Carl Sagan

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Carl Sagan
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

AuthorMessage
Ophus

Send message
Joined: 10 Nov 99
Posts: 205
Credit: 1,577,356
RAC: 4
United States
Message 397637 - Posted: 14 Aug 2006, 22:49:58 UTC - in response to Message 393472.  

Methinks you are not playing fair.

I believe what I believe on FAITH alone... I don't particularly care what others believe, hence, I don't need to provide anyone with any proof...

If you want to discredit someone's beliefs then you will have to provide them with the proof that what they believe in holds no truth... The lack of supporting evidence just doesn't cut it for someone who has experienced these things...

I believe I've had an encounter with God, I believe I've had an encounter with a ghost or angel, I believe I've had an encounter with witchcraft, I believe I've seen a UFO. I believe all these things to be very real because of my experiences and not because of Carl Sagans lack of experiences. I will continue believing in the reality of these supernatural phenomena until I see substantial evidence that proves otherwise and not because Dr Carl Sagan or anybody else says so...

See how easy that works? ;)



You have to be smoking crack, to make statements like this!


ID: 397637 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 399197 - Posted: 16 Aug 2006, 9:11:20 UTC - in response to Message 397637.  
Last modified: 16 Aug 2006, 9:19:42 UTC

statements like this!

Care to explain to me what this object was: My UFO Sighting

None of my experiences have been very 'dramatic', but they were definitely 'real' and they were definitely 'unexplainable'...

The floor is open... Somebody? Anybody? ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 399197 · Report as offensive
Chuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 511
Credit: 532,682
RAC: 0
Message 401981 - Posted: 20 Aug 2006, 5:06:54 UTC

So then you're ignoring me once again when I call you, jeffrey?

Why do you drag up other topics in a board about Carl Sagan? Go talk about your UFO where it belongs. Go to that link for my answer on it where it belongs.


Remind me again what Dr Carl Sagan's scientific proof was that their is/are no:

1. GOD
2. Ghosts
3. Angels
4. Witches
5. Aliens


Here is your answer, repeated:
READ 'THE DEMON HAUNTED WORLD' YET, JEFFREY??? YOU'LL FIND THE DISPROOF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IN THERE...

The whole book is your proof. Pick it up and actually read through it. Then come back here, and present whatever arguments you can 'think' up.

(modified since previous version deleted by moderator)

Never Forget a Friend. Or an Enemy.
ID: 401981 · Report as offensive
Airbuster

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 05
Posts: 115
Credit: 1,342
RAC: 0
United States
Message 401987 - Posted: 20 Aug 2006, 5:25:23 UTC - in response to Message 399197.  

statements like this!

Care to explain to me what this object was: My UFO Sighting

None of my experiences have been very 'dramatic', but they were definitely 'real' and they were definitely 'unexplainable'...

The floor is open... Somebody? Anybody? ;)


Sounds a lot like what I saw flying overhead, which I believe was in 1995; only I was expecting it, having heard about the Mir/space-shuttle docking.

The 2 craft together made for a very large and bright object which passed across the sky surprisingly quickly.
It was an amazing sight.

ID: 401987 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 401995 - Posted: 20 Aug 2006, 5:56:40 UTC - in response to Message 401987.  
Last modified: 20 Aug 2006, 5:57:13 UTC

the Mir/space-shuttle docking.

Are u serious... You really want me to believe that the space shuttle or the mir space station or both were moving at those speeds out in space especially during a docking procedure... Come on now, please be rational... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 401995 · Report as offensive
Profile Walla
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 14 May 06
Posts: 329
Credit: 177,013
RAC: 0
United States
Message 402359 - Posted: 20 Aug 2006, 21:10:19 UTC - in response to Message 401995.  
Last modified: 20 Aug 2006, 21:14:42 UTC

the Mir/space-shuttle docking.

Are u serious... You really want me to believe that the space shuttle or the mir space station or both were moving at those speeds out in space especially during a docking procedure... Come on now, please be rational... ;)


Jeffrey the space shuttle orbits the Earth at 17500 mph. Also they could be travelling at 100,000 mph yet if they are moving at the same speed in relation to each other it would be just as easy to dock as if they were going 100mph. What I just said could make no sense at all, as I just woke up after being awake for 22 hours straight.
ID: 402359 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 402423 - Posted: 21 Aug 2006, 0:00:03 UTC - in response to Message 402359.  

What I just said could make no sense at all

I decided to do a little research with the Mir/space-shuttle info you provided... One of the following events could have very well been what we were observing:

On February 23, 1997, a series of dramatic accidents started with an oxygen- generating canister bursting into flames and nearly forcing the crew to evacuate.

On June 25, 1997, a cargo ship rammed the station during a practice manual docking, puncturing a laboratory module, but the crew quickly sealed it off, saving the station.

I'm still a little skeptical, but these are very plausible explanations... I just wish I could remember the exact date or even the direction of motion to clear all doubt... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 402423 · Report as offensive
Airbuster

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 05
Posts: 115
Credit: 1,342
RAC: 0
United States
Message 402567 - Posted: 21 Aug 2006, 4:17:16 UTC - in response to Message 402423.  
Last modified: 21 Aug 2006, 4:20:13 UTC


I decided to do a little research with the Mir/space-shuttle info you provided... One of the following events could have very well been what we were observing:

On February 23, 1997, a series of dramatic accidents started with an oxygen- generating canister bursting into flames and nearly forcing the crew to evacuate.

On June 25, 1997, a cargo ship rammed the station during a practice manual docking, puncturing a laboratory module, but the crew quickly sealed it off, saving the station.

I'm still a little skeptical, but these are very plausible explanations... I just wish I could remember the exact date or even the direction of motion to clear all doubt... ;)


Some addtional info here

It was travelling in a S to N-ish direction when I saw it, btw.
Also, because of the little ;), I assume you were kidding when you questioned my seriousness.

ID: 402567 · Report as offensive
Airbuster

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 05
Posts: 115
Credit: 1,342
RAC: 0
United States
Message 402568 - Posted: 21 Aug 2006, 4:18:33 UTC - in response to Message 402567.  
Last modified: 21 Aug 2006, 4:21:44 UTC

<deleted>
ID: 402568 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 402630 - Posted: 21 Aug 2006, 6:12:03 UTC - in response to Message 402567.  

because of the little ;), I assume you were kidding when you questioned my seriousness.

Naw, much to my shame, I was being serious...

I ruled out the Mir because I hadn't known that it moved faster than the other satellites out there... And I ruled out the space-shuttle because I didn't think, and still don't think, that it would illuminate as brightly as the object we saw... While I'm not sure of the direction, I do know for sure that it was either east to west or west to east... I just can't remember if we were heading out or returning home...

As far as the ' ;) ' goes... That's kinda my trademark... I try to leave it a mystery as to wether or not I'm being sarcastic... Keeps everyone on their toes... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 402630 · Report as offensive
Michael Crowdfunding Project Donor*Special Project $75 donorSpecial Project $250 donor
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Aug 99
Posts: 4609
Credit: 7,427,891
RAC: 18
United States
Message 402691 - Posted: 21 Aug 2006, 10:33:27 UTC - in response to Message 401995.  
Last modified: 21 Aug 2006, 10:33:53 UTC

the Mir/space-shuttle docking.

Are u serious... You really want me to believe that the space shuttle or the mir space station or both were moving at those speeds out in space especially during a docking procedure... Come on now, please be rational... ;)



uhm, duh? it's a LEO object...they all haul arse.

ID: 402691 · Report as offensive
Chuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 511
Credit: 532,682
RAC: 0
Message 403709 - Posted: 22 Aug 2006, 19:44:37 UTC

hoahhhh am I biting my tongue right now.
Never Forget a Friend. Or an Enemy.
ID: 403709 · Report as offensive
Profile Jeffrey
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 03
Posts: 4793
Credit: 26,029
RAC: 0
Message 403972 - Posted: 23 Aug 2006, 1:25:30 UTC - in response to Message 403709.  

hoahhhh am I biting my tongue right now.

There's a first time for everything... ;)
It may not be 1984 but George Orwell sure did see the future . . .
ID: 403972 · Report as offensive
Airbuster

Send message
Joined: 22 Nov 05
Posts: 115
Credit: 1,342
RAC: 0
United States
Message 404034 - Posted: 23 Aug 2006, 4:11:27 UTC
Last modified: 23 Aug 2006, 4:15:57 UTC

I wrote something, but then decided to not say anything. Why don't they add a delete button?
ID: 404034 · Report as offensive
Chuck
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 511
Credit: 532,682
RAC: 0
Message 405175 - Posted: 24 Aug 2006, 14:28:41 UTC

Yes, for the first time you actually sort of listened and used your mental faculties when somebody disproved one of your beliefs.

You may yet become a scientist after all. It's what Carl Sagan tried to promote and share with everyone.

So, once again, how would a scientist, a man concerned only with what is verifiably true, make any statement without proof to back it up?
Never Forget a Friend. Or an Enemy.
ID: 405175 · Report as offensive
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3

Message boards : SETI@home Science : Carl Sagan


 
©2025 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.