Message boards :
Number crunching :
2nd: Legal Windows client
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
ric ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 03 Posts: 482 Credit: 666,047 RAC: 0 ![]() |
![]() that's a client operating now with the optimized SETI application. as mentioned, when running in HT mode, and having more than 2 Seti WUs ;) the final cpu time per SETI WU is around 2:45 +-. Now getting above times.. once again merci and thankyou for this work. It makes me happy, that not everything what belongs to boinc, must turn into the bad way. keep on! |
![]() Send message Joined: 6 Apr 03 Posts: 498 Credit: 3,200,504 RAC: 0 ![]() |
But u'll get less credit per WU.... ![]() |
ric ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 03 Posts: 482 Credit: 666,047 RAC: 0 ![]() |
@MiniZiper May I kindly ask you to edit your reply and remove the image from your answer, please? This would help the dial in users, the same image must not loaded twice, thankyou ;)
credits is not all, the joy and fun is (4me) higher rated For the "science" it could be also a gain, faster returning of the processed datas. The other thing, more load server side. Basically they are build for keeping load, that's why "computer" are build, to have load. A "Computer" not having something to do, must not be build. (backup and standby server excluded) and how much credits is enough? For far could never buy a cup of coffee with all the accumulated credits:) happy chunching |
dagwolf Send message Joined: 22 Jan 04 Posts: 13 Credit: 42,669 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've tried adding both of the SETI clients you have for AthlonXP. (seti-p3.zip and YAOSCW-K-r7.zip) I have an AthlonXP 2700+ (Thoroughbred) It has SSE. It also has MMX+. Per the instructions on http://www.shadyshack.dyndns.org/readme.txt, I ran the setiathome_4.11_windows_intelx86.exe file. However I only got the boinc_lockfile and stderr.txt files, no results.sah file. Does this mean this is a nogo? <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=531&prj=1"> |
Pascal, K G ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2343 Credit: 150,491 RAC: 0 ![]() |
MiniZiper if I may make a suggestion, try running pics thru a graphics program and lower the resolution and size, but keep it readable, cause it is almost 400k and that is killing the dailup guys, Thank You.... Semper Eadem So long Paul, it has been a hell of a ride. Park your ego's, fire up the computers, Science YES, Credits No. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 14 Jul 99 Posts: 335 Credit: 1,178,138 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I've tried adding both of the SETI clients you have for AthlonXP. It's not that difficult I think.. just follow the installation notes on my site (copied from one of the threads on this message board) and see if it works.. good chance it will. Basically it means copying the optimized seti app and the app_info.xml to your \\program files\\boinc\\projects\\setiathome.berkeley.edu\\ folder and restart boinc. Greetings, Speedy67 ![]() ![]() |
dagwolf Send message Joined: 22 Jan 04 Posts: 13 Credit: 42,669 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Well it seems to have worked okay. It's just that SETI is a little hard to communicate with right now. I'll run it through the weekend at least and see if verification works out. Thanks <img src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=531&prj=1"> |
Tetsuji Maverick Rai ![]() Send message Joined: 25 Apr 99 Posts: 518 Credit: 90,863 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
ric ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Jun 03 Posts: 482 Credit: 666,047 RAC: 0 ![]() |
BTW I hit minus rating on my message 121594 in this thread, which had had 1 rating. Actually now the rating became 0!!! Might a new canonical rating? 1-1=0 A postivite rating is one way to estimate "something well". It's a sign of admiration too. keep on the successfully path! Using the optimized versions as soon as the got available. Running now 4 clients with. Not having any kind of problem with it. They are wonderful stable. The only callenge is to get work from the seti project, as long as the are up. regards |
Astro ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
There, I went to each of your posts in this thread and the YAOSCW thread and gave each a + vote. |
Tetsuji Maverick Rai ![]() Send message Joined: 25 Apr 99 Posts: 518 Credit: 90,863 RAC: 0 ![]() |
BTW I hit minus rating on my message 121594 in this thread, which had had 1 rating. Actually now the rating became 0!!! yeah, but as I wrote before, when I hit a minus rating on my post with "0" rating, it hadn't gone to "-1". Instead it stayed "0". So I had been wondering "-" really worked or not. That's why I tried it. Now I understand a minus rating is displayed as "0", and the real rating is hidden. Getting work from the server? If you don't have other projects attached to boinc core, you can simply set work_buf_min_days to a bigger value....I set it to 15 days and I'll never be out of work :) and I'm very happy!! boinc core doesn't check the maximum value (as far as I saw the source.) May the Source be with you! Luckiest in the world. WMD = Weapon of Mass Distraction. Click this table. ![]() |
Astro ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
strange, I just gave your previous post a - rating and it's showing 0 and it was already 0. this system used to display negative ratings. tony I rated it negative as a test, no insult intended. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 3 Apr 99 Posts: 2452 Credit: 33,281 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I rated it negative as a test, no insult intended. Ditto with me, but now it's -1. Perhaps the first minus goes into the trash. Please ++ him, everybody else! Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
Tetsuji Maverick Rai ![]() Send message Joined: 25 Apr 99 Posts: 518 Credit: 90,863 RAC: 0 ![]() |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 29 Mar 05 Posts: 1407 Credit: 126,476 RAC: 0 ![]() |
oh my message 122651 had -1 rating and actually after I hit a minus, it's -2!! TMR, I just gave 2 of your messages a plus |
Astro ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Watch out. Another 18 or so negative posts and your message will be automatically filtered out. I would't worry. LOL |
![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 65 Credit: 18,370,396 RAC: 0 ![]() |
I used the 4.11 SSE2 client, and got a 3x boost in performance. Also noted some of the 'credit claimed' #'s not being accepted, but increased in what was 'given'. Always knew the AMD 64 could kick major crunching. ![]() |
Astro ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
we saw the first one you posted jake, I'm glad you're so happy. |
![]() Send message Joined: 14 May 99 Posts: 65 Credit: 18,370,396 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Told a friend about the optimized clients. His response: "Dont use them, they have virus' in them" 'Really' I think BitDefender (my AV prog) would have a fit if that were tha case, and just from downloading them! :) Weird people all around. ![]() |
Astro ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Apr 02 Posts: 8026 Credit: 600,015 RAC: 0 |
Told a friend about the optimized clients. His response: well, that and the hundreds who use these boards regularly might have noticed. especially with high "geek" factor in this group. LOL |
©2025 University of California
SETI@home and Astropulse are funded by grants from the National Science Foundation, NASA, and donations from SETI@home volunteers. AstroPulse is funded in part by the NSF through grant AST-0307956.