7/9 outage over

Author	Message
RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013652 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:02:52 UTC start uploading ID: 1013652 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013669 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:13:12 UTC download servers are disabled, there they go again wasting bandwidth. ID: 1013669 ·

Hellsheep Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 08 Posts: 428 Credit: 784,780 RAC: 0	Message 1013673 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:14:46 UTC - in response to Message 1013669. download servers are disabled, there they go again wasting bandwidth. I assume they're going to wait for a bit to allow everyone some ample time to upload their work that way when it gets pegged (as it most likely will) even with the new limit uploads hopefully won't be affected too much. - Jarryd ID: 1013673 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013676 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:16:59 UTC - in response to Message 1013673. Last modified: 9 Jul 2010, 15:17:36 UTC I assume they're going to wait for a bit to allow everyone some ample time to upload their work that way when it gets pegged... any good admin could limit the download server to say 80 MB/s. you only need a tiny bit of download bandwidth for handshaking on upload. ID: 1013676 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013682 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:22:28 UTC so they are going to wait for everyone to upload so we can all hit the download server at once. people have queued downloads, why not let them start. me thinks they do this s&*^ on purpose!!! looking at the graphs, it only requires about 1% of the upload bandwidth for handshaking (download bandwidth). ID: 1013682 ·

Bill Walker Send message Joined: 4 Sep 99 Posts: 3868 Credit: 2,697,267 RAC: 0	Message 1013683 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:23:10 UTC - in response to Message 1013676. I assume they're going to wait for a bit to allow everyone some ample time to upload their work that way when it gets pegged... any good admin could limit the download server to say 80 MB/s. you only need a tiny bit of download bandwidth for handshaking on upload. I respectfully disagree with your characterization of all the S@H staff as "not good". ID: 1013683 ·

Hellsheep Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 08 Posts: 428 Credit: 784,780 RAC: 0	Message 1013684 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:23:12 UTC - in response to Message 1013676. I assume they're going to wait for a bit to allow everyone some ample time to upload their work that way when it gets pegged... any good admin could limit the download server to say 80 MB/s. you only need a tiny bit of download bandwidth for handshaking on upload. Considering the connection is already having issues at max bandwidth, i doubt limiting it is effective. Also you mean 80Mb not 80MB. 80MB = 640Mbit We only have 100Mbit connection which is 12.5MB. So 20Mbit for uploads = 2.5MB. So essentially say goodbye to uploads since i'm uploading at 20KB/s each work unit. That means me alone could max out uploads. - Jarryd ID: 1013684 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013689 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:29:33 UTC - in response to Message 1013686. correct hellsheep, thanks for correcting me. :D ID: 1013689 ·

Hellsheep Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 12 Sep 08 Posts: 428 Credit: 784,780 RAC: 0	Message 1013690 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:30:38 UTC - in response to Message 1013689. correct hellsheep, thanks for correcting me. :D Any time. Math is something i'm actually good at. ;D - Jarryd ID: 1013690 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013698 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:36:09 UTC perhaps it would be a good idea to turn off downloading of AP work units since they are large. ID: 1013698 ·

RottenMutt Send message Joined: 15 Mar 01 Posts: 1011 Credit: 230,314,058 RAC: 0	Message 1013701 - Posted: 9 Jul 2010, 15:38:57 UTC - in response to Message 1013698. Ummm, i almost forgot what those Cuda MB workunits tasted like, "get in my belly"! ID: 1013701 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.