Questions and Answers :
Windows :
iam thinking about leaving Seti@home
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
San Ra-Lu Quonling Send message Joined: 3 Sep 99 Posts: 12 Credit: 39,307 RAC: 0 |
since days i send my WU´s to Seti but i dont get a Single Credit, i hope LHC gets new WU´s fast, then i kick Seti from Boinc... |
Keith Kennedy Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 149 Credit: 244,165 RAC: 0 |
Credits are nice, they make people happy. But are you in this for the credit, or as a contribution to science? |
THESPEEKER Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 168 Credit: 48,990 RAC: 0 |
It would help if you crunched the WU's that have been sent to your 4 computers only a handful have been done. http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/hosts_user.php?userid=340283 |
Keith Kennedy Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 149 Credit: 244,165 RAC: 0 |
> It would help if you crunched the WU's that have been > sent to your 4 computers only a handful have been done. > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/hosts_user.php?userid=340283 > > I suspect he has only one computer, even though the list shows four. The same happened to me when I deleted BOINC and reinstalled it a couple times trying to work around some problems. I have since deleted the "ghost" computers from my list. |
littleBouncer Send message Joined: 28 May 99 Posts: 151 Credit: 666,283 RAC: 0 |
> > It would help if you crunched the WU's that have been > > sent to your 4 computers only a handful have been done. > > > > http://setiweb.ssl.berkeley.edu/hosts_user.php?userid=340283 > > > > > I suspect he has only one computer, even though the list shows four. The same > happened to me when I deleted BOINC and reinstalled it a couple times trying > to work around some problems. I have since deleted the "ghost" computers from > my list. > I'm sure he set cache up of three days, and then he pushed several times the "reset"-Button on BOINC-Client 4.13 with the effect that all WU's are gone. How can he crunch them?? |
Pascal, K G Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 |
Looking over your results file, it appears you have not crunched that many WUWUs and you have a lot of WUWUs that will not be crunched because you keep detaching and reattaching to Seti@h... I see 4 computers listed, so you need to merge them and crunch more WUWUs if you want credit.....or you can go to LHC@H, your call. You have 133.89 credits listed.......... Links to Documents by Project or How I found out all the Stuff I Needed to Know About BOINC Semper Eadem So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride. Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No. |
Marz Send message Joined: 22 Jun 04 Posts: 13 Credit: 967,602 RAC: 0 |
> Credits are nice, they make people happy. But are you in this for the credit, > or as a contribution to science? > Both. I want to know my contribution is being used, not pending in limbo for ever. No credits, no contribution. |
Trane Francks Send message Joined: 18 Jun 99 Posts: 221 Credit: 122,319 RAC: 0 |
> > Credits are nice, they make people happy. But are you in this for the credit, > > or as a contribution to science? > > Both. I want to know my contribution is being used, not pending in limbo for > ever. No credits, no contribution. By participating through the rough times, you help BOINC development work out the kinks and ultimately deliver a solid platform on which to manage the various science projects. Even no credits results in contribution. |
mikey Send message Joined: 17 Dec 99 Posts: 4215 Credit: 3,474,603 RAC: 0 |
> > Credits are nice, they make people happy. But are you in this for the > credit, > > or as a contribution to science? > > > > Both. I want to know my contribution is being used, not pending in limbo for > ever. No credits, no contribution. > You might want to switch back to Classic then! Boinc DOES give credits but not on a consistent EVERYDAY basis. The system is NOT broken, but it does need some tweaking. It WILL be tweaked as time goes and your contribution IS helping! |
Marz Send message Joined: 22 Jun 04 Posts: 13 Credit: 967,602 RAC: 0 |
> You might want to switch back to Classic then! > Boinc DOES give credits but not on a consistent EVERYDAY basis. The system is > NOT broken, but it does need some tweaking. It WILL be tweaked as time goes > and your contribution IS helping! I've been thinking about it but I doubt I'll do it. The more results they get in for BOINC, the sooner things get straightened out. Just seems a bit much for so many files to go missing, so many errors to be produced. Here they are: No idea what this error means, I got the WU, it was reported back in about 2 days for each time, Unknown Outcome, New Client state: 8 Most of these have "Check Skipped" as validation, one "Invalid" That I saw, 1 or 2 with under a minute for CPU time the rest had more, 0 Cretit Granted: 13 Most of these were probably my fault, had cpu probs & had to format twice since I've started BOINC so some were lost, don't remember this many though, No Reply: 66 Download Error: 8 Missing File: 37 Pending: 53 In Progress: 14 Total Results: 520 |
Pascal, K G Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 |
From a post by Paul; From the "Rules and Policy" =============== Liability SETI@home and University of California assume no liability for damage to your computer, loss of data, or any other event or condition that may occur as a result of participating in SETI@home. Other BOINC projects Other projects use the same platform, BOINC, as SETI@home. You may want to consider participating in one or more of these projects. By doing so, your computer will do useful work even when SETI@home has no work available for it. These other projects are not associated with SETI@home, and we cannot vouch for their security practices or the nature of their research. Join them at your own risk. ============== From the Credit Page: Claimed credit is reported to a project when your computer communicates with its server. The granted credit that you receive may be different from the claimed credit, and there may be a delay of a few hours or days before it is granted. This is because some BOINC projects grant credit only after results have been validated. ================ From "Getting Started": Please keep in mind: There may be a delay of several days between when your computer reports a result and when it is granted credit for the result. Your User page shows you how much credit is 'pending' (claimed but not granted). The credit-granting process starts when your computer reports a result to the server (not when it finishes computing the result or uploading the output files). In rare cases (e.g. if errors occur on one or more computers) you may never receive credit for a computation. ================= Semper Eadem So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride. Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No. |
John McLeod VII Send message Joined: 15 Jul 99 Posts: 24806 Credit: 790,712 RAC: 0 |
> > You might want to switch back to Classic then! > > Boinc DOES give credits but not on a consistent EVERYDAY basis. The > system is > > NOT broken, but it does need some tweaking. It WILL be tweaked as time > goes > > and your contribution IS helping! > > > I've been thinking about it but I doubt I'll do it. The more results they get > in for BOINC, the sooner things get straightened out. Just seems a bit much > for so many files to go missing, so many errors to be produced. Here they > are: > > > No idea what this error means, I got the WU, it was reported back in about 2 > days for each time, Unknown Outcome, New Client state: > 8 I don't know either. > > > Most of these have "Check Skipped" as validation, one "Invalid" That I saw, 1 > or 2 with under a minute for CPU time the rest had more, 0 Cretit Granted: > 13 Check skipped means that the WU errored out on too many machines. There were some bugs that may have been straightned out recently. Keep a watch for any new ones. Invalid means that your result did not match the other results. I believe that these should be looked at. One of these isn't too bad. Under a minute may grant some credit but usually less than 0.01 which is the minimum to display. OTOH they may have errored out this fast. > > > Most of these were probably my fault, had cpu probs & had to format twice > since I've started BOINC so some were lost, don't remember this many though, > No Reply: > 66 Returned after the replacement was sent and returned (or not returned at all). Symptoms of a machine that is not on most of the time, a queue that is too large, resets, detaches, retiring a machine, or client hardware failure. > > > Download Error: > 8 Usually a problem with the WU. No processing on your part. > > > Missing File: > 37 There were some server crashes that had this symptom. > > > Pending: > 53 Waiting for others to return the WU for verification, or the verifier has somehow lost something. There was a bug that has supposedly been fixed within the past month or so that caused some of the older ones to enter this state permanently. > > > In Progress: > 14 You should have these on one of your computers being processed, waiting to be processed, waiting to upload, or waiting to report. > > > Total Results: 520 > BOINC WIKI |
San Ra-Lu Quonling Send message Joined: 3 Sep 99 Posts: 12 Credit: 39,307 RAC: 0 |
well i looked now at my credits non granted credit, btw switsched back from over 600 to 598 :-( i think thats it... bye Seti... |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.