"No project chosen for work fetch"

Message boards : Number crunching : "No project chosen for work fetch"
Message board moderation

Author	Message
gcpeters Send message Joined: 20 May 99 Posts: 67 Credit: 109,352,237 RAC: 1	Message 1236022 - Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:21:09 UTC Why am I seeing this in my logs when I do an update? That verbiage is terrible because I HAVE chosen a project...and new workloads are being pulled down... ID: 1236022 ·
Slavac Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 27 Apr 11 Posts: 1932 Credit: 17,952,639 RAC: 0	Message 1236045 - Posted: 24 May 2012, 18:50:16 UTC - in response to Message 1236022.   Is this on your 7.0.25 machines? You may want to downgrade to 6.10.60 which will probably solve a lot of your issues. Executive Director GPU Users Group Inc. - brad@gpuug.org ID: 1236045 ·
skildude Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60	Message 1236091 - Posted: 24 May 2012, 20:59:39 UTC - in response to Message 1236045.   A reminder that if you have work on a 7.0.XX BOINC and downgrade to a 6.X.XX you will lose all work onboard In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope ID: 1236091 ·
tbret Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 3380 Credit: 296,162,071 RAC: 40	Message 1236096 - Posted: 24 May 2012, 21:04:17 UTC - in response to Message 1236022.   Why am I seeing this in my logs when I do an update? That verbiage is terrible because I HAVE chosen a project...and new workloads are being pulled down... As best I can figure, it means "currently." Notice that it says that at the END of a fetch. Yes, I agree about the phrasing. I thought something was messed-up, too. It isn't a problem. ID: 1236096 ·
gcpeters Send message Joined: 20 May 99 Posts: 67 Credit: 109,352,237 RAC: 1	Message 1236218 - Posted: 25 May 2012, 1:27:11 UTC Why release new versions if you have to go to lesser versions to have things work correctly??? This is bad coding. /fail ID: 1236218 ·
BilBg Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 27 May 07 Posts: 3720 Credit: 9,385,827 RAC: 0	Message 1236257 - Posted: 25 May 2012, 4:17:30 UTC - in response to Message 1236218.   Why release new versions if you have to go to lesser versions to have things work correctly??? This is bad coding. /fail No need, see the answers in your other thread: http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=68187&nowrap=true#1236050   - ALF - "Find out what you don't do well ..... then don't do it!" :)   ID: 1236257 ·

 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.