Message boards :
Number crunching :
Optimized Astropulse 5.00 rev103 for Windows
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Sounds about right, However I think Raistmer has updated his combined cudaMB+AP package with spliced app_info's that may make things easier if you are unsure. Discussion of that, and appropriate links, are in his thread Modified SETI MB CUDA + opt AP package for full GPU utilization Note that I'd provide a link to his thread on Lunatics with the download, but it seems to be down right now. Jason [Edit: modified the link to point to the right message] "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Apr 01 Posts: 201 Credit: 47,158,217 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I will give it a go tonight... Cheers ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 ![]() ![]() |
I realized after all 600+ of my WU's went comp error that this is a 32 bit app. Ugh /me must read what I'm doing and remember I'm on x64 ![]() In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Fred W Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 2524 Credit: 11,954,210 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I realized after all 600+ of my WU's went comp error that this is a 32 bit app. Ugh /me must read what I'm doing and remember I'm on x64 But the 32 bit App runs fine on x64 - does for me!! Are you sure it wasn't a c**k-up in the app_info.xml?? F. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Oct 00 Posts: 9541 Credit: 50,759,529 RAC: 60 ![]() ![]() |
nope didnt work editted the app_info and checked it 2X before I installed it. reinstalled the old version and it worked fine ![]() In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face. Diogenes Of Sinope |
Claggy Send message Joined: 5 Jul 99 Posts: 4654 Credit: 47,537,079 RAC: 4 ![]() |
nope didnt work editted the app_info and checked it 2X before I installed it. reinstalled the old version and it worked fine Well, the stderr out's say something different, MB & AP both say: <core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> No main program specified </message> ]]> It means there wasn't an entry in your app_info for the work you already had, ie: 500 for AP, 603 for MB. Claggy |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 ![]() |
we need an app_info.xml like this, the old one <app_info> <app> <name>setiathome_enhanced</name> </app> <file_info> <name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name> <version_num>528</version_num> <file_ref> <file_name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> <app_version> <app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name> <version_num>603</version_num> <file_ref> <file_name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> </app_version> <app> <name>astropulse</name> </app> <file_info> <name>ap_5.00r69_SSE3.exe</name> <executable/> </file_info> <file_info> <name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</name> <executable/> </file_info> <app_version> <app_name>astropulse</app_name> <version_num>500</version_num> <file_ref> <file_name>ap_5.00r69_SSE3.exe</file_name> <main_program/> </file_ref> <file_ref> <file_name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</file_name> </file_ref> </app_version> </app_info> edit update with an Editor Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Richard Haselgrove ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 99 Posts: 14690 Credit: 200,643,578 RAC: 874 ![]() ![]() |
we need an app_info.xml That looked like a paste from Internet Explorer. Internet Explorer adds the dashes you saw before some tags, and adds extra spaces inside some tags. That file wouldn't have worked without re-editing. Always use a simple text editor like Notepad or Wordpad when preparing app_info.xml files. Edit - the updated version looks much better. Thanks for re-posting. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
Slow_Target Send message Joined: 5 Oct 02 Posts: 58 Credit: 6,704,641 RAC: 2 ![]() |
I have repackaged the combined packages with the new app and hopefully they will have them up soon. Any idea when these may show? |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Alright, well so far, it appears that I have dropped from 45-48 hours to under 40. Great job to all involved! Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
HarryM Send message Joined: 24 Jul 08 Posts: 68 Credit: 3,812,695 RAC: 0 ![]() |
First AP on rev 103 came in at 11.3 hours. They had been around 16 to 18 hours. Good job on the new version. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jan 01 Posts: 195 Credit: 71,324,196 RAC: 0 ![]() |
r103 takes about 6.45 instead of just over 9 hours on my 4ghz quad. Thank you. |
Fred W Send message Joined: 13 Jun 99 Posts: 2524 Credit: 11,954,210 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Anyone had any luck with r103 on the new Boinc 6.6.2? When I tried it last night, Boinc Manager wouldn't load properly (sometimes but, eventually all the time), Boinc Manager wouldn't shut down the connected client, and machine responsiveness slowed to a crawl. It did work fine for about an hour before I had occasion to do a warm re-boot; that was when the trouble started. Even when it was running with the app_info (confirmed by checking the tasks shown in Windows Task Manager) there was no mention of "Anonymous Platform" in the 6.6.2 Messages. After several re-starts of Boinc and several complete re-boots of the box had not fixed this, I removed the app_info (trashed the cache) and all is now back to normal... Apart from the fact that the only way I can stop it continuously downloading new work is to suspend network access!! F. Q9450 o/c GTX 295 Vista Home Premium x64 ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 Apr 01 Posts: 201 Credit: 47,158,217 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I am running the new BM and r103 and everything is crunching fine, though it did take an age to download all the WU's, I think it downloaded the maximum possible for each day in my cache regardless of processor speed. The Manager is very buggy, but it doesn't seem to have affected my crunching... ![]() |
Cosmic_Ocean ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Dec 00 Posts: 3027 Credit: 13,516,867 RAC: 13 ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, the real numbers for CPU seconds are in now. r69 was about 165,000 - 174,000 r103 is now showing between 141,000 - 157,000 Of course I was playing some games during the crunching, too, so that skews the results a bit. Linux laptop: record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 4438 Credit: 55,006,323 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 4 May 08 Posts: 417 Credit: 6,440,287 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Revision 103 is primarily a minor performance update,...snip Jason, I think that could now be officially classified as a classic understatement! |
W-K 666 ![]() Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19685 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 ![]() ![]() |
Revision 103 is primarily a minor performance update,...snip I nearly didn't upgrade because of that statement, but to go from 13.5/14 hrs/task down to 9.5/10 hrs/task is not a minor performance upgrade. |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.