Message boards :
Number crunching :
Anyone else using CUDA 3.0 dlls?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4
Author | Message |
---|---|
Crun-chi Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 174 Credit: 3,037,232 RAC: 0 |
And I will startup my GT 240 in few hours :) No problem I will send you message :) I am cruncher :) I LOVE SETI BOINC :) |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
Don't be shy.. You can do this also here in the forum.. It would be interesting for all. |
mimo Send message Joined: 7 Feb 03 Posts: 92 Credit: 14,957,404 RAC: 0 |
if i wanna use both (different) cards: i must have : attached two monitors or had enabled psychx on the second ... |
Mamluk Send message Joined: 10 Sep 09 Posts: 80 Credit: 2,448,048 RAC: 0 |
And I will startup my GT 240 in few hours :) I started BOINC just prior to frying my BIOS. The results were not encouraging - CUDA 2.3, PhysX disabled: NVIDIA GPU 0: GeForce GT240 (driver version 19562, CUDA version 3000, compute capability 1.2, 512MB, 279 GFLOPS peak) The GFLOPS are 15% less than my 8800GS on 19170. I didn't get to see how it would crunch though. |
Crun-chi Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 174 Credit: 3,037,232 RAC: 0 |
It have same performance then my 9800 green. So in fact it is faster card compared to characteristics. If GT240 has 96 cuda cores, and 9800 green 112, then it is faster compared to 9800. And also it cannot get over 47 °C (24/7 seti crunch) :) I am cruncher :) I LOVE SETI BOINC :) |
Raistmer Send message Joined: 16 Jun 01 Posts: 6325 Credit: 106,370,077 RAC: 121 |
In short, last nVidia driver (195.62) has worse performance then prev ones for my low-end GPU too. But the difference in performance is pretty small. Data provided: |
Sutaru Tsureku Send message Joined: 6 Apr 07 Posts: 7105 Credit: 147,663,825 RAC: 5 |
Thanks for your 'officially' test! Big table.. In short, which driver you would use now with current CUDA_V2.3 ? 190.38 , 190.62 , 191.07 ? BTW. 195.x and CUDA_V3.0_final wouldn't change this table with the current available equipment, or? |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.