Message boards :
Number crunching :
Difference in computing
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
bushrat Send message Joined: 12 Dec 04 Posts: 28 Credit: 73,315 RAC: 0 |
I have noticed that some PC's with pretty much same hardware takes half of the computing time as mine, My PC Other PC (example) Both have pretty much same integer and floating point speed. Can any one help me out with this ? |
Landroval Send message Joined: 7 Oct 01 Posts: 188 Credit: 2,098,881 RAC: 1 |
I have noticed that some PC's with pretty much same hardware takes half of the computing time as mine, A couple of things: 1) The benchmark speeds measure CPU performance ONLY, and there are other things (such as L2 cache) that can affect crunch times but aren't reflected in the benchmarks. 2) Some people run optimized clients. The science app is open source, and people have gone through the code and tweaked it for speed. More info is available here, in the Wiki. Given that the enhanced application is going to be coming out Real Soon Now (tm) and it will make the current optimized applications obsolete, I'd suggest running the standard client for the time being. Once the new application is out and the optimizers have had a crack at it, it may be worth moving to an optimized application for your OS and hardware. Happy crunching, Brian If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Compare the "Result ID" of your and the others. I suspect they are running an Optimized Application which cuts WU completion times substantially, 1/2 in the case of my AMD64's Yoascw W r7 is the right one for your particular processor Marisan webite, which hosts TMR Optimized apps |
W-K 666 Send message Joined: 18 May 99 Posts: 19122 Credit: 40,757,560 RAC: 67 |
You need an optimised Seti appliation. Try Marisan's Site or look for crunch3r he has some also. And there are post's such as Wanted Optimised Client.... you could read. |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
And the WIki has a complete guide ... with pictures! :) |
The Colourful jester Send message Joined: 18 Oct 01 Posts: 35 Credit: 2,680,511 RAC: 0 |
Paul... do you have shares in WIki? Hullo there. |
Astro Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Paul... do you have shares in WIki? I think he's 100% invested in the Wiki |
Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 19 Jul 00 Posts: 3898 Credit: 1,158,042 RAC: 0 |
Paul... do you have shares in WIki? Um, shares? The Wiki software I use is Open source, along with a MySQL database. I use a comercial provisioner as the host ... since not that many people seem to read anymore the bandwidth I have is more than enough ... As far as investments goes, I am heavily invested in shares on the stock market, yes ... but none in a Wiki only company. I prefer mutual funds ... Not sure if I answered the question or not ... |
bushrat Send message Joined: 12 Dec 04 Posts: 28 Credit: 73,315 RAC: 0 |
Thanx everybody, I appriciate your reply to this subject.. |
bushrat Send message Joined: 12 Dec 04 Posts: 28 Credit: 73,315 RAC: 0 |
I installed optimized program on my pc, seems like computing time was cut in half, but now I lost visual graph, (iow, Show Graphics button is grey), is that normal ? |
dbrinza Send message Joined: 31 May 99 Posts: 60 Credit: 16,887,043 RAC: 269 |
I installed optimized program on my pc, seems like computing time was cut in half, but now I lost visual graph, (iow, Show Graphics button is grey), is that normal ? Yep, that's normal. The graphics slows the workunit numerical processing, so it's not supported in the optimized application. |
©2024 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.