Message boards :
Number crunching :
seti servers
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Sep 99 Posts: 123 Credit: 7,443,272 RAC: 0 ![]() |
does anyone have the exact specs for all the seti servers i mean i have herd that they have a new opteron. but it is not listed on the server page. also what is the classic seti using ? just wondering ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 9 Nov 02 Posts: 9 Credit: 46,209 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I dont know any exact specs, but you can see some seticlassic servers (including their names) on this page And as you see on the status page, the Sun E450 is now used for setiboinc (ok, could of course be a new one :)) where did you heard about a new opteron system ? afaik the only use SUN servers - but if there's a new system, its not operating yet |
![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 05 Posts: 102 Credit: 1,360,617 RAC: 0 ![]() |
We now build Opteron servers; the SunFire V20z and SunFire v40z I believe SETI has a V40z as a database server ... ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Sep 99 Posts: 123 Credit: 7,443,272 RAC: 0 ![]() |
here is the current list jocelyn: Sun V40z (2 x 1.8GHz Opteron, 8 GB RAM) castelli: Sun E3500 (8 x 400MHz Sparc, 7 GB RAM) kosh: Sun D220R (2 x 440MHz Sparc, 2 GB RAM) klaatu: Sun D220R (2 x 440MHz Sparc, 2 GB RAM) koloth: Sun D220R (2 x 440MHz Sparc, 1 GB RAM) kryten: Sun E3500 (6 x 400MHz Sparc, 6 GB RAM) galileo: Sun E3500 (6 x 400MHz Sparc, 6 GB RAM) milkyway: Sun U60 (2 x 400MHz Sparc, 1 GB RAM) penguin: Sun D220R (2 x 440MHz Sparc, 2 GB RAM) philmor: Sun U10 (1 x 350MHz Sparc, 1 GB RAM) sagan: Sun E450 (4 x 400MHz Sparc, 2.5 GB RAM) ![]() |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13961 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
We now build Opteron servers; the SunFire V20z and SunFire v40z I've seen some benchmarks of those V40z's. Very impressive. And the new dual core systems will be even more impressive... Grant Darwin NT |
![]() Send message Joined: 4 Jul 05 Posts: 102 Credit: 1,360,617 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Yeah, I'm using V20zs on the grid at the moment (single core 2.6 Ghz Opteron 252s) and you can see from the benchmarks in my computer list they certainly seem to get the job done. The V20z and V40z are due to go end-of-life within the next few months (support will obviously continue) and have been replaced with our new Galaxy servers (SunFire x4100/x4200) which are apparently even more impressive... although I haven't had a chance to try any yet. ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Mar 99 Posts: 1444 Credit: 957,058 RAC: 0 ![]() |
For the record, we've have the V40z for a while - I just added it to the server status page to make it more complete. And yes, we'd like to have about 9 or 10 of them (or the new galaxies). - Matt -- BOINC/SETI@home network/web/science/development person -- "Any idiot can have a good idea. What is hard is to do it." - Jeanne-Claude |
Grant (SSSF) Send message Joined: 19 Aug 99 Posts: 13961 Credit: 208,696,464 RAC: 304 ![]() ![]() |
The V20z and V40z are due to go end-of-life within the next few months (support will obviously continue) and have been replaced with our new Galaxy servers (SunFire x4100/x4200) which are apparently even more impressive... although I haven't had a chance to try any yet. Looking forward to seeing some benchmarks on those. From memory the benchmarks i read were for a Dual & Quad CPU setup with 8GB RAM per CPU; they were running web server & database applications & the way they went though the data was amazing, not to mention how well they scaled with the extra CPUs (for those applications). The Xeons they were comparing them with didn't scale nearly as well, let alone come close to the Opteron's performance. I would like to see the benchmarks run on an 8 Dual Core CPU system with maximum possible installed RAM. It's hard to beleive that an x86 based system can be so powerfull... Grant Darwin NT |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 13 Jun 05 Posts: 1418 Credit: 5,250,988 RAC: 109 ![]() ![]() |
It's hard to beleive that an x86 based system can be so powerfull... The SETI@home distributed computing cluster is mostly x86-based :-) No animals were harmed in the making of the above post... much. ![]() |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.