Time to bring back the graphs...

Author	Message
cjsoftuk Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 248 Credit: 183,721 RAC: 0	Message 178092 - Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 6:03:23 UTC Yes, folks, it's probably nearly time to bring back the graphs because the good old validator is dead! They (Berkeley) have turned them off, but now we have about 150K wus sitting to validate. Oops. Anyone care to explain the mess? ID: 178092 ·

Jason Safoutin Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 8 Sep 05 Posts: 1386 Credit: 200,389 RAC: 0	Message 178093 - Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 6:19:02 UTC - in response to Message 178092. Last modified: 14 Oct 2005, 6:19:16 UTC Yes, folks, it's probably nearly time to bring back the graphs because the good old validator is dead! They (Berkeley) have turned them off, but now we have about 150K wus sitting to validate. Oops. Anyone care to explain the mess? We have been trying too all last night today and tonight (US Eastern time for me). No one knows. not even berkley. For the moment we just have to wait and see. See threads here: Here Here "By faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command, so that what is seen was not made out of what was visible". Hebrews 11.3 ID: 178093 ·

Scarecrow Send message Joined: 15 Jul 00 Posts: 4520 Credit: 486,601 RAC: 0	Message 178188 - Posted: 14 Oct 2005, 13:17:56 UTC - in response to Message 178092. Anyone care to explain the mess? I'm filing it under "spontaneous hickeys caused by demonic possession". I don't think the same hour by hour drama will unfold this time, but the graphs are here with all their spine tingling excitement. ID: 178188 ·

1mp0Â£173 Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 8423 Credit: 356,897 RAC: 0	Message 178464 - Posted: 15 Oct 2005, 6:44:18 UTC - in response to Message 178092. Last modified: 15 Oct 2005, 6:44:45 UTC Yes, folks, it's probably nearly time to bring back the graphs because the good old validator is dead! They (Berkeley) have turned them off, but now we have about 150K wus sitting to validate. Oops. Anyone care to explain the mess? Mess? They turned the validators and assimilators off to free resources for other tasks. Then they turned 'em back on, and things got caught up. We (by which I mean most of the folks on the message boards) are way too sensitive when it comes to things like this. When the validators were turned back on, the queue was despatched fairly quickly. ID: 178464 ·

cjsoftuk Volunteer tester Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 248 Credit: 183,721 RAC: 0	Message 178466 - Posted: 15 Oct 2005, 7:05:49 UTC - in response to Message 178464. Yes, folks, it's probably nearly time to bring back the graphs because the good old validator is dead! They (Berkeley) have turned them off, but now we have about 150K wus sitting to validate. Oops. Anyone care to explain the mess? Mess? They turned the validators and assimilators off to free resources for other tasks. Then they turned 'em back on, and things got caught up. We (by which I mean most of the folks on the message boards) are way too sensitive when it comes to things like this. When the validators were turned back on, the queue was despatched fairly quickly. I posted that before a message appeard on the home page. So no guesses why I did it! ID: 178466 ·

©2024 University of California

SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.