Message boards :
Number crunching :
Short estimated runtimes - don't panic
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5
Author | Message |
---|---|
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51478 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Oh, I do not disagree that I would luv to see an increase in the limits, although even the kittyman must admit that with the enhanced server availability over the last month or so, it has become less of a concern for now. I am just giving my gut feelings on how they will handle it. And I don't know how many more tweaks will be required until the APR numbers are where the boyz think they should be. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19406 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
Is there enough bandwidth to support an increase in limits? |
kittyman Send message Joined: 9 Jul 00 Posts: 51478 Credit: 1,018,363,574 RAC: 1,004 |
Is there enough bandwidth to support an increase in limits? Not yet, but don't panic. There are rumors of something coming up that might better support what we have now. All I can say. Meow. "Time is simply the mechanism that keeps everything from happening all at once." |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13855 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
Is there enough bandwidth to support an increase in limits? There wasn't enough bandwidth even when the limits were at their smallest. Grant Darwin NT |
Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14679 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 |
The current APR cap - after two rounds of tweaks - is high enough that only the very fastest GPUs are still being capped. Those hosts are fast enough that they should be able to burn through any pre-tweak tasks in a couple of days after the next (and final) adjustment. Then, it'll be a question for the labs: do they want to go back to the size of database they were running before the caps were put in place? And for the users: do we want to go back to the five or six hour maintenance outages that the bloated database needed for backup and compaction? And, with the newer and more reliable servers, do we need 10-day caches all the time? |
bill Send message Joined: 16 Jun 99 Posts: 861 Credit: 29,352,955 RAC: 0 |
No problems here. I haven't been out of work in months. |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13855 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 |
And, with the newer and more reliable servers, do we need 10-day caches all the time? I'd be happy to have a 4 day cache again, which would require the limtis to be about 2.5 times what they are now. Grant Darwin NT |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.