for that of cyclic Events, for also the periodicity it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodicity

So speaking about the weather, for only constantly changing, and it could be still happening, for only the natural occurrence it could be.

Any Postman Pat, for just delivering on the door, and perhaps not any wakeup call it should be either, for only the constant change still happening.

But here also suddenly, for also abruptly, for still the eventually it could also be, for that of an Event taking place, leading to possible change.

Except that it could be still the Method of Proof here, for just proving something, when still not any swirling weather, for only that of Dynamics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamics

Let it be, and next let it happen, for still come along, and be together, for the fantastic it sometimes could be, for also marvelous.

One step forward, for also the backwards it could be, and next "foot" for only such, when lying in a grave, for just the digging it perhaps could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top-down_and_bottom-up_design

Make it only top-down design here, for also the bottoms-up it could be, and next an approach towards nature, for only the meaning it still could be.

So here not any spending of time for only the leisure it could be, for only the Conclusion it could be instead, for that of just being thoughtful.

Either just tools we could be using for that of a given purpose, except still not any nature instead, for that of validness, for not any inconclusive instead.

Any cookbook could still be a recipe for only the way things should be done or carried out, for not any natural purpose or Consequence instead.

Only for the readily Fact it still could be, also that it could be assumed or asserted for just the same, when still that of a meaning.

Any passing of the vine for just the past it could be, only a notion of time for such, for still not any Proof it should be, for only that of aliens instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof

Nature could be still both conclusive and inconclusive for just meaning, for still only the assertion it could be, when also a presumption.

But do I perhaps not any know, for only just better, and it could be still that of Logical fallacy here, when only guessing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

Here only dinner served, for that of just "foot", for not any heavenly body it could be instead, for only stupendous, just for meaning.

My guess is that for only the realm of science it could be still, only the Method of Proof for such, for not any splendor or magnificence instead.

Make it only sorrow and pain for just being felt, and also the small versus large it could be, for that of a comparison, for still not any proving of Religion.

We know that the elephant could still choose to only remember, for not any forget, for still not any set and forget just for nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Implication

Just tell me a Lie, for not any Truth it should be instead, and next guessing that it could be still only Logic, for that of the Formal fallacy it could be.

Stupidity could still kill the cat, for only a blink of an eye for such, for not any stupendous nature it could be instead, for also that of Proof.

Here just next of kin could perhaps be only a relative, for not any inclusion or exclusion instead.

Add to it for only a sentence, and next not any subtract either, for still the Set it could be, for that of Mathematics here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dividend

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisor

Here so easy it could be for getting it wrong at times, for only the stake or stakes it could be, for that of shareholding.

I still could be comparing a couple of results, for not any nature instead, and for that using arithmetic operators like "<", "<=", "=", ">", and ">=".

But only for the comparison it could be still, next that of lesser or small for the same, when also bigger or greater, for still not any similarity.

We could be still making it only valid versus invalid, for also the conclusive or inconclusive for just the same, for not any glorification or extol,
for just such kind of nature, perhaps suiting or fitting a particular need.

Only easy comes, easy goes, next also the one thing coming at you for only an Intuition for such, for still not any valid sentence or Conclusion instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conclusion

Just do it, for only a given practice, and next also carry on, for the carry out it still could be, for only having things done, for also fulfilled.

Any speaking of, for just the table it perhaps could be, and next not any nature for only that of conclusive or inconclusive meaning still.

Perhaps I could be still offering condolences when someone could be passing away, for not any shy or weak I could be instead, for also that of complacency.

But only for that of give and take, next what still nature could be having to offer, for that of possible ambiguous meaning.

Just basic fundament, for also a Principle, and next also the reasoning it could be, for just that of thinking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambiguity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

So "hurray or hooray for Hollywood" it only could be, for not any turmoil or Chaos making for that of a Logical fallacy, just for the same.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

Here we still could be proving a thing for that of meaning, for just the answer it could be, for not any Dynamics for just order versus disorder instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIFO

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methodology

Here it should be only a method for that of such, when also a Methodology, for still only proving that of Chaos, for also the Turbulence or Viscocity it could be.

But just think about it, for just the readily it could be, and next also an assumption for only being asserted, for still the conclusive it also could be.

Any "betterment" for only just the better or bigger, and next also great or magnificent for just the same, when also stupendous as well, except that Einstein could
be making it that of Equivalence, for only the notion of time it could be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equivalence_principle

So let me just ask, for only the speculating it could be, for not any groundbreaking instead, when only new Ideas for just thinking, also could bring new Conclusions.

Here only the pioneering work it could be still, for that of breaking research into fertility problems, for example, for still not any time or space instead.

breaking new ground; innovative; pioneering.
groundbreaking research into fertility problems

Here Einstein could still think, for only the notion it could be, for not any groundbreaking instead, for perhaps a Fallacy only for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certainty

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

You may still be asking, for only the notion it could be, for not any right or wrong it should be for just telling, when still only a Premise here.

Any valid versus invalid instead, and next only a sentence, for also the Conclusion it could still also be.

But rather that he could be still proving, for only that of nature for such, when that of valid for just the same, for not any invalid instead.

Only questions still asked for that of meaning, and next an answer coming back, for only the Conclusion it still could be.

Tell me just right for only the thing it could be, and next not any wrong either, for still the valid meaning it could be, for not any invalid or meaningless.

I still could know for only the answer it could be, when still not any asserted or implied just for the same.

But next thinking that nature could be flawed just for meaning, also that of Construction it could be, for just "we built the city".

Any Design instead, and next also Intelligent Design, for not any Creation it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligent_design

But still only guessing, for not any conclusive it could be, and next also nature for its dubious or spurious meaning, for still that of both Contradiction and Ambiguity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_nihilo

But next out of nothing, for still the Matter it should be, and next not any Creation myth here either, for only the tenet or doctrine it perhaps might be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Here the guessing it still could be, for only picking a choice, and next that of randomness for also Causality, for only the way things could be interpreted.

But only a given choice for that of a select for such, and next not any turning in the grave, for only the different option or selection it still could be.
ID: 2053508 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053513 - Posted: 17 Jul 2020, 19:48:15 UTC
Last modified: 17 Jul 2020, 20:16:00 UTC

A bit long in the previous, but next for only follow the leader it could be still, also that of an Ambiguity, for only understanding nature just for meaning.

But rather just to the point, for only the exemplary it could be, next only a given understanding it still could be, when also explaining.

We could still be making it that of deterministic, for only nature for such, for also the ambiguous or contradictory it also could be, when only telling different things.

So just be my friend for only making it so, for only a nature we could still only explain, for not any wish or wishing it could be instead.

Prove just one thing, for only the single it could be, and next that of Proof for only such, for still not any other option instead, for that of possible Ambiguity.

But here only making it absolutes for such a thing, for also the readily Fact it also could be.

Perhaps we still could make it a witness for also the testimony it could be, for not any worthless or meaningless, when still only nature being concerned.

We know that some people could be still witness to an Event for just happening, and also that these could be credible, for only pilots here, when also experienced.

So for only the shy or weak it could be still, next also that of complacency, for still only a way of describing, when that of nature for such.

Only just weak versus strong instead, and perhaps a better way of telling it for only describing, for still the difference it could be.

The tenet or doctrine it perhaps could still be for only a sledgehammer for such, and next not any knock in my head, for only Religion instead.

But as I previously said or stated, for that of follow the leader here, still only the Proof we could make it, for also that of Credible evidence.

Just dismiss, for not any accept, and I could be still a Skeptic, for also a debunker, for not any believer I could be instead.

Only just the different things it could be, when only two for such, and next prove any aliens for only the reality it could be, for still not any dismissed.

Easy comes and easy goes, for only the tenet or doctrine it could be still, for also the Premise it could be for nature, when only doing such a thing.

Perhaps the readily acceptance it could be here for just Fact, for also the Proof it also could be, for still not any eventuality instead.

Tell me such a thing as right and wrong for only the thing it could be, and next also a difference for such, for still not any tenet here.

If I still could be making it right versus wrong for only the judgement it could be, next only the difference it could be for only that of meaning.

You already know that we could dismiss the WOW signal just for meaning, and the same also goes for any aliens we could only prove.

Only the trap it could be stiil, for also a dead end street, or Cul de Sac, and next only nature for just meaning, for still not any else we could prove.

So here perhaps not any favor it could be, when only an excuse instead, for still not any Truth just for meaning, for only the answer it still could be.

Only for that of aspiring, next also up and coming, for only the front of the queue it could be still, for not any scientist just waiting instead.

Here it even could be a link for that of such, for still only the leaderboard it could perhaps be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaderboard

Standing in a queue, for still only being served, and next the waiting it still could be, for not any dinner served.

Bring it to a halt for that of a standstill, and next also waiting in the queue, for not any crowd it could be instead.

But only for that of front versus rear, always the one coming first for only preceding, for not any late or latter, for still only just behind.

Make it a definition of time for only the Terminology it could be still, and next both that of beginning and end, for also the wait or standstill it could be.

Only just before, for not any later it should be, and next only where it started, for still only a moment of beginning for such.

Here a thing could be preceding another, for also the succeeding it could be, when also that of order of direction, for only the consecutive it could be.

Too soon, and next only premature for such, when still not any late, for only the latter it just could be.

Yes, I know that it could be spelling wrong for only the "late or latter" just above, for not any predecessor or successor it could be instead.

Only see you in the evening, for just the meeting it could still be, and next not any farewell instead, for just saying goodbye.

Here the end of the road it perhaps could still be, and next also nature for a meaning or Consequence, for only the Event it still could only be.

Just take it for only a word for that of meaning, and next nature for still a Consequence for just given, when also a Premise as well, for only being readily assumed.

Only bow your hat, for still not any curtsy or curtsey, and still nature for only meaning, for just the thing it still could be, when also that of aspiring, for that of a leaderboard.

But here still only the front of the queue for just standing and next also waiting, for not any rear end it should be, for not any expectancy it could be for just delivering a baby.

Credibility could still mean Logic for only readily assumed, for not any thought or guessed it could be instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought

But rather that you could still make it validness or validity, for only a thing being still assumed, for not any Proof it should be instead.

If I happen to know, next I could also be knowing for the answer it still could be, when also a valid Conclusion for just the same.

But for only the Matter Creation and also Creation myth it could be still, also that we could be making it Existence, for still only the presence it could be.

Is Logic next the same as any judgement that could be made still, for also Justice as well, for not any believability instead, for only that of Faith or Belief?

Hi ho, but next for only the Belief it could be only still, not any gullible it should be here either, for only a lack of Credibility, for not any "to transform indifference".

Only the weak versus strong it still could be, for only that of a difference, next not any complacency it should be here either, for just the Proof it could be.

Either I could just interpret the word here for only wrong, for still only the Belief it could be, when also Faith, for not any weakness it could be instead, for also sorrow and pain.

I guess we still could make it credible for only the Fact it still could be, when also a story for just being told, for not any believability instead, for only just gullible.

So here perhaps the Truth it could be, for only just making it right versus wrong, for also telling for the same.

Only the answer I still could make for that of meaning, next still that of Method of Proof for such a thing, for next only the weak or strong it perhaps could be.

Just the weak or weaker it could be, for also weakest, also weakness as well, for only the chain of the link it could be, for just holding it together.

But still perhaps only knowing here, for not any telling either, and still that of absolutes for only meaning, for not any Proof it should be instead.

So hold your breath, for still not any give or take, for only just nature for such a thing, when an answer could be lacking Credibility.

But only an answer for just that of telling, and still the recipe for just cookbook it could be, for not any Laws or Equations instead.

Only just made, for still the recipe it could be, and here nature for that of a meaning, for still not any constructed it could be, for only Design.

Make it still only readily known, and next also the Fact it could be for just Proof still, for not any biased or preconceived it could be,
for just prior instead, for that of the Deterministic it perhaps could be.

What comes before, and next also preceding for just the Event it could be, for not any succeeding it could be instead, for only a thing just following.

Only the moment of time it could be still, for not any delay it should be either, and next only a standstill for just the waiting it still could only be.

Any Fallacies instead, for not any Judgment it could be either, and next the thereafter it perhaps could be, for not any next or following instead, for only a moment for such.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judgement

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prejudice

Only tell me the right, for not any wrong it should be, for still only a difference, and next not any stone left untouched, for only the grave it could be still.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lazarus

Here not any objection in the Court it should be either, for still only unfinished business, for not any resurrection it should be here either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resurrection

But next not any thought it should be, for only free will for such, only that of nature for its meaning, for only the Truth it could be, for still not any absolutes.

Here it also spells judgement, for the Judgment it also could be, for still only an article for such, making for only confusion.

But for only the recognizing of Facts it still could be, only a recognition for such, when still that of Faith or Belief for just meaning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective

Just the end of the road it could be, for still not any beginning, or I could be still flipping around for just the opposite, for not any Prediction it should be either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prediction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omen

I could still make it nature that of assumed for only just meaning, when also thought, for also the implied or presumed it also could be.

But only come along, for still only taking it for granted, and next not any "foot" it should be either, for only just a grave instead, for also a burial process.

Maybe just the bad day it could be instead, for only a sandstorm, when also the wind hurling, for not any end sentence it could be instead, for that of a final Conclusion.

Just speak of the weather, for not making it any either, and for that still only the inconclusive it could be, when also invalid as well.

So here perhaps only factors it could be still, for just the whole it could be for that of meaning, when still only infinity here.

Still only dinner served, for only nature for such, when that of factors it only could still could be, for also being explained.

So here making a link for that of Thought just above, for still not any Mindset it could be, for just that of intellectual purposes.

Any Religion it could be instead, and next only Faith and Belief for such, for still not any Credibility it could be, when also that of gullible.

We could still be making it only Laws and Equations for just a thing in the making, for only that of presence, when also Existence.

But next "Trust your feelings", for only an opinion it could be, and next also the readily assumed it could be, when also presumed.

Both Logic and Arithmetic could be absolutes for the context where it could belong, for still not any part of a wider aspect, for only the Perspective it could be.

Only make it Proof for still the answer it could be, and next also the Truth it could be for only nature just telling, for still not any Lie or Falsification here.

For that, we could be still proving a Lie for only the answer it could be, for not any unjust instead, except that I still could perhaps know, for only the science it could be.

So for not any skidding of the road it could be, for only just slipping, next also falling, for not any ditch it could be instead.

Here it should not be any freefall either, for just forgetful instead, because here it could also be that of an oblivion.

Ashes to ashes perhaps, and next only an ashtray for such, for not any Cremation it could be instead, for still only that of ashes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon

Still only a bad day it could be, for that of sins and renunciation for such, for not any remorse it could be either, but next only the weakest link for that of nature,
for that of infallibility for such.

Could a tree still fossilize, for only old or extinct, or could you make it that of decay, for only the stink or "stench" it could be?

Prove any weakest link, for only the complacency it could be, and next not any strong it should be here either, for just the better.

So here still nature created, for only the Design it could be, when also meaning for the same, for only the interpreted it could be.

Just take it for granted, when still only happening, and next also the premeditated it could be, for still not any predicted for just in advance.

Make it just the Ten Commandments here instead, for only the bidding it could be, and next not any Proof of nature, for only a Theory for such.

End up just in the ditch, for only the stench it still could be, and next Religion for that of such, for not any better alternative it could be instead.

Being scientists here, for the mostly Atheist or Agnostic we could be, and next not any philosophing, for only the speculating it could still be.

For only the assertive I could be making it just previously, next also a Claim, for still not any speculative instead.

But for only "This is your life", and so on, I could still be only guessing, for not any ascertain it should be instead.

So here spelling for that of translating, and next confirm for that of also affirm, for still the sentence or Conclusion it could be.

state as a fact; assert strongly and publicly.

Any Speculation, and we know it could be only Economy for that of such, for still not any guess instead, for just the thoughtful you could be.

And for still not any Mind it should be here either, next only a dream instead, for still only leaving me speculating, for not any offer it should be instead.

God is good, for still only "supposedly" for such, for not any propose or proposal it should be either, for just only a Fact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creation_myth

And for not any ashes to ashes it still could only be, for maybe that of hurling wind instead, next only speak of the weather, for still the thing only being offered.

In which way could you perhaps tell me I am wrong just for meaning, when only that of Credo for such, when also that of Belief or Faith?

Could the answer be still in the hand for just the sleeves it could be, for not any revealing itself, for only the apparent or evident it could be?

Any fulfillment, and still the completion it could be, for also the absolutes it could be, for still not any Laws or Equations for just telling.

Only just the true it could be for that of an answer, and next also the obvious it also could be, for still not any unfinished, for only business for such.

So, for still not any ditch it could be, for also an ashtray, it could also be that of side to side, for just the wobble or irregularity it could be.

Maybe "Dear Watson" it could be here instead, for perhaps not any letter either, but just the apparent it could be, next also shining, for still not any gentle touch.

Here it could be just visual magnitude for that of a star, and next also apparent luminosity, for still not any "evidently" it should be instead.

Perhaps such a thing as brave, should not be any humble for just the opposite it could be, when perhaps not any proud either.

Only a humble stance, for perhaps only an attitude for such, and next not any shroud it should be here either, for only just "braveheart".

Just the silly or dumb you could be, when also foolish, next perhaps not any stance or attitude you could make for just a thing, for only the thing it could be.

Only reveal yourself for that of the hidden it could be, when also in the sleeves, next also unexplained, for only the Mystery it could be.

But still only that of bravery it perhaps could be, for not any humiliation instead, for still not any card it could be, for only just being pulled.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empirical_evidence

I better finish off the rest of the dinner here, before the beer, and next going to bed.
ID: 2053513 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bluestar

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 12
Posts: 7031
Credit: 2,084,789
RAC: 3
Message 2053539 - Posted: 18 Jul 2020, 3:22:13 UTC
Last modified: 18 Jul 2020, 3:59:30 UTC

And wasting a bit of time for that of the previous, when also becoming a need of emptying for only an ashtray for such.

Here pulling and plugging in the power cables going to the cards, for the system not any booting again.

It lies on my right side next to me, for that of a low table, and only a plastic cover just between.

Here Noctua choosing to put one fan blade just in between, but next pulling also that, for attaching the whole fan to the motherboard.

In addition, also a single 16 GB memory card in perhaps the wrong slot, for also both graphics cards inserted, and the processor is still Intel 10920X.

Again a combination of long screws here, for also fingers, but the bowed platters for that of oval or bent shape, still needs attaching to the fan first.

But it also reminds me that here it should not be any cylinder either, for also the name not being recalled, but more about that later.

So for not any cards on the table it could be, just all of them instead, for that of everything it also could be.

Just think of it, as I previously said, and next Options galore for still only possibilities available, and next I could be sailing on the sea.

And for still not any dinner served, only just all and everything still being possible, and next it could be still everything on the table, for only options available.

Could it be just a smile here, for not any candid camera, when such a thing could be still in the sleeves for only hidden, for not any honesty instead?

Just give and take for what nature could be having to offer, and next still only that of splendor and magnificence, for not any majestic instead.

Perhaps I could make it adore as well, for that of adoration, when still not any gracious, for just gratitude.

Choose to make it "betterment" for only a project in the making, and next a cylindrical shape for that of an object, when still being observed, for also the witness it could be.

But only just "on behalf of" and still only science for such, when next that of Einstein, for only a notion of time, for still not any endless possibilities.

Either just the framework of science it could be for only postulating, when still an Axiom, for not any guess or expectation it could be instead,
for still only the knowledge it could be, for only ready at hand.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

You said, I said, and next only the witness you could be, for not making it any personal, but only just on behalf of, when still nature in front of you, for just telling.

But next come along with me, and we could be living together, for still perhaps not Eternity, but only a witness to an Event which could be lacking a particular explanation,
except still our use or applicability of the resources being available, for only just at hand.

Use your hands for only that of tools, for still not any merchantability or fitness for a given purpose, and next nature could be coming close at you, for still only a readily hand.

Is nature any completed or fulfilled for only a Creation made or given, for still perhaps God's fingers for such, for still not any tools for just hands?

But only come along, for that of swinging together, and next still living in harmony, for not any loneliness, because here also the word "unison" is coming to me.

So writing off a little again, and Charles Darwin could be making it "survival of the fittest", for not any adaptation it could be instead.

Here making it both context and Concept just for meaning earlier on, so here not any continuing of this subject either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Ford_Coppola

Anyway, who was the filmmaker or producer here, when still forgetting the name, for only the cylindrical object it could be instead?

Could I be dancing on my heels for still not any slipping, or could I rather be using my toes instead?

Make it still nature set for only a preference, and next also the implied it could be for only just meant, for still not any Axiom instead.

Raise your hand for that of making an Oath, and it could be still Truth for that of meaning, for still not any written either, but just only heard.

Again that just oral should not be any Lyrics either, for still only the spoken word it could be, when also that of speech.

I previously made it that of absolutes here for only just meaning, for still not any Logical fallacy instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

But here also making it a gift, for still the offer it could be, and next also a reward as well.

Perhaps no need of making it any stuck here either, for only shut your mouth, for still only the fantastic it could be, when being witness to an Event.

If that of infinity is still what nature could be having to offer, also that of splendor and magnificence it could be still, for not any calibrate instead.

Just a flip of the coin, and we still could make it only opposite, for also the face it could be, when not any Contradiction instead.

Therefore deem it to be successful, when still not any failure, and next both magnificence and gratitude, for still not any sailing on the sea.

Ooh, perhaps, and next marvelous for such a thing, when still that of only being considered.

Could an Equation be telling about any God for its presence, for also the Laws of nature it could be?

Again, too soon, when also hastily, for only the Prejudice it could be, when also biased or preconceived.

Make it any sample for just a thing of nature, and still only explanatory Facts for what we could produce, for not any exemplary instead.

Only just give and take for that of meaning, and next also a willingness to produce, for still the sample or output it could be, for just generating.

Any Gods will instead, and next perhaps not any random excuse either, for only the obedience it could be.

Here making it inclined earlier on, for also that of apt, for still not any arbitrary it could be instead, except for still only a Premise instead,
except forgetting the word "lure" for that of the previous, when it could be inserted.

So, could the Earth be still visited, for not any write-off it could be instead, for just fantasy, or maybe out of the question for the whole thing?

If you think you could be right, next also you could know, for still the testimony it also could be.

Such a thing could still be that of an experienced pilot only for such, when also the witness he could be, for still an Event happening,
except that such a thing also could be that of a phenomenon.

Better science than just Religion still, for not any attributed or attributable it could also be.

"Shine on you, crazy diamond", and next only the twinkle of the star it could be, for not any stairs being climbed, for only being ascertained.

Could nature be still that of small and large just for meaning, when also minuscule, or could I only prove for the stated Fact it perhaps could be?

So here the hurling wind it still could be, for not any tornado either, and next only speaking of the weather, for just doing such a thing.

Make it perhaps a switch, for just on and off, and perhaps not any repeated occurrence it could be, for only just happening.

Perhaps Einstein was just fortunate here, for making it such an Equation, for just the spectacular it still could be, for not any spelling of a word.

But like a blink of just an eyelid, next still the on and off it could be, for also that of forgetful as well, and next happening with me.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modus_ponens

Only the fuse it could be, for still not any switch, and next also the mode it could be when only set, for also adjusted, and for that, not any recapitulate either.

1, 2, 3, for just counting, and still only a difference here, for not any absolutes it could be instead, for only just forgetting the other word.

Perhaps still only unique, for the crazy diamond it could be, for not any sunshine it could be instead, for that of brilliance versus brilliant.

If nature could be still the thing just being offered, next not any sleeves it could be, for just the hidden hand.

So, bow your head, for still the curtsy or curtsey it also could be, and next nature for just meaning, for only an Equation just telling, for also the Laws it could be.

Could you make it any Mandelbrot set just unique for that of meaning, for not any practical instead, when still only down to Earth, for the explanatory it could be?

But rather "whatif" instead, for not any Consequence either, and next we could prove nature for both the small and large it still could be.

Only tell me for just the answer it still could be, and next still Laws and Equations only for such, when still on behalf of nature, for just a meaning.

Any "third man" instead, and next Faceless coward for only such, when perhaps still not any idiot or Idiocy either.

The Creation we could make for perhaps only "minted", should be that of Creation myth, for not any crown it could be instead.

Just climbing of the stairs could still be a possibility, for not any falloff instead, because for that, you could be still only slipping and falling, for that of a mishap.

Is just the eventuality it could be, only that of splendor and magnificence, or could I make it just ugly instead, for not looking any good?

Only fortune versus misfortune, and still only two different things for only opposite, for not any "flavor" it could be instead, for that of just good luck.

So, turning away for only the slap in the face it could be, and next only Creation myth for that of the "believability" it should be, for not any Proof instead.

Any much, for just the more it could be, and also significant for just meaning, for still not any total instead.

But here only nature made for just a meaning, for also the Creation it could be, when also that of minted for only such.

Any blue screen instead, for not any face it should be, and next that of levels for only such, when that of both Intelligence and Conscience here.

Only the natural cause just for meaning, and next a thing we could determine for also produce, when still only coming up with, for just a Fact.

Is it still the hurling wind, for not any "swinging" either, and next only nature producing for only the Fact it still could be, for not any Religion instead?

"Say you, say me", for next only the welcome it could be, and next only the attributable it could be for just Fact, for not any gods or angels instead.

So here only standing on a platform, for my way of witnessing for also noticing, for still nature in front of me, for that of observational Facts it could be.

Could I be just wrong a couple of times, for not any telling it should be instead, for perhaps not any Gods word of wisdom, for only the Commandment it should be?

Nature could be still set, for also the implied or meant it could be, but next not any enchant or glamor, for perhaps not any thrill or thrillseeking either.

But next perhaps only just bidding it could be here, for not any Commandment either.

So, what is any practical here, for not any impractical either, when still only a story being dismissed for just the Fact it could be?

End of story, and next also end of sentence, for still not any dream or recapitulation it could be, for just bringing forth or forward that of memory.

Should I perhaps make it magnetic tape here for only just a rewind, for still not any "flier" I could be instead, for that of a notion of time and space?

Just a blank checque instead, for only just everything on the table, and still everything included, for only the possibilities it could be.

Could you rather assume instead, for still only the proven Fact it could be, when only nature for that of a sentence, for not any open hand it could be instead?

Only just "to" for not any "with" it should be either, and next only part of a sentence for only the important it could be, for still not any composition instead.

But only a mix for that of a mixture, and next also blend in for still the composition it could be, for perhaps not any "eventuality" instead, for just a finish.

In my national variant, for just the food dish it could be, next that of "Pizza grandiosa" for only such, for still not any splendor instead, for just tasting good.

But only detect, for also discern, and still only nature for a purpose and meaning, for also the Proof it also could be.

Any Creator it could be instead, for just the "better" it could be, and next Divinity for only such, for still that of Creation myth.

But next any wrong it could be, for still not any right, and only that of Proof for just meaning, for not any Judgement it could be instead.

Any Fallacy instead, and next perhaps still only wrong for just meaning, for not any unjust or unfair it could be either.

But for perhaps still only the Mandelbrot set, also the total scheme we could make it for just everything included, when still that of explanatory Facts.

Is nature still only there for that of being witnessed or observed, for also the Facts it could be, when also Evidence, for still not any Fallacy instead?

Perhaps it rather should be better just concluding for a given sentence, for still the Equation it also could be.

Yes, I still could know, for only the stated meaning it could be, when also Fact, for also the Evidence still needed, for only being produced.

But next perhaps still not any make it should be here either, for only just produced instead, for still not any manufactured either.

Here the rest of the beer right now, for still lying in the fridge.
ID: 2053539 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 198 · 199 · 200 · 201 · 202 · 203 · 204 . . . 333 · Next

Message boards : Cafe SETI : Stars are blue, Panthers are pink and the music plays here


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.