The fact that men are the predominant decision-makers now is only the consequence of the religious infiltration into our lives

{tone:rational and calm}
In the west men are the decision makers in the same way that Madonna's driver is in charge of her car. The idea that men are in charge was invented by one faction of the feminist movement in the late sixties to discredit men and take even more control away from them. It has been very successful, in the same way and for the same reasons that the weak HIV virus is successful. It disables the defenses that might be used to fight off the attack.

The primary cause of war is overpopulation and the consequent fighting over resources.

The fact that men are the predominant decision-makers now is only the consequence of the religious infiltration into our lives

I think the roles of men and women are rooted in the emergence of the species, back in a time when women who were pregnant or caring for infants for most of their short lives were simply incapable of protecting themselves.

No argument that long after these once necessary roles became obsolete, they were mandated by religions.

The good news is that I've seen nothing but overall progress for both women and men in my lifetime. One of my early memories of big business dealings is Joan Crawford, the new chairman of Pepsi Cola and her intro to the board of directors: "Don't f*** with me, fellas!"

As far as your comments on religion are concerned.....why oppose only 'organized' religion? Is it less harmful to the mind and life of man when it's disorganized and chaotic? But I do agree with you that in the whole it's harmful.

This depends on what animal species in nature you choose to study. It varies wildly. In short I don't agree with your premise that nature behaves this way nor do I believe that applying behaviors found in lower animals to the complex human construct is valuable. We're not troglodites. We're Rational Animals using deeply complex abstract concepts to organize our thoughts of the world around us.

Sure sounds like a load of old rubbish to me.
After all, what self respecting network engineer would use "wordpad" anyways?

Nuclear still has tremendous toxic waste problems ...

In space, who cares? Put it in the trash chute and push the eject button. Shoot it toward a sun where the nuclear reactions of the solar activity will far outweigh the effects of a small amount of the human's radioactive waste.

...but it does provide lots of electrical energy, which can be used with the casimir effect drive, basically a form of motion derived from interaction of VERY STRONG electric fields to provide effective directional thrust... "to those sceptics reading -it has already been tested and works, look up your history-- ... realistically we have to wait for fusion not this messy fision

Casimir effect is between two objects in a vacuum. With a spacecraft, you're left with one object (not two), in a vacuum. How would you produce your motion? One might think it could work within a gas cloud because you could use the molecules of the cloud as the second object, but how would it work in a decent vacuum?

Hello Sleestak, I wondered about your comment on the Casimir effect until I did a google/dogpile/yahoo and finally Copernic on it... now I see where you coming from. So now I have a problem, sitting in my hand is a report dated 1997 about the initial theory of and eventual testing of a form of what I personally shall now call "electro-propulsion" as very strangely the casimir name has been taken and reused for this other "effect". However the report originated in the government [NASA] archives on potential technology. The concept is actually a form of Propellant-less propulsion, no throw away red hot atoms of plasma or hydrogen ions etc. The concept involves interaction of both electric and electrostatic fields, with the byproduct of induced motion. I know it sounds strange, but have a look at this header from the archive..

The challenge to create the space drive
Millis, Marc G.
NASA Center for AeroSpace Information
Annual International Space Development Conference, New York, NY, United States, 23-24 May 1996 , 19960801; Aug. 1996
To travel to our neighboring stars as practically as envisioned by science fiction, breakthroughs in science are required. One of these breakthroughs is to discover a self-contained means of propulsion that requires no propellant. To chart a path toward such a discovery, seven hypothetical space drives are presented to illustrate the specific unsolved challenges and associated research objectives toward this ambition. One research objective is to discover a means to asymmetrically interact with the electro-magnetic fluctuations of the vacuum. Another is to develop a physics that describes inertia, gravity, or the properties of spacetime as a function of electro-magnetics that leads to using electro-magnetic technology for inducing propulsive forces. Another is to determine if negative mass exists or if its properties can be synthesized. An alternative approach that covers the possibility that negative mass might not exist is to develop a formalism of Mach's Principle or re-formulate ether concepts to lay a foundation for addressing reaction forces and conservation of momentum with space drives.
Accession ID:
Document ID:

I have decided that I need to examine the default settings for my dual 2.8GHz Xeon rig which is coming up for 3 years old now.

This was custom built for me,and the guy that did it found that WinXP trashed when HT was switched off in the BIOS.

To protect me from a complete reinstall he password protected the BIOS and never told me it. Three years on he has forgotten it.

Oh! I have full administrator rights.

My BIOS is from Phoenix Technologies Ltd
No: SE7505 VB20.86B.033.P07.030641451
Dated: 24th June 2003 (I don't want it reflashed)
Plug and Play V 1.00
SMBIOS/DMIV 2.F0

(details care of Sisoft Sandra)



I have Googled for BIOS password recovery methods and software (free preferably), and seen a number of techniques. This includes an overnight removal of the CMOS battery and backdoor passwords for the specific BIOS types!

Before I get moving on the backdoors and software accesses Google gave me! Can I ask ...

QUESTION: Can anyone recommend a relatively guaranteed way of accessing the BIOS password for my system, and point me where I need to go to get it. I am happy to purchase accessing software which will actually do the job!

My best Triplet has a power of 14.17.

C'mon people. Lets get some of our best numbers up. Surely someone can beat 14.17. I know there are folks on here that have had their computers crunching work unites for years and I've only been at this for a mere four days.

This message seems to require a lot of acceptance based on faith, with no proof at all....