x Cores + CUDA

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : x Cores + CUDA
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Bambi

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 26
Credit: 5,704,701
RAC: 1
United Kingdom
Message 851354 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 17:34:30 UTC

Has anyone else had BOINC/CUDA running a different numbers of jobs at different times?
Some times BOINC runs 3 jobs plus a CUDA job on my quad core, and others it runs 4 jobs + CUDA. My cc_config is set to 4 cpus, and not 5 (to force 5 jobs).

Most of the time BOINC runs 3 CPU + 1 GPU, but occasionally it runs 4 cpu jobs +1 gpu. Anyone else get this?
Bambi

ID: 851354 · Report as offensive
Maik

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 163
Credit: 9,208,555
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 851366 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 18:02:46 UTC

BM version?
ID: 851366 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15691
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 851392 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 20:19:25 UTC - in response to Message 851354.  

My guess is that when it is running 3+1, you are running 3 SETI MultiBeam and 1 CUDA. Then when you are running 4+1, you are running any four AP tasks or a different project and 1 CUDA.

The limitation is that when CUDA is running with MultiBeam, only 3 CPUs can be used (unless the cc_config is modified to allow 5 CPUs). Whereas with any other app such as AstroPulse or any other project, this limitation does not apply.

This is being looked into for the next BOINC release. The plan is to support all CPUs + GPU regardless of what app is running.
ID: 851392 · Report as offensive
Maik

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 163
Credit: 9,208,555
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 851402 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 20:32:44 UTC - in response to Message 851366.  

BM version?

I dont ask withaout a reason. I heared rumoring BM 6.5.x handels cpu+gpu without cc_config. Maybe its a bug (or you confuse the BM) if you are using 6.5.x and have set <ncpus> in cc_config ...
ID: 851402 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 851410 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 20:42:53 UTC - in response to Message 851392.  

My guess is that when it is running 3+1, you are running 3 SETI MultiBeam and 1 CUDA. Then when you are running 4+1, you are running any four AP tasks or a different project and 1 CUDA.

The limitation is that when CUDA is running with MultiBeam, only 3 CPUs can be used (unless the cc_config is modified to allow 5 CPUs). Whereas with any other app such as AstroPulse or any other project, this limitation does not apply.

This is being looked into for the next BOINC release. The plan is to support all CPUs + GPU regardless of what app is running.

Don't think that this can be the case, OzzFan, since that host has not returned an MB crunched on the CPU since 29th Dec.

Anyway, surely once Boinc recognises CUDA capability, all MB's will be tagged on download to crunch with CUDA so once the pre-CUDA cache has been used up one can't crunch MB on *both* the CPU and GPU? The modified cc_config is to allow a fourth AP to crunch on the 99.6% of the core that otherwise goes to waste.

F.
ID: 851410 · Report as offensive
Profile Joseph Stateson Project Donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 27 May 99
Posts: 309
Credit: 70,759,933
RAC: 3
United States
Message 851435 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 22:05:12 UTC - in response to Message 851354.  
Last modified: 9 Jan 2009, 22:06:03 UTC

Has anyone else had BOINC/CUDA running a different numbers of jobs at different times?
Some times BOINC runs 3 jobs plus a CUDA job on my quad core, and others it runs 4 jobs + CUDA. My cc_config is set to 4 cpus, and not 5 (to force 5 jobs).

Most of the time BOINC runs 3 CPU + 1 GPU, but occasionally it runs 4 cpu jobs +1 gpu. Anyone else get this?


I saw that only when the other tasks were high priority. I fixed that with 3+1 on my quad Q6700 Vista 64
ID: 851435 · Report as offensive
Holmis
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 99
Posts: 30
Credit: 951,184
RAC: 0
Sweden
Message 851449 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 22:57:24 UTC

I have seen this when running MB-CUDA on my 9600 GT and Einstein + Climate on CPU.
It usually starts with 3+1 and after a few CUDA is done it starts up a 4th CPU-task so it then runs 4+1, when this happens the GPU-task does slow down considerably.

This is with BM 6.4.5 and no cc_config
ID: 851449 · Report as offensive
Roberto Patriarca

Send message
Joined: 17 May 99
Posts: 22
Credit: 1,967,389
RAC: 0
Italy
Message 851687 - Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 14:33:44 UTC - in response to Message 851449.  


It usually starts with 3+1 and after a few CUDA is done it starts up a 4th CPU-task so it then runs 4+1, when this happens the GPU-task does slow down considerably.


Same here, as I reported in another thread. My only S&H application is CUDA Multibeam, but I run other projects on my CPUs.

Most of the times BoincManager starts by running 3 CPU tasks, but sometimes after a while it switches to 4. I was not able to figure out under which condition it decides to do so.

I did not mess with ncpu setting, either.
ID: 851687 · Report as offensive
Paul DT Scully
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Jun 04
Posts: 26
Credit: 259,861
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 851928 - Posted: 10 Jan 2009, 23:30:50 UTC - in response to Message 851687.  

I posted something similar to this resently; Crunching 6 WU on 5 cores...?

I was asked if I was running the cc_config override, which I am not. I only experienced the 5 CPU + 1 GPU with Einstein.

But for me, most of the time it seem that it depend on what CPU WU's I am crunching at the time. And this happens on either 6.4.5 or 6.5.0.

Check my Signature to see my current basic system config.


Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
Vista Ultimate x64 SP1
Mem: 4GB
8800GT 181.22
BOINC 6.6.3 Win64

ACTIVE PROJECTS
ID: 851928 · Report as offensive

Questions and Answers : GPU applications : x Cores + CUDA


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.