No new results created since 1st May ????????

Message boards : Number crunching : No new results created since 1st May ????????
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile Keith

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 483
Credit: 938,268
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 563825 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 18:23:45 UTC

How can the following statement be reconciled with the link below it?
Which is right? Surely we're not getting "Porkies" in the Technical News?

May 9, 2007
Update: Our science database server died on Tuesday, May 1st. We haven't been able to create new workunits since then (though we are still accepting completed results).

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=2847369

Keith
ID: 563825 · Report as offensive
QSilver

Send message
Joined: 26 May 99
Posts: 232
Credit: 6,452,764
RAC: 0
United States
Message 563835 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 18:31:57 UTC
Last modified: 9 May 2007, 18:32:56 UTC

As Matt explained in this reply:


Due to validation errors/timeouts we're still sending out work at the rate of about 1 workunit every few seconds (though that rate is slowing).

- Matt




QS
---edited to fix URL---
ID: 563835 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith T.
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Aug 99
Posts: 962
Credit: 537,293
RAC: 9
United Kingdom
Message 563837 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 18:35:09 UTC - in response to Message 563825.  

How can the following statement be reconciled with the link below it?
Which is right? Surely we're not getting "Porkies" in the Technical News?

May 9, 2007
Update: Our science database server died on Tuesday, May 1st. We haven't been able to create new workunits since then (though we are still accepting completed results).

http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/results.php?hostid=2847369

Keith


Look more closely and you will see that computer got very lucky and received 40 re-sent WUs!. They are all _3 or _4 Result IDs.
Sir Arthur C Clarke 1917-2008
ID: 563837 · Report as offensive
Profile BANZAI56
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 17 May 00
Posts: 139
Credit: 47,299,948
RAC: 2
United States
Message 563869 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 19:25:15 UTC - in response to Message 563837.  

Look more closely and you will see that computer got very lucky and received 40 re-sent WUs!. They are all _3 or _4 Result IDs.



Nice!

ID: 563869 · Report as offensive
Profile Keith

Send message
Joined: 19 May 99
Posts: 483
Credit: 938,268
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 563875 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 19:42:34 UTC
Last modified: 9 May 2007, 19:43:31 UTC

Yes. Thanks everyone. I just tumbled to the re-issue possibility and came back to mention it here, only to find several others had already pointed it out.
Sorry I doubted the Technical News -- Sorry -- Sorry

I still think this long outage may well be a blessing in disguise. The problem stale & ghost results are being isolated.

Keith
ID: 563875 · Report as offensive
Alinator
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Apr 05
Posts: 4178
Credit: 4,647,982
RAC: 0
United States
Message 563884 - Posted: 9 May 2007, 20:00:42 UTC

Agreed, I hope they are going to take advantage of this opportunity to get rid of the Zombies which have built up since the last 'Night of the Living Dead' incident. That was quite awhile ago now if memory serves correctly.

Alinator
ID: 563884 · Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : No new results created since 1st May ????????


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.