Largest WU's?

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Largest WU's?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Softlies
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jan 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 47,594
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 860487 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 2:07:50 UTC
Last modified: 1 Feb 2009, 2:11:51 UTC

Been goin for couple days now and all i get are these tiny wu's that finish in 5 mins or less. Just checked and my work buffer was only set to .25 days. Could that be why im not getting larger WU's?
If thats the case whats the smallest buffer i could use and still get all sizes of wu's. I upped it to 3 days buffer now and it has 10 gigs max. Would rather have it under a day if it doesnt matter

Edit: Also what is considered normal RAC? Seems i can get 5000 credits per day no problem but i see some peeps with 14k RAC's. Is that just multiple comps running same ID?
ID: 860487 · Report as offensive
Profile Leopoldo
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 99
Posts: 102
Credit: 3,051,091
RAC: 0
Russia
Message 860490 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 2:14:14 UTC - in response to Message 860487.  
Last modified: 1 Feb 2009, 2:18:47 UTC

Been goin for couple days now and all i get are these tiny wu's that finish in 5 mins or less. Just checked and my work buffer was only set to .25 days. Could that be why im not getting larger WU's?
If thats the case whats the smallest buffer i could use and still get all sizes of wu's. I upped it to 3 days buffer now and it has 10 gigs max. Would rather have it under a day if it doesnt matter


Size of received SETI@Home workunits is nearly equal, ~375Kbytes (differs text part with tags) for traditional S@H and ~8Mbytes for Astropulse. Processing time differs due to data recorded from telescope and algorithm used for calculations.
ID: 860490 · Report as offensive
Softlies
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jan 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 47,594
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 860495 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 2:31:23 UTC

Ok got an 8 meg AP now. But i wasnt getting them with the lower buffer. if i lower from 3 to will will i still get them or is that something differnt for everyone and i just have to tinker?

and whats considered normal RAC, damn good RAC, and Crazy RAC?
ID: 860495 · Report as offensive
Profile perryjay
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 20 Aug 02
Posts: 3377
Credit: 20,676,751
RAC: 0
United States
Message 860503 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 2:52:12 UTC - in response to Message 860495.  

The high RACs you're seeing are on what we call farms. Many computers running under one ID.They are usually at least quads and they crunch huge amounts of WUs fast.

Your RAC will depend on what kind of computer(s) you put to the task. You've got a really good machine there so expect to see your RAC climb pretty fast. You might also want to poke around on this site and read up on adding an optimizing app. It will help you go a lot faster. If you have any questions about this don't be afraid to ask. We have many people on here that are only too happy to help.


PROUD MEMBER OF Team Starfire World BOINC
ID: 860503 · Report as offensive
Softlies
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jan 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 47,594
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 860509 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 2:57:53 UTC
Last modified: 1 Feb 2009, 3:07:55 UTC

Ok. Thanks both for the help. I have been readin a bit about the optimizin app. Do they work for 64bit vista? couple ive seen werent labled of r64 i think

NM. Found one. gonna let my list clear before i mess with it i think
ID: 860509 · Report as offensive
Profile Leopoldo
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 99
Posts: 102
Credit: 3,051,091
RAC: 0
Russia
Message 860521 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 3:07:53 UTC - in response to Message 860495.  
Last modified: 1 Feb 2009, 3:10:29 UTC

Ok got an 8 meg AP now. But i wasnt getting them with the lower buffer. if i lower from 3 to will will i still get them or is that something differnt for everyone and i just have to tinker?

and whats considered normal RAC, damn good RAC, and Crazy RAC?


Don't afraid to set harddisk buffer too much - BOINC will fill it with workunits not up to allocated size but up to processing time "Additional work buffer" in days. Even 10 gigs will not filled if additional buffer small. For example, stock application on my Core2Duo 2.4 is processing Astropulse workunit about 2 days, so if I will set that additional buffer for 2 days, I will receive 2 workunits for current processing with my 2 cores plus 2 workunits avaiting - so only 24 Megabytes will be filled...

Recently Approved Credit (RAC) - is the mean quantity of recently completed workunits, calculation result from which was approved (is equal) by another cruncher (so-called wingman). So, RAC depends on computing power of your computer and on same thing from your wingman.

If you was first in completing of workunit, you will wait for wingman. If wingmans as fast as you - your RAC will be stable. If they will compute slower - RAC will drop (bad RAC).

r64 has no meaning with 64bit OS, rXXX - it's a release version. You can find optimized applications at specialized sites, but check possibilities of your CPU with program CPU-Z first - to choose correct application.
ID: 860521 · Report as offensive
Softlies
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Jan 09
Posts: 10
Credit: 47,594
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 860525 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 3:14:28 UTC

Not too worried bout the HD space. I have a terabyte, its just i dont want to have to wait 10 days if i want to clear my list : P I guess once i have it all set up it wont matter. But in another thread someone recommended letting you list clear before optimizing incase you clear your cache or something. Im not sure but i know i have a couple "disconnected by client"s from when i was trying to make graphics work before i found out you couldnt have them on CUDA : (
ID: 860525 · Report as offensive
Profile Leopoldo
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Aug 99
Posts: 102
Credit: 3,051,091
RAC: 0
Russia
Message 860530 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 3:26:19 UTC - in response to Message 860525.  
Last modified: 1 Feb 2009, 3:28:10 UTC

Not too worried bout the HD space. I have a terabyte, its just i dont want to have to wait 10 days if i want to clear my list


First of all, keep in mind that aborting tasks in BOINC Manager makes those workunits immediately available to processing by other crunchers.

If you wish to crunch with optimized applications then you can wait slight less than 10 days ;)
If BOINC was installed in no-service mode (called protected), then set project to "No New Tasks". Abort tasks which are not running. Wait until running tasks completes. Then exit manager (with closing scientific apps - they must not present in Windows Task Manager) and unpack optimized apps in desired directory. Start manager.
ID: 860530 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 860612 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 11:16:11 UTC - in response to Message 860495.  

Ok got an 8 meg AP now. But i wasnt getting them with the lower buffer. if i lower from 3 to will will i still get them or is that something differnt for everyone and i just have to tinker?

That you got no AP WUs had nothing to do with your cache buffer setting, there simply weren't any available at the SETI site. If enough work is ready to send, you'll be perfectly happy with a buffer of 0.1 days.

Gruß,
Gundolf
Computer sind nicht alles im Leben. (Kleiner Scherz)

SETI@home classic workunits 3,758
SETI@home classic CPU time 66,520 hours
ID: 860612 · Report as offensive
Profile Gundolf Jahn

Send message
Joined: 19 Sep 00
Posts: 3184
Credit: 446,358
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 860613 - Posted: 1 Feb 2009, 11:18:30 UTC - in response to Message 860530.  

First of all, keep in mind that aborting tasks in BOINC Manager makes those workunits immediately available to processing by other crunchers.

But don't forget to report them too! (Update button)
ID: 860613 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : Largest WU's?


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.