Message boards :
Number crunching :
CUDA Taking Too Long To Process?
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 29 May 99 Posts: 23 Credit: 8,695,373 RAC: 1 ![]() |
I got this message for a 6.08 wu (using 6.6.37 BOINC) - 7/30/2009 3:26:42 AM SETI@home Aborting task 04dc08ah.16808.1299.15.10.131_0: exceeded elapsed time limit 16701.964037 Didn't expect to see this. XP 32-bit, Q6600, GTX 260 - 216 (driver 182.15) I've been unable to successfully process any GPUGRID wu, but that's another story. I see the occasional aborted SETI CUDA wu abort, but I caught this one in the messages. Any info.? Is this related to the VLAR issue? ![]() |
Josef W. Segur Send message Joined: 30 Oct 99 Posts: 4504 Credit: 1,414,761 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I got this message for a 6.08 wu (using 6.6.37 BOINC) - Given your clues, I found the Task details 1320119915. It's not related to the VLAR issue, being a midrange "true angle range is : 0.432947". What happened was a failure to detect the GPU properly: setiathome_CUDA: Found 1 CUDA device(s): Device 1 : Device Emulation (CPU) totalGlobalMem = -1 The emulation mode doesn't work, so eventually it gets to "Falling back to HOST CPU processing...", and that's a generic slow CPU version. The maximum elapsed time was set assuming the GPU would do the work, so wasn't enough for CPU fallback mode. There are three other similar cases in that host's errored task list. I think others with similar problems have found updating to newer nVidia drivers helped. Joe |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 May 99 Posts: 23 Credit: 8,695,373 RAC: 1 ![]() |
Hi Josef, I've been dealing with driver issues and GPUGRID. Have fallen back to this revision as it is the most stable at this time. I thought that 6.6.37 took care of this type of issue. I'll try a newer version of the driver and monitor. Thanks for the reply! ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Dec 05 Posts: 13 Credit: 2,050,629 RAC: 1 ![]() |
After posting this to another forum, which may have been wrong, I found this thread. Please help if you can....I am running the 190.&& nVidia drivers and just updated the CUDA .dll's to the neww ones posted via the lunatics web site. Got some fresh CUDA work and on my GeForce 9400 GT (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 10GFLOPS) vid card, it is scheduled to take 13 HOURS to finish a batch! Any suggestions, or help IS GREATLY appreciated. |
MarkJ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Feb 08 Posts: 1139 Credit: 80,854,192 RAC: 5 ![]() |
After posting this to another forum, which may have been wrong, I found this thread. Please help if you can....I am running the 190.&& nVidia drivers and just updated the CUDA .dll's to the neww ones posted via the lunatics web site. Got some fresh CUDA work and on my GeForce 9400 GT (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 10GFLOPS) vid card, it is scheduled to take 13 HOURS to finish a batch! Any suggestions, or help IS GREATLY appreciated. Well 10Gflops is not fast for a graphics card. Its only an estimated time. It will need to work on a couple of them to get a better idea of how long they take. If it isn't a VLAR it will probably be a lot better than the 13 hour estimate. BOINC blog |
JohnDK ![]() ![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 28 May 00 Posts: 1222 Credit: 451,243,443 RAC: 1,127 ![]() ![]() |
After posting this to another forum, which may have been wrong, I found this thread. Please help if you can....I am running the 190.&& nVidia drivers and just updated the CUDA .dll's to the neww ones posted via the lunatics web site. Got some fresh CUDA work and on my GeForce 9400 GT (driver version 19038, compute capability 1.1, 1024MB, est. 10GFLOPS) vid card, it is scheduled to take 13 HOURS to finish a batch! Any suggestions, or help IS GREATLY appreciated. You could add <flops> to app_info.xml as described here http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_thread.php?id=53593 |
FiveHamlet ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 783 Credit: 32,638,578 RAC: 0 ![]() |
@ John Is it possible to shutdown Boinc and add FLOPS lines in app_info.xml then restart Boinc,and not loose tasks. I have about 1000 tasks to be processed and it will take a few days.Or would it be better to run the tasks out and then alter the .xml? I know the second option is the best way but I would like the timings a bit better. ![]() |
Fred W Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 2524 Credit: 11,954,210 RAC: 0 ![]() |
@ John Adding the flops line will not break anything as long as you are careful to re-save the .xml file as .xml and not as .txt. F. ![]() |
FiveHamlet ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Oct 99 Posts: 783 Credit: 32,638,578 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Thank's Fred ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.