Message boards :
Number crunching :
Intel® Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Temps
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
i got my this Day, but i was Suprised about the Temps, at Load System Asus P5B, Intel® Core 2 Quad Q6600, Cooler Master HyperTX 2,mit 2 x 1Gig GSkill PC800 DDR2 Speicher, Graka Nforce 7.600GS, TV-Karte Technotrend TT-DVB-Pci, 300 Gig Sata Maxtor, und 400 Gig Samsung Sata, DVD NEC 5800, Brenner LG GSA-4167B, zurzeit at standart Speed with Tat Core 1-4 72 - 78 Degrees................. with an CS601 and 4 extra Papst ventilating system Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
speedimic Send message Joined: 28 Sep 02 Posts: 362 Credit: 16,590,653 RAC: 0 |
|
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
It's time for this. a VapoChill ........................... thanks for this... Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
speedimic Send message Joined: 28 Sep 02 Posts: 362 Credit: 16,590,653 RAC: 0 |
Sag bescheid wenn du dir einen holst - ich schau mir das dann ma live an... :D mic. |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
|
speedimic Send message Joined: 28 Sep 02 Posts: 362 Credit: 16,590,653 RAC: 0 |
man liest ja überall das diese CPUs über 100 Grad abkönnen das kann mir keiner erzaehlen das das im 24/7-Betrieb lang gut geht... mic. |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
man liest ja überall das diese CPUs über 100 Grad abkönnen deswegen meine Bedenken... ich traue dem auch nicht, ... hast du ne guten CPU Kühler der meine Forderungen erfüllt Leise, und ne gute Kühlung das war mit meinem Intel® Core 2 Duo E6600 kein Problem... Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
Urs Echternacht Send message Joined: 15 May 99 Posts: 692 Credit: 135,197,781 RAC: 211 |
man liest ja überall das diese CPUs über 100 Grad abkönnen Schon mal über ne' Wasserkühlung nachgedacht ? Dann bleiben die Temperaturen dauerhaft niedriger und vielleicht geht dann auch noch etwas mehr Hertz. _\|/_ U r s |
speedimic Send message Joined: 28 Sep 02 Posts: 362 Credit: 16,590,653 RAC: 0 |
Ich hab meinen Quad noch nich... aber wenn dann kommt wohl ein Thermaltake BigTyphoon drauf. msattler hat wohl auch gut erfahrungen damit - und das will was heissen. mic. |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
Ich hab meinen Quad noch nich... aber wenn dann kommt wohl ein Thermaltake BigTyphoon drauf. msattler hat wohl auch gut erfahrungen damit - und das will was heissen. habe ich schon verbaut, nicht allzu leicht, aber geht ab, CPU lauft bei nen Bekannten nur mit Ca 600 Umdrehungen.... ... :) Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
|
speedimic Send message Joined: 28 Sep 02 Posts: 362 Credit: 16,590,653 RAC: 0 |
who are all the Boys with an Q6.600 running............ Mark, there's someone asking for you... :D mic. |
gomeyer Send message Joined: 21 May 99 Posts: 488 Credit: 50,370,425 RAC: 0 |
|
Fivestar Crashtest Send message Joined: 10 Dec 99 Posts: 226 Credit: 5,377,978 RAC: 0 |
who are all the Boys with an Q6.600 running............ I know you didn't ask me, but I have 50-54 deg C at full load on my Q6600 with a Big Typhoon on an Asus P5B. ;) Pam |
archae86 Send message Joined: 31 Aug 99 Posts: 909 Credit: 1,582,816 RAC: 0 |
I'm running a Q6600 at 3.0 GHz at 1.35V requested (1.264 reported by the sensor)who are all the Boys with an Q6.600 running............ For reporting temperatures comparisons, it is crucial to state which temperature, as reported by which ap. Otherwise you are almost certainly comparing applies to persimmons. So far as I know, the single temperature which is reported as the processor temperature by my motherboard BIOS, and Temp2 by Speedfan 4.32, and as "processor temperature" by PC Wizard 2007) is reported the same by all applications, but has quite a bit of calibration offset from sample to sample of the chip. (For example, my E6600 reports more than 5C below ambient, so the calibration error at that point is at least 6C). I don't have a reliable reference as to how this is measured physically, but I believe it is an attempt (not particularly successful) to provide a temperature that is close to the one you would get if you could measure the outside of the heat spreader at its geometric center (the place for which Intel states its thermal spec). On the other hand, the individual core temperatures reported in MSR's by the DTS scheme are presented as degrees C below a reference temperature at the register level, and are apparently meant to be used by fan control applications, not by temperature reporting applications for end users. Nevertheless, many applications report these temperatures, in two camps with a 15C difference. For B3 Q6600, some applications assume the correct reference is 100C, and others assume 85C. So if you report a core temperature without mentioning the reporting application or the assumed reference, there is an exact 15C ambiguity _plus_ the actual physical calibration error. Majority opinion on OC forums I've bothered to read is that the 100C reference is correct for B3 step Q6600 (and therefore very high temps). I believe this majority is wrong, based primarily on a near-ambient calibration comparison which I've posted to the Einstein forum here: my Einstein forum post on Q6600 temperature reference I've seen sufficient reports of preposterously high Q6600 idle temps (reported by the Lo-ref camp) in well-cooled systems to believe my sample of Q6600 is not especially unusual. So with all that preamble, my Q6600 running at 1.35V commanded at 3.006 GHz with an Enzotech Ultra-X heatsink/fan in a decent but not great case is reporting 46C as the "processor" temperature. The individual core temps for the two different plausible references are: Ref... Hi Lo Core 0 51 66 Core 1 48 63 Core 2 47 62 Core 3 47 62 For the record, I think the Hi column is much closer to the truth, but below the truth for cores 2 through 4, and with a slight calibration adjustment the truth probably is that all four cores are within a degree or so of 51. |
dnolan Send message Joined: 30 Aug 01 Posts: 1228 Credit: 47,779,411 RAC: 32 |
Currently I'm running 3 Q6600s, 2 at approximately 3000 Mhz and one at around 2925 Mhz. Two are using Zalman 9700 LED coolers, one a CNPS 9500. The highest temp is on a system using an Nvidia 650i Ultra motherboard and a 9700 LED cooler, using core temp, it's reporting core0 at 58C, core 1 at 48C. The other two are an Asus P5B Deluxe WIFI and an Asus P5B-Plus. Core temp reports a high of 54C and a low of 46C between all 4 cores on those two systems. The Nvidia based system is the one at 2925 Mhz, the two Asus based systems are close to or at 3000 Mhz. -Dave |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
just get a new CPU Cooler http://www.ekl-ag.de/frontend/produkt.php3?id_produkte=0000856&id_lang=0000001&id_matchcode=produkte lag hier noch rum :) and other WLP http://www.pc-cooling.de/Zubehoer/Waermeleitpaste/900100135/Arctic+C%E9ramique.html hatte ich auch noch :) Temps nur noch 63-68 Grad :) Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
UL1 Send message Joined: 20 Nov 06 Posts: 118 Credit: 21,406,060 RAC: 0 |
The temps are quite normal... Sys1: Q6600 B3 @ 3200MHz VCore 1,44, Gigabyte P35-DQ6, Zalman 9700 LED -> CPU 64, C1 63, C2 60, C3 54, C4 54, Ambient 29. (CPU-Z 1.40.9) Sys2: Q6600 B3 @ 3450MHz VCore 1,46, Asus P5K Deluxe WiFi, Thermalright IFX-14 -> CPU 68, C1 66, C2 64, C3 55, C55 , Ambient 29. (CPU-Z 1.40.9) (With this Mobo it is said the temps CPU-Z is reporting are set 5°C too high)... For both systems: Seti @ 100%, 24/7 |
Sir Ulli Send message Joined: 21 Oct 99 Posts: 2246 Credit: 6,136,250 RAC: 0 |
The temps are quite normal... thanks for your Info... Greetings from Germany NRW Ulli |
jason_gee Send message Joined: 24 Nov 06 Posts: 7489 Credit: 91,093,184 RAC: 0 |
Just Curious about the temps, from reading specs a while back of the quad CPUs I understood there should be a 20 degree celcius difference between the cpu temp and the core temp .... I gather that they meant stock speed at idle right? because your CPU & cores are nearly equal, is that because of constant 100% use & overclock? [Edit: It leads me to think they can go even faster if you can get the heat out even quicker .... ] "Living by the wisdom of computer science doesn't sound so bad after all. And unlike most advice, it's backed up by proofs." -- Algorithms to live by: The computer science of human decisions. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.