Overclocking and Cooling

Message boards : Number crunching : Overclocking and Cooling
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

AuthorMessage
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 735780 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 14:20:40 UTC

ah 32bit.

it is an intel DQ35JO 886 1333FSB mobo with ddr2 pcieglan GMA3100 video 12usb2 4 SATA If that helps
4x 1024Mb DDR2 800 ram
so the larger th bits my os can accept the more potential i have of getting the most out of my ram. what about clocking the ram? how do i get the sys to accept an overclocked ram, or is it like the cpu ? try it and see.. If possible i'd like to calculate it out first and try once.

also what is the safest max core temp for the Q6600
ID: 735780 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 735783 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 14:28:02 UTC - in response to Message 735780.  

ah 32bit.

it is an intel DQ35JO 886 1333FSB mobo with ddr2 pcieglan GMA3100 video 12usb2 4 SATA If that helps
4x 1024Mb DDR2 800 ram
so the larger th bits my os can accept the more potential i have of getting the most out of my ram. what about clocking the ram? how do i get the sys to accept an overclocked ram, or is it like the cpu ? try it and see.. If possible i'd like to calculate it out first and try once.

also what is the safest max core temp for the Q6600

It'll start to throttle back above about 72C which is why I asked about the prog you are using to measure it. I have always tried to keep below 62C to leave a margin for error.

F.
ID: 735783 · Report as offensive
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 735787 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 14:41:54 UTC - in response to Message 735783.  

ah 32bit.

it is an intel DQ35JO 886 1333FSB mobo with ddr2 pcieglan GMA3100 video 12usb2 4 SATA If that helps
4x 1024Mb DDR2 800 ram
so the larger th bits my os can accept the more potential i have of getting the most out of my ram. what about clocking the ram? how do i get the sys to accept an overclocked ram, or is it like the cpu ? try it and see.. If possible i'd like to calculate it out first and try once.

also what is the safest max core temp for the Q6600

It'll start to throttle back above about 72C which is why I asked about the prog you are using to measure it. I have always tried to keep below 62C to leave a margin for error.

F.


am using core temp 0.97.1 core temp beta. does this need adjusting?

ID: 735787 · Report as offensive
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 735797 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 15:14:53 UTC - in response to Message 734629.  

Once i figure out the temp and how far i can push it with standard heatsinks and fans then i'll know how far can set the fsb to match, but whats a general guide for voltage increase to keep the system stable? and does anyone know what temp ranges this cpu like to run in before breaking down? and where is this temp monitor i here about?

Or better does anyone know this configuration of motherboard and cpu? How far it can be taken considering adequate cooling, and how far with standard cooling.

Air cooled or water cooled?

Cheers GT

Just watch your cpu temps.......55c is OK, if you start to get up around 60c, you are pushing a bit.

As for vcore, the more the merrier. But.....don't use anymore than you need to keep the rig stable.
Raise your FSB in small steps. You will reach a point where the rig either will not boot or will crash after running Doze for a small while.
At that point, give it a little dose of vcore.....it should respond by staying stable again.
Repeat process......
At some point, you will find that vcore increases are required for even very small increases in FSB....you are reaching the limits.
And I cannot EVEN get into the RAMifications (LOL) of the RAM speed and timing settings here.....would be WAY too involved.
I will only say the my experience for Seti crunching is to NOT try to OC the RAM....1:1 FSB/RAM clock ratio is generally considered to be the best in OCing circles.....and at any FSB you are likely to achieve, this should not be a problem with even moderately good RAM.

As for the opti app.......go to Crunch3r's site and get the app.....
If you let me know what OS you are running (32 or 64 bit), I can link you directly.....

Happy crunching!!!


windows 32 bit.. so i use the windows 32 sse3 appl or is it Windows x64 (EM64T/AMD64) as my cpu is emt64t 2.4g?
ID: 735797 · Report as offensive
OzzFan Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Apr 02
Posts: 15692
Credit: 84,761,841
RAC: 28
United States
Message 735799 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 15:20:47 UTC - in response to Message 735797.  
Last modified: 7 Apr 2008, 15:23:03 UTC

windows 32 bit.. so i use the windows 32 sse3 appl or is it Windows x64 (EM64T/AMD64) as my cpu is emt64t 2.4g?


You can only use 64bit apps with a 64bit OS. Since you're using 32bit Vista, you must use the 32bit apps.
ID: 735799 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 735802 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 15:31:11 UTC - in response to Message 735787.  


am using core temp 0.97.1 core temp beta. does this need adjusting?



I am using coretemp 0.95.4 and this is what I get for my overclocked Q6600:


Direct Link

I haven't used the version you are using but I tend to believe coretemp, in which case I would be worried about the existing temps and thinking about some AS5 under the cooler before even considering overclocking.

I also use Speedfan, which is well known for reading 15C high on these chips and the Speedfan - 15 temps agree with (my version) of Coretemp pretty well.

F.

ID: 735802 · Report as offensive
gomeyer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 488
Credit: 50,370,425
RAC: 0
United States
Message 735820 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 16:32:53 UTC - in response to Message 735787.  
Last modified: 7 Apr 2008, 16:35:15 UTC


am using core temp 0.97.1 core temp beta. does this need adjusting?

FWIW, on my out-of-the-box Dell quads, Core Temp 0.97 reads about 15C higher than SpeedFan 4.33. No adjustments were made to either.

SpeedFan "feels" more accurate based on the HDA temp it shows, but that is purely a subjective opinion and YMMV.

[edit] Forgot the main reason for this post. The newer version of Core Temp may be "at fault", but again that's just an opinion. [/edit]
ID: 735820 · Report as offensive
Profile [KWSN]John Galt 007
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 9 Nov 99
Posts: 2444
Credit: 25,086,197
RAC: 0
United States
Message 735822 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 16:35:00 UTC - in response to Message 735820.  


am using core temp 0.97.1 core temp beta. does this need adjusting?

FWIW, on my out-of-the-box Dell quads, Core Temp 0.97 reads about 15C higher than SpeedFan 4.33. No adjustments were made to either.

SpeedFan "feels" more accurate based on the HDA temp it shows, but that is purely a subjective opinion and YMMV.


Actually, Speedfan reads 15C to low, and has to have an offset added. I use CoreTemp Beta also, and beleive what it reads.
Clk2HlpSetiCty:::PayIt4ward

ID: 735822 · Report as offensive
gomeyer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 488
Credit: 50,370,425
RAC: 0
United States
Message 735824 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 16:36:51 UTC - in response to Message 735822.  


am using core temp 0.97.1 core temp beta. does this need adjusting?

FWIW, on my out-of-the-box Dell quads, Core Temp 0.97 reads about 15C higher than SpeedFan 4.33. No adjustments were made to either.

SpeedFan "feels" more accurate based on the HDA temp it shows, but that is purely a subjective opinion and YMMV.


Actually, Speedfan reads 15C to low, and has to have an offset added. I use CoreTemp Beta also, and beleive what it reads.

Sorry John, see the edit on my previous post.
ID: 735824 · Report as offensive
gomeyer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 488
Credit: 50,370,425
RAC: 0
United States
Message 735832 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 17:03:13 UTC - in response to Message 735822.  


Actually, Speedfan reads 15C to low, and has to have an offset added. I use CoreTemp Beta also, and beleive what it reads.

John, do you know if Speedfan reads low for other CPU's or only for the Core 2's? The reason I'm asking is that Speedfan shows the Northwood I'm typing this on at 54C which would be 69C with the adjustment. The house is cool and the PC is not OC'ed, has been seriously cleaned out recently and AS5 properly applied to carefully cleaned heatspreader and heatsink. 69C sounds high. I obviously can't try CoreTemp for comparison on this chip.
I'm not doubting your word, and better safe than sorry when in doubt. Just for my information.


ID: 735832 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 735854 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 18:06:02 UTC

I've just downloaded Coretemp 0.97.1; it reads the same as my 0.95.4 on my Quaddie.

Can I refer you to this.

Following the guide convinced me that Coretemp was reading correctly (on my Asus P5B WiFi MoBo) and that Speedfan (which was reading 15C higher than Coretemp) needed a -15 offset on the core temperature readings. Notice that the "CPU" temp reading is never questioned in these discussions and mine is about 11C below the core readings from Coretemp and the adjusted Speedfan.

With all due respect to John Galt 007, if Speedfan is reading 15C LOW then my cores have been running at up to 82C for the last 6 months without a wimper and I just don't believe that.

F.
ID: 735854 · Report as offensive
gomeyer
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 21 May 99
Posts: 488
Credit: 50,370,425
RAC: 0
United States
Message 735875 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 19:04:07 UTC - in response to Message 735854.  
Last modified: 7 Apr 2008, 19:04:35 UTC

I've just downloaded Coretemp 0.97.1; it reads the same as my 0.95.4 on my Quaddie.

Can I refer you to this.

Following the guide convinced me that Coretemp was reading correctly (on my Asus P5B WiFi MoBo) and that Speedfan (which was reading 15C higher than Coretemp) needed a -15 offset on the core temperature readings. Notice that the "CPU" temp reading is never questioned in these discussions and mine is about 11C below the core readings from Coretemp and the adjusted Speedfan.

With all due respect to John Galt 007, if Speedfan is reading 15C LOW then my cores have been running at up to 82C for the last 6 months without a wimper and I just don't believe that.

F.

That looks like a very good article. I'll read it in detail when I have time to study as it's a long read.

I think perhaps the main thing I'll take away from this discussion is that both you and John agree that Coretemp gives a more correct reading vs Speedfan. That also agrees with the "better safe . . " philosophy IF speedfan reads too low. Speedfan does indeed read about 15C cooler on all four of my Core2 machines.

As for whether or not the same applies to this Northwood, I can't OC it anyway so it's probably a moot point.
ID: 735875 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 735877 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 19:08:41 UTC - in response to Message 735875.  

I've just downloaded Coretemp 0.97.1; it reads the same as my 0.95.4 on my Quaddie.

Can I refer you to this.

Following the guide convinced me that Coretemp was reading correctly (on my Asus P5B WiFi MoBo) and that Speedfan (which was reading 15C higher than Coretemp) needed a -15 offset on the core temperature readings. Notice that the "CPU" temp reading is never questioned in these discussions and mine is about 11C below the core readings from Coretemp and the adjusted Speedfan.

With all due respect to John Galt 007, if Speedfan is reading 15C LOW then my cores have been running at up to 82C for the last 6 months without a wimper and I just don't believe that.

F.

That looks like a very good article. I'll read it in detail when I have time to study as it's a long read.

I think perhaps the main thing I'll take away from this discussion is that both you and John agree that Coretemp gives a more correct reading vs Speedfan. That also agrees with the "better safe . . " philosophy IF speedfan reads too low. Speedfan does indeed read about 15C cooler on all four of my Core2 machines.

As for whether or not the same applies to this Northwood, I can't OC it anyway so it's probably a moot point.

The only philosophy to follow when overclocking!

F.
ID: 735877 · Report as offensive
Profile Sir Ulli
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Oct 99
Posts: 2246
Credit: 6,136,250
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 735902 - Posted: 7 Apr 2008, 20:30:00 UTC
Last modified: 7 Apr 2008, 20:32:26 UTC

my new Quad Q6.600

Hit Me

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli

ID: 735902 · Report as offensive
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 736450 - Posted: 9 Apr 2008, 13:32:39 UTC - in response to Message 735902.  

G'day Ulli, what cooling system are you running in yours? and where to i find that cpuZ you have up?. would you go much more than 3.2G

Danka.. hope splet that right.. thanks

my new Quad Q6.600

Hit Me

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli


ID: 736450 · Report as offensive
Fred W
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 13 Jun 99
Posts: 2524
Credit: 11,954,210
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 736458 - Posted: 9 Apr 2008, 13:56:31 UTC - in response to Message 736450.  

G'day Ulli, what cooling system are you running in yours? and where to i find that cpuZ you have up?. would you go much more than 3.2G

Danka.. hope splet that right.. thanks

my new Quad Q6.600

Hit Me

Greetings from Germany NRW
Ulli



CPUZ is available from here

Ulli is being conservative. This is the max that I can get Prime95 stable on my Asus P5B D/L WiFi MoBo using a Thermaltake Ultra120 Extreme cooler:


Direct Link.

I've been running that 24/7 since about October.

F.
ID: 736458 · Report as offensive
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 739308 - Posted: 15 Apr 2008, 9:15:01 UTC

ok now i've worked out how far to go.. i go into my bios and guess what.. intel password, hunted around intel site for a while, haven't found this password which allows me to get into that part of the bios... very frustrating.

back in the day that wasn't an issue.

I don't have the box as i bought from the shop and not really to happy with there service so i won't go back there unless neccesary.

Is this password/key on the site or any suggestions where to go? i'm almost ready to email intel and ask for my key. but not sure on there policy for oc. looked at there warranty and the shops warranty, they pretty much don't cover me for anything except a busted semi conducter, but that would have gone by now or at towards the end of its service life. So i'm not too concerned about warranty as they cover nothing anyway.

So this password, are they the same for all this series.. or is it individual?

Thanks GT
ID: 739308 · Report as offensive
UncleVom

Send message
Joined: 25 Dec 99
Posts: 123
Credit: 5,734,294
RAC: 0
Canada
Message 739373 - Posted: 15 Apr 2008, 13:48:59 UTC - in response to Message 739308.  

You need to use the BIOS setup clearing jumper to reset the password refer to Page 58 of the manual.

If you don't have it look here:

http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?strState=LIVE&ProductID=2783&DwnldID=15038&agr=N&lang=eng&PrdMap=2783

HTH

UncleVom
ID: 739373 · Report as offensive
GT (Dragon)

Send message
Joined: 18 Mar 08
Posts: 13
Credit: 1,042,391
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 739800 - Posted: 16 Apr 2008, 13:08:10 UTC - in response to Message 739373.  

You need to use the BIOS setup clearing jumper to reset the password refer to Page 58 of the manual.

If you don't have it look here:

http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?strState=LIVE&ProductID=2783&DwnldID=15038&agr=N&lang=eng&PrdMap=2783

HTH

UncleVom


So this will get me past the intel pword.. it wont reset the intel pword will it. i'll be able to get into and modify the bus speed and voltage. this way?
Why would intel put this password on and then tell you how to disable it?
ID: 739800 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13966
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 740271 - Posted: 17 Apr 2008, 4:44:57 UTC - in response to Message 739800.  

Why would intel put this password on and then tell you how to disable it?

Who ever sold you the system was the one that enabled & set the password.

Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 740271 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Overclocking and Cooling


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.