Temporarily Failed Upload...

Message boards : Number crunching : Temporarily Failed Upload...
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile LEX LETHAL
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 22
Credit: 423
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25754 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 2:55:16 UTC

Temporarily failed upload of:

* 05my04aa.7961.21250.392322.115_1_0

BOINC keeps backing off the transfer of this file. Everything else was working fine/has been working fine. Should I be worried?

Is it just because the server is busy? I remember reading something about if it backs up to 1 hour, it will abandon the upload and start a new project. Will I get credit for this project? IOW, will this project continuously try to upload after 1 hour?

Lex
ID: 25754 · Report as offensive
Pascal, K G
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 2343
Credit: 150,491
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25755 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 2:57:54 UTC

Server is down I think....
ID: 25755 · Report as offensive
Profile shiv

Send message
Joined: 4 Sep 04
Posts: 6
Credit: 30,669
RAC: 0
Philippines
Message 25756 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 2:59:16 UTC


Same here!!
ID: 25756 · Report as offensive
Profile The worm that turned
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 100
Credit: 4,872,533
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 25759 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:02:10 UTC
Last modified: 13 Sep 2004, 3:02:25 UTC

Yea,
server must be down
ID: 25759 · Report as offensive
Profile The worm that turned
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 May 99
Posts: 100
Credit: 4,872,533
RAC: 0
Australia
Message 25760 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:02:56 UTC
Last modified: 13 Sep 2004, 3:06:47 UTC

completed work now backing up in transfers
ID: 25760 · Report as offensive
Profile LEX LETHAL
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 22
Credit: 423
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25763 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:09:31 UTC

How hard would it be to put code in that shows clearly when and if the server is down? I mean, if the upload keeps getting rejected, is there a reason? What exactly is the reason? Especially if the reason was initiated by the admins? If it's a program lockup or connection failure, at least provide a safeguard for repeat tries for upload. At least give us that.

We shouldn't have to lose our WU, should we?

Lex
ID: 25763 · Report as offensive
Tony Martin

Send message
Joined: 5 Dec 99
Posts: 91
Credit: 69,723
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25769 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:21:33 UTC - in response to Message 25763.  
Last modified: 2 Oct 2004, 17:54:37 UTC

> How hard would it be to put code in that shows clearly when and if the server
> is down? I mean, if the upload keeps getting rejected, is there a reason?
> What exactly is the reason? Especially if the reason was initiated by the
> admins? If it's a program lockup or connection failure, at least provide a
> safeguard for repeat tries for upload. At least give us that.
>
> We shouldn't have to lose our WU, should we?
>
> Lex
>
>

If the server is down which it seems to be BOINC will keep trying to upload it untill it succeeds. So it will upload as soon as the server comes back on line. You will get your credit sooner or later.

ID: 25769 · Report as offensive
Profile Razorirr
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 92
Credit: 7,414
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25773 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:27:12 UTC

i dont think it dumps the temp failed at an hour because ive had them get to three before
~boinc its not the credit or satisfaction its the screensavers~
S@h Berkeley's Staff Friends Club © members
ID: 25773 · Report as offensive
texasfit
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 03
Posts: 223
Credit: 500,626
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25788 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 3:52:52 UTC - in response to Message 25763.  

>If it's a program lockup or connection failure, at least provide a
> safeguard for repeat tries for upload. At least give us that.
>
> We shouldn't have to lose our WU, should we?
>
> Lex
>
>
'Repeat failed uploads' is exactly what the program will do.

You will not lose any work.

When it comes back 'OnLine' it will upload and 'Report' the completed work units. You can also look under the 'Transfers Tab' and it will show you the count down time for each wu that it is going to try to upload.
----------



Join the Overclockers.com SETI Team!
ID: 25788 · Report as offensive
Profile xi3piscium
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 99
Posts: 287
Credit: 26,674
RAC: 0
China
Message 25868 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 11:36:36 UTC

Failed upload 14:02:07 local Beijing time.
19:36:06....no change...server still down.
ID: 25868 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25907 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 14:39:20 UTC - in response to Message 25763.  

Lex,

> How hard would it be to put code in that shows clearly when and if the server
> is down? I mean, if the upload keeps getting rejected, is there a reason?
> What exactly is the reason? Especially if the reason was initiated by the
> admins? If it's a program lockup or connection failure, at least provide a
> safeguard for repeat tries for upload. At least give us that.

The problem sounds simple but it is not. For example, the failure may be a hardware failure or a software failure, or both. In the case of many software failures, the hardware is up, but has no way to send the distress message because the software failed. In the case of hardware failures, in theory, the software stops and that is detectable using a "heartbeat" system. But, these don't work reliably at this stage of our capability.

> We shouldn't have to lose our WU, should we?

You won't. The exponential back-off is doing what it should, it is tryiing, then pausing waiting for the servers to start to respond. As others have said, at that time the system will succeed and the work will go up. If you are running low, well, that is the reason that we are going to a multi-project capable system.

For example, I have 5 projects "running" on BOINC right now...

SETI@Home
Predictor@Home (no new accounts - temporarily off line while they migrate to 4.0)
LHC@Home (no new accounts - may open back up at the end of september)
Einstein@Home (or Pirates@Home - no work at this time)
cp.net (a.k.a. Climate Prediction.net - workunits ~500 hours)

So, while SETI is stalled, I have work from LHC and cp.net in the loop. And I have not actually run out of SETI work yet on most systems (though I am getting very low on most).

If you are not on any of the other projects I would suggest that you at least also join cp.net on BOINC and that will keep you busy while SETI is getting back on the air.
<p>
Click Me!


ID: 25907 · Report as offensive
Scott Brown

Send message
Joined: 5 Sep 00
Posts: 110
Credit: 59,739
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25916 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 14:56:23 UTC

@Paul Buck

Joining CPDN is only an option if you don't have slower machines (above 800Mhz I think).


ID: 25916 · Report as offensive
Profile Paul D. Buck
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Jul 00
Posts: 3898
Credit: 1,158,042
RAC: 0
United States
Message 25941 - Posted: 13 Sep 2004, 16:20:19 UTC - in response to Message 25916.  

> @Paul Buck
>
> Joining CPDN is only an option if you don't have slower machines (above 800Mhz
> I think).

You are right ... shows how much I need to read ...

Yes, 800 MHz is their minimum recommendation. I am also hoping that both Predictor and LHC re-open for new accounts, though it is most likely that we would see this in LHC@Home than Predictor in the near term.

I was lucky enough to get an account in all 5 so far, so, it is keeping my machines busy ...

<p>
Click Me!


ID: 25941 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : Temporarily Failed Upload...


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.