One beer left in the fridge, so for this also a finishing one.

Make it perhaps science for that of living, if not any broken heart either, and for this we could also make it also a sense of proudness at times.

Perhaps I am too eager, or exaggerating a little, but also that Seti@home should be a way of bringing science to home, except for not carry you away either.

While science could also be a tool for that of knowledge itself, also that proudness could be making it what you are supposed to say.

Perhaps this also could be a bit wrong, in that you sometimes could have medicine for that of a cough, except for not any proudness or pride at all.

I think that we could make it two things here, namely a discussion about a subject itself, and next also the way the scientific community should behave,
or perhaps be all about.

Comments welcome, because feeling a bit lonely here, but please be polite as well.

And next also political nonsense at times as well, because two small words got the wrong way a little way down.

Perhaps it is time to hire more moderators here, for only the sake of politicising, except for not making it any science either.

For one thing we could still be making it Art, if not any dust either, because here also the story of the entity rising up from the ashes, where it also could be dust.

And here not any Jesus either, except for not any other name either.

Here that of basic constituents earlier on, when it also could be about compounds as well.

But next no fake story either, because it may or may not be part of science.

Make it still the blue book standing in the shelf of my parents, and next also "In the beginning", in the hands of a scientist this time,
someone could be shouting "You are the world", except not any "Who" either, for that of at least making it the world.

Watch the Olympic Games, if not any street game, in the city of Santa Monica, and also someone in a wheelchair, if not someone carrying a bicycle across the road,
or perhaps rather walking or running.

This only because it could be part of life and nothing else.

Funny isn't it, if even life itself, and also events as well, could be reflected by means of the notion of infinity, which by means of either Laws, or at least a constant of sorts,
could be the governing element for everything present, and next also in existence.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Infinity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concept

Here the closest I get is that of a concept for such a thing.

Also that I was thinking of leaving out God here for that of the rest, and rather make it nature instead.

Like the "Missing Link" for that of Evolution, and here thinking about Lucy for that of our ancestry, I am giving a thought of what is perhaps missing for that of either wording,
or concept, in order for making it a practical or possible explanation.

Like both Terms, also Concepts, as you well may know, and next also side by side as well.

Next give me a break, except for not having any such yourself, and it could also be a phrase.

But rather that you could make it a scientifical term for that of also a "notion" as well, except for not any flirting, or even sneezing your nose.

Next "nitty-gritty" as well, and also the small technicality as well, which next also could become an issue on its own, for that of both phrases, if not any speech.

The scientific community could be that of "trolls" at times, except for not any fools either, for that of also "Nobody's Fools".

Ring the bell of your door in the middle of the night, and it is harassment.

Make it rather science and you still also have to prove it, at least most of the time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relic

Here perhaps the leftover from a bygone or lost time, and next that you could perhaps claim or pretend to be an astronomer, only next to be also a ufologist.

Is this perhaps true?

Or is it rather so that true next also should make for Truth as well, and that the whole subject could be speaking for its own, like that of either respect, or perhaps behalf?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_fallacy

Here that of "invalid" again, in that it also could be an invalid concept as well, and also possible flawed thinking.

If perhaps flawed, also that of flawlessness as well, in that you could make it one thing for next another.

Or should it rather be either/or, because it also could be that above, because here I wake up myself for that of wording.

You also could make it a fake priest, except for still not the Pope, and next also question that of scientifical "terms" for that of its possible meaning.

The word or two earlier on became a bit too long, and like intermediary for a couple of things, I could also make it a shortcut.

For this also the reason why a priest could be still a priest, and not an oyster, by means of his office, because next digging a grave,
you also are supposed to end up in such one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formalism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle

I next could be still an astronomer of sorts and also make it the Universe for such a thing, but if so, am I next preaching, or could I be telling the possible "Truth"?

Next such a thing, only because it could also be science.

My guess is that if a difference between a Comedian and a speaker (small caps), next laughter from the audience, and not any applause.

Is this perhaps true, only because it also is fact, or should there be another reason, or perhaps explanation?

Here we could be still making it science for that of science itself, except for perhaps not any Religous belief at all.

Make it science, next also knowledge and also understanding, except for not anything more, at least when having that inclination.

Making it rather a Creator, and it also could be the possible divine, and next you are not speaking for any science at all.

Wrong science, and next also way of thinking as well, if not any wrong move either.

Make it a possible explanation, and next not any excuse either.

Again, those links which should be added, but perhaps getting a bit late.

It should be no secret that an orphaned child should be the same as a lost child, except for not being lost at sea either.

If next also an issue at hand, also that of a couple of Ideas and Thoughts as well, and next from where is it supposed to come from?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought

Here perhaps the first of these two this time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penetration_test

Here of course it becomes wrong.

But rather that I could make it both the hammer and saw for that of possible tools in your hand, except for not any Bible either,
and next also pretend to be a scientist, when it rather could be that of both Profanity and Blasphemy for that of your liking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Profanity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blasphemy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdisciplinarity

Again those different words next also for that of a different meaning, and next also the interpretation needed each time.

If you do not mind, I would like to hear scientists speaking for themselves, rather than any preaching either, for next that of "Stairways to Heaven",
only because we could be left believing in one thing for another, except for making it any Belief in itself.

Nuff said, at least for now.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perdition

For now an empty page only here, and a bit of shame.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnation

Next, the same as before.

Or perhaps it could be so that one part of science could be about facts, while another about possible "Truth".

Digging in the sand is perhaps not the same as looking into the sky, for that of both knowledge, and perhaps also Conscience.

Like love sometimes in the air, also that of a couple of things being only part of the subconscious as well, and next also a state of mind.

"Knock it off" and it well could be the sledgehammer for such, except for not any feather either, which could be proving the opposite.

Making one thing becoming experimental fact and next also proven as well, could be telling about at least one part of the story, if perhaps not both, or all.

If rather still the "Hammer and Feather" experiment for this, you also know that one thing could also go for another, in that it could be precisely the same.

Again the word which perhaps showed up a little here, namely the word translate, in that you could make it both an Equation, and next also a Principle,
only because it could go for the same for each single thing, but perhaps not for both.

Perhaps not about any behavior for that of possible aliens or extraterrestrials, but rather conduct or etiquette, if it rather should be about intelligence,
because here also that of a possible protocol for that of possible Contact.

If still different sciences, next also different explanations as well, because it could be about different subjects as well,
but next where do you take science for granted, also because it could also be about facts?

Perhaps still no intelligent signal as such, but next rather credibility in itself for that of both reports and also observations as well.

Where did it all start for at least the Universe, and next the Steady State Model as well, except for not an evolutionary Universe, only because of evolution itself?

I am supposed to believe that infinity should still represent something, because it also could amount to something?

Next a teaspoon for that of acid, and also add water for the rest, and you could be having the possible mixture, except for not a liter either, for that of water.

Here still that of laughter as well, in that it could be laughter from the audience, but perhaps no laughter about a subject itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology

If still rather about Religion for a couple of things, next also that of "In the hands of God" as well, except for not any trap or trapdoor either.

Like a negation, you also could be making it the inverse again, except for perhaps not the mirror all the time either.

Here the word converse, or conversely comes to mind, in that we always could think of one thing, and next also being so, except for not any different either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contradiction

So here perhaps still a bit of technology for our purposes, except for perhaps making it anything else either.

I still could make it technology for a purpose, of course, but we could end up rather speaking of ourselves, except for perhaps others which also might be present.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flint

Perhaps getting it wrong here, but also that it could be the axe of Stone Age Man, for next that of his tools for hunting, and also possible weaponry.

But if rather still about the Universe here, why such a thing as both Laws and Equations, when it also could be about random events, and also Consequences?

Here still "In the hands of God" for a couple of things, and next you incorporate this into a living world which could be our own, and next also that for living.

Why do you sometimes bow, and next do not greet for that of a handshake, only because it could be a way of practise, and not a way of life?

For this also the different facets of nature as well, if not any aspect either, in that a face always have to show up against another, for the rest of it also showing up.

Compare with that of a bus driving backwards in a YouTube video for that of Earthquakes, when next time supposedly flies all the time, except for no standstill either.

It next becomes wrong, only by watching.

Or perhaps rather the fact that while time could still be relative only (here small caps), also that both forwards and backwards becomes the way of explaining time itself.

In the same way as having several or many gods (Dualism) makes for that of both counting, and also that of quantifying as well, we could end up with just that,
except not making it something else for the whole thing.

Therefore it perhaps becomes wrong, or a wrong thing to say, when it comes to the possible final result, in that it also could be about a GUT, for that of an understanding.

Here keying in "Top down algorithm" in the Wikipedia, and not a single result coming back either, because here perhaps not about a Methodology itself,
but rather a Method which could be used.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsing

The fact is that you could choose one thing for another, for that of a subject, next also that it also could be about nature, except for also the different elements for each, which next could be telling about
the possible different, except for not any similar either.

For this, at least three different words, or wording, if not any Terminologies either, of which one ended up a bit down the list here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complementary_colors

Except for in the middle of the day here, also that you could be having Complementary colors, and next also black and white as well.

Perhaps still an unknown subject or issue for a couple of things, except not for looking into the unknown either, for next making it the Universe.

Like also "Nobody's fools" as well as also fools and horses, the fact that we also could make it "smart" for a couple of other things, and next also for that of nature as well.

You probably know about "Smart weapons" here, but also that Chess as a game could be about deductive thinking.

Is the reason for any Chaos, only because we also could quantisize such a thing as well, or is only Order possible because of a given "Commandment" for such?

Here the colored picture being noticed a little while ago, depicting the Universe for that of its possible structure, and next both walls, filaments and voids as usual.

Perhaps still that of gravity itself, only because it could be that of enforcing the Laws, and next by its name as well, in that it could still be the Forces of nature here.

In fact I still could be questioning that of technology here, if not asking either, except for still thinking that the Laws of nature could still be that of Equations,
and next also a context for such a thing.

So for this, perhaps still "In the beginning" for a couple of things, except for not any Inertia either, which could be telling about possible technology,
rather than perhaps nature itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_differential_equation

Almost lost the whole thing, but together with the salad here, being revisited right now.

My guess is that Intelligence could still be telling about ourselves, and next also the ants as well, but rather that it still does not translate into nature for such a thing,
in that we perhaps could still make it elementary particles here, except for not Belief, for next any Religous thoughts about ourselves.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thought

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind

You see, different subjects, because it could be still different issues, except for not any "state of mind" either, which could be telling the whole thing.

Keying in "Collective" here using the Wikipedia, and the same problem again, except for not the word for this being used at Facebook.

It next could be Collective evolution, except for nothing coming back for that of a query.

Here also my confusion for making it Conscience, when it rather should be about the conscious and the unconscious.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consciousness

But still that rather Atheists and Agnostics could be laughing at Religion, except for not giving a thought that the Universe once became created, and it also becomes that of Cosmology.

Or perhaps was being created above, for that of the simpler or symbolic thinking, or perhaps only general thought that it once came into existence next from nothing.

Perhaps also a difference between prevailing and prevalent here as well, in that the Big Bang could be the "prevailing cosmological model for the Universe".

Next that this is here where it goes wrong as well, in that it also could become Creation myth, already from the start.

Like also Tabloid journalism, and Tabloid newspapers, also that of desktop computing as well, and next also desktop science.

Make it still that of Materialism for that of Matter itself, and next also the physical world, except for perhaps not any other explanations which could be available.

For that still the word possibilities above, which should be about Logic, if not any Quantum mechanics either.

Ever heard about a "shut up" badge, except for not any words from God either, which could be a possible Commandment?

Next God said, if not told either, and you could choose to be forgetting the whole thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deluge

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_myth

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noah%27s_Ark

Here forgetting about the Noah's Ark, only because it could be about a deluge.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forgiveness

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolution

Mentioned before, but next you also have the forbidden fruit as well, being eaten by Eve, only because she had the wrong sex, and next became a woman.

[url]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forbidden_fruit[/url]

But where next is the tree?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_the_knowledge_of_good_and_evil

This because both a Belief itself, and also a notion for the same should make for a difference, also when it comes to possible science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nucleosynthesis

Oh. perhaps ended up wrong here, in one given way or another.

But next that of both infallabilities and infallabilities for that of ourselves, next with also respect to nature, in that it also could be about Creation.

I could finish off the rest of the beer right now, but it is still in the middle of the day, so next no fun.

Do you catch the article about Russia and hypersonic missiles at Yahoo! today?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beehive

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beehive_Cluster

It also could be about the Beehive Cluster as well, but here rather thinking about the Labyrinth,
where possibly, if not for obvious reasons, the internal structure of physical objects could be more defined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labyrinth

It should be no secret that it perhaps could be more easy thinking about a Labyrinth, rather than extraterrestrial intelligence, because of the way it could be showing up.

Like both shoes and also shoelaces, a couple of things could be lying in such a way, and next also put away as well, because it should not be standing on your shoulders either.

It became a little discussion before for that of life versus death, without too much objection, because it also could be a natural way of telling about these things as well.

Still perhaps rather a fact of life, except for not any depiction of nature either, but next "In the hands of God" could perhaps be telling about God himself,
except for not the way nature is supposed to be either.

Because still the difference here, in that you could assume both Equations, and also the Laws of nature, belonging to the physical part of it, and next where we also belong.

Like a King, or perhaps Emperor, you are not supposed to ask God to step down, and next mix in with the people, and the same thing goes with the Universe as well,
in that it also could be the observable Universe.

Guess what, but still perhaps some 78 billion years across, and only 13.8 billion years in radius, or across one axis, and next only half its diameter as well,
so here you have one of those discrepancies.

So, perhaps still a bit of science here, in that it could be acid in water, and not the opposite, but next that we also could be making it "Stairways to Heaven" as well,
for that of making it also a possible Belief.

Should God be next visible only because it could be about elementary particles, or even a Credo of sorts?

If we do not know, this is also because we also do not know, but if we actually knew, we also are supposed to know.

Where are those opposite Equations which could be telling about the Existence of God, except for not any Mathematical equations, or even physical Laws?

Also that it could be both converse, inverse and also that of negation above, except for perhaps not helping much either.

Like a summa summarum, or summa resumé, making it Field equations as well, could be making it at least equations being part of nature, except for not any famous equation either,
which could be telling about even more, or perhaps else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enumeration

And now not taking that of "Prerequisite" either, for that of a Condition, in the Wikipedia, when next keying in.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Condition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Premise

Here it becomes that of Premise again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifold

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation

Like a Manifold, also a Manifestation as well, and also Manifestation of God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifestation_of_God

Here also spring or source water as well, if not any mountain spring water either, because it rather became the Fountain of sorts, which except for perhaps the bird Phoenix,
could symbolize the spiritual being for that of an apparition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fountain

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destiny

Is nature still telling about itself for that of both Swastikas, if not any Janus face either, or is it rather only symbolism for that of also pretending?

Perhaps not any flatland either, but when next making it both stars, galaxies, and also clusters of galaxies, it it the way of the Universe of perhaps telling about itself.

Next adding a bit of symbols and swastika as well, and you have the rest of the story as well.

Make it rather a cryptic message, and it next could also be translated, except for not any pet lying on your desk either.

Like the Shroud of Turin, for example, except for not a billion results, it is not supposed to be any science either, because it next not counts.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence

Perhaps evidence should suffice here, when being mentioned, in that it could be a quite strong word to use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assertion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titius%E2%80%93Bode_law

For the first that scientists should still be thinking, and also be having both noses and ears, and for the second it became an example here about science itself.

Getting back to that above.

Similarly, listening in to a speech by a young lady, next in Washington D.C. for that of weapons control,
she interestingly touches on the possible roots and causes by not making it only a couple of tears.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance

Perhaps not all or everything here, but I came across this after doing so.

Except for not the things which always should come along and be included, of course.

Of course it could be a difference between ants and ourselves, but next also contemporary for a couple of things, by also making it Cynicism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynicism_(contemporary)

4,3 light years

4.3 light years

Seems to me that perhaps 4,3 is the more logical, because it next could only be a separation between two single numbers, next also both integer ones as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eagle_Nebula

Except for not any "Lucky devil" either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Static_variable

Next stuck when keying in Dynamic variable, except for still only Burl Ives for "It's your life, it is your day".

Should perhaps Logic be for that of Order versus Chaos here as well, in that it could still be a difference?

Sit in a chair, and next also a "rip off" as well, for that of a Cartoon, and next always movement.

Moving a million tons in a single sequence is not the same as holding a kilo in your hand, or maybe a litre as well,
and for the same reason also that of a feather, in that weight itself perhaps was not discussed that much.

Here I get it to the electron for perhaps the lightest of all, if not rather the Quark instead, because we could become more busy dealing with that of charge.

Again that we could be listening to alpha Centauri, of course, except for not only making it a dream of everything, including ourselves.

Sing a song, and next it becomes Lyrics as well, except for not believing in the Devil either.

To be fair or perhaps honest, it should be better being open minded, but next the fact that a Type I through Type III civilization next could have dish served,
for next "On the menu" as well, in order to become comprehended and understood, and next also a fact for such.

Should Monotheism next be the possible reason for that of Belief alone, or should we rather believe in those Equations which could explain nature?

Here for that of a sight-seeing tour across Los Angeles today, for next that of events also in slow motion, but next also happening.

The reason is why is still could be that of society, and next our own, which next should be compared to the rest of the Universe, and events happening there.

If even Infinity is only part of the puzzle, which next translates into bits and pieces, is perhaps the subject of Religion flawed, or perhaps inadequate,
if not lacking, when it also could be about Armageddon for that of an Armistice of war, except for any Revelation which could be visible in the sky?

God knows, but except for perhaps only a wish, also that I could be an astronomer of sorts, and next looking at the stars.

Make it a wish, and next also wishful thinking as well, but next in which way for which context for next that of possibly "believe"?

I definitely agree that there could be fallibles here, but next also that of the Laws of nature also could be for a given cause.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causality

Like also the power of love itself, sometimes you know how nature works only by means of example, or rather because it could be written in the books.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclic_redundancy_check

Sorry, not for you stupid, because here rather levels of intelligence for that of a given measure itself, because you always could be having the genius as well.

In the old schoolyard, we could be jumping the paradise at times, by placing each foot in a separate ring when next jumping around.

But next, when becoming an adult, you could have that of Object oriented programming instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-oriented_programming

Ask yourself the distance to the nearest star, and it next becomes some 4.3 light years, but only because of the speed of light, which next should be a constant.

Like both Inertia, also the Hammer and feather as well, in that it could be "Make and break" for a couple of things, and next also hard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plausibility_structure

Here perhaps better for only the word itself.

My guess is that women are not supposed to catch the train either, but rather asking for "enlightenment".

Make it rather Morality, and it also could be about dignity as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignity

Here it takes one wording, but not the opposite way around, for next that of a bow, when it also could be a curtsy or curtsey as well, for that of women.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociology

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavior

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fanaticism

And not forgetting any Fanaticm either, because next also that of a Rule of thumb for at least a principle.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_thumb

Needs checking here, because perhaps a better one.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frequentist_probability

Here keying in Statistical probability at first, because I mentioned at PrimeGrid such a way for that of finding prime numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stochastic

Here getting to the ugly word as well, which you have to check out yourself for the possible details.

Like a bit of buckle bones, you are sometimes nuts as well, at least when being a scientist concerned.

But next one step closer, next for that of nature, in that it also should be about knowledge.

A bit of a break here, and next catching my breath, for that of losing it all.

Next the swamp or marsh for also that of a witch ring, and also the word hexenoic (needs checking).

Again that Postulate makes it into Axiom when next checking.

Like diginity above, also what it perhaps is not about either, and next also supposedly so.

Yes, you may ask, only because it is a question, but rather an answer itself.

A bit of noise, and next also nuisance as well, because perfectness should also be symmetry for what it is supposed to mean.

Here you make it a volume label for that of a disk, except for not any "Gentle touch" either, for that of a song, and next also sing a song as well,
for that of only telling about the Universe.

If not wrong, Dick is a pet word of sorts for that of Richard, and here Dick Cheney for that of an example.

Here that of a witchhunt again, when it rather could be a pet for that of animals, and next also that of a marsh, or swamp.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(Dante)

Trying a couple of others first.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sciatica

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dystrophy

Perhaps related in some way to our search for that of the latter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appendix

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appendix_(anatomy)

Here it apparently broke for that of a former Prime Minister of my country, and next in a fall being experienced.

Please have me corrected if I get it wrong here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyslexia

Like ought to be, next perhaps not any "Not to be" either, because here that of possible story, except for not always any written either for such, which next could be a story about life,
and next also nature as well.

Funny, is it not, but if perhaps so, it still leads back, or redirects back at that of Axioms for such a thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quintessence

Lost a bit of the previous, but here perhaps a couple of good things once more or again.

While still looking for it, next it also could be a place in nature for that of living, and still perhaps also about us,
for next also the big or greater picture which also could be around.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Phantom_of_the_Opera

But next that still science supposedly sell.

Remember back a couple of years ago when we had a television series featuring the American Civil War?

Here for a moment skipping Racism, and perhaps also slavery as well, because a diamond always comes with a necklace, and for this you also have to be a rich man.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orson_Welles

Same here, because it becomes that of a story being told, except for the man himself.

Like Nickname as well, it also translates into Moniker as well, and also becomes a tell-tale story of an issue perhaps not supposed or meant to be.

But rather "reveal yourself" here, because it also became a word or two for this as well.

Need a bit of translation, and it also becomes an interpreter for this, except for not any speech analysis, or synthesis either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthesizer

Next a bit of album for that of listening.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clairvoyance

Back to business and next back to subject as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudoscience

The rumor, except for no song either, could perhaps be that "When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough Get Going".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-n3sUWR4FV4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmhjXEkI5Lg

Funny is it not, but Mercury also translates into quick silver, except for not any swamp or marsh either.

For this perhaps also the hidden world of the mind as well, in that it could be about possible disguises.

If perhaps only dreams, where is perhaps the Scientific Method in all of this, next for a possible explanation?

Still watch the swamp or marsh in the middle of the night, and also the little "mittens" or perhaps creatures, which next could also be translucent.

Perhaps still only "In the middle of the night" for that of a melody, but next also a question for that of an answer, in next for that of which science could be all about.

So. which word of expression, except for not any trampling on my foot either, because if not wrong, not Isaac Newton for that of the "Hammer and Feather" either.

Here my idea or suggestion for that of "weighted distribution" went down the drain for my outbox, or perhaps sent, so here no more being added.
except for rather making it "weighted distribution" for a couple of things.

Guess, what, but except for sometimes hard science, you also could make it ridicule for the whole thing.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ridicule

Guess what, but is perhaps watching YouTube for a couple of movies about a Proof process either, because it could be about a Method of Proof?

Rather making it details for a couple of things, and you next have to discern all the details, for that of a possible meaning.

Like underflow, also overflow as well, and it becomes the numerical thing or issue, which you supposedly are not that fond of.

Here synonymous next for that of tantamount as well, except for not any Statue of Liberty either, which could mean the Constitution.

One of the reasons for that of "Liberty", is that of the "Right to know"issue, which next also becomes that of "Freedom of Expression".

Attack always precede any defense, except for not making it any "Faceless coward" either.

But here rather the little place called Earth, and next our place in the Universe as well, except for also still a bit of "Nobody's Fools" as well.

If perhaps rather still a dream only, should it be half-hearted, because of only wishing for such a thing, or rather that it could manifest itself into possible truth?

Guess what, but Python could still be a programming language, except for not any false conception, or perhaps idea, for next that of the truth, by means of Monthy Python itself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python%27s_Life_of_Brian

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ptolemy

Catch you later for that of a possible difference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OBwS66EBUcY

The old print or version of Sky and Telescope had the word "surreptitious" for that of a photograph.

Next also "meticulous" as well, because it also could be digging in the sand.

But here also the "Comprehensive list of Gaussian candidates" except for not any bits and pieces either, and next everything laid on the table as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comprehension

My guess is that it should be so for a told story, except for not any fake one either, in that it could be music for both a love story,
and also that of events happening in the sky.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close_Encounters_of_the_Third_Kind

Except for not making it any realm of sciences, of course.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critters_(film_series)

Perhaps wrong here, but at least catching a little by reading.

Make it rather a painting, and next also the fine print at the bottom.

Is it perhaps still the misconception around that it could be about Critters, when it rather could be a world view for that of nature around us,
which next could be about a possible Conception?

Bad or ugly me, but perhaps not any Perception either, because also Conception or Conceptions of God.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conceptions_of_God

Here perhaps a nice one for such.

Like both the left hand, also the right hand as well, in that Inertia could next make it into that of Perception, next for that of possible "Belief".

So, why a "crooked" hand for such, when it rather should be straight?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSeJckOUZrs

If perhaps still only the Ace, for that of the Joker, and perhaps also Trump, or triumph, also the word "tantamount" mentioned previously.

Viva la Revolucion, except for not any spritual or conceptual thinking either, because here again it became a thought of that of subtraction versus division,
for that of a couple of thoughts of nature, and next for that of their own shape or perhaps "boxes" as well, in next also being that of an idea.

You ask for an parlor, or parlour, and next perhaps not any intention either.

This being fumbled upon, namely that the Force of gravity should not be any stumbling block either.

Here WYSIWYG as usual, except for not the midget versus the wheel either, which next also could be large.

Like also pretending, also not that very much either, in that I could make it that of a military man for that of a couple of observations and also discoveries,
but next that of also making it a bit of "Stairways to Heaven" as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretentious

Sorry, do not have that yet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_natural_phenomena

I mentioned that of Revelation above, or in the previous, and next also "knock-knock" for such a thing as well.

You could next make it both Determinism, and also Methodology if you will, but next any "Proof" whatsoever for what supposedly could be a Religious issue?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernatural

"I have a dream"...

But next I ought not to prove it either, sigh.

Make it ESC for that of ASCII character 27, and next Escape from New York, except for not any escape from Hell either.

Like open science, also open minded as well, and next I could still trust my books.

Here that of a GUT in process, next for, or because of that of thinking, and next which GUT?

Always a tell-tale story, if not any explanation either, but should it next rather be a difference, only because we also could differentiate?

If you rather make it the weather, still a couple of complex algorithms for that of a couple of questions, except for not any answers either.

Here perhaps still the bow as a symbolic gesture, except for not any such thing for nature either, which could mean a simplistic,
rather than a deterministic principle.

Or should we rather make it so that it could be still a couple of loose cards, or perhaps threads, which needs to be picked up, in order to make it possible science?

Make it an Equation of sorts, and perhaps not for me either, except for rather a couple of Black Holes, next in order to understand the Universe.

I mentioned the link for this earlier on, but do not have it here right now.

Please, please, like both faces, also facets as well, and also the Man in the Moon as well.

Why such a thing, except for having my own thread here?

Like illusion, also desillusion as well, if not any deluge either.

Here that of Noah's Ark, except for not any other word lost or between either.

But next a bit of "knock-knock" as well, in that all roads could be leading to Rome.

Make it rather a bit or couple of infallacies, and next such a thing itself, or on its own, rather than the thing it is supposed to be.

Here that of "granted" as well, except for not any be or to be either, because here also an idea which could become lost.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pluralism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Being

Next the mentioned "la-la" land for such as well.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antagonism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropology

Compare with Anthropology, where science is perhaps correct, if not any wrong either.

Pour a strong drink or beverage in a small glass, and next bottoms up for the same.

Like a credible issue itself, perhaps not any Credible science either, for its supposed or intended meaning.

Here the same possible rewrite, in that it next could be that of biting in the dust as usual, except for not any bow for science, which next could mean an Absolution.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyrant

Translates into possible tyranny, if not getting the above right either.

Make it rather the dentist here, and he could be picking, rather than just pricking, for that of making it stone upon stone as well.

My guess is that Religion is perhaps not any "Fiction" either, except for still a Conceptual reality, which next could be about science.

I said "Beware the wolf" in the past, except for not making it any heels or toes either.

We perhaps could agree that the reason for infinity is not the reason why I could be still sitting here.

Translates wrong right now, and should rather be about Monotheism, and next about God as well.

Needs a fix here, because not about any adventure or entertainment either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_travel

Here keying in Time machine right now.

Like a sake of, next also purpose as well, in that it should be about a possible meaning, and perhaps not only about ourselves.

I was thinking about the fact that even time could be a notion, except for not any Heaven and Hell either.

Next perhaps nature in front of your feet if you happen to be lucky, except for perhaps not any jerk either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis

Now it becomes more clear, in that a religous or theological mind should not be the same as any scientific mind or character either.

Here for that of both advocate and assert, if not any espouse either, because you probably know that I had problems with this word.

Here you get a little closer explanation for this word.

Next reality for that of the first, next the scythe being used for taking it all away.

Pick a random sample and next also choose as well, except for not any "Here we go" either, and it could be the last day of life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perdition

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damnation

Unfortunately, we could make it that for life itself, because it next could be about birth and subsequent death.

Here a classical example of processes for still that of life, except for not making it any death either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recycling

Make it a trip to Holland, or perhaps Netherlands, for that of wind turbines, and next that of wind in action, for next producing energy.

But rather that it seems to me, except for not making it any occult either, or even a couple of tears which could be shed.

When next perhaps still details, also the small difference as well, except for not the big void or emptiness, which also could signify nature.

You know, still two teeth in the upper jaw, and next also a bit of intelligence as well.

Next perhaps only one part or half part of the subject, except for not any Bomb away, of course.

Ask for a solution, and next also a peaceful solution as well.

What if perhaps a demonstration became that of free will of sorts, and next also an expression of a possible meaning?

For this also banner and slogans as well, except for not any shouting either, but to me it seems perfectly clear that it next could be only one thing, namely that of an interpretation of nature,
next by means of a certain context itself.

Like knucklehead, also that of line in the bottom, if not any lace either.

Next perhaps a kiss as well, and you could end up believing in the whole story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enigma

Translates into enigmatic here, except for the Enigma machine, which could be for that of the Second World War.

Again one of those, it seems. where one thing could perhaps pretend to be another.

Yes, make it both Racism and slavery, if you will, and next also extermination as well, because it should be part of nature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extermination

Compare with Excorcism, and you perhaps have something else.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism

You still could make it the Nobel Peace Prize, and also laureate for such a thing, but here I find a bit of nice wording as well.

Magic --> sorcery

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ezekiel

Next a couple of wheels inside wheels . . .

Myths versus legends . . (Ursa Major)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conglomerate

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attribute

Here for that of perhaps a start, if not making it any sets either.

Read my lips, and next my mind as well, and next the fact that Creation supposedly goes for that of nature.

Make it rather that of a Contradiction, next also a bad day as well, if not any Heaven and Hell either, for a bit of thought.

Perhaps adding here, except for those links.

Extrapopulate . . .

Except for perhaps still ourselves, and not any Fort Knox either, because as you probably know, there could be a way of thinking of us for that of ourselves, next only one civillization among many others.

But still the rule of law, of course, if not any jungle either.

Stoa, for that of stoachism, or the like, and here it suddenly became lost, for that of contents.

Getting back at it.

Darnit! but here not the Forces with me this time, for that of such a process or principle.

Edit: Trying. as you probably know, but next it went straight down, like falling down a shaft.

Keeping a tab on it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence

Yeah, math versus science, for next that of teaching me a lesson as well, excpet for perhaps not anything else either.

Or perhaps a foot in the grave, except for not any life itself and next also still making it science.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5-fP4QpL0A

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diarrhea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Absentia

Abhorrent (or disgusting) for next that of the snowman as well.

Peace on Earth, except for not any Lovejoy either.

But next rather a powdercake, and also gunsmoke as well, if not any fireworks either.

Or perhaps rather a gut feeling as well, if not making it any GUT either.

Next so proud I am, except for not making it any Stoachism either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4xV8xxXR2Q

Hmm, except for not in the spotlight either, except for perhaps not only the link at the bottom here.

https://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=81525

If perhaps not any answers either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fata_Morgana_(mirage)

Perhaps something else in between here, which became lost.

Figaro . . .

Next, rest only because you are lying, and not only because of your laurels either.

Stich, and next also a mitch, except for not any windows either, which could be part of a house.

But next rather dumb, dumber, dumbest, for next also the silly fool around, and next not pretending to be the best either.

Here still that of wording, of course, and next also that of magnificience, if not any greatness either.

Knucklehead. but next also a measure as well, if not any Heaven on Hell either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sand

Next count it for that of the individual grains, except for not any stupid thought either, about possibly being alone, next for that of humankind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7HGwVqI_FM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4xV8xxXR2Q

Speaking about credibility, next also a bit of unfinished here,

Yes, I know, next for that of my thread, but also the silly thing of sometimes not being heard as well.

Getting back at it.

Except for perhaps not knowing what science is still about.

Me or my, except for not any next about either.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos

Perhaps still one way of looking at Chaos as a possible subject, except for also the factors which could make such a thing possible.

Like R.I.P for sometimes a good policeman, also that it could be life on Earth as usual, and next a couple of sins being carried out at times.

Next also a bit of hatred coming along as well.

Perhaps this is the meaning of it all, and it should be only salvation for that of possible death when it happens.

Indifference is perhaps not the same as any indulgence either, but in one sense we could still make it "Love from God" in such a context.

But also that factors could be a different thing than any Reason as well, and therefore it may be impossible to determine any factors here.

Edit: Should have switched the order of the comma and punctuation mark in the earlier question.

Except for stating the goals for what you wish to achieve.

Perhaps you were thinking that I had almost forgotten that.

For this sometimes the night or carpet crawler associated with such a thing as Cramp, or Muscle spasms.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cramp

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epileptic_seizure

Here perhaps a valid subject in itself for that of a subject, for that of the latter, but perhaps not the wished for, or preferred subject here.

But next we perhaps should also agree that science sells at times, for that of the intelligent signal which never manifests, or is coming our way,
for that of our detection capabilities.

Next still both science and also scientists could be having the upper hand, for that of throwing one thing out for another, except sometimes that of credible witnesses for such a thing.

Is this perhaps about a given attitude, or perhaps a reflection upon given or stated facts, when such a thing happens?

Perhaps still that of emptiness of space at times, except for both notions, terms, and also expressions for a couple of subjects,
except for not any Laws or Equations either.

The logo being used for the national oil company here, is featuring the droplet, with the sharp needle at one end.

Here perhaps that of a feature making up nature. like also that of patterns, but next that perhaps not any Mercury is needed for that of an element,
in order to calculate both area, and also volume.

Credible reports by means of also credible facts should not be a thing coming from ones mind, but rather a perception of three-dimensional space,
and also the huge distances involved.

Radio signals next become transmitted, or perhaps emanated, by means of waves for such, and next at the speed of light, or almost.

We are able to detect such waves from radio sources like M87, which next are also galaxies located outside the Milky Way.

The high pitch sound is next not the same as the deep rumble either, but both should next be reflected in the numbers coming as a result of processing.

Before acknowledging the possibility of an intelligent signal coming from space, it is necessary to acknowledge the UFO phenomenon itself,
so here a link to such a thing is welcome.

Like sometimes overstepping, also that of taking a couple of things for granted already from the start.

If I happened to say such a thing, perhaps you could make a guess, or perhaps know the possible outcome, except for a couple of things being noted for that of both
video and also graphics software (raster graphics).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raster_graphics

Like that of also raster graphics, you also could make it Perception itself for such a thing, in order to also make it not such a thing either.

The UFO phenomenon next could be a valid subject for that of its occurrence only, and we therefore could be choosing to do science on the subject.

Like also indulgence, also forbearance as well, if not any patience either.

Almost 15 years at work here, it becomes the yet another starting day, except for the problems slowly rising here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stack

Still Burnham's Celestial Handbook standing in my shelf, and also the frontside cover photograph of a radio telescope on a high rise book as well.

But next that of a military origin for that of a view or conception of things related to that of objects of extraterrestrial origin, and I could be left believing in the whole story.

The question "Are we alone" is perhaps an old one, and we could be left still unanswered when it comes to the whole question.

Like both Myths and also Legends, also Folklore as well, when listening to this word at the moment.

If not wrong, perhaps not any Gutenberg either, but sometimes you could come across figures depicting that of a Labyrinth, or the similar,
which could be showing a property of nature by also featuring it this way, but here perhaps a little more specific when needed,
except for not the subject itself.

And next it also could become only that of black and white here as well, and not any colors.

So, what is the name of the witch here, riding the broom or brush?

Apparently not any Cinderella either.

Ancient term or terminology here, and the better name for this is needed, except for both horizontal and also vertical for a couple of things flying in the air,
and next the guess or assumption that it perhaps might be a product of technology.

In fact it became such a thing for myself, before the whole thing of the video camera was being put away, and next no more.

These became visits of sorts from an alien civilization, believe it or not, and if perhaps exponential, if not any logarithmic for the Kardashev scale,
also a guess that it here could be much like a Type II civilization for this.

If the old Seticlassic gaussian scores could be thought of, or deemed valid for their possible origin, next also the fact being present as well, for that of perhaps not being alone.

Except for not any front page cover either, of course, which next could be staring you in the face for that of such.

Like "Move along", also "come along" as well, and next such a thing as usual, next for also that of a continuation of the subject, and also similar research.

My guess is that we could be having a couple of stupid Politicians at times, if not any clever, but next that it also could become a statement or declaration of sorts,
next for the fact that we perhaps are not alone in space.

But if next both swastika and symbols, if not any raster graphics either, also that of such a thing which could represent or make up nature,
and next by means of both property and feature, could be representing such a thing, rather than only being a product of ourselves.

Like both love and affection, also passion at times as well, and next passion for a subject.

Make it Seti@home, next also science at home as well, for that of perhaps both science and also Religion for such a thing.

Technology by means of a product could sometimes break in its socket, while diamonds could last forever.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psyche

Psyche could next be derived from Psychology, and next also about a state of mind.

Like also Ascencion, or perhaps Ascuncion, for that of a couple of islands, also the rise of Jesus for such a thing, and next towards Heaven.

Perhaps it became the thing forgotten here, and needs checking for that of facts.

Here Ascension, Saint Helena, for that of the intended place, and I have to make it Saint here manually.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascension_of_Jesus

I leave it here for now, except for still only stars and stripes for making the difference between the clever or skilled, if not any cunning either,
and next also the one passing by, who next could be a loser.

This because Logic could be thought of as the reason for Intelligence itself, and rather than neutron stars or Black Holes, we could be back at the human brain.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurology

Like sillyness, also stupidness at times, and next that the emptiness of space should be the reason for both life and Intelligence here on Earth.

But next that making it a Creator of sorts for the whole thing, and it becomes that of Religion and Faith once again.

Hyperspace is perhaps not a thing for real, but rather that we could be using the "better" words for that of possible Terminology, in order to illustrate a particular subject.

For this, also the fact that it sometimes could be "Have a nice day", for that of wishful thinking, except for not translating such a thing into possible dreams either.