Optimized Astropulse 5.00 rev103 for Windows

Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized Astropulse 5.00 rev103 for Windows
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile jason_gee
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Nov 06
Posts: 7489
Credit: 91,093,184
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 856419 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 13:37:09 UTC - in response to Message 856417.  
Last modified: 22 Jan 2009, 13:38:25 UTC

Sounds about right, However I think Raistmer has updated his combined cudaMB+AP package with spliced app_info's that may make things easier if you are unsure.

Discussion of that, and appropriate links, are in his thread Modified SETI MB CUDA + opt AP package for full GPU utilization

Note that I'd provide a link to his thread on Lunatics with the download, but it seems to be down right now.

Jason

[Edit: modified the link to point to the right message]
"Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions.
ID: 856419 · Report as offensive
Profile MadMaC
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 01
Posts: 201
Credit: 47,158,217
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 856420 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 13:46:20 UTC - in response to Message 856419.  

I will give it a go tonight...

Cheers
ID: 856420 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 856430 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 15:25:33 UTC

I realized after all 600+ of my WU's went comp error that this is a 32 bit app. Ugh /me must read what I'm doing and remember I'm on x64


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 856430 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 856450 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 17:54:18 UTC - in response to Message 856430.  

I realized after all 600+ of my WU's went comp error that this is a 32 bit app. Ugh /me must read what I'm doing and remember I'm on x64

But the 32 bit App runs fine on x64 - does for me!!

Are you sure it wasn't a c**k-up in the app_info.xml??

F.
ID: 856450 · Report as offensive
Profile skildude
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Oct 00
Posts: 9541
Credit: 50,759,529
RAC: 60
Yemen
Message 856451 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 17:59:36 UTC - in response to Message 856450.  

nope didnt work editted the app_info and checked it 2X before I installed it. reinstalled the old version and it worked fine


In a rich man's house there is no place to spit but his face.
Diogenes Of Sinope
ID: 856451 · Report as offensive
Claggy
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 5 Jul 99
Posts: 4654
Credit: 47,537,079
RAC: 4
United Kingdom
Message 856495 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 20:08:16 UTC - in response to Message 856451.  
Last modified: 22 Jan 2009, 20:13:26 UTC

nope didnt work editted the app_info and checked it 2X before I installed it. reinstalled the old version and it worked fine


Well, the stderr out's say something different, MB & AP both say:

<core_client_version>6.2.19</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<message>
No main program specified
</message>
]]>

It means there wasn't an entry in your app_info for the work you already had,
ie: 500 for AP, 603 for MB.

Claggy
ID: 856495 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 856514 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 20:40:25 UTC
Last modified: 22 Jan 2009, 20:55:49 UTC

we need an app_info.xml

like this, the old one

<app_info>
<app>
<name>setiathome_enhanced</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>528</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app_version>
<app_name>setiathome_enhanced</app_name>
<version_num>603</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>AK_v8_win_SSSE3x.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
<app>
<name>astropulse</name>
</app>
<file_info>
<name>ap_5.00r69_SSE3.exe</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<file_info>
<name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</name>
<executable/>
</file_info>
<app_version>
<app_name>astropulse</app_name>
<version_num>500</version_num>
<file_ref>
<file_name>ap_5.00r69_SSE3.exe</file_name>
<main_program/>
</file_ref>
<file_ref>
<file_name>libfftw3f-3-1-1a_upx.dll</file_name>
</file_ref>
</app_version>
</app_info>


edit update with an Editor

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

ID: 856514 · Report as offensive
Richard Haselgrove Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 99
Posts: 14690
Credit: 200,643,578
RAC: 874
United Kingdom
Message 856517 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 20:49:08 UTC - in response to Message 856514.  
Last modified: 22 Jan 2009, 21:06:32 UTC

we need an app_info.xml

like this, the old one

That looked like a paste from Internet Explorer.

Internet Explorer adds the dashes you saw before some tags, and adds extra spaces inside some tags. That file wouldn't have worked without re-editing.

Always use a simple text editor like Notepad or Wordpad when preparing app_info.xml files.

Edit - the updated version looks much better. Thanks for re-posting.
ID: 856517 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 856520 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 20:57:23 UTC

update app_info.xml

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli


ID: 856520 · Report as offensive
Slow_Target

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 02
Posts: 58
Credit: 6,704,641
RAC: 2
United States
Message 856552 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 21:51:36 UTC - in response to Message 856242.  

I have repackaged the combined packages with the new app and hopefully they will have them up soon.


Any idea when these may show?
ID: 856552 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 856596 - Posted: 22 Jan 2009, 23:55:17 UTC

Alright, well so far, it appears that I have dropped from 45-48 hours to under 40.

Great job to all involved!
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 856596 · Report as offensive
HarryM
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 24 Jul 08
Posts: 68
Credit: 3,812,695
RAC: 0
United States
Message 856602 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 0:14:31 UTC

First AP on rev 103 came in at 11.3 hours. They had been around 16 to 18 hours.

Good job on the new version.
ID: 856602 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 856615 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 0:42:19 UTC

It will be a little while before my Windows machine get to my AP units, will see if I get any improvement on the 18 hours that r69 took on a E6550(2.33)

ID: 856615 · Report as offensive
Profile mr.kjellen
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Jan 01
Posts: 195
Credit: 71,324,196
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 856731 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 7:51:53 UTC

r103 takes about 6.45 instead of just over 9 hours on my 4ghz quad.
Thank you.
ID: 856731 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 856778 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 12:59:01 UTC

Anyone had any luck with r103 on the new Boinc 6.6.2? When I tried it last night, Boinc Manager wouldn't load properly (sometimes but, eventually all the time), Boinc Manager wouldn't shut down the connected client, and machine responsiveness slowed to a crawl. It did work fine for about an hour before I had occasion to do a warm re-boot; that was when the trouble started.

Even when it was running with the app_info (confirmed by checking the tasks shown in Windows Task Manager) there was no mention of "Anonymous Platform" in the 6.6.2 Messages.

After several re-starts of Boinc and several complete re-boots of the box had not fixed this, I removed the app_info (trashed the cache) and all is now back to normal... Apart from the fact that the only way I can stop it continuously downloading new work is to suspend network access!!

F.

Q9450 o/c
GTX 295
Vista Home Premium x64
ID: 856778 · Report as offensive
Profile MadMaC
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Apr 01
Posts: 201
Credit: 47,158,217
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 856783 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 13:24:03 UTC

I am running the new BM and r103 and everything is crunching fine, though it did take an age to download all the WU's, I think it downloaded the maximum possible for each day in my cache regardless of processor speed.
The Manager is very buggy, but it doesn't seem to have affected my crunching...
ID: 856783 · Report as offensive
Cosmic_Ocean
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Dec 00
Posts: 3027
Credit: 13,516,867
RAC: 13
United States
Message 856852 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 17:34:49 UTC

Yeah, the real numbers for CPU seconds are in now.

r69 was about 165,000 - 174,000
r103 is now showing between 141,000 - 157,000

Of course I was playing some games during the crunching, too, so that skews the results a bit.
Linux laptop:
record uptime: 1511d 20h 19m (ended due to the power brick giving-up)
ID: 856852 · Report as offensive
Profile arkayn
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 99
Posts: 4438
Credit: 55,006,323
RAC: 0
United States
Message 856942 - Posted: 23 Jan 2009, 22:42:44 UTC

I went from 17.88 hours down to 12.56 hours, that is a big boost on my system.

ID: 856942 · Report as offensive
Profile Virtual Boss*
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 May 08
Posts: 417
Credit: 6,440,287
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 857066 - Posted: 24 Jan 2009, 4:58:49 UTC - in response to Message 856342.  

Revision 103 is primarily a minor performance update,...snip


Jason, I think that could now be officially classified as a classic understatement!
ID: 857066 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19685
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 857068 - Posted: 24 Jan 2009, 5:03:03 UTC - in response to Message 857066.  

Revision 103 is primarily a minor performance update,...snip


Jason, I think that could now be officially classified as a classic understatement!

I nearly didn't upgrade because of that statement, but to go from 13.5/14 hrs/task down to 9.5/10 hrs/task is not a minor performance upgrade.
ID: 857068 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Optimized Astropulse 5.00 rev103 for Windows


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.