Athlon64 v AthlonXP

Message boards : Number crunching : Athlon64 v AthlonXP
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · Next

AuthorMessage
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181731 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 10:05:53 UTC

I currently run to systems, a 3500+ Athlon64 and a 2800+ Athlon XP. what is the best way to configure the A64 so that it outperforms the XP, at the moment the XP seems consistantly better that the 64?

ID: 181731 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19062
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 181735 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 10:24:01 UTC

I've had a look at the information available on the computers, and feel more information is needed.

what is the true cpu clock speed, depending on exact models clock speed of XP could be higher than 3500+ ?

What mobo's are in use?

How much memory is fitted and the clk speed's of same?

Does the BIOS allow adjusment of memory timings?

That's my first quick pass. I have seen reports that 32 bit progs on 32 bit cpu's are faster than 32 or 64 progs on 64 bit cpu's mainly because the infrastructure needed to compile 64 bit programs and OS is not there yet.

Andy
ID: 181735 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181738 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 10:42:34 UTC

Athlon64 :- CPU 200MHz, 1.5GB RAM, Gigabyte GA-K8NSC-939. AthlonXP :- CPU 166MHz, 512MB RAM, DFI Infinity NFII Ultra. Both with unoptimized settings :(

ID: 181738 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 181749 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:12:41 UTC - in response to Message 181731.  

I currently run to systems, a 3500+ Athlon64 and a 2800+ Athlon XP. what is the best way to configure the A64 so that it outperforms the XP, at the moment the XP seems consistantly better that the 64?

What else is running on the Athlon64 system?
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 181749 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181750 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:15:30 UTC

Just the usual stuff, Avast AntiVirus+Bluetooth adapter+Firewall+Spybot S&D+Winbar. Nothing out of the ordinary

ID: 181750 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 181752 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:18:44 UTC - in response to Message 181735.  

I have seen reports that 32 bit progs on 32 bit cpu's are faster than 32 or 64 progs on 64 bit cpu's mainly because the infrastructure needed to compile 64 bit programs and OS is not there yet.

32 bit programmes do run faster under a 32bit OS.
However even without a 64bit OS & applications many 32bit programmes are often faster than clock speed alone would suggest on a 64bit CPU due to it's extra registers, and also there have been quite a few tweaks to the micro-code as well with each version as they've been released.
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 181752 · Report as offensive
Profile Crunch3r
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Apr 99
Posts: 1546
Credit: 3,438,823
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 181754 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:22:14 UTC - in response to Message 181749.  

I currently run to systems, a 3500+ Athlon64 and a 2800+ Athlon XP. what is the best way to configure the A64 so that it outperforms the XP, at the moment the XP seems consistantly better that the 64?

What else is running on the Athlon64 system?


You should take a look at the Cool'n'Quiet settings in your bios on the athlon64.
Try to disable it and see what happens to the crunching times.





Join BOINC United now!
ID: 181754 · Report as offensive
Grant (SSSF)
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 99
Posts: 13736
Credit: 208,696,464
RAC: 304
Australia
Message 181756 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:25:59 UTC - in response to Message 181750.  

Just the usual stuff, Avast AntiVirus+Bluetooth adapter+Firewall+Spybot S&D+Winbar. Nothing out of the ordinary

Winbar?
Bring up the task manager & see what's using the CPU time, otherwise use performance monitor to log things over a day or 2.

Just did a quick check.
Athlon64 3500+ 2.2GHz
Athlon XP 2800+ 2.08GHz or 2.25GHz depending on the type (Thoroughbred or Barton).
Grant
Darwin NT
ID: 181756 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19062
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 181758 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:27:54 UTC

The 1.5GByte ram is unusual size can you tell us how many sticks and were they all installed at same time. Do you know if they support the same memory timings, the BIOS by default will set to the lowest SPD timing if not the same.

Andy
ID: 181758 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181759 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:29:05 UTC

Will watch for a couple of days, will try the cool'n'quiet settings and the XP is a Barton core

ID: 181759 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181760 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 11:30:12 UTC - in response to Message 181758.  

The 1.5GByte ram is unusual size can you tell us how many sticks and were they all installed at same time. Do you know if they support the same memory timings, the BIOS by default will set to the lowest SPD timing if not the same.

Andy


1.5GB Ram is x3 stcks of 512MB DDR 400 (same speed etc.)

ID: 181760 · Report as offensive
Profile kev1701e
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 28 Dec 99
Posts: 138
Credit: 10,216,553
RAC: 0
United States
Message 181790 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 12:51:27 UTC - in response to Message 181760.  

The 1.5GByte ram is unusual size can you tell us how many sticks and were they all installed at same time. Do you know if they support the same memory timings, the BIOS by default will set to the lowest SPD timing if not the same.

Andy


1.5GB Ram is x3 stcks of 512MB DDR 400 (same speed etc.)



By using 3 memory sticks you've disabled dual-channel mode on the memory which will slow the system somewhat but the most likely culprit is the already mentioned Cool'n'Quiet feature. I'd disable it.

kev


kev

X2 4400+,4200+ @2.75GHz, XP1800+ @1.65GHz, P4 @1.6GHz
ID: 181790 · Report as offensive
W-K 666 Project Donor
Volunteer tester

Send message
Joined: 18 May 99
Posts: 19062
Credit: 40,757,560
RAC: 67
United Kingdom
Message 181808 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 13:32:34 UTC - in response to Message 181790.  

By using 3 memory sticks you've disabled dual-channel mode on the memory which will slow the system somewhat but the most likely culprit is the already mentioned Cool'n'Quiet feature. I'd disable it.

kev



I agree with this, but if it is the Cool'n'Quiet then think it needs investigating why its slowing the cpu. Even running at 100% using stock heatsink/fan shouldn't cause overheating.

Andy
ID: 181808 · Report as offensive
Profile Atomic Kitten Death March
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 8 Oct 04
Posts: 153
Credit: 415,035
RAC: 0
United States
Message 181820 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 14:16:10 UTC

yeah, i think it has to be a setting somewhere. I have a AMD 64 3000(1.8 Ghz) that before i optimized it still went a little faster than my frineds XP 3200(at least 2 Ghz). Now i overclock and run optimized and it takes anywhere from 1 to 1.33 hours for a WU, which is almost twice as fast as his XP 3200 optimized. Just for reference to prove that it should be going faster than the XP machine.
Join the team, SETI.USA We are growing and could use your help to overcome SETI.Germany...www.setiusa.net

ID: 181820 · Report as offensive
Hammer

Send message
Joined: 13 Dec 02
Posts: 74
Credit: 1,773,558
RAC: 0
Croatia
Message 181870 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 18:04:12 UTC

And use optmized clients, it can greatly speed up crunching on athlon64 because of SSE2 instructions that AthlonXP lack.
ID: 181870 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181892 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 19:33:59 UTC

Have removed x1 stick of Ram thus enabling Dual Channel, but can't find anything to do with cool'n'quiet

ID: 181892 · Report as offensive
Profile Tern
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 03
Posts: 1122
Credit: 13,376,822
RAC: 44
United States
Message 181899 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 19:45:24 UTC - in response to Message 181892.  

Have removed x1 stick of Ram thus enabling Dual Channel, but can't find anything to do with cool'n'quiet


On a Gigabyte MB, it's probably in Setup... I know it is on my ASUS, and they're direct competitors, so probably do about the same things. No telling what they call it - I had to actually read my MB manual!
ID: 181899 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181904 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 20:01:42 UTC - in response to Message 181899.  

Have removed x1 stick of Ram thus enabling Dual Channel, but can't find anything to do with cool'n'quiet


On a Gigabyte MB, it's probably in Setup... I know it is on my ASUS, and they're direct competitors, so probably do about the same things. No telling what they call it - I had to actually read my MB manual!


Have checked through the BIOS and Manual and can find no reference to Cool'n'Quiet

ID: 181904 · Report as offensive
Profile AndyK
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 3 Apr 99
Posts: 280
Credit: 305,079
RAC: 0
Germany
Message 181906 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 20:02:31 UTC - in response to Message 181892.  
Last modified: 24 Oct 2005, 20:03:41 UTC

Have removed x1 stick of Ram thus enabling Dual Channel, but can't find anything to do with cool'n'quiet


With a Gigabyte Mainboard you have to enable the extended view of BIOS by pressing CTRL+F1 in the main screen of the BIOS.
Then go to the new appeared "Advanced Chipset Features" and you will find the Cool'n'Quiet option.

Andy
Want to know your pending credit?


The biggest bug is sitting 10 inch in front of the screen.
ID: 181906 · Report as offensive
Profile Lord Tedric
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Jun 99
Posts: 204
Credit: 1,063,736
RAC: 0
United Kingdom
Message 181913 - Posted: 24 Oct 2005, 20:16:34 UTC - in response to Message 181906.  

Have removed x1 stick of Ram thus enabling Dual Channel, but can't find anything to do with cool'n'quiet


With a Gigabyte Mainboard you have to enable the extended view of BIOS by pressing CTRL+F1 in the main screen of the BIOS.
Then go to the new appeared "Advanced Chipset Features" and you will find the Cool'n'Quiet option.

Andy


the only thing I found was a refernce to CPU-Thermal Throtle, this was set to 50%. Is lower or higher better?

ID: 181913 · Report as offensive
1 · 2 · 3 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : Athlon64 v AthlonXP


 
©2024 University of California
 
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.